Monday, January 24, 2022

Kevin Harper Jr: California: Shaken baby syndrome/Abusive head trauma case: Major (Welcome) Development: He has been ordered to be released after 13 years of wrongful incarceration for the tragic death of his 6-month-old son based solely on medical evidence that has been significantly criticized within the medical community as unreliable, The Northern California Innocence Project reports..."Harper’s son, J.H. was born 13 weeks prematurely and suffered from numerous medical conditions as a result. After an extended stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), J.H. came home and continued to suffer from many medical issues with frequent visits to the doctor and some to the emergency room. In the early morning hours of August 21, 2008, while in Harper’s care, J.H. had a medical emergency and stopped breathing. Unable to connect with a 9-1-1 operator, Harper rushed his son to the emergency room where hospital staff was able to restart J.H. ’s heart. But tragically, J.H. was deprived of oxygen for too long and suffered irreparable brain damage. J.H. died on August 23, 2008. Based solely on the evidence of a bleed under the thin membrane surrounding his brain (subdural hematoma), brain swelling (edema), and bleeding in his eyes (retinal hemorrhaging) - findings known as the “triad” - the doctors diagnosed J.H. with “shaken baby syndrome” SBS (later renamed Abusive Head Trauma or AHT), which meant they suspected that J.H. had been abused, although they could not identify any external injuries pointing to abuse. Despite evidence that Harper was always gentle and patient with J.H., and someone who could easily calm his son, Harper was prosecuted and convicted of causing his son’s death and sentenced to 25 to life in prison. At his sentencing, Harper said, “I understand that I have been convicted of the charges before me, but still believe in my heart that I did nothing wrong. I loved my son and being a father very much. Our loss has hurt me...in a way that I can’t begin to explain. And I know if there was anything that I could have done or said that could have helped save my son’s life, regardless of how the outcome would have affected me, I would have done it.” The work of NCIP and of innocence organizations throughout the country has exposed the leading causes of wrongful convictions, including the misuse of an SBS/AHT diagnosis to prove abuse."


QUOTE OF THE DAY: "Melissa O’Connell, NCIP’s attorney on this case, said, “Kevin and [J.H.]’s mother and their families suffered unimaginable loss and pain. Kevin’s wrongful conviction added another level of tragedy. This case was medically complex and there is concrete evidence that the SBS/AHT diagnosis is unreliable, but when suspected, alternative causes of a baby’s death are often missed or ignored. Tragically, that appears to be what happened here.”


------------------------------------------------------


PASSAGE ONE OF THE DAY: "Through the thorough investigation of this case, NCIP, Cooley, and Latham & Watkins learned from a medical expert who reviewed J.H.’s medical records that there were alternative medical explanations for J.H.’s death, none of which were presented at Harper’s trial because a radiologist, an expert in the review of radiological scans which provided the most critical medical evidence in this case, never testified."


-------------------------------------------------------


PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "The SBS/AHT diagnosis started as a hypothesis by Dr. Norman Guthkelch in the early 1970s as an inquiry for doctors to consider when a child presented with no external injuries but suffered bleeding in their brain. Decades later, Dr. Guthkelch expressed concern that his profession was using a hypothesis as a legal basis for incarcerating parents, emphasizing that “getting it right” required doctors to distinguish between hypotheses and knowledge. Dr. Guthkelch explained that “SBS and AHT are hypotheses that have been advanced to explain findings that are not yet fully understood.” NCIP is undertaking a project to identify cases in which parents and caretakers, otherwise described as good and loving, have been wrongfully convicted based on false or unreliable expert testimony."


---------------------------------------------------------


RELEASE: "Team Secures Release of Wrongly Convicted Father in Infant Son’s Death," published by The Northern California Innocence Project on January 20, 2022.



GIST:  'SANTA CLARA, Calif., January 20, 2022 – Kevin Harper Jr. was ordered to be released this week after 13 years of wrongful incarceration for the tragic death of his 6-month-old son based solely on medical evidence that has been significantly criticized within the medical community as unreliable. Harper has always maintained his innocence and along with the law firms of Cooley LLP and Latham & Watkins LLP, the Northern California Innocence Project (NCIP) actively worked to bring him home.


During his wrongful incarceration, Harper participated in and facilitated numerous life improvement courses, organized various fundraisers, earned his Associate’s Degree in Business, and worked in numerous jobs assigned to trusted inmates. He looks ahead to be reunited with his close-knit family, including his teenage daughter, mother, and grandmother. Although his transition out of prison will be challenging, Harper’s strong support system will provide him stable housing, job prospects, and the emotional encouragement he needs to live a hopeful life.


Patrick Gibbs, Partner with Cooley LLP said, “The Latham and Cooley firms are grateful for the opportunity to partner with one another and with NCIP on this case. We appreciate the Sacramento District Attorney’s Office’s commitment to re-reviewing Kevin’s case and for petitioning for Kevin’s resentencing and release, restoring his freedom after 13 years so he can return home. A very recent change in California law (AB 1540) made this possible, and the Court correctly applied the new law.”


Upon his release, Harper looks forward to challenging his legal team to a game of bowling in his new hometown in Southern California where he’ll be living with his mother.

Harper’s Wrongful Conviction


Harper’s son, J.H. was born 13 weeks prematurely and suffered from numerous medical conditions as a result.


After an extended stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), J.H. came home and continued to suffer from many medical issues with frequent visits to the doctor and some to the emergency room. 


 In the early morning hours of August 21, 2008, while in Harper’s care, J.H. had a medical emergency and stopped breathing. 


Unable to connect with a 9-1-1 operator, Harper rushed his son to the emergency room where hospital staff was able to restart J.H. ’s heart. But tragically, J.H. was deprived of oxygen for too long and suffered irreparable brain damage. J.H. died on August 23, 2008.


Based solely on the evidence of a bleed under the thin membrane surrounding his brain (subdural hematoma), brain swelling (edema), and bleeding in his eyes (retinal hemorrhaging) - findings known as the “triad” - the doctors diagnosed J.H. with “shaken baby syndrome” SBS (later renamed Abusive Head Trauma or AHT), which meant they suspected that J.H. had been abused, although they could not identify any external injuries pointing to abuse.  


Despite evidence that Harper was always gentle and patient with J.H., and someone who could easily calm his son, Harper was prosecuted and convicted of causing his son’s death and sentenced to 25 to life in prison. 


At his sentencing, Harper said, “I understand that I have been convicted of the charges before me, but still believe in my heart that I did nothing wrong. I loved my son and being a father very much. Our loss has hurt me...in a way that I can’t begin to explain. And I know if there was anything that I could have done or said that could have helped save my son’s life, regardless of how the outcome would have affected me, I would have done it.”  


The work of NCIP and of innocence organizations throughout the country has exposed the leading causes of wrongful convictions, including the misuse of an SBS/AHT diagnosis to prove abuse."


Through the thorough investigation of this case, NCIP, Cooley, and Latham & Watkins learned from a medical expert who reviewed J.H.’s medical records that there were alternative medical explanations for J.H.’s death, none of which were presented at Harper’s trial because a radiologist, an expert in the review of radiological scans which provided the most critical medical evidence in this case, never testified.


Melissa O’Connell, NCIP’s attorney on this case, said, “Kevin and [J.H.]’s mother and their families suffered unimaginable loss and pain. Kevin’s wrongful conviction added another level of tragedy. This case was medically complex and there is concrete evidence that the SBS/AHT diagnosis is unreliable, but when suspected, alternative causes of a baby’s death are often missed or ignored. Tragically, that appears to be what happened here.”


The SBS/AHT diagnosis started as a hypothesis by Dr. Norman Guthkelch in the early 1970s as an inquiry for doctors to consider when a child presented with no external injuries but suffered bleeding in their brain.


Decades later, Dr. Guthkelch expressed concern that his profession was using a hypothesis as a legal basis for incarcerating parents, emphasizing that “getting it right” required doctors to distinguish between hypotheses and knowledge. Dr. Guthkelch explained that “SBS and AHT are hypotheses that have been advanced to explain findings that are not yet fully understood.”


NCIP is undertaking a project to identify cases in which parents and caretakers, otherwise described as good and loving, have been wrongfully convicted based on false or unreliable expert testimony.


About the Northern California Innocence Project (NCIP):

NCIP is a non-profit clinical program of Santa Clara University School of Law whose mission is to promote a fair, effective, and compassionate criminal justice system and protect the rights of the innocent. Since its inception in 2001, NCIP has processed over ten thousand requests for inmate assistance, investigated hundreds of cases, pursued litigation or collaborative resolution in dozens, and obtained the freedom of 34 wrongfully convicted individuals. Learn more at www.ncip.org.


About Cooley LLP"

Clients partner with Cooley on transformative deals, complex IP and regulatory matters, and high-stakes litigation, where innovation meets the law. Cooley is committed to expanding access to justice through pro bono work. The firm collaborates with legal services organizations to represent individuals seeking justice and opportunity, provide nonprofit organizations the tools they need to effect change and support the economic development of underserved communities. Cooley has 1,500 lawyers across 17 offices in the United States, Asia, and Europe.


About Latham & Watkins LLP:

Latham & Watkins delivers innovative solutions to complex legal and business challenges around the world. From a global platform, our lawyers advise clients on market-shaping transactions, high-stakes litigation and trials, and sophisticated regulatory matters. Latham is one of the world’s largest providers of pro bono services, steadfastly supports initiatives designed to advance diversity within the firm and the legal profession, and is committed to exploring and promoting environmental sustainability.


The entire release can be read at:

http://ncip.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Kevin-Harper-Press-Release-.pdf

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:

------------------------------------------------------------------

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;