Monday, September 16, 2024

Central Park Five: (The Exonerated Five): How Trump's taking out a full-page advertisement in New York City newspapers calling for the return of the death penalty for four Black teenagers and a Latino teen who were falsely accused of having raped a jogger in Central Park played a central role in Pamela Harris's response to the former President's criticism of her racial identity, in Tuesday night's presidential debate Char Adams reports on NBC:…"In response, Harris said Tuesday that Trump had a divisive history with race that she described as “tragic.” She highlighted that Trump discriminated against Black people looking to live in one of his father’s buildings. And she chided him for calling for the “Exonerated Five,” previously known as the “Central Park Five,” to face the death penalty. "I think the American people want better than that, want better than this," Harris said."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY:  "Ultimately, DNA evidence linked a serial rapist to the crime. But the teenagers spent years behind bars before their convictions were vacated in 2002. New York City later paid them $41 million in a legal settlement. One of the men, Yusef Salaam, now a New York City Council member, condemned Trump’s comments during the recent Democratic National Convention. “Forty-five wanted us unalived,” he said, referring to Trump as the 45th president. “He wanted us dead. Today, we are exonerated because the actual perpetrator confessed and DNA proved it.  “That guy says he still stands by the original guilty verdict,” Salaam said, referring to Trump."


--------------------------------------------------------------------


STORY: "Harris takes a question about their identity  as an opportunity to examine Trump's record on race, by Reporter Char Adams, published  by NBC, on September 10, 2024. (Char Adams is an  award-winning journalist covering race and identity for NBC News. who  mainly focuses on social justice, systemic patterns and culture._



GIST: "Donald Trump doubled down on questioning Kamala Harris’ race during Tuesday night’s presidential debate and refused to acknowledge his past comments about her identity.

Trump said “I don’t care what she is” when moderator David Muir asked him why he believed it was appropriate to weigh in on Harris’ heritage. 

“Whatever she wants to be is OK with me,” Trump said. When Muir referred to Trump’s comments last month claiming Harris “turned Black” for political gain, Trump said, “I don’t know.” 

“All I can say is I read where she was not Black that she put out. I’ll say that. And then I read that she was Black, and that’s OK. Either one was OK with me.”

'Tragedy': Harris responds to Trump's criticism of her racial identity


Trump made the initial comments in an interview at the National Association of Black Journalists convention. 

“She was only promoting Indian heritage,” he said then. “I didn’t know she was Black until a number of years ago, when she happened to turn Black, and now she wants to be known as Black.”

“Is she Indian or is she Black?” he asked. 

She’s both. Harris’ mother was Indian, and her father is Jamaican. 

In response, Harris said Tuesday that Trump had a divisive history with race that she described as “tragic.” She highlighted that Trump discriminated against Black people looking to live in one of his father’s buildings. And she chided him for calling for the “Exonerated Five,” previously known as the “Central Park Five,” to face the death penalty. 

"I think the American people want better than that, want better than this," Harris said.

In 1989, Trump took out a full-page advertisement in New York City newspapers calling for the return of the death penalty for four Black teenagers and a Latino teen who were falsely accused of having raped a jogger in Central Park. Their convictions were overturned, but Trump has not apologized, and he has consistently refused to walk back his comments, arguing that they had admitted guilt.

He continued the refusal during the debate.

“They admitted, they said, they pled guilty, and I said, ‘Well, if they pled guilty, they badly hurt a person — killed a person ultimately,” he said, adding that “a lot of people” agreed with his actions then.

Ultimately, DNA evidence linked a serial rapist to the crime. But the teenagers spent years behind bars before their convictions were vacated in 2002. New York City later paid them $41 million in a legal settlement. One of the men, Yusef Salaam, now a New York City Council member, condemned Trump’s comments during the recent Democratic National Convention.

“Forty-five wanted us unalived,” he said, referring to Trump as the 45th president. “He wanted us dead. Today, we are exonerated because the actual perpetrator confessed and DNA proved it. 

“That guy says he still stands by the original guilty verdict,” Salaam said, referring to Trump."

The entire story can be read at:

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/harris-presidential-debate-trump-race-central-park-5-rcna17054

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

  • SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:


    https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/120008354894645705/4704913685758792985

    ———————————————————————————————

    FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
    Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
    Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

    —————————————————————————————————
    FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!


    Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————-