PUBLISHER'S VIEW: I am pleased to have the opportunity to devote some space to a newly published book: "The Nurses Are Innocent: The Digoxin Poisoning Fallacy," by Gavin Hamilton M.D. The title refers to the investigation of the deaths of babies at the Hospital for Sick Children in 1980 and 1981 for which a nurse named Susan Nelles was charged with murder. (My first free-lance story for the Toronto Star described Ms. Nelle's discharge at her preliminary hearing). I later wrote in the Star about the public inquiry in which Justice Samuel Grange found that babies had been murdered in spite of testimony which shredded the validity of digoxin tests conducted by Ontario's Centre for Forensic Sciences and raised a significant doubt as to whether any babies had been murdered. Now Dr. Hamilton, a retired radiologist, has, at least in my mind, provided the real reason for the deaths of the unfortunate babies at the renowned hospital: A toxin found in natural rubber which is technically like digoxin, which was used in disposable plastic syringes and intravenous devices. As the late Dr. Peter Macklem, the above noted witness at the Grange Inquiry, says in his preface to this book: "What can be learned from this black stain on Canada's judicial system? One lesson certainly stands out: We cannot ever again allow a group of unqualified amateur diagnosticians to make life and death decisions about such important matters as potential serial murders." Dr. Macklem's comments have me thinking about the so-called arson experts in Texas who concluded with such compelling certainty that Cameron Todd Willingham had set the fire which killed his family - and were proven to have been so terribly, terribly wrong. (Willingham, an innocent man, was executed in Texas). Dr. Hamilton also has a tantalizing theory that a certain now-disgraced pathologist named Charles Smith may have been responsible for turning the tragic deaths into murders. He points out that "In 1980 - which was at the beginning of what was to become known as the digoxin baby poisoning epidemic period, he was hired by the Hospital for Sick Children as an anatomic pathologist - with an expressed keen interest in performing autopsies on children who had died suddenly." (More about that in another post); This book can be purchased through Amazon at:
http://www.amazon.ca/Nurses-Are-Innocent-Digoxin-Poisoning/dp/1459700570
Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog
----------------------------------------------------------
STORY: Q and A with Gavin Hamilton, author of "The Nurses Are Innocent: The Digoxin Poisoning Fallacy," published in Defining Canada: Books and Authors in Action on November 17, 2011.
GIST: "Did you have a specific readership in mind when you wrote your book? My intent from the start was to prove to the police, the judiciary, the Ontario Chief Coroner, the Attorney General, the medical staff at the Toronto Hospital for Sick Children, the media – and to the Canadian public at large – that no digoxin poisoning occurred and that Susan Nelles was innocent. I believe that the nursing profession will concur with my explanations and will welcome this evidence which exculpates Susan Nelles – and the nursing profession she continues to represent so well. The false idea of multiple murders and the incorrect diagnosis of digoxin poisoning has been allowed to linger for 30 years – and is dismissed with multiple solid references."
http://www.definingcanada.ca/In 1980 - which was at the beginning of what was to become known as the digoxin baby poisoning epidemic period, he was hired by the Hospital for Sick Children as an anatomic pathologist - with an expressed keen interest in performing autopsies on children who had died suddenly.2011/11/17/qa-with-gavin-hamilton-m-d-author-of-the-nurses-are-innocent/
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at:
http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith
Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:
http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html
Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog; hlevy15@gmail.com;