Monday, November 30, 2020

'Federal death penalty: "A Disgrace': Trump's DOJ Schedules Three More Federal Executions in Days Before Anti-Death Penalty Biden Takes Office," Common Dreams News (Reporter Julia Conley) reports...Two months before President-elect Joe Biden is set to take office and halt the use of the federal death penalty, President Donald Trump's Justice Department on Friday evening announced it plans to execute three more death row inmates in addition to three whose state-sanctioned killings were already planned for the coming weeks. The announcement came a day after the execution of Orlando Hall—the first American to be put to death by the federal government by a lame-duck administration in more than a century. There will never be a day when the death penalty is anything other than utterly cruel and barbaric. But this execution is made particularly horrific by the fact that Orlando Hall is the first person to be executed by a lame-duck administration in over one hundred years."



Nota Bene: New post in my 'Selfless Warriors Blog' released earlier today  (Monday November 30, 2020) at the link below:


 Selfless Warrior Win Wahrer/Guy Paul Morin: "Win is one of a kind.  There are others who have given their life for a cause - but when I heard how it all came about for her - taking on the Canadian criminal justice system without a law degree and then becoming a founding member of the only organization in Canada  to help free those wrongly convicted,  her story is nothing short of a Hollywood thriller. Win lives her life like everyone matters and would do just about anything to help someone who has suffered an injustice.  She is their relentless hero, their warrior.   Filmmaker Lori Kuffner.


selflesswarriors.blogspot.com


------------------------------------------------


Back to The Charles Smith Blog: 


QUOTE OF THE DAY: "We all should be paying more attention to the killing spree that the Justice Department is currently engaging in, fitting in all the federal executions that it can before Joe Biden is inaugurated in January," tweeted journalist Jamil Smith."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "If Trump's plans proceed, two of the men newly scheduled to be put to death will be executed less than a week before Biden takes office. Two of the inmates, Corey Johnson and Alfred Bourgeois, have intellectual disabilities according to their attorneys, and one of them, Dustin John Higgs, maintains that his co-defendant was the sole gunman in the murder he was convicted of committing. "


STORY: “‘A disgrace’: Trump’s DOJ schedules three more  federal executions in days before anti-death penalty Biden takes office,” by reporter Julia Conley, published  by ‘ Common Dreams’ on November 21, 2020.


SUB-HEADING: “We  all should be paying  more attention to the killing spree that the Justice Department is currently engaged in.”


GIST: Two months before President-elect Joe Biden is set to take office and halt the use of the federal death penalty, President Donald Trump's Justice Department on Friday evening announced it plans to execute three more death row inmates in addition to three whose state-sanctioned killings were already planned for the coming weeks. 


The announcement came a day after the execution of Orlando Hall—the first American to be put to death by the federal government by a lame-duck administration in more than a century.


There will never be a day when the death penalty is anything other than  utterly cruel and barbaric.


But this execution is made particularly horrific by the fact that Orlando Hall is the first person to be executed by a lame-duck administration in over one hundred years.


After reviving the use of the federal death penalty this past summer, if the planned executions go forward, Trump will have overseen 14 executions in seven months. Previously, the federal government had not put any inmates to death in 17 years.


Anti-death penalty advocates in recent weeks have demanded that the federal government halt the executions of Hall, Lisa Montgomery, and Brandon Bernard. As Common Dreams reported earlier this month, Montgomery's lawyers say she was experiencing psychosis linked to a lifetime of sexual and physical abuse when she killed a woman in 2004. More than a thousand child advocates, mental health experts, and anti-sex trafficking campaigners have called on Trump to commute her sentence. 


Four Democratic lawmakers this month also demanded that the administration cancel the executions in light of the fact that Trump will only be in office until January and American voters this month decisively chose to elect an anti-death penalty president instead of him. 


"While you will remain in office for a few more weeks, going forward with executions in the weeks before the new administration takes office would be a grave injustice," they wrote. 


Montgomery was scheduled to be killed on December 8, but a judge this week ordered that her execution be delayed until at least December 31 after her attorneys contracted Covid-19 and were unable to represent her. 


If Trump's plans proceed, two of the men newly scheduled to be put to death will be executed less than a week before Biden takes office. Two of the inmates, Corey Johnson and Alfred Bourgeois, have intellectual disabilities according to their attorneys, and one of them, Dustin John Higgs, maintains that his co-defendant was the sole gunman in the murder he was convicted of committing. 


"We all should be paying more attention to the killing spree that the Justice Department is currently engaging in, fitting in all the federal executions that it can before Joe Biden is inaugurated in January," tweeted journalist Jamil Smith. 


We all should be paying more attention to the killing spree that @TheJusticeDept is currently engaging in, fitting in all the federal executions that it can before @JoeBiden is inaugurated in January. The death penalty must end, everywhere and forever.


"This is a disgrace," wrote anti-death penalty advocate Sister Helen Prejean of the administration's plans."


The entire story can be read at:

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/11/21/disgrace-trumps-doj-schedules-three-more-federal-executions-days-anti-death-penalty

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD (FOR NOW!): "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
----------------------------------------------------------

Sunday, November 29, 2020

Ronnie Long: North Carolina: (Tainted identification procedure, concealment of exculpatory evidence and much more): BET (Black Entertainment Television channel) tells the story of a Black man who wrongfully served 44 years in prison - and who's pleas for a pardon are being met with 'deaf ears' by Roy Cooper, the Governor of North Carolina... "While Ronnie Long's sentence was vacated and charges dropped, he blames a racist justice system that destroyed state evidence with the intention of leaving him to die in prison."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "In May of 1976, 19-year-old Ronnie Long went to court for a trespassing charge in Concord, North Carolina. He could have never predicted doing so would have led to being accused and identified In the courtroom as the rapist of a white woman. Long was pointed out by the victim because, according to his attorney Jamie Lau,  she testified “he was the only one in the courtroom that looked remotely similar to the person who had attacked her.” The victim, who passed away in 2016, originally told law enforcement the attacker was “yellow,” indicating that he was a light-skinned, Black man and she “never mentioned any facial hair on her attacker.” Long had a beard, a mustache and is a dark-skinned man.  Additionally, out of the 43 fingerprints police collected from the rape scene, none of the prints matched Long’s, the Charlotte Observer reported. Nonetheless, he was quickly convicted by an all-white jury. In May, Long’s lawyer defended his case to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which included 15 members of the nation’s second highest court.  According to the Charlotte Observer, North Carolina Judge James Wynn slammed the case by saying, “Prosecutors clearly had evidence that any defense counsel in the world, not only in 1976 but (in) the history of this country, would have wanted or needed and which should have been supplied. And yet, we did not provide it.”

------------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Black Man Who Wrongfully Served 44 Years In Prison Pleads With North Carolina Governor To Pardon His Sentence," published by BET on November 25, 2020. (BET staff);

SUB-HEADING: "While Ronnie Long's sentence was vacated and charges dropped, he blames a racist justice system that destroyed state evidence with the intention of leaving him to die in prison,"

GIST: In August, the state of North Carolina finally released Ronnie Long after serving 44 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. He was convicted by an all-white jury of raping a white woman in 1976. After decades of his case going back and forth in the courts, his sentence was finally vacated and all charges dropped. 


However, Roy Cooper, the Democratic Governor of North Carolina, has refused to pardon the 64-year-old and without a pardon, Long is still considered guilty by the state and remains ineligible for compensation for his time behind bars. 


In an emotional interview on SiriusXM’s The Clay Cane Show, Long pleaded with Cooper to grant his pardon and that of three other African American men who were released after their wrongful convictions.


“I am disappointed in the fact that you got a system here in the state of North Carolina -- you got four exonerees in one state. That within itself speaks volumes,” explained Long. “You got four Black men in one statement that have been exonerated. I was exonerated by the second highest court in the United States.” 


He continued, “My constitutional rights were violated. My fifth and fourteenth amendment was violated. I ask Roy Cooper, who is going to be held accountable for my constitutional violation?” 


Equally heartbreaking, Long said that he was not able to reunite with his mother, Elizabeth Long, who died on July 11 at 89-years old, which was about a month before he was finally released. It was her prayer to see her son as a free man again before she passed away, which unfortunately never happened.


Long said through tears, “My mom died a month before I got out… That hurt me. That hurt me for real, man. I lost my two sisters. I lost my dad. I lost my mother and ain't nobody for the state said, ‘We apologize. We made a mistake.’ I can't even get an apology.”

<div classge"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROZjshsgEIs" target="_blank">Try watching this video on www.youtube.com</a>, or enable JavaScript if it is disabled in your browser.</div></div>

Black Lives Do Matter"


In May of 1976, 19-year-old Ronnie Long went to court for a trespassing charge in Concord, North Carolina. He could have never predicted doing so would have led to being accused and identified In the courtroom as the rapist of a white woman.


Long was pointed out by the victim because, according to his attorney Jamie Lau,  she testified “he was the only one in the courtroom that looked remotely similar to the person who had attacked her.”


The victim, who passed away in 2016, originally told law enforcement the attacker was “yellow,” indicating that he was a light-skinned, Black man and she “never mentioned any facial hair on her attacker.” Long had a beard, a mustache and is a dark-skinned man. 


Additionally, out of the 43 fingerprints police collected from the rape scene, none of the prints matched Long’s, the Charlotte Observer reported. Nonetheless, he was quickly convicted by an all-white jury.


In May, Long’s lawyer defended his case to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which included 15 members of the nation’s second highest court. 


According to the Charlotte Observer, North Carolina Judge James Wynn slammed the case by saying, “Prosecutors clearly had evidence that any defense counsel in the world, not only in 1976 but (in) the history of this country, would have wanted or needed and which should have been supplied. And yet, we did not provide it.”


Pressure has since been put on Governor Cooper, who made headlines for tweeting “Black Lives do Matter” on May 31, to commute Long’s sentence,  but he has yet to do so as Long continues to fight to clear his name and move on with the remainder of his life. 


The entire story can be read at:

https://www.bet.com/news/national/2020/11/24/ronnie-long-44-years-prison-pardon-north-carolina-governor-roy-cooper.html

--------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: (National Registry of Exonerations); "Although Concord police had a photo of Long to show Bost, they decided on another route. They asked her to accompany them to the courthouse on May 10, telling Bost that the man who raped her might or might not be present. Bost sat in the second row, disguised with a red wig and sunglasses.  When Long’s case came up an hour or so later, he walked around to the defense table, wearing a flowered leisure shirt and a medium-length brown leather jacket. Even before Long spoke, Bost notified the officers that Long was her attacker. Later, at the police station, Bost picked Long’s photo out of an array. He was the only person in the array wearing a leather jacket. Long’s trespassing charge had been dismissed, but the police showed up at his house a few hours later and told him he needed to return to the station to clear up a few matters. When he arrived, they arrested him and charged him with rape and burglary. For the next 44 years, he would remain behind bars. 

----------------------------------------------

PASSAGE ONE OF THE DAY: (National Registry of Exonerations):  "Although Concord police had a photo of Long to show Bost, they decided on another route. They asked her to accompany them to the courthouse on May 10, telling Bost that the man who raped her might or might not be present. Bost sat in the second row, disguised with a red wig and sunglasses.  When Long’s case came up an hour or so later, he walked around to the defense table, wearing a flowered leisure shirt and a medium-length brown leather jacket. Even before Long spoke, Bost notified the officers that Long was her attacker. Later, at the police station, Bost picked Long’s photo out of an array. He was the only person in the array wearing a leather jacket. Long’s trespassing charge had been dismissed, but the police showed up at his house a few hours later and told him he needed to return to the station to clear up a few matters. When he arrived, they arrested him and charged him with rape and burglary. For the next 44 years, he would remain behind bars."

--------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: (National Registry of Exonerations);  (Dissenting Judge) Thacker criticized prosecutors for arguing during the years of appeals that Long’s attorneys should have tested the material themselves or asked the state’s witnesses whether items had been tested.  “This argument is nonsensical and offensive. Such an argument completely turns the burden of proof in criminal cases on its head. Again, I am shocked as to the apparent need to educate the state that the burden of proof in criminal cases rests with the state, and remains with the state throughout the course of the trial.” She closed by writing, “In this circumstance, Appellant must prevail. To hold otherwise would provide incentive for the state to lie, obfuscate, and withhold evidence for a long enough period of time that it can then simply rely on the need for finality. That, I cannot abide.”

----------------------------------------------------

Read National Registry of Exonerations entry  by Ken Otterbourg at the link below:  It was just after 9:30 p.m. on April 25, 1976, when a man broke into a house on South Union Street in Concord, North Carolina, by climbing up a white banister and then entering through a window off the porch roof.

Sarah Bost, a 54-year-old widow, was home alone. She told police that the perpetrator surprised her in the kitchen, put a knife to her throat, and demanded money. But there was none in her purse, and Bost said the man then dragged her to the stairs, ripped off her clothing and raped her. She would later say that she kept trying to look at the man’s face, but he kept pushing her head to the side and telling her “Don’t look at my face.” She said she fought back. A medical report would note that some of her fingernails were “nearly bent backwards.” 

About 10 minutes into the attack, Bost’s phone rang. The assailant fled. Bost ran to a neighbor’s house, called 911, and was taken to Cabarrus Memorial Hospital. Along with treating Bost for the bruises and cuts she received in the attack, Dr. Lance Monroe combed her pubic area for hair samples and did a vaginal swab, in accordance with the emergency room’s rape protocols. 

At the hospital, two officers with the Concord Police Department showed Bost a photo array of 13 Black men between the ages of 20 and 30 years old. Bost, who was white, did not make an identification. But in the officers’ report, she described her attacker as “a Black male, height, five foot, five to five foot nine, slender build, slim hips. Subject was plain spoken, used correct English and at times spoke very softly. No speech defect, accent or noticeable brogue evident. Subject was wearing a dark waist length leather jacket, blue jeans with a dark toboggan pulled over his head. Could possibly have been wearing gloves.” 

Her initial descriptions included no mention of any facial hair. She would later describe her attacker as being “light-skinned” or “yellow,” or “not your normal black person.” 

The Concord Police Department’s investigation of the crime scene turned up several pieces of evidence. They found burned out matches on the floor of a bedroom near the window ledge off the porch roof. They also found a shoe print on the banister, and investigators were able to lift an impression of it.

A few days after the attack, 20-year-old Ronnie Long became a person of interest in the investigation. At the time, Concord police knew that Long had been a suspect in an investigation of a similar rape and burglary in Washington D.C. in August 1975 after his Social Security card was found at the crime scene. (No charges were ever filed. The victim was unable to make an identification; Long’s attorneys would later say he had lost his wallet while visiting the city.)

Police arrested Long on April 29, 1976 and charged him with trespassing in the public park near his home, which was about a mile or so from Bost’s house. He came to the police station the next day to be fingerprinted and photographed. A report noted he wore a waist-length black leather jacket and black gloves, and that he kept his gloves on for most of his time at the station. The report said “He was able to do things as normal as someone without gloves. He was able to take out of his billfold his drivers [license].” 

At the time, Long worked as a cement mason and lived with his parents. His court date on the misdemeanor trespassing charge was May 10. 

Although Concord police had a photo of Long to show Bost, they decided on another route. They asked her to accompany them to the courthouse on May 10, telling Bost that the man who raped her might or might not be present. Bost sat in the second row, disguised with a red wig and sunglasses. 

When Long’s case came up an hour or so later, he walked around to the defense table, wearing a flowered leisure shirt and a medium-length brown leather jacket. Even before Long spoke, Bost notified the officers that Long was her attacker. Later, at the police station, Bost picked Long’s photo out of an array. He was the only person in the array wearing a leather jacket.

Long’s trespassing charge had been dismissed, but the police showed up at his house a few hours later and told him he needed to return to the station to clear up a few matters. When he arrived, they arrested him and charged him with rape and burglary. For the next 44 years, he would remain behind bars. When police searched Long’s family car in the station’s parking lot, they found a green toboggan and some gloves. Long said he had never seen the hat. They also found several matchbooks. 

Long’s trial in Cabarrus Superior Court began on September 27, 1976, after a summer of demonstrations and protests surrounding his arrest. Prior to the voir dire of potential jurors, the Cabarrus County sheriff and other members of law enforcement reviewed a list of potential jurors and disqualified people from being called for jury duty. The county kept no record of the reasons for disqualification. The 49-person jury pool contained just two Black residents, and an all-white jury was seated for the trial. (At the time, Cabarrus County was approximately 20 percent Black.)

Bost testified that she was sure Long was her attacker, but her testimony differed from her earlier description and with Long’s appearance. Now, she said that her attacker wore a mustache. And she also continued to state that her attacker was light-skinned, although Long was dark-skinned. 

Monroe testified about the severity of Bost’s injuries and his examination of the vaginal fluid. He was not asked and did not testify about any samples he collected. 

During the trial, the state sought to introduce testimony comparing the burnt matches found at the crime scene with the matchbooks found in the Long family car. Long’s attorneys fought to suppress this evidence. With the jury not present, Long’s attorneys sought more information about the testing done on the matches. First, Detective David Taylor said the officers had taken the matches from the car because they were similar to those found at Bost’s house. When asked if they matched, he responded, “I didn’t match them, no sir.” Judge William Z. Wood asked, “Then they were not matched?” Taylor said that was correct. “In other words,” asked Wood, “the matches you got out of the car do not match with those found at the crime scene?” Taylor said, “I can’t testify to that.” Finally, Wood asked Taylor if he had any information about comparing the matches, to which Taylor replied, “No sir, they did not match.”

But with the jury present, Taylor repeated his claim that the matches he found in the Long family car were “of a similar nature” to burned matches found in Bost’s house.

Detective Van Isenhour also testified about the investigation of the crime scene and the processing of evidence. He said that he had processed the shoe print on the banister and then also made a print of Long’s shoes for comparison. He testified that on May 11, 1976, he had brought this evidence to the SBI crime lab. He was asked if that evidence had ever left his possession or control. He replied that it hadn’t. He also said that Taylor had given him other evidence, including a leather jacket, the green hat, and the matches. He testified that the jacket had also never left his control. He made no mention of this evidence being tested.

Dennis Mooney, the SBI’s print expert, testified about the footprints. He told jurors that the print on the banister “could have been made” by Long’s shoe, but he was not sure and it was not a “positive identification.”

Long did not testify, but he presented a strong alibi for the night of April 25, which was a Sunday. Witnesses said he had attended a meeting to plan a class reunion until about 8 p.m. He then went home from around 8:30 to 10 p.m., before leaving for a party in Charlotte, about 25 miles away. Witnesses said that while he was at home, he talked on the phone with his mother, his two-year-old son and the boy’s mother. People who saw him at the party testified that he had no bruises or signs of a struggle on his body. They also agreed that he was wearing khakis, not jeans, at the party and the reunion meeting, because at least one witness said he was at both events and made fun of Long’s attire. In addition, the witnesses said they never saw Long wear a toboggan. He favored leather hats.

In closing arguments, the prosecutor said, “We have shown that Ms. Bost’s testimony is not only accurate, but totally consistent with every piece of physical evidence existent. Everything she says happened that is capable of being corroborated by physical evidence ... is so corroborated.”

When Long’s attorneys argued there was no physical evidence that connected Long to the attack, prosecutors responded by saying that the absence of this evidence showed the honesty of the police, because it would have been easy for officers to rub Long’s clothing against the banister and put paint on the garments.

Rioting broke out in Concord after the jury convicted Long of burglary and rape on October 1, 1976. At the time of Long’s arrest, a rape conviction carried a mandatory death penalty in North Carolina, but the U.S. Supreme Court had struck down the state’s overly broad death penalty on July 2, 1976. He was sentenced to life in prison. 

Long’s first appeal claimed that Bost’s pre-trial identification was “impermissibly suggestive” because of flawed practices by the Concord Police Department. He also said the police searched his car without consent and that the shoe print testimony should have been excluded. The North Carolina Supreme Court rejected his appeal in 1977. 

In 1986, Long filed a Motion for Appropriate Relief, again arguing that the car search was illegal. Long also claimed that the jury selection was improper and racially biased. In addition, he said his attorneys had been ineffective in failing to adequately challenge the jury’s composition. The North Carolina Supreme Court denied his motion in 1988. 

Long then moved his appeals to federal court, raising many of these same issues in his first petition for a writ of habeas corpus. That petition was denied in 1990. 

On April 20, 2005, the North Carolina Center for Actual Innocence filed a motion on Long’s behalf asking a superior court judge to order the SBI, the Cabarrus County District Attorney’s Office, and the Concord Police Department to turn over all records and evidence collected in the case. The court granted the motion on June 7, 2005, and also ordered the hospital to turn over any records.

At a hearing a week later, the SBI said the only evidence it knew about was the shoe print. The police said they had a master case file, but the district attorney said a review of that file found “nothing of evidentiary value.” 

The records released by the hospital included Monroe’s report, which showed a release form signed by Bost allowing the hospital to turn over pubic hair samples and a test tube of vaginal samples to the Concord Police Department. An officer signed the form, stating that he had received the evidence.

Although the district attorney had downplayed the value of the master file, it contained significant information about the investigation and the evidence collected. 

The files showed that Isenhour had created two evidentiary reports, one undated and the other dated May 12, 1976. The undated report said that Isenhour had only taken the shoe prints to the SBI, while the other evidence had been held for further “investigative uses.” The May 12 report told a different story, stating that 14 pieces of evidence – clothes from Bost and Long, hair samples, carpet samples, and paint chips – were taken to the crime lab.

Six months later, the SBI turned over the evidence reports to Long’s attorneys. 

The reports said that the hair found at the crime scene was different from Long’s and more reddish in color. It also said no hair consistent with Long’s was found in Bost’s clothing, and Long’s clothing showed no paint or carpet fibers similar to the samples from Bost’s house. In addition, the report said that four of the five matchbooks found in the car were of a different color than the burnt matches found at the crime scene. The fifth lacked sufficient identifying characteristics, but the analyst said the burnt matches “probably didn’t originate from this matchbook.” 

In addition, the report made clear that Isenhour had not testified truthfully. He said the only evidence he had taken to the SBI was the shoe print, and that it had never left his control. In fact, the SBI had kept all the evidence that Isenhour brought for eight days. 

These SBI reports and related documents became the basis of a second Motion for Appropriate Relief Long filed in 2008, claiming that he was entitled to a new trial because the state had failed to turn over exculpatory evidence to his attorneys. This requirement is based on the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1963 ruling in Brady v. Maryland. To win a new trial based on a Brady violation, a defendant must show that evidence was not disclosed, that it was favorable to the defendant, and that its disclosure had a reasonable probability of changing the verdict. 

During an evidentiary hearing on the motion, the prosecutor at Long’s trial said he had never seen the SBI reports, and that if he had, he would not have allowed Isenhour to testify in the manner that he did. 

But the state pushed back on Long’s Brady claims, arguing that the SBI reports that failed to connect him with the crime were inconclusive, rather than exculpatory, and were therefore immaterial. In addition, prosecutors noted that Long’s attorneys had plenty of opportunity to ask Monroe and the police officers about whether other tests had been performed. But they didn’t, and the state shouldn’t be penalized for a defense attorney’s trial strategy. 

During the hearing, James Fuller, one of Long’s trial attorneys, said that the reports would have played a powerful role in undercutting Bost’s testimony. 

“I got one test here that does not implicate you,” he said. “Okay. I’ve got a second test that does not implicate you. And now the jury is paying attention. And now I’ve got a third test and a fourth test, and pretty soon it creates a snowball effect that you’re not the defendant. And that’s why I believe every one of those tests was critical.”

On February 20, 2009, Judge Donald Bridges of Cabarrus County Superior Court denied Long’s Motion for Appropriate Relief. He said there was no proof that the police or the district attorney’s office had ever received Monroe’s report, and that the defense had failed to ask Monroe any questions about his examination of Bost. Bridges wrote that the SBI lab reports didn’t provide meaningful analysis, which meant the state’s failure to disclose wasn’t a Brady violation. 

Jurors, Bridges said, had a chance to examine the evidence, if not hear about the reports, and that not all of the undisclosed evidence was beneficial to Long. “The cumulative effect of any items with any value is so minimal that it would have had no impact on the outcome of the trial.” 

Long appealed this ruling to the N.C. Supreme Court, which has seven justices. Justice Barbara Jackson was elected in 2010, after oral arguments had been held, and she took no part in the decision released on February 4, 2011. The remaining six justices deadlocked, affirming the lower court’s decision by default. 

Long then began a second series of appeals through the federal courts. He filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina in 2012 that was dismissed because he had not obtained pre-filing authorization. 

After that dismissal, Long’s attorneys contacted the North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission, a state agency that investigates and makes recommendations on claims of innocence. As part of the commission’s initial review, it obtained 43 fingerprints – previously undisclosed, even after the 2005 order – that had been lifted from the crime scene by investigators with the Concord Police Department. Long’s fingerprints were excluded as contributors. Four of the prints were of sufficient quality to run through state and national databases. The Concord police said its comparison returned “no possible contributors,” but declined to state which databases they had queried. While Bost, who died in 2015, had testified that her attacker wore gloves, the burned matches suggested the attacker had taken them off at some point during the crime because it would be difficult to strike a match while wearing gloves. 

The vaginal samples collected by Monroe were never located. Because of a lack of DNA evidence in Long’s case, the Innocence Commission decided not to pursue further investigation.

Now represented by attorneys with Duke University’s Wrongful Convictions Clinic, Long filed a third petition for a writ of habeas corpus in 2016. This petition said that the fingerprints were new evidence of innocence, part of a legal strategy to allow Long to get around the limitations on successive appeals, although later federal court rulings said that Long needed first to litigate the fingerprint claim in state court. 

The petition argued that Bridges had erred in weighing the materiality of the state’s Brady violations and that Bost’s initial identification of Long was inherently flawed. His attorneys said there had been no need to bring her to the courthouse, where Bost waited nervously in disguise while a stream of Black men charged with crimes paraded past.

“Holding the procedure in a courtroom further enhanced the likelihood that the victim would select someone despite his possible innocence, because the courtroom itself conveys a message that the persons present were criminals,” the petition said. While Bost later selected Long from a photo array 20 minutes after the courtroom identification, Long’s attorneys said that selection was contaminated because Bost was “primed” to pick Long. 

Long’s petition was independently supported by dozens of attorneys, legal scholars and criminologists, whose brief provided context about the challenges of eyewitness identifications and the forensic evidence at the heart of the appeal.

The petition argued that Bridges’s ruling ran counter to federal law by trivializing the importance of the undisclosed evidence. Although this evidence didn’t directly exonerate Long, the petition said that it was exculpatory, and that it discredited the police investigation and impeached the state’s witnesses. Equally important, the petition said, it was the obligation of prosecutors to turn over this sort of evidence. The burden does not rest on defense attorneys to ask whether it existed. 

U.S. Magistrate Judge L. Patrick Auld recommended denying Long’s petition on May 22, 2018. While his findings acknowledged significant legal errors by Bridges in his interpretation of what constitutes exculpatory evidence, Auld agreed that the evidence wasn’t sufficiently material to have made a difference at trial. He said Bost’s identification was strong and decisive, and while her initial identification was “unorthodox,” Long’s attorneys couldn’t point to how it violated Long’s rights as a defendant. The district court adopted Auld’s recommendations. Long appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, where a three-judge panel heard arguments in March 2019.

By a 2-1 vote, the appellate court rejected Long’s appeal on January 8, 2020. In the majority opinion, written by Judge Julius Richardson and joined by Judge Paul Niemeyer, the court said that Bridges had not been unreasonable in how he viewed the materiality of the undisclosed evidence. The opinion said that most “jurors would consider the impeachment evidence peripheral.” The opinion also said that Congress had created a necessary high bar for defendants seeking relief in federal court, placing “great weight on the values of federalism and finality.”

Judge Stephanie Thacker wrote the dissent. She noted that Bost’s identification was neither as strong nor as consistent as previous courts or her colleagues had ruled. While the majority opinion said that Isenhour had offered an “incomplete picture of the testing he requested,” Thacker was more pointed. She wrote: “In short, he lied. Repeatedly.” (Isenhour pled guilty to possession of a stolen U.S. Treasury check in 1987 and was sentenced to four years in prison.)

Thacker criticized prosecutors for arguing during the years of appeals that Long’s attorneys should have tested the material themselves or asked the state’s witnesses whether items had been tested. 

“This argument is nonsensical and offensive. Such an argument completely turns the burden of proof in criminal cases on its head. Again, I am shocked as to the apparent need to educate the state that the burden of proof in criminal cases rests with the state, and remains with the state throughout the course of the trial.”

She closed by writing, “In this circumstance, Appellant must prevail. To hold otherwise would provide incentive for the state to lie, obfuscate, and withhold evidence for a long enough period of time that it can then simply rely on the need for finality. That, I cannot abide.”

Because of the split decision, Long petitioned the Fourth Circuit court for what is known as an en banc review of his case. (Less than 1 percent of these requests are granted.) On August 24, 2020, the judges, by a 9-6 vote, reversed the dismissal of Long’s petition. 

Now in the majority, Thacker wrote: “A man has been incarcerated for 44 years because, quite simply, the judicial system has failed him. Rather than overstepping our judicial role, as the dissent contends, today we remain faithful to our oath by “administer[ing] justice.” 

Judge Catherine Eagles of U.S. District Court granted Long’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus on August 27, 2020, and he was released from prison that day. The Cabarrus County District Attorney’s Office dismissed the charges on August 28. 

Long is now seeking a pardon of innocence from Gov. Roy Cooper, which would allow him to receive compensation for his wrongful conviction. Cooper served as attorney general from 2001-2017, and his office played a key role in representing the state during Long’s unsuccessful appeal of the order denying his 2008 Motion for Appropriate Relief. 

Long married in 2014, and he told CBS News that he wanted to spend time with his family and his son. He said he wanted to visit the graves of his parents, long dead. “I know my mother and father died with a broken heart. I’m gonna tell them now, when I visit the gravesite, ‘Your son is clear.’”


------------------------------------------------------------------

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD (FOR NOW!): "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
----------------------------------------------------------

Saturday, November 28, 2020

Jaythan Kendrick: Queens, New York: wrongful identification case: Major (Welcome) Development: He has spent 25 years - a quarter century - in prison trying to prove his innocence."...Exonerated at last, the Davis Vanguard (Reporter Ruby Chavez) reports..."Hours after the crime, the police locked in on the Army veteran, confirming him as the main suspect. Kendrick had no criminal record and the description given was based on a 10-year-old boy. There were two witnesses that the prosecution used primary evidence to convict Kendrick. The child from the third-floor apartment who saw the crime. The other was a man who claimed he had not seen the attacker, but later changed his statement to corroborate law enforcement’s theory that Kendrick was the criminal in this case. Kendrick’s Innocence Attorney, Susan Friedman, argued, “This is a textbook case of wrongful conviction exposing the worst flaws in our system—racial profiling, unduly suggestive identification procedures, and a lack of police accountability at very least.”


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: This Blog is interested in eye-witness identification issues because  wrongful identifications are at the heart of so many DNA-related exonerations in the USA and elsewhere - and because so much scientific research is being conducted with a goal to making the identification process more   transparent and reliable- and less subject to deliberate manipulation.  I have also reported far too many cases over the years - mainly cases lacking DNA evidence pointing to the suspect - where the police have rigged the identification process in order to make an identification inevitable. 
Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.
----------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "There was no physical evidence linking to Kendrick to the crime, yet he was convicted and sentenced to 25 years-to-life for murder and another 8 to 25 years for robbery. The 10-year-old witness was asked to identify the suspect in a lineup. The 10-year-old asked the police officer if the “real murderer” was going to be in the lineup. The detective did confirm that the suspect would be—this contributes to about 69 percent of misidentifications. There are more than 375 wrongful convictions overturned by post-conviction DNA evidence in the U.S, due to mistaken eyewitness identification. The adult witness had recanted the identification he made. He admitted “he never could identify the perpetrator’s face.” Friedman vouches for Kendrick by explaining, ”Mr. Kendrick has endured an unimaginable injustice for over 25 years. He has spent decades trying to right this wrong, but the system failed him at every step… thankfully, the new evidence in this case, including DNA, has provided overwhelming proof of Mr. Kendrick’s innocence.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "After 25 years in prison Jaythan  Kendrick is exonerated in Queens," by reporter Ruby Chavez, published by The Davis Vanguard on November 22, 2020. (Ruby Chavez is a graduating senior at California State University Sacramento majoring in Criminal Justice and minoring in Sociology. She is from Visalia, California.)

GIST: "Jaythan Kendrick has spent 25 years, a quarter century, in prison trying to prove his innocence.

But Thursday, November 19, 2020, Judge Joseph Zayas brought Kendrick’s fight to an end, vacating his conviction. Kendrick walked out of Queens County Supreme Court in NYC as a free man after 25 years.

Kendrick said, “I’m very, very happy today because I never thought this would happen, although I hope and wish that it would.”

Kendrick had been trying to prove his innocence and served a 25 year sentence in the process, noting, “I’ve just known one thing for the last 25 years: I did not commit this crime…Nobody really understands what it is to be in prison when you are innocent and you know you’re innocent and you’re behind that wall.”

Kendrick was exonerated for a 1995 murder conviction because of newly discovered witnesses and DNA evidence that supported his long-standing claim of innocence.

Kendrick began fighting for justice in November 1994. He was a postal worker on leave due to his disability, arrested for the murder of a 70-year-old woman, who was stabbed to death during a robbery at Ravenswood Houses. At the time, Kendrick was living at the same location.

Hours after the crime, the police locked in on the Army veteran, confirming him as the main suspect. Kendrick had no criminal record and the description given was based on a 10-year-old boy.

There were two witnesses that the prosecution used primary evidence to convict Kendrick. The child from the third-floor apartment who saw the crime. The other was a man who claimed he had not seen the attacker, but later changed his statement to corroborate law enforcement’s theory that Kendrick was the criminal in this case.

Kendrick’s Innocence Attorney, Susan Friedman, argued, “This is a textbook case of wrongful conviction exposing the worst flaws in our system—racial profiling, unduly suggestive identification procedures, and a lack of police accountability at very least.”

There was no physical evidence linking to Kendrick to the crime, yet he was convicted and sentenced to 25 years-to-life for murder and another 8 to 25 years for robbery.

The 10-year-old witness was asked to identify the suspect in a lineup. The 10-year-old asked the police officer if the “real murderer” was going to be in the lineup. The detective did confirm that the suspect would be—this contributes to about 69 percent of misidentifications.

There are more than 375 wrongful convictions overturned by post-conviction DNA evidence in the U.S, due to mistaken eyewitness identification.

The adult witness had recanted the identification he made. He admitted “he never could identify the perpetrator’s face.”

Friedman vouches for Kendrick by explaining, ”Mr. Kendrick has endured an unimaginable injustice for over 25 years. He has spent decades trying to right this wrong, but the system failed him at every step… thankfully, the new evidence in this case, including DNA, has provided overwhelming proof of Mr. Kendrick’s innocence.”

The Innocence Project and law firm WilmerHale collaborated with the Queens District Attorney’s Office in the reinvestigation of Kendrick’s case for the past eight months. This resulted in his exoneration on Thursday.

“A textbook example of how a terrible wrong can be made right,” said Judge Zayas.

Judge Zayas said, “In your case, the miscarriage of justice, in my view, is monumental. And it took way, way too long to discover—and you, sir, deserve better than that.”

Kendrick hopes “if anything can come from this, it’s that somebody needs to figure out how we can stop innocent people from going behind that wall,” he said. after serving 25 years as an innocent man.

The entire story can be read at:

https://www.davisvanguard.org/2020/11/after-25-years-in-prison-jaythan-kendrick-is-exonerated-in-queens/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD (FOR NOW!): "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
----------------------------------------------------------

Friday, November 27, 2020

Scott Austic: West Australia: Major Development: (White elephant case): He has been acquitted of murdering his pregnant lover Stacey Thorne after police allegedly planted evidence, ABC News reports: Key points: Stacey Thorne was murdered in 2007 while 22 weeks pregnant. Her lover Scott Austic had his initial guilty verdict overturned on appeal. His second trial heard police planted evidence against him."



Image result for "white elephant"

In the years since I started publishing this Blog I have become increasingly disturbed by the 'white elephant' in the room: Sheer, unadulterated, willful   misconduct in the criminal justice system - much  of it involving forensic evidence - committed by lab technicians,  pathologists, police officers, who plant incriminating objects such as weapons and drugs which are then submitted like lawful  exhibits for forensic analysis,  prosecutors and others.  Think Annie Dookhan; Think Sonia Farak; Think David Kofoed; Think Charles Smith; Think Ken Anderson; Think Gene Morrison. Think Michael West;   I therefore decided years ago to run this image of a white elephant at the top of every applicable post henceforth, to draw our reader's attention to   what I see as a major problem in all too many criminal justice system's - my own included.  Harold Levy; Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
"Reformers have for years recommended that all forensic labs be independent from law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies' and this is a key reform promoted by The Justice Project (2008). But fixing these problems is only half the answer' because half of the wrongful convictions attributed to misleading forensic evidence involved deliberate forensic fraud' evidence tampering' and/or perjury. 
From "The Elephant in the Crime Lab," by co-authored by Sheila Berry and Larry Ytuarte; Forensic Examiner; Spring, 2009;

-------------------------------------------

WARNING: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised that this article contains the name and images of people who have died.

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "However, at the retrial, unlike the initial case, the defence was based on allegations "a small but corrupt" group of police officers, who had decided early on Mr Austic was the culprit, planted crucial evidence against him.  David Edwardson QC said that included the Jim Beam can and the knife that was alleged to be the murder weapon. The defence called an expert, who testified the knife "miraculously" found by detectives in a paddock that already been thoroughly searched by State Emergency Service volunteers, was not long enough to have inflicted the deep wounds suffered by Ms Thorne. The defence also claimed the cigarette packet found on the table at Mr Austic's home did not appear in photographs and videos of the same scene taken by forensic police the day before."

--------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Scott Austic acquitted of murdering pregnant lover Stacey Thorne after police allegedly planted evidence," by reporter Joanne Menagh, published by ABC News on November 20, 2020.

GIST: After 13 years fighting to clear his name, most of that time in custody, WA man Scott Austic has been found not guilty — after a second trial — of murdering his pregnant lover.

Amid allegations that police in 2007 framed the 45-year-old, the Supreme Court jury deliberated for two hours before acquitting him of fatally stabbing 35-year-old Stacey Thorne.

Mr Austic's mother broke down sobbing when the verdict was delivered.

Ms Thorne was 22 weeks' pregnant with Mr Austic's child when she was stabbed 21 times at her Boddington home, about 120 kilometres south-east of Perth, before stumbling outside where she collapsed and died. 

Mr Austic, described in court as Ms Thorne's casual sexual partner, first stood trial in 2009 when he was found guilty of wilful murder and sentenced to life in jail with a 25-year minimum.

An appeal in 2010 was dismissed, but he was granted a rare second challenge to his conviction eight years later, after concerns were raised that key pieces of evidence, including the alleged murder weapon, were planted by police.

Last year, after that second appeal was heard, Mr Austic's conviction was overturned and a retrial ordered.

That took place over the past three weeks with prosecutor Justin Whalley SC outlining "11 strands of circumstantial evidence" that he claimed proved Mr Austic was Ms Thorne's killer.

)
  • The evidence included: 
  • Mr Austic "lying" to police in an interview about what he was wearing on the night of the stabbing, because CCTV from the local hotel showed him in different clothing
  • the discovery of a Jim Beam can with Mr Austic's DNA on a verge outside Ms Thorne's home
  • the discovery of a knife with Ms Thorne's blood on it in a paddock near Mr Austic's home
  • the finding of a bloodstained cigarette packet on a table at Mr Austic's house; and importantly
  • a motive, because Mr Austic did not want Ms Thorne to have his child.


The evidence about that alleged motive included a text message Mr Austic sent Ms Thorne 10 days before her death saying "I will do anything for you not to have it. Just please let me know. I'll do anything."

As he did at his first trial, Mr Austic denied having anything to do with Ms Thorne's death.

Police allegedly planted evidence:

However, at the retrial, unlike the initial case, the defence was based on allegations "a small but corrupt" group of police officers, who had decided early on Mr Austic was the culprit, planted crucial evidence against him. 

David Edwardson QC said that included the Jim Beam can and the knife that was alleged to be the murder weapon.

The defence called an expert, who testified the knife "miraculously" found by detectives in a paddock that already been thoroughly searched by State Emergency Service volunteers, was not long enough to have inflicted the deep wounds suffered by Ms Thorne.

The defence also claimed the cigarette packet found on the table at Mr Austic's home did not appear in photographs and videos of the same scene taken by forensic police the day before.

The police officers who found the items were called to testify at the trial, and categorically denied "introducing", or planting, the items in question.

In a closing address to the jury, Mr Whalley described the allegations as "fantasy land."

He suggested the bloodstained cigarette packet on the table at Mr Austic's could be seen in "zoomed in" versions of the original photographs taken by police.

He also raised the possibility that the forensic pathologist who did the post-mortem examination on Ms Thorne's body in 2007, who had since died, may have made "erroneous" measurements of the knife wounds she suffered.

But in the end, the jury of 12 men and women was not satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that Mr Austic murdered Ms Thorne, and delivered a unanimous verdict of not guilty.

Victim's family voice anger over outcome:

The courtroom was packed with members of Mr Austic and Ms Thorne's families.

The police officers who investigated the case — including those whose credibility was called into question — were in attendance.

Outside the court Ms Thorne's sister Hayley said the family was devastated by the verdict.

"To be feeling the way that we are feeling now, is like, I can't even feel my own body," Hayley Thorne said.

"It's not justice with a white jury, where's our justice? This is white privilege.


Ms Thorne said the family would be upset to see Mr Austic walking free.

"It hurts, it hurts. If we see him walking out of this courthouse it's going to kill us," she said.

Hayley Thorne's niece, Charmaine Williams, said the last 13 years had been heartbreaking for the family.

"Every time they have an appeal, it brings up the hurt for our family. Every time," she said.

"Stacey never died, you know?

"She is with us, but we're still feeling the pain every time they bring that up in our faces and it's not fair on our family.

"Where's the justice? There's no justice.""

-------------------------------------------------

The entire story can be read at:


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD (FOR NOW!): "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
----------------------------------------------------------