PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "The crime scene was never cordoned off. Spanton was, that night — after making her complaint understood, demanding to speak with a female officer — tested for alcohol and drugs while the officers were allowed to go home without submitting to a breathalyzer test. Vital evidence disappeared. Both accused wiping messages and videos from the night off their cellphones. At one point, investigators travelled to Canada to interview Spanton’s friends and relatives, digging around in her personal life, but no such intense probe was undertaken with the accused. It seemed an endless nightmare, with the appeals and the reversals, yet Spanton persevered, coping with the bureaucracy of a foreign country. While the defendants, after being originally suspended, were permitted to return to their jobs."
COMMENTARY: "Guilty verdict in French police gang rape trial a testament to Canadian woman’s perseverance," by Toronto Star columnist Rosie DiManno, published on January 31 2019.
PHOTO CAPTION: "Elite police officers Antoine Quirin, left, and Nicolas Redouane, were sentenced to seven years in prison."
GIST: "They were heroes. Now they’re convicted rapists. A
pair of elite anti-terrorism French cops were on Thursday found guilty
in the gang rape of a Canadian tourist five years ago at police
headquarters in Paris. 36 Quai des Orfèvres: A fabled address, the building — known simply as “36” — has made appearances in movies and crime fiction. That’s
where Emily Spanton told court a group of off-duty officers she’d met
took her for a private tour on April 22, 2014, following a night of
heavy drinking at a nearby Irish pub. Eighty minutes later, around
4 a.m., Spanton stumbled barefoot down the stairs. She’d lost her
tights and her glasses and carried her shoes. She was covered in
bruises, injuries which would be documented. And
as Spanton repeatedly told cops at the front desk, she’d just been
raped by two, perhaps three officers, the conversation stilted by both
sides unable to understand the other’s language. All
this time later, after years of tortuous legal proceedings — charges
filed, charges dropped, a humiliating re-enactment of the crime at
another hearing, crucial evidence disappearing, deleted, destroyed, a
massive undertaking to collect blood samples from more than 100 officers
who worked in the building for the purpose of obtaining DNA, charges
reimposed — the two accused have been found guilty by a judge and jury,
after eight hours of deliberation, and sentenced to seven years in
prison. The
two officers are members of the crack Brigade de recherche et
d’intervention unit of France’s national police — specializing in
anti-terrorism and anti-gang operations — are revered in the country,
especially since BRI stormed the Bataclan theatre during a co-ordinated
terrorist attack in Paris in November, 2015 that killed 130 people.
Assailants had burst into the concert hall while a band was performing,
shooting into the audience in sustained volleys and had taken about 20
people hostage when BRI rushed the venue. That members of this prestigious unit would then be accused of gang rape — viol en réunion — stunned and dismayed the nation. In
the court proceedings, the officers — Antoine Quirin, 40, and Nicolas
Redouane, 49 — weren’t referred to by their full names, their identities
protected by a French law that shields law enforcement working in
sensitive police jobs. Spanton, who grew up in Toronto, daughter of a
high-ranking police officer but now lives in Niagara, waived anonymity. As
the verdict was delivered Thursday, one of the defendants shook his
head in disbelief while the other wept and collapsed into his lawyer’s
arms. They were standing mere feet from Spanton, who also shed tears,
according to media reports from inside the Palais de Justice courtroom,
situated right next door to “36,” on the bank of the Seine. In his
final statement before sentencing, Redouane told the court: “I should
never have brought Emily Spanton to the BRI offices. All my life I’ve
had good relationships with women. I never, never, never assaulted,
attacked or raped Emily Spanton.” Quirin said it has been a “five year nightmare” for him and his family. The
trial and its previous iterations were replete with denials and
jaw-dropping revelations about how the investigation had been originally
mishandled and subsequently compromised, while the public and
commentators debated sexual assault prosecutions in the post #MeToo era.
At issue was the concept of consent, as both accused insisted that
Spanton had willingly participated in events. But Spanton’s
testimony had been consistent throughout, even as the 39-year-old
woman’s character and lifestyle and sexual habits had been scorched by
the defence teams. This, of course, is typical of sexual assault trials
everywhere, including Canada — belittling and bullying the complainant. She
admitted to getting drunk with the off-duty officers, thus was in no
fit state to give consent. Arriving at the BRI’s fifth-floor offices,
eager for a private tour, she was forced to drink whiskey, she said,
forced to perform oral sex and then raped several times by two, possibly
three, men. Taking the stand on the opening day of the trial, two
and a half weeks ago, Spanton testified that she was “excited to see
the “36.” “They explained the police station had been the subject of
films, and made it sound like something I would want to see and I
thought that going to a police station would sober me up as there would
be plenty of lights and people.” Instead, the offices were empty and dark. It was, she said, “the worst mistake of my life.” Spanton
testified she was made to drink more, then forced to her knees and
raped as the officers became violent when she wouldn’t go along with
their sexual intentions. “They smashed my face against the desk,” she
would later state in an interview with French TV. “I was stunned. I was
seeing stars. I couldn’t see anything for a while, I couldn’t see them
either, they were behind me.” At trial, Spanton said: “I just gave up, just wanted it to be over. I kept my eyes closed.” Spanton
testified: “Someone was forcing himself into my mouth. Someone
penetrated me. Then someone else. When it finished, I gathered up my
belongs, but I couldn’t open the door. I was pulled into another office
and everything happened again.” Then told: “Go home.” Quirin
initially denied any sexual contact with the victim but changed his
story after his DNA was found on Spanton’s underwear. As was the DNA of
Redouane DNA from a third person was never identified despite the
blood-testing conducted on scores of police employees. During the
assault, Redouane had sent a particularly incriminating text message to a
colleague. “Hurry up, she’s a swinger.” That message was deleted from
his phone but retrieved on the recipient’s mobile. The judge —
known as the trial president — said Thursday the court was “convinced by
the victim’s steadfast statements” and by “scientific and technical
evidence.” Prosecutor Philippe Courroye, in his closing arguments,
said Spanton had been “easy prey” for the officers. “By taking
advantage of a young, drunk foreigner, by treating her as an object,
they have gone over to the side of those they pursue. Not policemen but
“usurpers, unworthy of their badges, acting in the same way as those
they pursue. “They have lied, failed, concealed.” From the
outset, the investigation was an inept mess. The crime scene was never
cordoned off. Spanton was, that night — after making her complaint
understood, demanding to speak with a female officer — tested for
alcohol and drugs while the officers were allowed to go home without
submitting to a breathalyzer test. Vital evidence disappeared. Both accused wiping messages and videos from the night off their cellphones. At
one point, investigators travelled to Canada to interview Spanton’s
friends and relatives, digging around in her personal life, but no such
intense probe was undertaken with the accused. It seemed an
endless nightmare, with the appeals and the reversals, yet Spanton
persevered, coping with the bureaucracy of a foreign country. While the
defendants, after being originally suspended, were permitted to return
to their jobs. Before leaving the stand, Spanton was asked by the judge what she expected from the court. “I just want to stand up and publicly confront these men. Then I want to move on, close this chapter.” The
disgraced officers had been facing a possible sentence of 20 years for
gang rape. They were also ordered to pay $23,000 in damages to Spanton. They have 10 days to file an appeal."
