PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "“We face a health privacy crisis where care is inaccessible due to criminalization, costs, stigma, and the rise of government intrusion into medical care which forces people to delay or retreat from care, worsening their health,” says Sara Geoghegan, senior counsel at EPIC. Geoghegan and her colleagues point to incidents of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents occupying emergency rooms, waiting rooms, and hospital lobbies, noting that clinicians have reported agents blocking treatment and listening in on conversations between patients and health workers."
----------------------------------------
PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "For nearly a decade, Department of Homeland Security guidelines advised immigration agents to avoid enforcement actions in sensitive locations, such as schools, places of worship, and medical or mental health care facilities, unless exigent circumstances existed or prior approval was obtained. Those protections were rescinded in January 2025 when then–acting DHS secretary Benjamine Huffman revoked the Biden-era memo and replaced it with an interim directive for officers to use “common sense” in deciding when and where to conduct enforcement actions."
-----------------------------------------
Legal and health care observers have since reported visible ICE activity in medical facilities, such as agents in reception areas and interference with care, and noted that uncertainty about enforcement roles—even in public spaces—is contributing to fear among patients and clinicians. In August, a CalMatters investigation documented the real-world impact of increased ICEpresence at health facilities in California. It found that federal immigration agents were appearing more frequently at emergency rooms and clinics amid a ramp-up in deportations, sometimes accompanying detained patients through reception areas and waiting in lobbies, and that the visible presence of armed agents had left workers and patients uneasy and without guidance on how to respond. Hospital staff told reporters that the sight of ICE agents “makes many wary” and exacerbates concerns about privacy, legal rights, and the ability to care for sick patients without interference."
-----------------------------------
PASSAGE THREE OF THE DAY: "Federal immigration authorities have gone beyond traditional enforcement tactics by tapping into vast commercial and insurance data systems to locate people for deportation. Reporting by 404 Media shows ICE agents have gained access to ISO ClaimSearch—a private insurance and medical billing database said to contain more than 1.8 billion insurance claims and 58 million medical bills—and are using it to identify individuals for deportation. “Immigration status should not be collected by providers unless required by law,” EPIC says. ICE did not respond to a request for comment."
-----------------------------------
STORY: "Surveillance and ICE Are Driving Patients Away From Medical Care, Report Warns, published by Wired (Reporter Dell Cameron), on January 21, 2026. (Dell Cameron is an investigative reporter from Texas covering privacy and national security. He's the recipient of multiple Society of Professional Journalists awards and is co-recipient of an Edward R. Murrow reward for investigative reporting. Previously he was a senior reporter at Gizmodo and a staff reporter for the Daily Dot.)
SUB-HEADING: A new EPIC report says data brokers, ad-tech surveillance, and ICEenforcement are among the factors leading to a “health privacy crisis” that is eroding trust and deterring people from seeking care.
GIST: "When immigration agents enter hospitals, and private companies are allowed to buy and sell data that reveals who seeks medical care, patients retreat, treatment is delayed, and health outcomes worsen, according to a new report that describes a growing “health privacy crisis” in the United States driven by surveillance and weak law enforcement limits.
The report, published by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), attributes the problem to outdated privacy laws and rapidly expanding digital systems that allow health-related information to be tracked, analyzed, breached, and accessed by both private companies and government agencies.
EPIC, a Washington-based nonprofit focused on privacy and civil liberties, based its findings on a review of federal and state laws, court rulings, agency policies, technical research, and documented case studies examining how health data is collected, shared, and used across government and commercial systems.
“Unregulated digital technologies, mass surveillance, and weak privacy laws have created a health privacy crisis,” the report says. “Our health data is increasingly being harvested, sold, and used beyond our control.”
The organization found that health data routinely escapes medical settings and gets repurposed for surveillance and enforcement and is increasingly deterring patients from seeking care.
EPIC identifies the sale of medical and health-related data as a central driver of the crisis. “Trafficking in individuals’ personal information has become a booming industry in the absence of a federal data privacy law,” it says, “and health information is no exception.”
The report describes a largely unregulated market in which data brokers buy, aggregate and resell information that can reveal diagnoses, treatments, medications and visits to medical facilities. This data is often collected outside traditional health care settings—through apps, websites, location tracking and online searches—and can be repurposed for advertising, insurance risk scoring, or government surveillance without patients’ knowledge or consent.
Once sold, EPIC notes, the information can be difficult or impossible to control, increasing the risks of profiling, discrimination, and higher costs for care, while discouraging people from seeking treatment in the first place.
Last year, WIRED reported that Google’s advertising ecosystem allowed marketers to target US consumers based on sensitive health indicators, including chronic illness, using data supplied by third-party brokers, despite company rules barring such use. The investigation found that advertisers could reach millions of devices linked to conditions such as diabetes, asthma, or heart disease through audience segments circulating inside Google’s ad-tech platform.
In a 2022 investigation, The Markup examined the websites of Newsweek’s top 100 US hospitals and found that 33 were sending sensitive patient information to Facebook through the Meta Pixel, an online tracking tool. Reporters documented the pixel transmitting details when users attempted to schedule appointments, including doctors’ names, medical specialties and search terms such as “pregnancy termination,” along with IP addresses that can often be linked to individuals.
Health privacy experts told The Markup that some of the data sharing may have violated the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the nation’s primary law governing the privacy of medical records, which is supposed to limit how hospitals can disclose identifiable patient information to third parties without consent or specific contracts.
EPIC argues that large technology companies have become central actors in the health privacy crisis by embedding surveillance tools across health, advertising, and data-broker ecosystems while pressing policymakers to loosen constraints on data collection. The report warns that those practices have public-health consequences, particularly for people already wary of surveillance or government scrutiny.
“We face a health privacy crisis where care is inaccessible due to criminalization, costs, stigma, and the rise of government intrusion into medical care which forces people to delay or retreat from care, worsening their health,” says Sara Geoghegan, senior counsel at EPIC.
Geoghegan and her colleagues point to incidents of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents occupying emergency rooms, waiting rooms, and hospital lobbies, noting that clinicians have reported agents blocking treatment and listening in on conversations between patients and health workers.
For nearly a decade, Department of Homeland Security guidelines advised immigration agents to avoid enforcement actions in sensitive locations, such as schools, places of worship, and medical or mental health care facilities, unless exigent circumstances existed or prior approval was obtained. Those protections were rescinded in January 2025 when then–acting DHS secretary Benjamine Huffman revoked the Biden-era memo and replaced it with an interim directive for officers to use “common sense” in deciding when and where to conduct enforcement actions.
Legal and health care observers have since reported visible ICE activity in medical facilities, such as agents in reception areas and interference with care, and noted that uncertainty about enforcement roles—even in public spaces—is contributing to fear among patients and clinicians.
In August, a CalMatters investigation documented the real-world impact of increased ICEpresence at health facilities in California. It found that federal immigration agents were appearing more frequently at emergency rooms and clinics amid a ramp-up in deportations, sometimes accompanying detained patients through reception areas and waiting in lobbies, and that the visible presence of armed agents had left workers and patients uneasy and without guidance on how to respond.
Hospital staff told reporters that the sight of ICE agents “makes many wary” and exacerbates concerns about privacy, legal rights, and the ability to care for sick patients without interference.
Federal immigration authorities have gone beyond traditional enforcement tactics by tapping into vast commercial and insurance data systems to locate people for deportation. Reporting by 404 Media shows ICE agents have gained access to ISO ClaimSearch—a private insurance and medical billing database said to contain more than 1.8 billion insurance claims and 58 million medical bills—and are using it to identify individuals for deportation.
“Immigration status should not be collected by providers unless required by law,” EPIC says.
ICE did not respond to a request for comment.
EPIC warns that artificial intelligence, which is increasingly used in health care and consumer applications, can magnify existing privacy harms by processing vast amounts of health-related data with little regulatory oversight. AI systems often “feed on the commercial surveillance system,” it says, ingesting tracking and behavioral data to make predictions, recommendations, or decisions that affect access to care. There is no comprehensive federal law governing their use in these contexts.
EPIC connects this to concerns that unregulated AI can automate profiling, entrench bias, and amplify surveillance risks due to its ability to draw inferences from data gathered outside traditional clinical settings. Current privacy frameworks like HIPAA do not address the unique challenges posed by real-time inference, algorithmic decisionmaking, or the use of third-party AI tools on sensitive information.
The report is critical of the dominant “notice-and-choice” model that governs much of US privacy law—whereby companies satisfy legal obligations by disclosing data practices in privacy policies and obtaining nominal consent, even as individuals have little realistic ability to understand or negotiate how their health-related information is used. Privacy protections have increasingly been reduced to lengthy disclosures and opt-ins that place the burden on individuals to navigate complex systems they cannot realistically understand or avoid, the report says.
“Big Tech is making us sicker, and it’s using its influence on the federal government to demand more of our data and have even fewer regulations for surveillance,” says Geoghegan. “People should not need to choose between quality care and data privacy.”
The entire story can be read at:
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/
SEE BREAKDOWN OF SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG, AT THE LINK BELOW: HL:
https://www.blogger.com/blog/
——————————————————————————————
FINAL WORD: (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases): "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
——————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions. They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;