Friday, June 2, 2017

Dr. Mark Shelly; Arizona; Desecration of a marine corps sergeant's brain, careers and credibility: A medical examiner whose conduct has come under scrutiny - as has the conduct of the givernment agencies who employed him. And now the forensic pathologist's evidence will come under even greater scrutiny when he testifies in the criminal courts. " "A Maricopa County forensic pathologist got into some serious trouble with the United States Navy and why some are questioning his judgment," KPNX..." Lindsay Herf, the executive director of the Arizona Justice Project, which seeks justice for the innocent and the wrongly imprisoned issued this statement on the investigation: “The role of an independent medical examiner's office is crucial to a fair and functional criminal justice system. This includes conducting autopsies and forming opinions based on science and medicine. This also includes honesty from the employees at the medical examiner's office that are handling the investigations of the deceased throughout this county. Upon hiring, a potential county employee must undergo a background check. It is the duty of the agency to conduct a thorough background check and disclose those results. “The criminal justice system is supposed to provide a level playing field. Under Arizona law, any misconduct - including a felony conviction or job related malfeasance - by an employee who may be a witness in a trial shall be disclosed to the opposing party. “When these rules are not followed, the criminal justice system suffers.”


STORY: "A Maricopa County forensic pathologist got into some serious trouble with the United States Navy and why some are questioning his judgment," by reporters Wendy Halloran and Elizabeth Wiley, published by KPNX on May 18, 2017.

SUB-HEADING: "Current Maricopa Co. forensic pathologist was reprimanded by Navy."

SUB-HEADING: "A former Navy doctor’s past revealed: He insulted the memory of a dead Marine by bringing one of his internal organs home for "Show and Tell" with his family."

GIST: "Recent investigations have uncovered a number of employees at the Maricopa County Medical Examiner's Office with questionable pasts -- many of whom serve as expert witnesses for the state in high-profile murder cases. The latest is Dr. Mark Shelly, whose past conduct is raising questions about his hiring in Phoenix. Heroes who put their lives on the line for the country deserve dignity and respect in death from all Americans. But especially from the person tasked with handling a service members remains. Forensic pathologists perform autopsies to determine causes of death, sign death certificates and provide expert testimony in criminal and civil court cases. Shelly is now a forensic pathologist who works for the Maricopa County Medical Examiner's Office. What did the county know when they hired him? Shelly doesn't want to talk about what he did in 2011. He was transporting a Marine Corps sergeant's brain for further examination when he failed to follow protocol – something that got him in serious trouble with the United States Navy and has some questioning his judgment. A decorated commander in the United States Navy, Shelly was commissioned with the Navy Reserve at the Bureau of Medicine in Bethesda, Maryland, in 1994. He detached in June 1998 and went directly to the Navy Reserve Personnel Command, serving until 2006. From there he did his post-graduate professional training in St. Louis, Missouri, until September 2007. He immediately went to work at the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology in Washington, D.C., staying until August 2009. In October 2009, he went from Navy Reserve to Active Duty. His last assignment – where he would get into trouble – was as a military medical examiner for the Naval Medical Center in Portsmouth, Virginia. There he handled autopsies for military members up and down the Southeast coast. According to his service records, Shelly received several awards, including the Joint Service Commendation Medal, Meritorious Unit Commendation, National Defense Service Medal and the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal. On December 20, 2011, Shelly was at the Marine Corp base in Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, performing an autopsy on a sergeant who was found dead in his home. After the autopsy, Shelly was tasked with retaining the Marine's brain for future neuropathological examination. He drove the brain, stored in a stock jar, back to Virginia. Shelly was supposed to take it the Portsmouth Naval Hospital where he worked. But he took a detour to his home. Records show he removed the sergeant's brain from the jar, held it and allowed his young children to handle the brain while his wife took photographs. Shelly delivered the brain to the Portsmouth Naval Hospital the next day. An anonymous caller reported his actions to the police. The Virginia Medical Board launched an investigation into allegations Shelly may have violated the law and regulations. The doctor ultimately entered into a consent order with the board on June 25, 2012, without admitting guilt. He was reprimanded and ordered to pay a $2,500 fine for his alleged misdeed. Investigative documents from the Virginia Medical Board reveal that the neuropathologist who autopsied the brain confirmed that Dr. Shelly's actions did not impact on his ability to determine the cause of death of the Marine Corp sergeant. “Further the neuropathologist was unable to tell by examination that the decedent's brain had been touched in anyway,” records said. In the agreement, Shelly neither admitted or denied the truth and agreed not to contest the findings of the Virginia Medical Board’s investigation. Meanwhile, the Navy launched an investigation. Shelly was put on desk duty, his hospital privileges were suspended, and he was not allowed to do anything clinical. Navy records show Shelly received a written reprimand for dereliction of duty for failing to maintain control of evidence in the investigation into the Marine's death. Shelly also failed to get permission to have an off-duty job as a local medical examiner and was reprimanded for making "false official statements" to the Navy about that off-duty job, records show. The off-duty job was with the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner in Norfolk, Virginia. According to records, Shelly worked eight hours a week taking calls to determine which cases fell under the medical examiner’s jurisdiction. According to Navy records, he failed to disclose in a November 2009 employment questionnaire for Portsmouth Naval Hospital that he had been employed as a local medical examiner for the Tidewater Region of Virginia. He was terminated from the Tidewater Region job on January 20, 2012, after the chief medical examiner learned about the incident with the Marine’s brain. On December 6, 2012, the head of Medical Staff Services at Naval Medical Center Portsmouth Patricia K. Saunders wrote, "Issues concerning his failure to maintain control of evidence were referred to a peer review panel which resulted in a recommended adverse privileging action. That action is pending review at Navy Medicine Headquarters.  Records further show that in June 2012 the Commanding Officer of the Portsmouth Naval Hospital recommended that Shelly's privileges be revoked for the alleged unprofessional behavior. However, a final decision was pending from the Surgeon General of the Navy. On October 12, 2012, Shelly wrote to Kathy Fowkes, with the Arizona Board of Osteopathic Examiners, that his clinical privileges as both a forensic and anatomic pathologist were suspended in January 2012. He wrote, 'Since January, I have dealt with both legal and administrative Navy issues, looked for civilian jobs, gone to interviews etc. I have remained in my office at the Naval Medical Center in Portsmouth, VA but have not been allowed to do anything clinically." Shelly added in the letter that he would be out of the Navy within three to four months. Shelly wrote the Arizona Board of Osteopathic Examiners in late 2012 because he had a conditional offer for a position with the Maricopa County Medical Examiner's Office, but needed a license from to work in this state. He disclosed what he'd done on his application. In a letter to the board, Shelly said his children expressed an interest in his job so he showed the brain to them. He explained what the different parts of the brain and how it works. READ: Shelly's full letter to the Arizona Board of Osteopathic Examiners He gave some insight into the deceased Marine Corp sergeant’s death, that the Marine was found unresponsive at his home near Camp Lejeune and couldn’t be resuscitated. The autopsy, Shelly wrote, demonstrated coronary artery disease as the likely cause of death. In addition, Shelly wrote that the Marine had a medical history significant for multiple sclerosis and other conditions which is why Shelly retained his brain for future neuropathological examination at Dover Air Force Base. Shelly wrote that he allowed his children to gently feel the brain while wearing plastic mittens and that he "emphasized respect for the decedent the entire time we examined the brain, which was no more than approximately 3 minutes." But he didn’t disclose that he allowed his wife to take pictures. Shelly wrote that he exercised extremely poor judgment and he deeply regretted the pain he caused the sergeant’s family. Board members questioned Shelly about the incident, but the meeting wasn't recorded and minutes from the meeting were not taken. The board has Ottmar and Associates, a court reporting service, transcribe the minutes. But the company confirmed they were told not to transcribe this case. The board’s Executive Director Jenna Jones confirmed they have different policies in place now with regards to transcription. Without a recording or minutes, there’s no way to know what Shelly was asked or how he answered.   Two of the seven board members voted against him – Dr. Douglas Cunningham and Dr. Mary Ann Picardo – but Arizona granted him his medical license despite the incident. In June 2013, Maricopa County hired Shelly and he's worked there ever since. Maricopa County says Shelly disclosed the incident with the Marine’s brain to the chief medical examiner and director at the time he was hired. Shelly also let them know he had been terminated from his off-duty job – the job the Navy reprimanded him for making false statements about – saying only that he was fired due to Naval legal issues. His file doesn’t further explain his record with the Navy and he was unwilling to speak with us when 12 News approached him. Maricopa County declined our request for an interview, saying the incident was fully investigated by the Navy, Shelly was honorably discharged and he disclosed the investigation during the interview process. Maricopa County Director of Communication Fields Moseley released a full statement on behalf of the county.........The records custodian for the Maricopa County Attorney's Office confirmed Shelly is not on its Rule 15 Disclosure Database, formerly known as the Brady List. This is a list of police officers and others who offer expert testimony who have marred credibility, lied under oath and have engaged in misconduct. The MCAO has a duty to disclose to criminal defendants when those on the list might be called to testify. The MCAO said it became aware of Shelly’s past more than two years after he was hired and reviewed the incident. According to a spokesperson, “the matter was reviewed on 8/31/2015 and the decision was made not to place him in the R15DD." The MCAO provided a list of cases for which Shelly was listed as a potential witness. Of the 24 criminal cases, most are murder cases, including one high-profile case of Phillip "Mitch" Brailsford. Brailsford is charged with second-degree murder and expected to stand trial in the fall. Shelly performed the autopsy on the victim in the Brailsford case. Lindsay Herf, the executive director of the Arizona Justice Project, which seeks justice for the innocent and the wrongly imprisoned issued this statement on the investigation: “The role of an independent medical examiner's office is crucial to a fair and functional criminal justice system.  This includes conducting autopsies and forming opinions based on science and medicine. This also includes honesty from the employees at the medical examiner's office that are handling the investigations of the deceased throughout this county.  Upon hiring, a potential county employee must undergo a background check.  It is the duty of the agency to conduct a thorough background check and disclose those results. “The criminal justice system is supposed to provide a level playing field.  Under Arizona law, any misconduct - including a felony conviction or job related malfeasance - by an employee who may be a witness in a trial shall be disclosed to the opposing party. “When these rules are not followed, the criminal justice system suffers.” 

The entire story can be found at:

http://www.12news.com/news/investigative/current-maricopa-co-forensic-pathologist-was-reprimanded-by-navy/436483549

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog;