Monday, March 14, 2016

Waney Squier: U.K. (Aftermath 5): "Guilty of intellectual dishonesty," A powerful commentary by Sue Luttner of SBS - referring to the recent decision of a General Medical Council tribunal finding Dr. Squier guilty of misconduct for supposedly misleading the court by giving her professional opinion based on her own research and the research of others that shaken baby syndrome does not exist. "Even in this environment, Dr. Squier has been willing to say in print and in court what her own research and experience were telling her about shaken baby theory. I am in awe of both of her intellectual honesty and her courage, and I am horrified at Friday’s decision. The only silver lining I can think of is that maybe, this time, they have gone too far."

The entire post can be found at:

Dear Reader. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog. We are following this case. I have added a search box for content in this blog which now encompasses several thousand posts. The search box is located  near the bottom of the screen just above the list of links. I am confident that this powerful search tool provided by "Blogger" will help our readers and myself get more out of the site.

The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at:

Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:

Harold Levy: Publisher;