Tuesday, December 28, 2021

Bobby Bostoc: Missouri: Convicted at 16, he won parole from a 241-year term with help from his sentencing judge (Judge Evelyn Baker) - who later wrote in a Washington Post op-ed piece that she “deeply” regretted punishing Bostic for his immaturity, noting scientific research that juvenile brains lack impulse control and don’t assess risks and consequences the same as adults..."Tony Rothert, legal director for the ACLU of Eastern Missouri, said Bostic’s case “demonstrates what we all know: Who we are as children does not forever demarcate who we can become as adults.” Baker said she hopes Bostic’s case leads to changes in how juveniles are treated in the criminal justice system. “In this society, we talk about our love of children,” she said. “We don’t seem to love them very much. I think every kid should be given the opportunity to show that he or she has changed, grown up, reformed and that their whole live should not be based on a stupid decision.”


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Three years ago, Baker asked the U.S. Supreme Court to give Bostic the chance for reform and added her name to an amicus brief filed by 26 former judges, prosecutors and law enforcement officials. Bostic sought relief under a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision that banned sentences of life without parole for juveniles in non-homicide cases. His lawyers argued Bostic’s prison term violated the constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. But in 2018, the nation’s highest court rejected Bostic’s appeal. Now, Bostic is the first in Missouri to win parole under an amended state law that took effect in August. Bostic is among about 100 people in Missouri serving de facto life sentences for crimes committed as juveniles, according to the American Civil Liberties Union, which represented Bostic in his quest for parole. Rep. Mark Sharp, D-Kansas City, who sponsored the amendment, said earlier this year that it was Bostic’s case that inspired the law change relating to juvenile parole. It offers parole eligibility to those sentenced as juveniles to prison terms of more than 15 years for crimes other than homicides."

------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "'I had to have hope': St. Louis man wins parole from 241-year term with help from sentencing judge," by Reporter Joel Currier, published by St. Louis Today, on  December 21, 2021.

GIST:  Circuit Judge Evelyn Baker believed Bobby Bostic would die within five years of going to prison after she sentenced him in 1997 to 241 years for his role in an armed robbery.


While ordering what could have been effectively a life sentence for Bostic, Baker said, she believed the then-16-year-old would become “another statistic” because of his “dangerous” and “stupid” behavior.


Instead, Bostic, now 42, will be leaving prison next year. He was recently granted parole thanks to a change in Missouri law for juvenile offenders, and help from Baker.


Bostic went to prison for the 1995 robbery of a group of people delivering Christmas presents for the needy in the city’s Botanical Heights neighborhood.


He and an 18-year-old accomplice each shot and wounded a victim — slightly injuring one — and then carjacked a woman in St. Louis. The accomplice took a plea deal and got 30 years. Bostic went to trial and lost.


Under the old law, Bostic would not have been eligible for parole until he turned 112 years old. Now, he’s scheduled to leave prison next November after 2½ decades behind bars.


“I sentenced a child but Bobby Bostic is a very fine young man now,” Baker told the Post-Dispatch in an interview this month. “He’s changed. He’s done a 180. Emotionally, intellectually, he’s become an adult. He’s a very bright person. And I think he really started looking inward to see what it was that he needed to change about himself.”


Three years ago, Baker asked the U.S. Supreme Court to give Bostic the chance for reform and added her name to an amicus brief filed by 26 former judges, prosecutors and law enforcement officials. Bostic sought relief under a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision that banned sentences of life without parole for juveniles in non-homicide cases.


His lawyers argued Bostic’s prison term violated the constitution’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. But in 2018, the nation’s highest court rejected Bostic’s appeal.


Now, Bostic is the first in Missouri to win parole under an amended state law that took effect in August. Bostic is among about 100 people in Missouri serving de facto life sentences for crimes committed as juveniles, according to the American Civil Liberties Union, which represented Bostic in his quest for parole.


Rep. Mark Sharp, D-Kansas City, who sponsored the amendment, said earlier this year that it was Bostic’s case that inspired the law change relating to juvenile parole. It offers parole eligibility to those sentenced as juveniles to prison terms of more than 15 years for crimes other than homicides.


“I’m overjoyed,” Bostic told the Post-Dispatch Thursday by telephone from the Jefferson City Correctional Center. “At the same time, I feel like it’s long overdue. But I’m blessed to have the opportunity to have a second chance at life.”


‘Bobby’s Law’:

Baker, 73, said in an interview that Bostic’s case is one of three she never forgot — the other two were men she sentenced to death for murdering children.

“He was so young and so tiny,” Baker said of Bostic. “And he wound up with more time than people who kill people.”


The 241-year sentence was excessive, Baker said, but it also “kept him alive and allowed him to grow up to become the man that he is today.”

Baker told him as she delivered that sentence, “You’re gonna have to live with your choice and you’re gonna die with your choice because, Bobby Bostic, you will die in the Department of Corrections.”


But Baker changed her view of Bostic a few years ago, writing in a Washington Post op-ed piece that she “deeply” regretted punishing Bostic for his immaturity. In her essay, she noted scientific research that juvenile brains lack impulse control and don’t assess risks and consequences the same as adults.


Allowed one advocate at his Nov. 9 parole hearing, Bostic picked Baker. She readily accepted his invitation after having received letters from him and visiting him in prison. Baker said she calls the amended Missouri law “Bobby’s law.”


Tony Rothert, legal director for the ACLU of Eastern Missouri, said Bostic’s case “demonstrates what we all know: Who we are as children does not forever demarcate who we can become as adults.”


Baker said she hopes Bostic’s case leads to changes in how juveniles are treated in the criminal justice system.

“In this society, we talk about our love of children,” she said. “We don’t seem to love them very much. I think every kid should be given the opportunity to show that he or she has changed, grown up, reformed and that their whole live should not be based on a stupid decision.”


‘Never gave up’:

In a 2014 Post-Dispatch profile of his case, Bostic said he grew up poor in north St. Louis, first used marijuana at age 10 and PCP and alcohol not long after. He dropped out of high school after being arrested for drugs and said a younger brother was paralyzed in a gang-related shooting.


Bostic still regrets his actions but says he believes his sentence was excessive. He said his first goal after prison is to counsel young people and speak publicly about his experiences to help them avoid making similar mistakes. He said he has written more than a dozen nonfiction and poetry books while in prison and plans to start a publishing company to reach at-risk youths.


“As I was here in prison, I couldn’t sit around and blame nobody but myself,” Bostic said. “I didn’t live on anger here. I just took the sentence and made the best of it. I fought to try to give it back unsuccessfully in a lot of ways over the years, but I never gave up.”


Bostic said he didn’t harbor bitterness over his sentence nor feel sorry for himself. Instead, he focused on bettering himself through reading, writing and taking college-level courses that allowed him to earn an associate’s degree and then a bachelor’s degree.


“I took that energy from being mad at the unjust sentence to say, ‘OK, one day I’ll get out one day but until then, just keep changing your life,’” he said. “It was my own actions that led me here so I had to change that. At the same time I was trying to find a way free.”

Bostic said the hardest part about being in prison was losing parents, a brother, friends and the chance to start his own family. But he never lost hope.


“If I’d have gave up hope, then there wasn’t nothing to live for,” he said. “This is not a place where I want to spend the rest of my life. So I had to have hope. And then the goals I wanted to do — I can’t reach kids the way I could if I’m out there. I can’t help change their lives in here. I can’t use my bad life as an example for nobody here.”


Bostic is grateful to Baker for being his ally, but he also now considers her a friend. Baker said she was happy to help and hopes he’ll be careful after prison, fearing he’ll encounter people “who will try to undo him.”


She plans to greet him when he’s released.

“I want to be there the day he walks out and once again give him a hug and a kiss on the cheek,” Baker said."

The entire story can be reads at:


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: "It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.

Monday, December 27, 2021

Beleaguered D.C. Crime lab: Question of the day: How many People were wrongly convicted because of The District's dysfunctional crime lab?, as asked by The Washington Post Editorial Board..."The 157-page report by the Virginia-based SNA International consulting firm is damning. It turned up inadequately trained fingerprint and firearms examiners who had failed proficiency tests; a lack of internal controls; leadership failures within and above the agency and a culture that prioritized output over quality. The report recommended a top-to-bottom overhaul of the Department of Forensic Sciences but so dire were the findings that, The Post’s Emily Davies reported, D.C. deputy mayor for public safety and justice Chris Geldart said the city would have to determine whether it even wanted to bring some services back to the lab. Since the loss of accreditation, D.C. has been outsourcing testing."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "The 157-page report by the Virginia-based SNA International consulting firm is damning.  It turned up inadequately trained fingerprint and firearms examiners who had failed proficiency tests; a lack of internal controls; leadership failures within and above the agency and a culture that prioritized output over quality.  The report recommended a top-to-bottom overhaul of the Department of Forensic Sciences but so dire were the findings that, The Post’s Emily Davies reported, D.C. deputy mayor for public safety and justice Chris Geldart said the city would have to determine whether it even wanted to bring some services back to the lab.  Since the loss of accreditation, D.C. has been outsourcing testing."..................That people might have been wrongly arrested, prosecuted or convicted because of this dysfunctional agency should keep officials up at night.  So should the thought of the pain that reopening cases will inflict upon the survivors and victims of crime.  It’s important that the District get it right this time and commit the resources necessary to ensure a comprehensive review of past cases and accurate analysis of evidence of future cases."

-------------------------------------------------------------

EDITORIAL: "How many people were wrongly convicted because of D.C.'s dysfunctional crime lab," published by The Washington Post, on December 27, 2021.

GIST: "The D.C. Consolidated Forensic Laboratory opened in 2012 to much fanfare. At a cost of $220 million, the facility was set up to be independent from law enforcement and the court system. 

It promised to bring objective, state-of-the-art science to crime analysis.

 Just how miserably the lab failed to live up to those objectives was laid bare in a recent report that calls into question arrests, prosecutions and convictions that over the past decade relied on scientific analysis from the lab.


After concerns about the lab resulted in a loss of national accreditation in May, Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) commissioned “a complete assessment” of the agency. 


The 157-page report by the Virginia-based SNA International consulting firm is damning. 


It turned up inadequately trained fingerprint and firearms examiners who had failed proficiency tests; a lack of internal controls; leadership failures within and above the agency and a culture that prioritized output over quality. 


The report recommended a top-to-bottom overhaul of the Department of Forensic Sciences but so dire were the findings that, The Post’s Emily Davies reported, D.C. deputy mayor for public safety and justice Chris Geldart said the city would have to determine whether it even wanted to bring some services back to the lab. 


Since the loss of accreditation, D.C. has been outsourcing testing.


SNA recommended there be a review of past criminal convictions. Ms. Bowser’s release of the report was accompanied with an order forming a committee — which will include representatives of the public defender service, the U.S. attorney’s office and the D.C. attorney general’s office — to implement the report’s recommendations, including the reexamination of cases dating back a decade that involved the lab’s firearms examination, latent fingerprint and digital evidence units. 


“Do I feel a sense of responsibility? Yes, absolutely,” said Mr. Geldart. “The District owns this responsibility.”


The mayor’s move is welcome but, for too long, her administration seemed to be in denial about the problems at the lab. 


When concerns were raised nearly two years ago by the offices of the U.S. Attorney and D.C. attorney general, the administration sloughed them off, at one point even blaming “institutional tensions” between law enforcement and prosecutors and forensic scientists. 


Attorney General Karl A. Racine, to his credit, made a public commitment in the spring to undertake a post-conviction review of cases involving his office and has taken steps to create a new unit to do the work.


 A spokesman for the U.S. attorney’s office said it, too, is committed to a review of cases.


That people might have been wrongly arrested, prosecuted or convicted because of this dysfunctional agency should keep officials up at night. 


So should the thought of the pain that reopening cases will inflict upon the survivors and victims of crime. 


It’s important that the District get it right this time and commit the resources necessary to ensure a comprehensive review of past cases and accurate analysis of evidence of future cases."


The entire editorial can be read at:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/12/27/how-many-people-were-wrongly-convicted-because-dc-dysfunctional-crime-lab/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: "I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: "It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.

Susan Neill-Fraser: "Lack of Justice."...A reporters perspective; Echo's of Lindy Chamberlain: (Following rejection of Neill-Fraser's latest bid for freedom)..."For those who think there has been a miscarriage of justice, and I am one of them, the Tasmanian Court of Criminal Appeal’s dismissal of ’s bid for freedom was disappointing. But hardly a surprise. Over the years I have covered murder prosecutions in various jurisdictions but never one that secured a conviction without a body, a witness, a credible motive and a weapon. The Tasmanian criminal justice system seemed, at least to me, to go out on a limb given the danger of huge reputational damage had the case gone the way of the notorious Lindy Chamberlain conviction back in 1982. A subsequent Northern Territory Royal Commission into Chamberlain’s wrongful conviction questioned circumstantial evidence, flawed forensics, overzealous policing and a presumption of guilt rather than innocence. Lindy eventually received $1.3m from the government. Not much compensation considering the family’s suffering, the jailing and the public vilification. Susan Neill-Fraser's supporters have always said that the Chamberlain miscarriage is exactly what happened here in River City."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Professor Robert Moles at Flinders University of South Australia is the leading Australian expert on miscarriages of justice. Extrapolating from the similar legal systems of the USA and the UK, where miscarriages are more vigorously investigated, Bob Moles reckons: “We must have between 400 and 800 wrongly convicted people in Australian prisons. Each case is an unspeakable tragedy.” Public opinion is mostly overwhelmingly against the convicted person, as Dr Moles told me this week. “Most members of the public and most people in the justice system suffer from what I call ‘cognitive bias’. They cannot bear to believe the police and the courts might sometimes get it terribly wrong. That is just too awful to believe. It is literally unthinkable.” OK. But I still don’t think she did it. And if she did, with no body, no witness, no weapon and scant motive she should have committed the perfect crime."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: As published by 'Networked Knowledge':   "On 3 December 2021 Charles Wooley reported in The Mercury, Lack of justice for Neill-Fraser." (Charles Wooley is  a Tasmanian  60 Minutes reporter and documentary filmmaker.)

GIST: "For those who think there has been a miscarriage of justice, and I am one of them, the Tasmanian Court of Criminal Appeal’s dismissal of ’s bid for freedom was disappointing. But hardly a surprise.

Over the years I have covered murder prosecutions in various jurisdictions but never one that secured a conviction without a body, a witness, a credible motive and a weapon. The Tasmanian criminal justice system seemed, at least to me, to go out on a limb given the danger of huge reputational damage had the case gone the way of the notorious Lindy Chamberlain conviction back in 1982.

A subsequent Northern Territory Royal Commission into Chamberlain’s wrongful conviction questioned circumstantial evidence, flawed forensics, overzealous policing and a presumption of guilt rather than innocence. Lindy eventually received $1.3m from the government. Not much compensation considering the family’s suffering, the jailing and the public vilification.

Susan Neill-Fraser's supporters have always said that the Chamberlain miscarriage is exactly what happened here in River City. But I suspect Sue’s supporters are not in a majority as the Mercury judiciously editorialised this week: “No legal system is perfect. The courts in Tasmania are not immune from the possibility of a miscarriage of justice. But this case has been through an extraordinary sequence of scrutiny by a series of courts and tribunals. There has been criticism of the state’s police, judiciary and legal system – the vast majority has been shown to have been unfounded and wrong.” Professor Robert Moles at Flinders University of South Australia is the leading Australian expert on miscarriages of justice. Extrapolating from the similar legal systems of the USA and the UK, where miscarriages are more vigorously investigated,

Bob Moles reckons: “We must have between 400 and 800 wrongly convicted people in Australian prisons. Each case is an unspeakable tragedy.” Public opinion is mostly overwhelmingly against the convicted person, as Dr Moles told me this week. “Most members of the public and most people in the justice system suffer from what I call ‘cognitive bias’. They cannot bear to believe the police and the courts might sometimes get it terribly wrong. That is just too awful to believe. It is literally unthinkable.” OK. But I still don’t think she did it. And if she did, with no body, no witness, no weapon and scant motive she should have committed the perfect crime.

But for now, short of her partner Bob Chappell turning up in Rio de Janeiro, or someone ’fessing up to killing him, the matter looks at an end. Whatever you think or I think is now immaterial. Sue will spend her 13th Christmas in jail and next year she will qualify for parole.

Recently the system released a man convicted of murder, rape and torture (in a case so appalling I won’t reiterate the detail) back on to the streets. So why not a wheelchair- bound 67-year-old grandmother? What danger does she represent to society?

But to qualify for parole will need to be contrite just like any other convict who seeks early release.

The question is, can she bring herself to utter the classic line of the old prison lag? “I’m sorry and I dunno why I done it, I just done it.” Doesn’t sound much like her, does it? But Sue, if you are reading this, try not to be consumed by the fury of the innocent.

Co-operate. Take the get-out-of-jail-card and rejoin your family. Once you are free you can campaign for much needed reform of the criminal justice system, such as having a forensic science unit which is independent of the police.

You could also support Bob Moles’ recommendation that Australia should adopt the UK model of a Criminal Review Commission which since 1997 has identified 460 wrongful convictions including 100 for murder. Canada is setting up such a body. New Zealand established its CRC last year. The United States has Innocence Projects and even Conviction Integrity Units set up by prosecutors. Australia is almost alone among comparable countries in failing to enable any truly independent reviews of wrongful convictions.page2image2351026672

Sue, might I suggest that you now know more than most people about the need for criminal justice reform. So, if you are innocent, as many of us believe, some good might yet come of your incarceration."

The entire story can be read at:

http://netk.net.au/Tasmania/Neill-Fraser122.pdf

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: "I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: "It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.

Sunday, December 26, 2021

Roman Zadorov: Israel: On-going retrial: Murdered girl's mother tells radio interviewer she does not believe he is the killer - and criticizes the forensic work - shoe imprint evidence - conducted by the police, Time News reports..."When asked if she thinks it seems difficult to convict Zadorov of murder – she replied: “I have been thinking about this for 15 years. Lying to me and the public at large. No one knew what was going on there – it was a delusional verdict. The forensic vision in the quotes was the imprint of the shoes – it turns out they did not check the rest of the imprints – there was a very serious omission by the police here. He is not the killer and all the evidence that was attached to them began to collapse slowly."


BACKGROUND: "Tair Rada was murdered inside a bathroom stall at the Nofei Golan School in Katzrin on December 6, 2006. Almost three years later, the Nazareth District Court convicted Roman Zadorov, a foreign citizen and resident of Katzrin, of murdering the girl. The verdict ignored a dense fabric of defense evidence that led to his conviction. Since then, however, the affair has continued to occupy the media and public opinion. Despite the firm verdict - the justice system has discussed it several more times and left the conviction intact. Zadorov, who worked in flooring at Rada's school, was arrested a few days after the murder, confessed to the murder and even reenacted it. He then retracted his confession, and as the trial progressed the defense was able to raise doubts among the public that Zadorov was indeed the killer. Subsequently, the defense presented two new opinions regarding the type of knife with which Rada was murdered as well as the marks that were on her pants. The district court reviewed the opinion, and decided at the end of the day to uphold the conviction. However, Zadorov's defense team appealed to the Supreme Court again and this time Zadorov was again convicted of murder - but only by a majority opinion. Justices Yitzhak Amit and Zvi Zilbertal convicted the defendant, while Judge Yoram Danziger acquitted him out of doubt. A year ago, Zadorov filed another appeal to the Supreme Court. About two months ago, Chief Justice Hanan Meltzer ruled that Zadorov should have a retrial. "


Jerusalem Post: Reporter Eli Ashkenazi; August 26, 2021.


---------------------------------------------------

BACKGROUND TWO: "A blow to the prosecution in the Zadorov trial? “It is impossible to determine the size of the shoe by the imprint on the jeans of the late Tair Rada,” retired Chief of Staff Yaron Shur, a shoe imprint expert for the Israel Police, said today (Tuesday) in his testimony in the Nazareth District Court.  testimony was received that the imprint of Zadorov's salamander shoe on Rada's pants was found in the arena. However, during the appeals in the Supreme Cour, doubts arose as to thew reliability of the shoe imprint."

Time News report: December 21, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------


QUOTE OF THE DAY: "In a conversation she had this morning (Friday) with Nissim Mashaal on 103FM, she referred to a sentence that is stirring the country: “Zdorov is not the killer. There are some suspects but my hands are tied and I can not do anything and a half. “


---------------------------------------------------------


GIST: "The District Court in Nazareth is currently hearing the evidence in the retrial of Roman Zadorov, who is accused of the murder of Tair Rada at the Nofei Golan school in Katzrin in 2006 – 15 years ago.

Tair’s mother, Ilana, makes sure to appear at all court hearings, and listen to all the evidence.


In a conversation she had this morning (Friday) with Nissim Mashaal on 103FM, she referred to a sentence that is stirring the country: “Zdorov is not the killer. There are some suspects but my hands are tied and I can not do anything and a half. “


Rada recounted: “I never imagined that going to court and canceling my daily routine would be so difficult. From what I see, if you are not there you do not really know all the protocols, so my presence in the place is important. “


When asked if she thinks it seems difficult to convict Zadorov of murder – she replied: “I have been thinking about this for 15 years. Lying to me and the public at large. No one knew what was going on there – it was a delusional verdict. The forensic vision in the quotes was the imprint of the shoes – it turns out they did not check the rest of the imprints – there was a very serious omission by the police here. He is not the killer and all the evidence that was attached to them began to collapse slowly. “


“I do not say this one hundred percent,” Rada added – explaining: “I am the mother of a victim, the victim’s family is not involved in the criminal proceedings nor in the knowledge. I do not rely on the senses. Let the prosecution come and prove to me unequivocally that Zadorov is the killer, so rest my mind but not my mind. But so far nothing.


“We are here in the middle of a process, for example in everything related to AK. I am eagerly awaiting more material – I know information, but I have no evidence. I have to come as I came to the hearings and see how significant evidence is added. “


She later promised: “We will find the killer. We have found directions and we can not reveal them, what’s more while the trial reveals more and more things. If Zadorov wins, we can know more. Beyond that, even after thirty years, it is possible to find out who the killer is, and I have directions that I cannot reveal. “


Asked if she tends to suspect the killer is from the immediate area or school, Rada replied in the affirmative: “I can say this and I base it on a few things: during the interrogation all the children were divided into youth interrogators to talk to, and when we collect all the forms we find out That part is written ‘The above is brought for further investigation on suspicion of the murder of Tair Rada’. The thing is, they did nothing about it. The children did not come for further investigation.


“These are suspects, but my hands are tied and I can do nothing and a half,” she stressed. “I have made moves and attempts to reach several trials and the State Attorney’s Office over the years.""


The entire story can be read at:

ilana-rada-zdorov-is-not-the-killer-there-are-some-suspects-but-my-hands-are-tied

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: "I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: "It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.

Derek Allen: North Carolina: Shaken Baby Syndrome: As the National Registry of Exonerations puts it, he pled guilty to murder and sexual offences win the death of a toddler, received a new trial, in part based on misleading forensic evidence created by a state crime laboratory, and the case was dismissed in 2016...This case belongs in our 'enough to make one weep' department - an apparent effort by police, prosecutors and forensic labs to conceal forensic evidence that would clear an innocent man - and the appeal courts just couldn't give a damn. It is sad and outrageous. HL...On March 2, 1998, a Durham County grand jury indicted Allen for two additional crimes, first-degree murder and felony child abuse. A judge granted prosecutors approval on July 6, 1998 to seek the death penalty against Allen, who denied any involvement in Adesha’s death. The police submitted several pieces of Adesha’s clothing to the SBI crime laboratory for testing. Jennifer Elwell, a forensic scientist, conducted the testing on August 17-18, 1998. First, Elwell performed a preliminary test on Adesha’s training pants and two of her sleepers. She said in her report that these items “exhibited chemical properties consistent with what [she] would see in a bloodstain.” Elwell then moved to perform a confirmatory test on the samples. This test, known as a Takayama test, came back negative. There was no mention of these results in Elwell’s report, but in her lab notes she placed a small dash next to the word “Takayama” for each tested item. As the case moved to trial, Allen’s attorneys – Robert Brown with the Durham County Public Defender’s Office and Stephen Freedman with the Center for Death Penalty Litigation – began filing discovery motions with the Durham County District Attorney’s Office. The state provided Allen’s team with Elwell’s report and her lab notes. Part of another motion asked for any evidence of drug use by potential state’s witnesses during the relevant time period. Prosecutors said they had no such reports. A judge hearing the discovery motions denied Allen’s request for prior witness statements, and prosecutors did not provide the results of Ward’s polygraph test or her responses to the subsequent questions asked by Gilliam. On August 18, 1999, Assistant District Attorney Freda Black wrote to Brown to discuss a plea deal, urging him to get Allen to accept what was their “bottom line” offer. She said it was in Allen’s best interest, and she provided several statements made by Ward that inculpated Allen. Allen entered an Alford plea to second-degree murder and first-degree sexual offense before Judge Leon Stanback of Durham County Superior Court on August 26, 1999. Under an Alford plea, a defendant doesn’t admit guilt but acknowledges the state has sufficient evidence to convict. Because Allen didn’t admit guilt, the state had to present a factual basis for the plea. Black told Stanback that the blood on Adesha’s clothing was one of the state’s most important pieces of evidence. She also mentioned the emergency-room nurse’s statement and one of Ward’s statements to the police. Stanback sentenced Allen to between 43 years and nine months and 54 years and one month in prison."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Five years later, on March 19, 2009, Judge Orlando Hudson of Durham County Superior Court vacated Stanback’s judgments, allowing Allen to withdraw his Alford plea. He was released from prison on April 14, 2009, and placed in the Durham County Jail, and then released on bond September 9, 2010. Durham prosecutors intended to retry Allen, and his new attorney, Lisa Williams, began filing her own series of discovery requests in early 2010. She inspected the state’s files in April 2010, and then requested 23 pages missing from Gilliam’s report, which included the results of Ward’s polygraph test and Gilliam’s subsequent interview with Ward.  Separately, an independent review of the SBI crime lab released in August 2010 found that the lab’s analysts had routinely filed misleading reports that failed to adequately disclose negative results, often burying those contradictory findings in cryptically written lab notes.  Then-Attorney General Roy Cooper commissioned the review after the exoneration of Gregory Taylor. As with Allen’s case, a lab chemist had reported the presence of blood in his report linking Taylor to a murder but had not included further tests that were either negative or inconclusive. The review found 230 cases, including Allen’s, where analysts didn’t adequately disclose the results of lab work."

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RECENT ENTRY INTO U.S. NATIONAL REGISTRY OF EXONERATIONS: Author Ken Otterbourg; Posted on  December 16, 2021. Contributing factors; False or misleading forensic evidence;  perjury or false accusation; official misconduct;  Inadequate legal defence. (A lethal cocktail indeed.)

GIST: "On the afternoon of February 9, 1998, Derrick Allen called 911 and said that a toddler in his care, 2-year-old Adesha Artis, was unresponsive.

Paramedics arrived at the apartment in Durham, North Carolina, where Allen lived with Adesha and Diane Jones, Adesha’s mother. They found Adesha had no pulse. They also noticed what appeared to be a small amount of blood on the inside left leg of her pantsuit. Allen told the paramedics that Adesha had complained of leg pain and become unresponsive after he took her out of the bathtub.

The paramedics took Adesha to the hospital, but she was unable to be revived. The attending physician who examined the girl said there was a “fresh noticeable tear” in the girl’s vagina, with “some blood [being] found inside the vagina and on the clothes [Adesha] wore to the hospital. An emergency-room nurse said that Allen was looking at Adesha’s vaginal area in the moments after the girl was pronounced dead.

Later that day, police charged Allen with a statutory sex offense. A medical examiner performed an autopsy. The examiner’s report said that there were cuts and abrasions on Adesha’s vagina. It also said the girl had subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhaging of the brain, moderate swelling of the brain, bleeding in her spinal column, and bleeding in her retinas. The medical examiner said that Adesha's death was the result of shaken baby syndrome. 

Allen had not been the only adult looking after Adesha on the day she died. Jones’s cousin, Kia Ward, had slept over the night before and helped care for Adesha on February 9. 

Ward gave investigators a statement on February 10. She said that she cared for Adesha by herself until around 11 a.m., when Allen woke up. She said that Allen became frustrated with Adesha because the toddler wet her clothes. He took her into the bathroom, where he bathed her and spanked her. He then dressed the girl. 

Later, Ward said, she noticed that Adesha was “shaking – almost like she was having a seizure.” She asked Allen what was wrong, and he said that he had been giving Adesha a piggy-back ride, and she had fallen off. Ward said she then saw Allen changing Adesha’s underwear. Ward said that Allen then asked her whether she noticed that Adesha was limping, and Ward said she had. Ward said Allen then picked up the girl and placed her on the bed in Jones’s room. Ward said she left the apartment at around 2 p.m., about a half hour before the 911 call.

On February 29, 1998, Special Agent Mike Wilson with the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation administered a polygraph test to Ward. He asked Ward a series of questions, including whether Ward had harmed Adesha and whether Ward had been truthful with him and with Detective Dwight Gilliam of the Durham Police Department. Wilson would write in a report that Ward was “not deceptive” in her responses. 

After the polygraph test, Gilliam asked Ward some additional questions. She admitted to smoking marijuana but said she didn’t smoke on the day Adesha died or the day before. She also told Gilliam that she had sex with Allen two summers earlier but had not had much contact with him since then, and that they had become “kind of like enemies.”

On March 2, 1998, a Durham County grand jury indicted Allen for two additional crimes, first-degree murder and felony child abuse. A judge granted prosecutors approval on July 6, 1998 to seek the death penalty against Allen, who denied any involvement in Adesha’s death.

The police submitted several pieces of Adesha’s clothing to the SBI crime laboratory for testing. Jennifer Elwell, a forensic scientist, conducted the testing on August 17-18, 1998. First, Elwell performed a preliminary test on Adesha’s training pants and two of her sleepers. She said in her report that these items “exhibited chemical properties consistent with what [she] would see in a bloodstain.”

Elwell then moved to perform a confirmatory test on the samples. This test, known as a Takayama test, came back negative. There was no mention of these results in Elwell’s report, but in her lab notes she placed a small dash next to the word “Takayama” for each tested item.

As the case moved to trial, Allen’s attorneys – Robert Brown with the Durham County Public Defender’s Office and Stephen Freedman with the Center for Death Penalty Litigation – began filing discovery motions with the Durham County District Attorney’s Office. The state provided Allen’s team with Elwell’s report and her lab notes. Part of another motion asked for any evidence of drug use by potential state’s witnesses during the relevant time period. Prosecutors said they had no such reports. 

A judge hearing the discovery motions denied Allen’s request for prior witness statements, and prosecutors did not provide the results of Ward’s polygraph test or her responses to the subsequent questions asked by Gilliam.

On August 18, 1999, Assistant District Attorney Freda Black wrote to Brown to discuss a plea deal, urging him to get Allen to accept what was their “bottom line” offer. She said it was in Allen’s best interest, and she provided several statements made by Ward that inculpated Allen.

Allen entered an Alford plea to second-degree murder and first-degree sexual offense before Judge Leon Stanback of Durham County Superior Court on August 26, 1999. Under an Alford plea, a defendant doesn’t admit guilt but acknowledges the state has sufficient evidence to convict.

Because Allen didn’t admit guilt, the state had to present a factual basis for the plea. Black told Stanback that the blood on Adesha’s clothing was one of the state’s most important pieces of evidence. She also mentioned the emergency-room nurse’s statement and one of Ward’s statements to the police. Stanback sentenced Allen to between 43 years and nine months and 54 years and one month in prison.

Allen filed a pro se petition on January 27, 2004, challenging his conviction, arguing that Stanback had sentenced him too harshly given the absence of aggravating factors or proof of criminal history. 

Five years later, on March 19, 2009, Judge Orlando Hudson of Durham County Superior Court vacated Stanback’s judgments, allowing Allen to withdraw his Alford plea. He was released from prison on April 14, 2009, and placed in the Durham County Jail, and then released on bond September 9, 2010.

Durham prosecutors intended to retry Allen, and his new attorney, Lisa Williams, began filing her own series of discovery requests in early 2010. She inspected the state’s files in April 2010, and then requested 23 pages missing from Gilliam’s report, which included the results of Ward’s polygraph test and Gilliam’s subsequent interview with Ward. 

Separately, an independent review of the SBI crime lab released in August 2010 found that the lab’s analysts had routinely filed misleading reports that failed to adequately disclose negative results, often burying those contradictory findings in cryptically written lab notes. 

Then-Attorney General Roy Cooper commissioned the review after the exoneration of Gregory Taylor. As with Allen’s case, a lab chemist had reported the presence of blood in his report linking Taylor to a murder but had not included further tests that were either negative or inconclusive. The review found 230 cases, including Allen’s, where analysts didn’t adequately disclose the results of lab work. 

On October 12, 2010, Williams filed a motion to dismiss the charges against Allen. She argued that the state “knew or should have known that the written conclusion contained in [Elwell’s] lab report contained false, misleading and incomplete information;” that the state had failed to disclose information about Ward’s polygraph results in a timely manner; that the state failed to treat Ward as a possible suspect or pursue alternate suspects; and that numerous pieces of evidence had been lost, including all specimens and samples taken from Adesha’s body.

Judge Hudson held a hearing on December 9-10, 2010. He heard from several witnesses, including Black, the prosecutor, and Elwell, the lab chemist. Elwell said it was SBI practice in cases with negative Takayama results to report the last “valid” test without comment. Black said she had no knowledge prior to Allen’s plea that Ward considered Allen an enemy or that Elwell’s reported test was inconsistent with a later test mentioned in her lab notes. 

After hearing from the witnesses, Hudson dismissed the charges against Allen on December 10, 2010. He followed up the bench ruling with an order filed March 9, 2011, that harshly criticized the SBI and prosecutors for their actions and failure to turn over evidence to Allen’s attorneys. He said the state had used the threat of the death penalty as leverage to secure a plea from Allen, while at the same time withholding evidence to which he was entitled. Hudson called the SBI lab results “deceptively written” and “designed to obscure the fact that confirmatory testing was performed … and yielded negative results.”

Hudson also said he didn’t believe Black’s testimony that she didn’t know about the inconclusive test when she presented the factual basis for Allen’s plea. He noted that Elwell’s phone log said she spoke with Black on August 18, 1998. Hudson also said Black had misled Stanback, when she said there was no evidence suggesting a state witness had used illegal drugs. Hudson said that this misconduct, combined with the loss of evidence and the inability of police to locate Kia Ward, made it impossible for Allen to receive a fair trial.

The state appealed Hudson’s ruling dismissing the charges with prejudice. On September 4, 2012, the North Carolina Court of Appeals reversed and sent the case back to Durham County. The opinion, written by Justice Samuel J. Ervin IV, said Hudson had misapplied the law in dismissing the case. It noted that because Allen’s case had never gone to trial, the state’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence wasn’t a violation of Allen’s rights. 

“Although we agree with the trial court that the polygraph report and Ms. Ward’s statement tended to undermine her credibility and did, for that reason, have impeachment value, the State is not constitutionally required to disclose material impeachment evidence prior to the defendant’s decision to enter a guilty plea,” the ruling said.

The appellate court noted that the state had turned over Elwell’s report and lab notes before Allen entered his plea. While the documents were hard to decipher, a more thorough investigation could have uncovered the meaning of the dash marks next to the Takayama tests, the court said.

“We share the trial court’s displeasure with the manner in which the blood testing results were disclosed to Defendant and the manner in which aspects of the prosecution of this case have been handled. Even so, given our inability to discern any legal basis for the sanction imposed in the trial court’s order, we are obligated to reverse it,” the court wrote.

More than four years later, on October 25, 2016, prosecutors dismissed the charges against Allen. 

“After significant investigation by law enforcement and the District Attorney’s Office, witnesses essential to the prosecution of this case either cannot be located or are uncooperative and refuse to assist in the prosecution,” wrote Assistant District Attorney Luke Bumm. “As a result, the State cannot meet the burden of proving every element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt and therefore cannot proceed with the prosecution of this case.”

In 2019, Allen filed a pro se lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina against Elwell, Black, the SBI and other officials involved in his prosecution. On October 6, 2021, Judge Thomas Schroeder dismissed most of the complaint, except for the claims against Elwell. 


---------------------------------------------------------------------

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: "I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: "It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.