Sunday, September 20, 2026

September 20: Former Neonatal Nurse Lucy Letby: Rachel Aviv, The 'New Yorker' scribe who has studied the case in depth, writes that, "The new Lucy Letby report misses the point," noting that: "The lead nurse for pediatrics said, “No one could give us any other reason and why—why should it just be her? You know, we had highlighted in another table that one of the Registrars”—a junior doctor—“had also been present on a number of—of occasions. But for some reason it was only the nurse that was being sort of pinned.” The Countess’s executives decided that the hospital should no longer treat babies born before thirty-two weeks, because it was “currently understaffed and under skilled,” as one report put it. They also commissioned the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health to review the deaths, and, at another meeting, the executives decided that they would keep Letby away from the unit until the review had been completed. “Frustrated + defeated,” the director of nursing, Alison Kelly, wrote afterward. In an e-mail, Rees called Letby’s prolonged removal from the ward “wrong and immoral,” saying that it was “based on a senior Clinician having a ‘gut feeling’ with no evidence.” She warned of “the message that this sends out—a Clinician is being listened to and supported, with potential devastating consequences for a nurse.” Letby filed a grievance, saying that she had been removed from her job without justification. “It is awful and I don’t know where it has all come from and why they can’t let it go,” Letby said, at her grievance hearing. “I have gone through all of this on their word.” The chair of the grievance hearing said, “It is clear that the 2 consultants”—the British term for senior doctors—“call the shots.” “I was disgusted by their behavior,” the grievance investigator responded. He also said that, if the pediatricians had called the police, the unit would have become a crime scene. “I was happy for the Police to come,” Letby replied. “I had nothing to hide.”

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "A separate group of twenty-four clinicians and scientists, including the forensic-science regulator for England a...

September 18: William Whateley: Michigan: National Registry of Exonerations: Anatomy of a flawed arson investigation: Author Ken Otterbourg notes that: While in prison, Whateley shared a cell with Larry Smith Jr., who was exonerated in 2021. After Smith’s release, he brought Whateley’s case to the attention of Life After Justice, which then partnered with the Exoneration Project. "..."The motion included reports from two fire experts who said that Wojtowicz’s investigation was incomplete and unreliable. Michael Higgins, the founder of K-Chem Labs, said that Wojtowicz failed to interview Woodward and her boyfriend, both smokers and the last known people in the trailer, about their activities before they left. He also said that the lack of testing on materials in the trailer made Wojtowicz’s testimony suspect. “Wojtowicz stated that gasoline was poured on the kitchen floor and ignited, without any evidence to substantiate this conclusion,” Higgins wrote. “Wojtowicz did not examine the scene, which would require the investigator to remove the debris from the floor, document with photos and drawings of what he observed, and collect samples that are sent to the laboratory for analysis … Wojtowicz’s statement to the jury was totally fictitious. He had no factual or scientific evidence that there was any flammable liquid in the fire scene.”

QUOTE OF THE DAY: “William lost nearly a decade of his life because the system failed to apply sound science,” said Jarrett Adams, cofounder...