Friday, May 28, 2021

Kevin Cooper: Death Row: California: Major Development: (I will be following closely. HL); Gov. Gavin Newsom has ordered an independent investigation into his convictions in the stabbing deaths of four people, including two children, at a suburban Los Angeles home in 1983, to help him sort out conflicting DNA test results..."Newsom appointed a law firm to review court records and all facts and evidence in the case, including those that don’t appear in trial and appellate records, along with the results of DNA tests previously ordered by the governor. The order said the tests had been completed, but Cooper’s lawyers and the San Bernardino County district attorney’s office have “starkly different views” about whether they support Cooper’s claims.""

PASSAGE ONE OF THE DAY: "San Bernardino County prosecutors said previous DNA tests showed that Cooper, who had escaped from a prison two days before the slayings, was in the Ryens’ home and smoked cigarettes in the Ryens’ stolen station wagon, and that Cooper’s blood and the blood of at least one victim was on a T-shirt found by the side of a road leading away from the scene of the murders. Cooper claimed that investigators planted his blood on the T-shirt. He argued that trial evidence “was manufactured, mishandled, planted, tampered with, or otherwise tainted by law enforcement,” according to Newsom’s order. Cooper’s supporters have said other evidence, including untested hair samples, indicated there were multiple killers who were white or Hispanic. Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday ordered an independent investigation  into  the conviction of death row inmate Kevin Cooper, who says he was framed for the stabbing deaths of four people, including two children, at a suburban Los Angeles home in 1983."


-----------------------------------------------------


STORY:  Gov. Newsom orders independent investigation into death row inmate Kevin Cooper's murder conviction," reported by The Associated Press, published by KTLA  5.


GIST: Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday ordered an independent investigation into the conviction of death row inmate Kevin Cooper, who says he was framed for the stabbing deaths of four people, including two children, at a suburban Los Angeles home in 1983.


Cooper, 63, maintains he was framed and has been seeking gubernatorial clemency since 2016.


In his executive order, Newsom said he “takes no position” on Cooper’s guilt or innocence or whether to grant him clemency.


Newsom appointed a law firm to review court records and all facts and evidence in the case, including those that don’t appear in trial and appellate records, along with the results of DNA tests previously ordered by the governor.


The order said the tests had been completed, but Cooper’s lawyers and the San Bernardino County district attorney’s office have “starkly different views” about whether they support Cooper’s claims.

Cooper’s attorney, Norman Hile, called the order gratifying.


“We are confident that a thorough review will demonstrate that Kevin Cooper is innocent and should be released from prison,” he said.


Cooper was convicted of a 1983 attack in Chino Hills, east of Los Angeles. Doug and Peggy Ryen, their 10-year-old daughter, Jessica and 8-year-old son, Joshua, were attacked in their sleep along with an 11-year-old neighbor, Christopher Hughes, who was a houseguest. Investigators said they were stabbed more than 140 times with an ice pick, knife and hatchet.


Joshua’s throat was slashed, but he survived.


San Bernardino County prosecutors said previous DNA tests showed that Cooper, who had escaped from a prison two days before the slayings, was in the Ryens’ home and smoked cigarettes in the Ryens’ stolen station wagon, and that Cooper’s blood and the blood of at least one victim was on a T-shirt found by the side of a road leading away from the scene of the murders.


Cooper claimed that investigators planted his blood on the T-shirt.


He argued that trial evidence “was manufactured, mishandled, planted, tampered with, or otherwise tainted by law enforcement,” according to Newsom’s order.


Cooper’s supporters have said other evidence, including untested hair samples, indicated there were multiple killers who were white or Hispanic.


The case attracted national interest after New York Times’ columnist Nicholas Kristof, U.S. Sen. Kamala Harris of California and reality television star Kim Kardashian urged officials to allow re-testing.


In December 2018, then-Gov. Jerry Brown ordered DNA retesting for a T-shirt, towel, and a hatchet handle and sheath. Two months later, Newsom ordered additional DNA testing of hair samples collected from the victims’ hands and the crime scene, as well as two blood samples and a green button that investigators said linked Cooper to the crime and his attorney alleged was planted.


According to Newsom’s executive order, prosecutors argue that “overwhelming evidence” points to Cooper’s guilt and contend that his conviction was affirmed by state and federal appeals courts after conducting “exhaustive reviews” of the evidence and Cooper’s misconduct claims.


Messages seeking comment from the San Bernardino County district attorney’s office weren’t immediately returned after hours.


Cooper had been scheduled for execution in 2004. But a federal appellate court stayed the execution pending further review. Both the California and U.S. supreme courts rejected his appeals.


California hasn’t executed anyone since 2006, and Newsom has imposed a moratorium. There are more than 700 men and women on the nation’s largest death row.


https://ktla.com/news/california/gov-newsom-orders-independent-investigation-into-kevin-coopers-murder-conviction/


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project

Cristhian Bahena Rivera: Iowa:Bulletin: Verdict: The jury has found him guilty of murdering Molly Tibbetts, The Daily Beast (Reporter Pilar Melendez) reports..."After over seven hours of deliberation, jurors in Scott County Court found Bahena Rivera, a 26-year-old Mexican national who worked at a dairy farm, guilty of first-degree murder. Bahena Rivera remained emotionless as the verdict was read. He will now be held without bail until his July 15 sentencing in Montezuma."


GIST: "Cristhian Bahena Rivera, the Iowa farmworker accused of killing 20-year-old Mollie Tibbetts in 2018, has been convicted of murder.

After over seven hours of deliberation, jurors in Scott County Court found Bahena Rivera, a 26-year-old Mexican national who worked at a dairy farm, guilty of first-degree murder.

Bahena Rivera remained emotionless as the verdict was read. He will now be held without bail until his July 15 sentencing in Montezuma."

The entire story can be read at:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/cristian-bahena-rivera-found-guilty-of-murdering-mollie-tibbetts?utm_source=web_push

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

Cristhian Bahena Rivera: Iowa: On-going trial: (defence argued false 'confession' and failure to pursue alternative suspects): Jury gets case after hearing wildly contrasting theories of who killed Mollie Tibbetts, UK Yahoo News (Reporter Bill Hutchinson) reports, as jury begins its deliberations..."In closing arguments in the high-profile case, a prosecutor said the evidence "overwhelmingly" points to Cristhian Bahena Rivera, whose defense attorney countered with the claim that Bahena Rivera actually was a victim of two armed kidnappers and that one of them fatally stabbed Tibbetts."


PUBLISHERS NOTE: I have been following this case because of the ‘confession’ related issues - and the degree to which it has become politicized. As the trial is expected to be widely televised (the courtroom will be closed to the public) I will not be reporting on the proceedings on a daily basis. I will  only dip in if  warranted by  testimony,  evidence,  or issues relevant to this blog .

Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: "This Blog is interested in 'false confessions' because of the disturbing number of exonerations in the USA, Canada and multiple other jurisdictions throughout the world, where, in the absence of incriminating forensic evidence the conviction is based on self-incrimination – and because of the growing body of  scientific research showing how vulnerable suspects (especially young suspects)  are to widely used interrogation methods  such as  the notorious ‘Reid Technique.’ As  all too many of this Blog's post have shown, I also recognize that pressure for false confessions can take many forms, up to and including inducement. deception (read ‘outright lies’) physical violence,  and even physical and mental torture.

Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE ONE OF THE DAY: "(Prosecutor) Brown said "irrefutable evidence," including DNA, surveillance video footage and the defendant's earlier confession, points to the only person responsible for Tibbetts' slaying -- the one who led police to her body in a cornfield five weeks after she vanished while out for a jog in her hometown of Brooklyn, Iowa. "Her life was brutally taken by the defendant on July 18, 2018," Brown told the jury, showing a photo of a smiling Tibbetts on an overhead projector screen. "She was confronted by this man," Brown said, repeatedly pointing at Bahena Rivera. "She crossed paths with him and it ended her life."


-------------------------------------------------------------


PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY:  "(Defence lawyer) Frese told the jury that local law enforcement working on the Tibbetts' case had the "unlimited resources of the federal government," including the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. "Think about that. Now that is unprecedented," Frese said. Yet, Frese said, every lead investigators had chased in the first four weeks they searched for Tibbetts came up empty. "Imagine the pressure to close this case," Frese said. "Imagine the pressure to put this case to bed, because that's the context in which this arrest and this charge happened."  He said some of the investigation was "sloppy" and that "it really got sloppy when Cristhian Bahena Rivera got targeted." "Folks, what happened here was they closed a case. They didn't solve a case," Frese said. He said "we wholeheartedly disagree" with the prosecution's description of Bahena Rivera's statement to Romero as a confession. He said that Romero and other investigators forced a "false confession" from Bahena Rivera, who wanted to "get them out of his hair" after he worked a 12-hour day at a dairy and was interrogated for 11 hours. He noted that prosecutors never played the video during the trial of Bahena Rivera's confession to Romero and left it up to Romero, an inexperienced police officer who had never previously conducted an interview in a homicide case, to tell the jury what was said. He also said there was never a video of Bahena Rivera leading investigators to the body. Prosecutors said they didn't play the video in court because the interview was conducted in Spanish."


------------------------------------------------------------------


STORY: "Jury gets case after hearing conflicting claims of how Mollie Tibbetts was killed," by Reporter Bill Hutchinson, published by UK Yahoo News on May 27, 2021.


GIST: An Iowa jury began deliberating the fate of a Mexican national Thursday after hearing wildly contrasting theories of who killed Mollie Tibbetts, a University of Iowa student.


In closing arguments in the high-profile case, a prosecutor said the evidence "overwhelmingly" points to Cristhian Bahena Rivera, whose defense attorney countered with the claim that Bahena Rivera actually was a victim of two armed kidnappers and that one of them fatally stabbed Tibbetts.


After seven days of hearing evidence and listening to testimony about a murder that rocked the American Heartland, the Scott County jury received the case and began deliberations Thursday afternoon. The panel deliberated for a little over three hours before calling it a day and will reconvene on Friday.


The closing arguments came a day after Bahena Rivera, a 26-year-old undocumented immigrant, took the witness stand in his own defense and for the first time claimed that two unknown men wearing stocking masks and sweaters on July 18, 2018, abducted him from his trailer house, forced him to drive to where the 20-year-old Tibbetts was jogging, killed her and put her body in the trunk of his car.


"That's a figment of his imagination," prosecutor Scott Brown said of Bahena Rivera in his closing summation in the Davenport, Iowa, courtroom.


Brown said "irrefutable evidence," including DNA, surveillance video footage and the defendant's earlier confession, points to the only person responsible for Tibbetts' slaying -- the one who led police to her body in a cornfield five weeks after she vanished while out for a jog in her hometown of Brooklyn, Iowa.


"Her life was brutally taken by the defendant on July 18, 2018," Brown told the jury, showing a photo of a smiling Tibbetts on an overhead projector screen.

"She was confronted by this man," Brown said, repeatedly pointing at Bahena Rivera. "She crossed paths with him and it ended her life."


Defense attorney Chad Frese told the jury that under intense pressure to solve the case investigators "targeted" Rivera and "cherry-picked" facts that fit their theory without seriously considering the possibility of other suspects.

"There is serious doubt in this case," Frese said.


Frese accused the Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation of being "sloppy" in its probe, claiming its agents "cut corners" in a rush to make an arrest in a case that he said had become "a circus," attracting national media attention that included a reward for information on Tibbetts' whereabouts that ballooned to $400,000.


"They had four weeks of nothing, and then they picked this man," Frese said of his client. "Who better to pick than an undocumented immigrant, who doesn't speak the language, who has nobody here to speak of to help him out?"


Video that broke the case open;


Brown, of the Iowa Attorney General's Office, was allowed to present his summation first, telling the jury that Tibbetts, a sophomore at the University of Iowa studying child psychology, was home for the summer and working at a day-care center.

"She was a smart young woman. She's what you'd call a low-risk victim," he said, explaining that Tibbetts had no known enemies, didn't do drugs and was never the victim of domestic violence.


He said that after Tibbetts went missing, investigators worked tirelessly to find her. 


He said it wasn't until mid-August 2018 when detectives combing through surveillance video from a home in Brooklyn came across footage of Tibbetts jogging and noticed a black Chevrolet Malibu circling the same area.

"Within 30 seconds of Mollie passing through that video we see that car," Brown said. "This is the video that broke the case open."


He asked the jury to recall the testimony of Steve Kivi, a Poweshiek County Sheriff's investigator working on the Tibbetts' case, who said he spotted the black Malibu while driving home from work on Aug. 16, 2018, followed it and identified Bahena Rivera as the driver.


Brown said that when Kivi initially questioned Bahena Rivera, he claimed to have no knowledge of Tibbetts other than what he saw on the news and on missing-person posters.


Brown said it was the first of four different stories Bahena Rivera has now come up with, including his testimony on Wednesday of being abducted by masked men.


The prosecutor led the jury through statements Bahena Rivera made during an Aug. 20, 2018, interview with investigators, including a Spanish-speaking police officer, Pamela Romeo.


He said Bahena Rivera denied any involvement in Tibbetts' disappearance until Romero confronted him with still photos from the security video placing his car at an exact time and location Tibbetts was jogging.


Romero testified during the trial that Bahena Rivera implicated himself in Tibbetts death, allegedly confessing that he did see her that day, that he found her attractive and followed her. Romero claimed that Bahena Rivera allegedly said he stopped his car and began jogging alongside Tibbetts and that she threatened to call the police.

"What does that do to him? It makes him angry," Brown said. "He admits that he was angry. He admits that she slapped him at one point."


He alleged that anger is what motivated Bahena Rivera to stabbed Tibbetts nine to 12 times.


Brown said Bahena Rivera told Romero that he "blacked out" and didn't remember Tibbetts was in the trunk of his car until he looked down and saw her wireless earbud in his lap. In his testimony, Bahena Rivera admitted that he removed Tibbetts from his trunk and dumped her body in a cornfield.


Romero testified that after 11 hours of questioning, Bahena Rivera led investigators to the cornfield, where they found Tibbetts' badly decomposed body about 500 feet down a row of tall corn, covered in leaves.


Brown said Tibbetts' DNA was collected from the trunk of Bahena Rivera's car. He reminded the jurors of Bahena Rivera's alleged words to Romero after Tibbetts' body was located: "I brought you here, didn't I? So, that means that I did it. I don't remember how I did it."

"He's telling the officer that he did it. It's his confession. He's telling officers that he killed Mollie Tibbetts," Brown said.


He pleaded with the jury not to believe Bahena Rivera's new story of being kidnapped by Tibbetts' so-called real killers, saying Bahena Rivera has had ample opportunity to tell investigators.

"He didn't tell them that because it's not true," Brown said.


Brown added, "Justice in this case, ladies and gentlemen, is a verdict of murder in the first degree."


'Unlimited resources'

Frese, who's defending Bahena Rivera along with his wife, attorney Jennifer Frese, also began his closing argument by speaking about Tibbetts.


"This young woman was a spectacular young woman. She was destined to do great things. She was destined to become the change she wanted to see in the world," Frese told the jury. "She was just about to spread her wings and fly. We acknowledge that. We sympathize with her family."


He said the loss of Tibbetts has evoked a lot of emotion.


"That could be a problem when you're sitting as a juror, because when you're sitting as a juror emotions have no place in that deliberation room," Frese said. "Don't decide this case based upon emotions. It's not your job to right a wrong."


Frese told the jury that local law enforcement working on the Tibbetts' case had the "unlimited resources of the federal government," including the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security.


"Think about that. Now that is unprecedented," Frese said.

Yet, Frese said, every lead investigators had chased in the first four weeks they searched for Tibbetts came up empty.

"Imagine the pressure to close this case," Frese said. "Imagine the pressure to put this case to bed, because that's the context in which this arrest and this charge happened."


He said some of the investigation was "sloppy" and that "it really got sloppy when Cristhian Bahena Rivera got targeted."


"Folks, what happened here was they closed a case. They didn't solve a case," Frese said.


He said "we wholeheartedly disagree" with the prosecution's description of Bahena Rivera's statement to Romero as a confession. He said that Romero and other investigators forced a "false confession" from Bahena Rivera, who wanted to "get them out of his hair" after he worked a 12-hour day at a dairy and was interrogated for 11 hours.


He noted that prosecutors never played the video during the trial of Bahena Rivera's confession to Romero and left it up to Romero, an inexperienced police officer who had never previously conducted an interview in a homicide case, to tell the jury what was said. He also said there was never a video of Bahena Rivera leading investigators to the body.



Prosecutors said they didn't play the video in court because the interview was conducted in Spanish.


Frese said investigators also didn't seriously consider other suspects, including Tibbetts' boyfriend, Dalton Jack, who testified that Tibbetts had found out he was cheating on her and that she discussed breaking up with him a month before she was killed.


Prior to the start of opening statements, prosecutors called Nick Wilson, Jack's work supervisor, as a rebuttal witness. Wilson testified that on the day Tibbetts went missing Jack was with him working on a construction project in Dubuque, Iowa, about 140 miles from Brooklyn.


Brown said police investigators looked at six different people, including Jack, and cleared them all.


Frese asked the jury to consider Bahena Rivera's testimony that two men kidnapped him, forced him to drive to where Tibbetts was jogging and that one of them stabbed her to death. Bahena Rivera testified that the assailants told him they knew his former girlfriend, Iris Gamboa, the mother of his 5-year-old daughter, and threatened to harm her and the child if he told the police about them.


Frese asked the jury to acquit Bahena Rivera, saying his testimony "makes as much sense as the state's theory."


The entire story can be read at: 

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/jury-gets-case-hearing-contrasting-233800052.html

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;

-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

Ashley and Albert Debelbot: Georgia: On April 13, 2021, the charges of murdering their newly born infant, which had wrongfully kept them in prison since 2,008 were dismissed, with an apology from the prosecutor. The National Register of Exonerations entry, by Ken Otterbourg, posted earlier this week - listing 'false or misleading forensic evidence' as one of the causes, tells their story..."Mark Jones, the district attorney for the Chattahoochee Judicial Circuit, said in court that there was “mounting medical evidence that says the child was born this way.” He was not district attorney during the trial, and he apologized to the Debelbots “on behalf of Chattahoochee Judicial Circuit for not getting a fair trial.”


PASSAGE ONE OF THE DAY: "The state also introduced as a rebuttal witness a jailhouse informant and career criminal named Melvin Tarver, who was briefly in jail with Albert Debelbot. He testified that on the morning that the trial was to start, Debelbot told him that his wife might have harmed the infant. Tarver said: “He told me, said, ‘Man, I went out to get some dope’ . . . And when he came back he asked his wife where the baby was. And he said ‘She say she spanked her and put her to bed’ … And then he got up and he went in the room where the baby were (sic) and he picked the baby up and the baby wasn’t moving. So he asked her what she had done. And she said ‘Nothing. I just spanked her and put her to bed.’"

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY:  "Ashley Debelbot testified and said her daughter was in her bassinet next to the couple’s bed. She noticed the bump on McKenzy’s head when she checked on her in the middle of the night.  She testified that she didn’t know how the infant was harmed, but also said that she had had some labor issues, including high blood pressure. “You think high-blood pressure crushes a skull?” asked prosecutor Sadhana Dailey, “A severe hand blow crushes a skull. Tell us what else crushes a skull.” Moments later, Dailey said, “It’s either you or your husband. Which of you did it?” “I didn’t do it, and I don’t think my husband did it,” Ashley Debelbot replied.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE THREE  OF THE DAY: "The final defense witness was Dr. Daniel Sahlein, a neuroradiologist. He said there was evidence of blood clots in the infant’s brain, a condition known as dural sinus thrombosis. He said this creates an abnormally thin skull, and that a vaginal delivery can cause it to tear. He said these injuries often go unnoticed, even by experienced physicians. The infant’s initial post-birth exam was conducted by a second-year resident."

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENTRY: Ashley and Albert Debelbot, by Ken Ottrbourg, published by The National Registry of Exonerations on May 25, 2021.   

GIST: "On May 29, 2008, Ashley Debelbot gave birth to a baby girl named McKenzy Debelbot at Martin Army Hospital in Fort Benning, Georgia, near the city of Columbus.

Ashley, who was 23 years old, and her husband, 22-year-old Albert Debelbot, had met in the Army, when they were both stationed in South Korea. He had served in combat in Iraq, and Ashley had left the service after becoming pregnant. 

The family left the hospital on May 31, 2008, but quickly returned in the early morning of June 1, 2008, after they noticed a bump on the infant’s forehead. McKenzy died a few hours later.

Very quickly, the Columbus Police Department began investigating. A detective took Ashley back to the couple’s apartment to take photographs and then brought her to the police station to give a statement. Ashley told the officer she did not know what happened but said, “God may have done this to the baby.” 

Dr. Lora Darrisaw, a medical examiner with the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, performed an autopsy on June 2. Her report said there was significant bleeding in the infant’s brain associated with head trauma. She found fractures in the skull, suggesting it had been crushed, and swelling of the brain. 

Darrisaw said it was her opinion that the injuries were not caused by the birth itself, which she said had been without complications. She noted that the child had cried vigorously upon delivery. In addition, she said that the injuries were of such a traumatic nature that they would have been noticed at the hospital.

Darrisaw concluded that the cause of death was a homicide due to blunt force trauma. She also concluded that the injury had to have happened after the Debelbots brought their daughter home from the hospital. Albert and Ashley Debelbot were arrested that day and later charged with malice murder, felony murder, and child abuse.

The Debelbots were tried jointly in Muscogee County Superior Court in October 2009. Ashley Debelbot was represented by Sandy Callahan. Albert Debelbot was represented by Bill Mason. 

The two attorneys clashed over legal strategy. Callahan would later say that Mason, as a court-appointed attorney, had greater access to funds for expert witnesses, and Callahan wanted to use those monies to hire a forensic expert to examine the autopsy and other medical records. Mason said no. Callahan would later testify that Mason, who died in 2014, told him that he had seen Darrisaw testify before and “I see no need to question her credibility or her statements.” 

Undeterred, Callahan went out on his own and found an expert witness, Dr. John Plunkett, a forensic pathologist. Two weeks before trial, Plunkett said he was not available during that period. Callahan asked for a continuance. Mason opposed it. Judge Douglas Pullen denied it, and the trial began. 

Darrisaw was the state’s primary witness, and she offered the only evidence that a crime occurred. Darrisaw testified that the infant’s injuries had been received less than four hours before her death, during a time when the girl was with only her parents. “The baby after this injury is completely flaccid, unable to do anything and eventually dies very rapidly.” If such an injury had occurred at the hospital, Darrisaw said, the hospital staff would have noticed it. 

Darrisaw did testify that sections of her autopsy were inconsistent with trauma, noting that the right side of the infant’s brain was “soft and mushy” but the left side was “unremarkable.” She said that part of her conclusion that the cause of death was homicide was based on the lack of other explanations. 

During Callahan’s cross-examination, Darrisaw testified that she had seen an investigative report prepared by the Muscogee County Coroner’s Office before starting her autopsy. Neither the prosecution nor the defense had seen the document. The report offered no explanation for the injuries and, by default, advanced the idea of a crime. It also painted Albert Debelbot as hen-pecked and noted discrepancies in the couple’s statements to police, suggesting they might be hiding something. Callahan moved for a mistrial, arguing that the report had improperly influenced Darrisaw. Pullen denied the motion.

Mason had planned on using a “good-character” defense for Albert Debelbot, having him testify about his military service and the awards he had won while deployed overseas. But the tactic didn’t work. Prosecutors objected to the relevance of this testimony, and the judge sustained their objection. Later, Mason would ask Pullen to give the jurors a “good-character” instruction prior to deliberations. He declined, stating, “There has been no substantive evidence of good character in this case.”

The state also introduced as a rebuttal witness a jailhouse informant and career criminal named Melvin Tarver, who was briefly in jail with Albert Debelbot. He testified that on the morning that the trial was to start, Debelbot told him that his wife might have harmed the infant. 

Tarver said: “He told me, said, ‘Man, I went out to get some dope’ . . . And when he came back he asked his wife where the baby was. And he said ‘She say she spanked her and put her to bed’ … And then he got up and he went in the room where the baby were (sic) and he picked the baby up and the baby wasn’t moving. So he asked her what she had done. And she said ‘Nothing. I just spanked her and put her to bed.’”

Ashley Debelbot testified and said her daughter was in her bassinet next to the couple’s bed. She noticed the bump on McKenzy’s head when she checked on her in the middle of the night. 

She testified that she didn’t know how the infant was harmed, but also said that she had had some labor issues, including high blood pressure.

“You think high-blood pressure crushes a skull?” asked prosecutor Sadhana Dailey, “A severe hand blow crushes a skull. Tell us what else crushes a skull.” Moments later, Dailey said, “It’s either you or your husband. Which of you did it?”

“I didn’t do it, and I don’t think my husband did it,” Ashley Debelbot replied.

During closing arguments, Dailey pointed out that the Debelbots hadn’t presented any evidence contradicting the autopsy. 

“In seventeen months what has the defense brought you? What have they brought you into the court to refute our evidence? Nothing. Except the two people charged with killing their baby telling you, ‘Yeah, we don’t know what happened. We don’t know.’”

Dailey also noted that the Debelbots hadn’t filed a lawsuit against the hospital. “They haven’t done that. Why? Because they don’t have any evidence that the hospital did this or that these injuries were caused by the birthing process.”

Dailey then turned to the principle of reasonable doubt. “The judge will charge you on reasonable doubt. Just keep in mind, and he will charge you, reasonable doubt does not mean beyond all doubt. It does not mean to a mathematical certainty. Which means we don’t have to prove that ninety percent. You don’t have to be ninety percent sure. You don’t have to be eighty percent sure. You don’t have to be fifty-one percent sure. It does not mean to a mathematical certainty.”

Neither Callahan nor Mason objected to this argument. The jury convicted the Debelbots on October 29, 2009 of all three charges. They were later sentenced to life in prison, and the felony murder and abuse charges were vacated.

The Debelbots appealed. Albert Debelbot was now represented by the Wisconsin Innocence Project, which had developed an expertise in cases involving infant deaths, and the Office of the Public Defender in Chattahoochee County. Attorneys with the law firms of Robins Kaplan and Eversheds Sutherland, along with the Georgia Public Defenders Council, handled Ashley Debelbot’s appeal, coordinating with her husband’s team.

In 2015, the Debelbots moved for new trials, arguing ineffective assistance of counsel based largely on a failure to present medical evidence rebutting the state’s case. Their joint post-conviction hearing was held before Judge Arthur Smith III, who had taken over the case after Judge Pullen retired. 

Four medical experts testified about the infant’s death and said her injuries occurred either before or during her birth. Critically, these experts made their findings using CT scans of McKenzy’s brain, records that Ashley Debelbot claimed in a court filing that prosecutors had not given to Callahan. 

Plunkett, the forensic pathologist who was to testify at the trial, testified at the hearing that the autopsy photos showed pieces of McKenzy’s skull had rounded edges, indicating a healing process and an earlier wound. The fractures, he said, could not have been acute, because they didn’t fit together. The “soft and mushy” brain that Dr. Darrisaw testified about, Plunkett said, could not have happened in a single day just before death.

Dr. Julie Mack, a pediatric radiologist, testified that CT scans showed the infant had extensive brain loss. “[T]here’s no question the loss of brain occurred intrauterine. You can’t lose this amount of volume of brain after birth in three days. Can’t happen. Absolutely can’t happen.”

Dr. Peter Dehnel, a pediatrician, testified that he examined the autopsy and other medical records and noticed that there was a significant size difference between the infant’s right and left thighs and that this discrepancy carried through the girl’s body. He said it was likely caused by an “intrauterine vascular insult” that caused underdevelopment on the left side.

Dehnel said there were other signs that the infant’s fatal injury occurred well before discharge from the hospital. In particular, there was a sharp increase in the circumference of the infant’s head, and he said this abnormality, which was measured by the hospital staff, should have been investigated.

The final defense witness was Dr. Daniel Sahlein, a neuroradiologist. He said there was evidence of blood clots in the infant’s brain, a condition known as dural sinus thrombosis. He said this creates an abnormally thin skull, and that a vaginal delivery can cause it to tear. He said these injuries often go unnoticed, even by experienced physicians. The infant’s initial post-birth exam was conducted by a second-year resident.

Darrisaw, the state medical examiner, also testified at the hearing. She agreed with the defense witnesses that there was a size difference between the left and right side of the infant’s brain. She also backed off her trial testimony that suggested a quick death after the occurrence of the injuries. Instead of a few hours, she now placed the window for the injuries to between eight and 12 hours before death. 

Dr. Susan Palasis, a neuroradiologist, also testified for the state. She appeared to take issue with Darrisaw’s autopsy, stating that pathologists “have the final say and they’re not always a hundred percent accurate.”

She appeared to contradict Darrisaw in other areas. The “soft and mushy” part of McKenzy’s brain suggested an injury that occurred 24 hours or even longer before the child’s death. She also said the bleeding in the brain was either acute or subacute, indicating a time of injury up to seven to 10 days before death.

On December 12, 2017, Smith denied the motion for a new trial. His three-page order offered little in the way of explanation but said the evidence offered by the defendants failed to reach a threshold level of admissibility. Smith based his order on an interpretation of a Georgia Supreme Court ruling in Harper v. Georgia that excluded the testimony of a psychiatrist who had administered a so-called “truth serum” to a murder defendant. Moreover, issues of admissibility notwithstanding, Smith wrote that none of the medical evidence was credible. 

The Debelbots appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court, which on March 13, 2019, upheld the conviction but sent the case back to Muscogee County for further review. The justices said there was sufficient evidence to sustain the convictions, but they sharply criticized Smith’s order for its vagueness. 

The court’s ruling said: “Despite having qualified all four of the Debelbots’ expert witnesses as experts, however, the motion-for-new-trial court dismissed all their testimony in two separate ways. First, the court concluded in one sentence that all the Debelbots’ witnesses, expert and otherwise, were not credible. And second, the court concluded that all of the Debelbots’ medical evidence was inadmissible under our decision in Harper. As we explain further below, the sweeping nature of these conclusions precludes our meaningful review at this time, requiring that we vacate and remand for more precision.”

Two months later, on May 6, 2019, Smith again denied a motion for a new trial. His ruling said that “the verdict was not contrary to the evidence.” 

The Debelbots appealed, arguing that Smith had misinterpreted the Harperruling and that the mistakes by their trial attorneys violated their right to effective representation. 

On February 28, 2020, the Georgia Supreme Court vacated their convictions. It did not rule on whether their attorneys were ineffective for failing to present expert testimony but said they were ineffective in failing to object to Dailey’s misstatement of the law during closing arguments, when she told jurors that they didn’t have to be 51 percent certain to convict the couple.

The court wrote: “Accepting the unrebutted expert testimony that McKenzy died as a result of the criminal infliction of blunt force trauma, accepting the compelling evidence that Albert and Ashley had essentially equal opportunities — and no one else had any opportunity at all — to inflict that trauma, in the absence of evidence suggesting that the trauma was inflicted specifically by one or the other, and irrespective of whether Albert and Ashley colluded, the logical probability that either of them inflicted the fatal trauma would be 50 percent. A 50 percent probability of guilt does not, of course, authorize a jury to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Pullen’s jury instructions didn’t cure the “gross misstatement of the law,” the opinion said, because he may have inadvertently reinforced the problem when he told the jurors that there was no fixed number of certainty beyond a reasonable doubt. 

Following the court’s ruling, the Debelbots were released from prison in July 2020. On April 13, 2021, the charges were dismissed. 

Mark Jones, the district attorney for the Chattahoochee Judicial Circuit, said in court that there was “mounting medical evidence that says the child was born this way.” He was not district attorney during the trial, and he apologized to the Debelbots “on behalf of Chattahoochee Judicial Circuit for not getting a fair trial.”

Speaking to reporters after the charges were dismissed, Ashley Debelbot said, “I thought I would never hear that being said to me, ever. Once you’ve been incarcerated, the word ‘Sorry’ never comes up, at all. So, I was grateful. I was thankful that was even an option at that moment. I don’t hold any bitterness toward anybody. I’m just happy that me and my husband can now properly grieve for the daughter that we lost.""

The entire entry can be read at:

http://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/about.aspx

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;

-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

Thursday, May 27, 2021

Gilbert Lee Poole Jr: Michigan. Junk 'bite mark' evidence case: Major Development. As Associated Free Press reporter reports in the Detroit Free press, he has been exonerated after spending 32 years in prison..."Poole repeatedly denied any role. In 2015, the Michigan Court of Appeals ordered DNA testing of biological material gathered by police in 1988. There was evidence of type A blood at the scene, which didn't match Mejia's or Poole's blood. "Someone else fought with Robert Mejia in the woods that early morning and someone else killed him," Assistant Attorney General Robyn Frankel told the judge. Attorney General Dana Nessel said the county prosecutor's office, which handled the case in 1988-89, had no objection to vacating Poole's conviction. Bite mark evidence "has been widely debunked. It's not reliable anymore," Nessel said. "Then you have here not just that but the advent of very reliable types of testing such as DNA."


QUOTE OF THE DAY: "For years, Gilbert Poole Jr. had challenged his first-degree murder conviction with expertise from the Innocence Project at WMU-Cooley Law School.  An Oakland County judge dismissed the conviction at the request of the Michigan attorney general's office, clearing the way a few hours later for Poole's release from a prison in Jackson. "I spent decades learning, reading, studying law, but none of that was working for me," Poole, 56, said in court. "It wasn't until I surrendered to a higher power and God stepped in and sent me a band of angels to look past the rules and regulations and looked to see who was standing in the furnace. I was standing in the furnace. I didn't belong here."


----------------------------------------------------------------------


STORY: "Michigan man exonerated of fatal-stabbing after 32 years in prison," The Detroit Free Press (Reporter Ed White) reports. (Thanks to Dr. Michael Bowers of 'CSIDDS: Forensics and Law in Focus" for  bringing this story to our attention at the link below: "Locked up for more than three decades for murder, Gilbert Lee Poole, Jr. had been serving a life sentence since 1989 based largely on a form of forensic evidence once widely used but no longer deemed reliable: bite mark analysis. Now that DNA evidence has ruled him out as the killer, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel (D) hailed his exoneration as the debut act of her two-year-old Conviction Integrity Unit.")

https://csidds.com/2021/05/27/forensics-more-abfo-bitemarker-damage-gilbert-lee-poole-jr-exonerated-of-murder-after-three-decades-thename1966/


GIST: A man was exonerated Wednesday after 32 years in prison when authorities agreed that he was wrongly convicted of a fatal stabbing in suburban Detroit based on faulty evidence, including a bite mark on the victim.


For years, Gilbert Poole Jr. had challenged his first-degree murder conviction with expertise from the Innocence Project at WMU-Cooley Law School. 


An Oakland County judge dismissed the conviction at the request of the Michigan attorney general's office, clearing the way a few hours later for Poole's release from a prison in Jackson.

"I spent decades learning, reading, studying law, but none of that was working for me," Poole, 56, said in court. "It wasn't until I surrendered to a higher power and God stepped in and sent me a band of angels to look past the rules and regulations and looked to see who was standing in the furnace. I was standing in the furnace. I didn't belong here."


Poole repeatedly denied any role. In 2015, the Michigan Court of Appeals ordered DNA testing of biological material gathered by police in 1988. There was evidence of type A blood at the scene, which didn't match Mejia's or Poole's blood. 

"Someone else fought with Robert Mejia in the woods that early morning and someone else killed him," Assistant Attorney General Robyn Frankel told the judge.


Attorney General Dana Nessel said the county prosecutor's office, which handled the case in 1988-89, had no objection to vacating Poole's conviction.


Bite mark evidence "has been widely debunked. It's not reliable anymore," Nessel said. "Then you have here not just that but the advent of very reliable types of testing such as DNA."


Poole's lawyer, Marla Mitchell-Cichon of the law school's Innocence Project, said an exoneration seemed out of reach at times.


"But we are thrilled that the truth has finally been established," she said. 

Nessel said Poole will be eligible for a variety of post-prison services, including housing assistance. She didn't address whether he would qualify for $1.6 million under Michigan's wrongful conviction compensation program.


The law grants $50,000 for each year spent in prison if someone is exonerated, typically because of new evidence.


The entire story can be read at: 


https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2021/05/26/michigan-man-exonerated-fatal-

stabbing-32-years-prison-gilbert-poole/7448237002/


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;