Wednesday, February 5, 2020

BULLETIN: Martin Tankleff: False confession case: (A truly inspirational story: HL): Exonerated in his parents murder - after serving 17 years in prison before his conviction was thrown out - he is about to be sworn in as a lawyer, Newsday (Reporter Nicole Fuller) reports.



PUBLISHER'S NOTE: This Blog is interested in false confessions because of the disturbing number of exonerations in the USA, Canada and multiple other jurisdictions throughout the world, where, in the absence of incriminating forensic evidence the conviction is based on self-incrimination – and because of the growing body of  scientific research showing how vulnerable suspects are to widely used interrogation methods  such as  the notorious ‘Reid Technique.’ As  all too many of this Blog's post have shown, I also recognize that pressure for false confessions can take many forms, up to and including physical violence, even physical and mental torture.
 
Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog:
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "In 2018, Suffolk County awarded Tankleff $10 million in a settlement following a 2009 federal court lawsuit against the county, which claimed detectives who investigated the murders fabricated a false confession and suppressed exculpatory evidence. Tankleff also received a $3.375 million settlement from New York State under the Unjust Imprisonment and Conviction Act."

---------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Martin Tankleff, exonerated in his parents' murder, to be sworn in as lawyer," by reporter Nicole Fuller, published by Newsday on February 4, 2020. (Nicole Fuller is Newsday's senior criminal justice reporter.)



GIST: "Martin Tankleff, who served over 17 years in prison before his conviction for killing his parents was thrown out, is scheduled to be admitted to the New York State bar Wednesday --  becoming one of a handful of exonerees practicing law in the state. "The first time my name will be read on the record somewhere, it will be huge," Tankleff, 48, said in an interview Tuesday ahead of the swearing-in ceremony in Brooklyn on Wednesday. "I'll be able to  represent people -- literally say, 'Martin Tankleff for the defense' or 'Martin Tankleff for the plaintiff' -- being able to advocate for people in a much different way." Following his release from prison 13 years ago, Tankleff graduated from Touro Law Center in Central Islip in 2014 and in recent years has taught at both Touro and Georgetown University and worked as a paralegal at a Manhattan law firm. After he passed the bar exam in 2017, he faced a long approval process for admittance to the state bar, said attorney Barry Scheck, co-founder of the Innocence Project, who along with former Judge Barry Kamins, represented Tankleff pro bono during the bar admissions process. "He's already done extraordinary things," said Scheck, referencing Tankleff's work with Georgetown students to exonerate a wrongly accused defendant from Buffalo. "He has continued to be a very active spokesperson, a mainstay in the innocence movement. A lot of exonerees have been active in trying to reform the system and Marty has always been outstanding in that way." Tankleff was sentenced to 50 years to life in prison in 1990 for bludgeoning and stabbing his parents, Arlene and Seymour Tankleff, to death in their Belle Terre home in 1988. He was 17 at the time of his parents' deaths. Tankleff's conviction was based largely on a confession that Tankleff repudiated almost immediately and refused to sign.
In 2007, an appellate court overturned his conviction, ruling that Suffolk County Court Judge Stephen Braslow did not properly consider new evidence introduced by Tankleff’s legal team, and he was released. That evidence suggested that Seymour Tankleff’s business partner, Jerry Steuerman, hired a pair of hit men to kill the Tankleffs. Steuerman has always denied any involvement in the murders. Steuerman owed Seymour Tankleff $500,000 and fled to California after the murders under an assumed name after faking his death. In 2018, Suffolk County awarded Tankleff $10 million in a settlement following a 2009 federal court lawsuit against the county, which claimed detectives who investigated the murders fabricated a false confession and suppressed exculpatory evidence. Tankleff also received a $3.375 million settlement from New York State under the Unjust Imprisonment and Conviction Act. Tankleff said the bar admittance process was "torturous," but he got through it with his attorneys' help and the love and support of his wife Laurie and their daughter Kourtney. "For me, I think the reality won't actually hit until I sign the book," said Tankleff, referring to the custom of newly minted attorneys signing the attorney roll book. "I've been through so much in my life, the signing of the book really is that final culmination that you're admitted to the bar." In a text message, his former attorney Bruce Barket, of Mineola, said: "Mr. Tankleff's work and accomplishments are remarkable. From wrongly convicted to prison to exonerated to law school and now admission and helping others. It's an honor to know him." Tankleff said once he's an official lawyer, he plans to stay at Metcalf & Metcalf, P.C, the Manhattan law firm where he's worked since 2018. The parts of the law he's most interested in practicing? Criminal and civil rights law, he said, and of course, he wants to assist defendants with wrongful convictions. "Part of me wants to help educate the legal system to the pitfalls, to prevent wrongful convictions -- what things to be wary of and what to look for." John McAlary, the executive director of the New York State Board of Law Examiners, which adminsters the bar exam and vets applicants for admission to practice law in the state, did not respond to a message seeking comment Tuesday on Tankleff's admission."

The entire story can be read at:
https://www.newsday.com/long-island/suffolk/martin-tankleff-lawyer-conviction-overturned-1.41429938

----------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: (National Registry of Exonerations): "Tankleff called police and after the ambulance had departed, police took him in for questioning because, with blood on his hands, they suspected he was involved. The interrogation went on for hours, although Tankleff told the police that his father’s partner in a bagel store owed his father $500,000, had threatened his parents with violence and was the last person to leave the home the night before. At one point, detective K. James McCready told Tankleff that his father had awakened at the hospital and identified him as his mother’s attacker. At that point, Tankleff said his father never lied and that perhaps he had blacked out and killed his mother. He provided a possible, though inaccurate narrative of how it happened and was asked to sign the statement. Tankleff, however, refused to sign it and disavowed any involvement in the crime."
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Read National Registry of Exonerations entry by Maurice Possley at the link below:  About 6 a.m., on September 7, 1988, 17-year-old high school senior Martin Tankleff awoke to discover his parents had been attacked in their bed in their home on Long Island, New York. His mother, Arlene, was stabbed to death, but his father, Seymour, though severely beaten, was still alive.
Tankleff called police and after the ambulance had departed, police took him in for questioning because, with blood on his hands, they suspected he was involved.
The interrogation went on for hours, although Tankleff told the police that his father’s partner in a bagel store owed his father $500,000, had threatened his parents with violence and was the last person to leave the home the night before.
At one point, detective K. James McCready told Tankleff that his father had awakened at the hospital and identified him as his mother’s attacker. At that point, Tankleff said his father never lied and that perhaps he had blacked out and killed his mother.
He provided a possible, though inaccurate narrative of how it happened and was asked to sign the statement. Tankleff, however, refused to sign it and disavowed any involvement in the crime.
He was charged with killing his mother and attempting to kill his father—a charge that was changed to murder after his father died on October 6, 1988 without ever regaining consciousness.
By then, Seymour Tankleff’s business partner, Jerry Steuerman, had vanished.
In late spring 1990, Tankleff went on trial in Suffolk County District Court. Among the witnesses was Steuerman, who had been in the Tankleff home for a poker game and was the last to leave. After the crime, Steuerman withdrew money from a joint bank account with Tankleff, fled to California, adopted an alias and shaved his beard.
Eventually, Steuerman resurfaced and was called as a witness at the trial. He said that he had fled out of fear that he would be blamed. He testified, “I did not do this.”
The cornerstone of the prosecution case was Tankleff’s unsigned confession. On June 28, 1990, after a 13-week trial, Tankleff was convicted of both murders.
On October 23, 1990, he was sentenced to 50 years to life in prison.
The conviction was upheld by the Appellate Division New York State Supreme Court in December 1993 by a vote of 3 to 2. The dissenting judges said there was insufficient evidence to convict him.
Over the next 10 years, Tankleff obtained pro bono legal assistance and numerous appeals were filed in state and federal courts. Although he continued to lose, attorneys and investigators began assembling what they hoped would be a critical mass of evidence of his innocence.
In 2003, a private investigator tracked down Glenn Harris, who gave a sworn statement that he had driven two hit men, Joe Creedon and Peter Kent, to and from the Tankleff residence on the night of the crime. Harris said he did so at the behest of Steuerman. At a hearing in July 2004, Suffolk County Judge Stephen Braslow declined to grant Harris immunity from prosecution and so Harris invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination and his testimony was not heard.
Over the next two years, more evidence was unearthed that began to corroborate Harris’s account.
Another witness, Karlene Kovacs, said Creedon told her that he was involved. She said Creedon told her that he and another man hid in the bushes behind the Tankleff house, ran to avoid being caught and had to get rid of their bloody clothes.
Meanwhile, evidence surfaced that McCready, the detective who obtained the alleged confession from Tankleff, had come under investigation for perjury.  Further, the lead prosecutor in the case against Tankleff had a business relationship with Steuerman prior to the murders.
Eventually, the defense assembled more than 20 witnesses to paint a picture of that Steuerman orchestrated the murders.
One piece of new evidence was a bloody imprint on a sheet in Arlene Tankleff’s bedroom that appeared to be from a knife. No matching knife was found, suggesting that someone other than Martin Tankleff had taken it.
In addition, two witnesses  came forward to say that McCready had been seen together with Steuerman prior to the murders. Other evidence showed that McCready, had violated police department rules by showing crime-scene photographs to unauthorized persons.
But on March 17, 2006, another petition for a new trial was denied following a hearing.
On December 18, 2007, the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court in Brooklyn unanimously overturned the convictions, ruling that if a jury heard the new evidence, it would probably acquit Tankleff.
Tankleff was released on December 27, 2007. The charges were dismissed on July 22, 2008.
In March 2009, Tankleff filed a federal civil wrongful conviction lawsuit against the State of New York and the Suffolk County police department and several officers, including McCready. In January 2014, the State of New York settled for $3.375 million. in 2018, Suffolk County settled for $10 million.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
  
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices.""
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
-----------------------------------------------------------------