Monday, July 9, 2018

Sex crime investigations: Northern Ireland: "Two important cases in the news" (The Gail Chambers case and the so-called claims of a Westminister paedophile ring, prompt Northern Ireland's 'News Letter' - the oldest English language general daily newspaper still in publication, having first been printed in 1737 - to opine that Ireland's police service should follow Scotland Yard's new policy by approaching rape reports with an open mind - rather than always believing the complainant..." Cressida Dick, the respected Metropolitan police commissioner, recently said that her officers will now approach rape reports with "an open mind" rather than always believed. After that development the News Letter asked the PSNI (Police Service of Northern Ireland) if it was planning to "rethink" the matter, like the Met, but it gave no indication that it was. It should."

PSNI should follow Met and keep open mind on abuse claims - Belfast Newsletter
EDITORIAL: "PSNI  (Police Service  of Northern Ireland) should follow Met and keep open mind on abuse claims" published by  the 'News Letter'  on July 4, 2018. (The News Letter is one of Northern Ireland's main daily newspapers, published Monday to Saturday. It is the oldest English language general daily newspaper still in publication, having first been printed in 1737.)

GIST: "There are two important court cases in the news. One is a proven false claim of sex assault, the other an as yet untried charges for perverting the course of justice. A wheelchair-bound woman, Gail Chambers, 51, from Lurgan, lied that she was raped. She has a history of such fabrications. The other case is in England and involves charges against a man whose identity is given only as 'Nick'. His claims about a Westminster paedophile ring were described by a police officer as "credible and true" and sparked a £2.5 million Operation Midland probe. Distinguished public figures, including Lord Brammall, the late Lord Brittan and the late Edward Heath, came under suspicion. Another target of the claims, the ex MP Harvey Proctor, said yesterday: "Justice must now be allowed to take its course."   (See  July 3, 2018 Telegraph story: "VIP paedophile accuser 'Nick' charged with perverting the course of justice and fraud," at the link positioned later on this page);  So it must, but whatever the verdict in that case, urgent questions already arise around the previous policy of the police to believe alleged victims. Have police and media been too quick to relay claims? In the case of Ms Chambers, there need to be clear reasons why she was not jailed. Her victim was spared the horror of a trial, but even so he has suffered lasting trauma. People who fabricate assault claims such as Chambers mot only try to destroy innocent people, but they undermine the many victims of real abuse. The judge took into consideration Chambers' "mental and physical difficulties". It is the only possible justification for avoiding jail. Examples such as the Chambers case mean all sex claims have to be treated with caution (as well as tact). Cressida Dick, the respected Metropolitan police commissioner, recently said that her officers will now approach rape reports with "an open mind" rather than always believed. After that development the News Letter asked the PSNI if it was planning to "rethink" the matter, like the Met, but it gave no indication that it was. It should."

The entire editorial can be found at:
https://www.newsletter.co.uk/news/opinion/psni-should-follow-met-and-keep-open-mind-on-abuse-claims-1-8556191


Telegraph story: "The man known as Nick, whose allegations sparked the VIP sex abuse scandal, was last night charged with inventing the claims and then fraudulently claiming £22,000 in compensation claims. The 50-year-old - whose true identity can still not be revealed for legal reasons - will appear in court in September, after the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) charged him with 12 counts of perverting the course of justice and one count of fraud. Prosecutors also allege that Nick created a fake witness called 'Fred' and sent police emails from a false account in an attempt to corroborate his claims. Nick had told detectives he had been raped and abused in the 1970s and 1980s by a number of powerful men, including the former Prime Minister Sir Edward Heath;  the former head of the Army, Lord Bramall; the former Home Secretary, Lord Brittan; former Tory MP, Harvey Proctor and the former Labour MP, Lord Janner. He even claimed that some members of the group had murdered three boys during sex games. But despite Scotland Yard - which described the allegations as credible and true - launching an 18-month, £2.5 million investigation with 31 full time detectives, no evidence to support any of the claims was ever found. Last night Mr Proctor said: "The decision of the CPS to prosecute Nick for perverting the course of justice and fraud is to be welcomed. Justice must now be allowed to take its course. I hope there will be no unnecessary delays in arranging the trial. The torture that was and is Operation Midland should end as soon as is possible." The decision to charge Nick will heap further embarrassment on the former Met Commissioner, Lord Hogan-Howe, who was heavily criticised for his handling of Operation Midland. The former Scotland Yard chief was forced to apologise to those who had been placed under investigation and the Met later paid £100,000 in compensation to Lord Bramall and Lady Brittan. A  report into the investigation by retired High Court judge, Sir Richard Henriques, identified 43 mistakes by the Metropolitan Police, including having misled the Chief Magistrate when applying for search warrants.   Northumbria Police were then asked to investigate Nick on suspicion of perverting the course of justice and fraud. Following a ten month police probe, a file of evidence was passed to prosecutors last September and prosecutors outlined their charges yesterday. The charges alleged that Nick sought to back up his story by setting up an encrypted email account and allegedly inventing a witness called 'Fred' to corroborate his claims. He is also accused of handing the police a penknife and two military epaulettes, claiming he had kept them from the time of the abuse. Nick allegedly took detectives on tours of properties around London where he said the appalling abuse had taken place. Among the public figures he claimed had abused him was the prolific paedophile, Jimmy Savile. In 2013 he made a successful claim to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA) for the sexual abuse he said he had suffered and was awarded £22,000. The allegations he made to police caused untold damage to the reputations of a string of public figures and Lord Brittan died before his name had been cleared. Lord Bramall, whose wife was suffering from dementia at the time, had his Hampshire home raided by 20 detectives, who spent hours going through their intimate personal possessions. His wife subsequently died with the cloud of suspicion still hanging over her husband's head. Mr Proctor, who was also subjected to a dawn raid by police, was forced to leave his job as private secretary to the Duke of Rutland and was left homeless when he lost his grace and favour apartment. At the moment Nick cannot be named due to other legal proceedings that are pending. Announcing the charging decision, Frank Ferguson, Head of Special Crime at the CPS, said: “The CPS has considered a file of evidence from Northumbria Police relating to allegations of perverting the course of justice and fraud by a 50-year-old man. “The police investigation provided evidence that the man had made a number of false allegations alleging multiple homicides and sexual abuse said to have been carried out in the 1970s and 1980s. “Following careful consideration we have concluded there is sufficient evidence to bring a number of criminal charges. “He has today been charged with 12 counts of perverting the course of justice and one count of fraud and will appear before Westminster Magistrates’ Court in due course." Criminal proceedings in relation to this matter are now active and it is extremely important there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings.”


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog;