GIST: "A federal appeals court has ruled that former Indiana State Trooper David Camm can sue for false arrest in the highly publicizerd murders of his wife and two children. Camm was twice convicted of murdering his family, only to have both convictions overturned. He was acquitted in a 2013 trial and later won a civil settlement of $450,000.  Camm told police that he had come home from playing basketball at a church and found his wife, Kimberly; son Bradley, 7; and daughter Jill, 5, shot in their Georgetown home. He said he found his wife, Kimberly, lying in a pool of blood on the garage floor. His son, Bradley, 7, and daughter Jill, 5, were also shot and in the back seat of Kimberly's Ford Bronco. Camm said he thought Bradley was still alive and pulled him from the vehicle to administer CPR, according to court documents. When that didn't work, he called Indiana State Police.   The court opinion relies only on Camm's version of events and says his original arrest was based on information from a "a plainly unqualified forensic assistant." The assistant, Robert Stites, was only qualified to take evidence photos but had analyzed blood spatter on Camm's clothing and told investigators Camm had been near his family when they were shot. Camm's lawyers argued he picked up the blood on his clothes as he reached for Bradley.  Furthermore, Camm alleged that Stites, Stites' boss, investigators and prosecutors "willfully or recklessly made false statements" about his involvement. Stites, court documents say, described the blood spatter on Camm's clothing to his boss over the phone.  What was once called malicious prosecution is now being called a Fourth Amendment violation, and Tuesday's opinion says officials fabricated evidence, suppressed the truth about Stites' qualifications and wrongly arrested Camm based on "unqualified observations." Stites later testified, court documents say, that he'd investigated homicides for the Army, Naval Intelligence and the FBI, which officials discovered to be false.  Sam Lockhart, Camm's uncle, said on Thursday that the family had no comment on the decision. Charles Boney is serving a 225-year sentence in the murders. He testified against Camm in the third trial. But jurors found his testimony unreliable."

The entire story can be read at:

https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/local/2019/09/10/david-camm-can-sue-false-arrest-judge-rules/2280080001/

-------------------------------------------------------

Read the entire decision at the link below: Thanks to one of my Blogger pals who sent this decision  to me with the following note: "David Cramm comes home to find his wife and two children killed. He's detained for 13 years before he's finally acquitted in a third trial. And this happens because the state lied about an "utterly unqualified" assistant pretending to be a blood-spatter analyst. (The extent of his scientific training was a single chemistry class, which he flunked.) And there's so, so much more. The state also lied about running a DNA test that could have exonerated the man. The second prosecutor was sanctioned for trying to cash in on a book deal. The first prosecutor ended up representing the real murderer."

http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2019/D09-10/C:18-1440:J:Sykes:aut:T:fnOp:N:2397044:S:0
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Read the fascinating  National Registry of Exonerations entry by Maurice Possley, a truly phenomenal observer of America's criminal justice system,  at the link below: 

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Prior to the trial, a sweatshirt found under the boy's body was submitted for DNA testing. The DNA was not Camm's. The prosecution claimed the profile was submitted to the FBI's DNA database without finding a match, although evidence later showed the profile had not been submitted to the FBI database at all.Prior to the second trial, the defense obtained further DNA testing and at the defense urging, the unidentified profile was submitted to the FBI database. The DNA profile from the sweatshirt was linked to a man named Charles Boney. When questioned by police, Boney admitted owning the sweatshirt but said he had donated it to the Salvation Army prior to the shootings. After police matched Boney to a palm print found on the family’s vehicle, Boney gave an assortment of accounts, but ultimately said he had gone to the home to sell a gun to Camm and was outside of the garage when Camm shot the victims. Due to the extensive publicity, the case was moved to Warrick County Superior Court and Camm was charged with three counts of murder and a count of conspiracy to commit murder. Boney was tried separately in 2005 and was convicted of three counts of murder and one count of conspiracy to commit murder. He was sentenced to 225 years in prison.  In 2006, at Camm’s second trial, the prosecution presented the blood spatter evidence, as well as three inmates who were housed in the same jail facility with Camm and who said that Camm had admitted the killings to them. Additionally, the prosecution presented Boney's testimony that he conspired with Camm to commit the murders and, for the first time, the prosecution suggested that Camm had molested his 5-year-old daughter. The prosecution contended that the daughter either had reported or was going to report the abuse to her mother, and that Camm killed the family to conceal the molestation. The prosecution presented autopsy evidence that found blunt force trauma to her genitals and a pathologist testified the injuries were consistent with molestation occurring within 24 hours of her death. The defense contended there was no evidence that Camm ever molested his daughter and contended that if there was evidence of molestation, it was caused by Boney, who was the sole perpetrator and had previously been convicted of assaulting women. But the defense evidence was barred by the trial judge. At the close of the prosecution’s case, the judge dismissed the conspiracy charge. On March 3, 2006, Camm was convicted again of three counts of murder. This time, he was sentenced to life in prison without parole."

--------------------------------------------------------------

THE ENTRY: "On the night of September 28, 2000, former Indiana state trooper, David Camm, called police and reported finding the bodies of his 35-year-old wife, Kim, and their two children, 7-year-old Brad and 5-year-old Jill, shot to death in the family’s garage in Georgetown, Indiana.

Camm, who had retired as a state trooper four months earlier to work in the basement waterproofing business with an uncle, said he had been playing basketball at a church and came home around 9 p.m. to find Kim outside the family vehicle on the floor of the garage. He said he looked in the car and found the children. He thought Brad might still be alive, so he reached over Jill and took out the boy and put him on the floor and began performing CPR. When the boy did not respond, Camm, 36, called the Sellersburg, Indiana State Police post.

On October 1, 2000, Camm was charged with three counts of murder primarily based on an analysis of the t-shirt he was wearing. A state forensic analyst said that some spatters of Jill’s blood were found on the shirt and were the result of high velocity blood spatter consistent with the spatter produced by shooting someone.

Due to the extensive media coverage of the case, jurors were selected from nearby Johnson County and brought to Floyd County Superior Court for the trial in January 2002.

The prosecution’s case was two-pronged—the t-shirt with the purported blood spatter, which was challenged by a defense expert, and extensive evidence about Camm’s personal life. Twelve women testified to a variety of relationships—some adulterous and some prolonged—with Camm. The prosecution contended that the motive was $750,000 in life insurance money.

Camm maintained that he had left the house to play basketball from 7 p.m. until 9:20 p.m. when he came home and found the victims. Police determined that the shootings took place sometime after 7:30 p.m. when Kim would have arrived home with the children after Brad’s swimming practice.

On March 17, 2002, the jury convicted Camm of three counts of murder. He was sentenced to 195 years in prison.

In August 2004, the Indiana Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and ordered a new trial. The court held that the introduction of the extramarital affairs had been unfairly prejudicial.

Prior to the trial, a sweatshirt found under the boy's body was submitted for DNA testing. The DNA was not Camm's. The prosecution claimed the profile was submitted to the FBI's DNA database without finding a match, although evidence later showed the profile had not been submitted to the FBI database at all.
Prior to the second trial, the defense obtained further DNA testing and at the defense urging, the unidentified profile was submitted to the FBI database. The DNA profile from the sweatshirt was linked to a man named Charles Boney.
When questioned by police, Boney admitted owning the sweatshirt but said he had donated it to the Salvation Army prior to the shootings. After police matched Boney to a palm print found on the family’s vehicle, Boney gave an assortment of accounts, but ultimately said he had gone to the home to sell a gun to Camm and was outside of the garage when Camm shot the victims.
Due to the extensive publicity, the case was moved to Warrick County Superior Court and Camm was charged with three counts of murder and a count of conspiracy to commit murder. Boney was tried separately in 2005 and was convicted of three counts of murder and one count of conspiracy to commit murder. He was sentenced to 225 years in prison.

In 2006, at Camm’s second trial, the prosecution presented the blood spatter evidence, as well as three inmates who were housed in the same jail facility with Camm and who said that Camm had admitted the killings to them.

Additionally, the prosecution presented Boney's testimony that he conspired with Camm to commit the murders and, for the first time, the prosecution suggested that Camm had molested his 5-year-old daughter. The prosecution contended that the daughter either had reported or was going to report the abuse to her mother, and that Camm killed the family to conceal the molestation. The prosecution presented autopsy evidence that found blunt force trauma to her genitals and a pathologist testified the injuries were consistent with molestation occurring within 24 hours of her death.

The defense contended there was no evidence that Camm ever molested his daughter and contended that if there was evidence of molestation, it was caused by Boney, who was the sole perpetrator and had previously been convicted of assaulting women. But the defense evidence was barred by the trial judge.
At the close of the prosecution’s case, the judge dismissed the conspiracy charge. On March 3, 2006, Camm was convicted again of three counts of murder. This time, he was sentenced to life in prison without parole.

In 2009, the Indiana Supreme Court reversed the convictions and sent the case back for a third trial. The Court held that Camm’s defense had been unfairly prejudiced by the introduction of the highly speculative evidence suggesting he had molested his daughter.
In the fall of 2013, Camm went on trial a third time with another change of venue—this time to Boone County Superior Court in Lebanon, Indiana.

"On the night of September 28, 2000, former Indiana state trooper, David Camm, called police and reported finding the bodies of his 35-year-old wife, Kim, and their two children, 7-year-old Brad and 5-year-old Jill, shot to death in the family’s garage in Georgetown, Indiana.

Camm, who had retired as a state trooper four months earlier to work in the basement waterproofing business with an uncle, said he had been playing basketball at a church and came home around 9 p.m. to find Kim outside the family vehicle on the floor of the garage. He said he looked in the car and found the children. He thought Brad might still be alive, so he reached over Jill and took out the boy and put him on the floor and began performing CPR. When the boy did not respond, Camm, 36, called the Sellersburg, Indiana State Police post.

On October 1, 2000, Camm was charged with three counts of murder primarily based on an analysis of the t-shirt he was wearing. A state forensic analyst said that some spatters of Jill’s blood were found on the shirt and were the result of high velocity blood spatter consistent with the spatter produced by shooting someone.

Due to the extensive media coverage of the case, jurors were selected from nearby Johnson County and brought to Floyd County Superior Court for the trial in January 2002.

The prosecution’s case was two-pronged—the t-shirt with the purported blood spatter, which was challenged by a defense expert, and extensive evidence about Camm’s personal life. Twelve women testified to a variety of relationships—some adulterous and some prolonged—with Camm. The prosecution contended that the motive was $750,000 in life insurance money.

Camm maintained that he had left the house to play basketball from 7 p.m. until 9:20 p.m. when he came home and found the victims. Police determined that the shootings took place sometime after 7:30 p.m. when Kim would have arrived home with the children after Brad’s swimming practice.

On March 17, 2002, the jury convicted Camm of three counts of murder. He was sentenced to 195 years in prison.

In August 2004, the Indiana Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and ordered a new trial. The court held that the introduction of the extramarital affairs had been unfairly prejudicial.

Prior to the trial, a sweatshirt found under the boy's body was submitted for DNA testing. The DNA was not Camm's. The prosecution claimed the profile was submitted to the FBI's DNA database without finding a match, although evidence later showed the profile had not been submitted to the FBI database at all.
Prior to the second trial, the defense obtained further DNA testing and at the defense urging, the unidentified profile was submitted to the FBI database. The DNA profile from the sweatshirt was linked to a man named Charles Boney.
When questioned by police, Boney admitted owning the sweatshirt but said he had donated it to the Salvation Army prior to the shootings. After police matched Boney to a palm print found on the family’s vehicle, Boney gave an assortment of accounts, but ultimately said he had gone to the home to sell a gun to Camm and was outside of the garage when Camm shot the victims.
Due to the extensive publicity, the case was moved to Warrick County Superior Court and Camm was charged with three counts of murder and a count of conspiracy to commit murder. Boney was tried separately in 2005 and was convicted of three counts of murder and one count of conspiracy to commit murder. He was sentenced to 225 years in prison.

In 2006, at Camm’s second trial, the prosecution presented the blood spatter evidence, as well as three inmates who were housed in the same jail facility with Camm and who said that Camm had admitted the killings to them.

Additionally, the prosecution presented Boney's testimony that he conspired with Camm to commit the murders and, for the first time, the prosecution suggested that Camm had molested his 5-year-old daughter. The prosecution contended that the daughter either had reported or was going to report the abuse to her mother, and that Camm killed the family to conceal the molestation. The prosecution presented autopsy evidence that found blunt force trauma to her genitals and a pathologist testified the injuries were consistent with molestation occurring within 24 hours of her death.

The defense contended there was no evidence that Camm ever molested his daughter and contended that if there was evidence of molestation, it was caused by Boney, who was the sole perpetrator and had previously been convicted of assaulting women. But the defense evidence was barred by the trial judge.
At the close of the prosecution’s case, the judge dismissed the conspiracy charge. On March 3, 2006, Camm was convicted again of three counts of murder. This time, he was sentenced to life in prison without parole.

In 2009, the Indiana Supreme Court reversed the convictions and sent the case back for a third trial. The Court held that Camm’s defense had been unfairly prejudiced by the introduction of the highly speculative evidence suggesting he had molested his daughter.

In the fall of 2013, Camm went on trial a third time with another change of venue—this time to Boone County Superior Court in Lebanon, Indiana. Prior to the trial, the judge barred any testimony relating to molestation. Boney testified for the prosecution that he brought an untraceable gun to the Camm home on the night of the murders and that he was outside the garage when Camm killed his wife and children.

The defense presented a Dutch forensic expert who testified that his analysis of the sweatshirt found at the scene showed the presence of Kim Camm’s DNA, suggesting Kim had struggled with Boney. The expert said he also found Boney’s DNA under one of Kim’s fingernails.

On October 24, 2013, the jury acquitted Camm and he was released. In 2014, Camm filed a federal civil rights lawsuit seeking compensation. In 2016, Floyd County settled for $450,000. The case against the remaining defendants was dismissed in January 2018."
-------------------------------------------------------------

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;