Tuesday, December 22, 2020

Termaine Hicks: Pennsylvania: Anatomy of a cover-up: Innocence Project statement on his recent release and exoneration after serving 19 years behind bars for a crime he did not commit..."When they realised they shot the wrong person and that Termaine was unarmed, they embarked on a cover-up."

QUOTE OF THE DAY: "This case is yet another example of systemic police abuse that is pervasive in the criminal legal system and persists because of institutional protections and a lack of accountability,” said Vanessa Potkin, Termaine’s Innocence Project lawyer. Officers involved in this case had extensive internal affairs files with numerous allegations of lying, planting evidence, excessive force, and substantiated complaints filed by civilians. And if these records had been publicly available, Termaine might not have had to endure so many years of injustice or been wrongly convicted at all. Pennsylvania is currently one of 21 states where police disciplinary records are kept confidential."

------------------------------------------------------------------ 

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "At trial, police falsely testified that they shot Termaine because he pointed a gun at them while lunging toward them. However, Termaine was unarmed, and new forensic evidence has concluded that Termaine was shot from behind — meaning he wasn’t coming toward the officers when he was shot. The gun police claimed that they recovered from Termaine’s jacket pocket was actually registered as the off-duty weapon of a uniformed Philadelphia police officer. And Termaine’s clothes from the scene were kept as evidence and did not include a hoodie. Officers saw surveillance footage the day of the crime that confirmed the assailant was wearing a hooded sweatshirt, which should have excluded Termaine as a suspect, but they did not make the tape or its contents available to the defense until after trial. Based on officers’ false testimony, Termaine was convicted of rape, aggravated assault, possessing an instrument of crime, and terroristic threats. He was sentenced to up to 25 years in prison."

---------------------------------------------------------------------

RELEASE: "Termaine Hicks was exonerated after 19 years of wrongful incarceration," published by The Innocence Project on December 18, 2020.

GIST:  "Termaine endured an outrageous injustice for nearly two decades.

In the early morning of Nov. 27, 2001, he was walking home in South Philadelphia when he heard a woman screaming and went to help. He was about to call 911 when the police arrived in response to earlier calls from neighbors who saw the assailant drag the victim into an alley from their windows. One described the assailant as wearing a grey hooded sweatshirt. 

But when the police arrived, they completely misread the situation, erroneously assumed Termaine was the assailant, and shot him three times in the back. 

When they realized they’d shot the wrong person and that Termaine was unarmed, they embarked on a cover-up. 


At trial, police falsely testified that they shot Termaine because he pointed a gun at them while lunging toward them. However, Termaine was unarmed, and new forensic evidence has concluded that Termaine was shot from behind — meaning he wasn’t coming toward the officers when he was shot. The gun police claimed that they recovered from Termaine’s jacket pocket was actually registered as the off-duty weapon of a uniformed Philadelphia police officer. And Termaine’s clothes from the scene were kept as evidence and did not include a hoodie. Officers saw surveillance footage the day of the crime that confirmed the assailant was wearing a hooded sweatshirt, which should have excluded Termaine as a suspect, but they did not make the tape or its contents available to the defense until after trial.

Based on officers’ false testimony, Termaine was convicted of rape, aggravated assault, possessing an instrument of crime, and terroristic threats. He was sentenced to up to 25 years in prison.

“This case is yet another example of systemic police abuse that is pervasive in the criminal legal system and persists because of institutional protections and a lack of accountability,” said Vanessa Potkin, Termaine’s Innocence Project lawyer. Officers involved in this case had extensive internal affairs files with numerous allegations of lying, planting evidence, excessive force, and substantiated complaints filed by civilians. And if these records had been publicly available, Termaine might not have had to endure so many years of injustice or been wrongly convicted at all. Pennsylvania is currently one of 21 states where police disciplinary records are kept confidential. 

Here at the Innocence Project, we’re working every day to pass laws that address police misconduct which far too often leads to wrongful convictions. "

The entire release can be read at:

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgxwKjxBlZLghNGKnWlJvwRrPvtdB

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD (FOR NOW!): "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------