Saturday, December 22, 2018

Back in action: On-Going: Defunct Motherisk lab: Dr. Gideon Koren (Under investigation in Israel); Toronto Star investigative team gets another direct hit as it takes us "Inside the flawed world of medical publishing that allowed a lie in a paper coauthored by Dr. Gideon Koren to pollute the scientific record."..."Koren, who retired from Sick Kids in June 2015, has continued to publish since his departure. Neither he nor his lawyers responded to emails and phone calls seeking comment for this story. Koren, who now lives in Israel, had been working as a senior researcher for Maccabi Health, a healthcare provider. In late October, Physicians for Human Rights Israel, a medical ethics’ watchdog, wrote to Maccabi Health with concerns that Maccabi may not know about Koren’s role in two Sick Kids controversies, including the Motherisk scandal. On Dec. 5, Maccabi, in a letter obtained by the Star, wrote back saying it had appointed a committee to “examine the role of Professor Koren in these incidents.” Israel Hayom, a national newspaper, reported on Dec. 18, that Maccabi Health said Koren will be on leave until the end of the investigation. Haaretz, another Israeli newspaper reported that day that Koren defended the Motherisk lab by saying it was clinical, not forensic, and “won praise.” He said, according to the newspaper, that claims of biased or misleading research were outright libel. Sick Kids said last week that it is “regrettable” that an audit of Koren’s work had not been conducted sooner and that there should have been “closer oversight of his disclosure and publication practices.”

›
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: The once vaunted gold-standard test employed by the Hospital for Sick Children's now defunct (hair-testing)  for ...

Back in action; On-going: Julie Rea: Illinois: Pamela Colloff winds up her Pro-Publica, New York Times, collaboration on Joe Bryan (Texas) with a compelling account of the Julie Rea (Illinois) blood-splatter case - and a contextual analyis of how so-called blood-splatter 'science' fits in with the numerous other kinds of faukty forensic science. After reading these stories I am left with one compelling question: How can the so-called experts get it so very, very wrong? HL..." Prosecutors used a forensic discipline called bloodstain-pattern analysis to argue that an intruder never entered her home on the night of the crime and that Rea was, in fact, her son’s killer. She was convicted of first-degree murder in 2002 largely on the strength of the testimony of two bloodstain-pattern analysts. Four years later, Rea was acquitted at a retrial, after a legal team assembled by the Center on Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University’s Pritzker School of Law in Chicago mounted a vigorous defense that challenged the state’s forensic testimony. They also presented new evidence that a serial killer of children — a lifelong drifter who was on Texas death row for a nearly identical crime — had confessed to killing Joel. Rea was formally exonerated in 2010. Today, she belongs to a growing community of victims: Americans who were wrongly convicted with the help of forensic disciplines allowed into courtrooms despite little to no proof of their reliability."

›
  PASSAGE OF THE DAY: " Bloodstain-pattern analysis is rooted in the belief that the drops, spatters and trails of blood at a crim...