Thursday, June 23, 2022

Kamee Dixon: Bellingham, Washington. Jury deliberations have begun on charges of deadly child abuse, FOX 13 (Reporter France Thompson) reports. "The trial has gone on for nearly three months, with the prosecution saying the victim suffered repeated injury at Dixon’s hands. The defense used its closing arguments Wednesday to reinforce its version of events—the child’s death was an accident. Since the start of the trial, Dixon and her defense claimed three-year-old Hazel Holman’s death is the result of her choking on a breakfast sandwich. Dixon previously testified saying she opened the child’s locked jaw with her hand, "scooped out" food and attempted to perform CPR. During closing arguments, the defense showed a video recorded by doctors inside the child’s throat. "If we go forward a little bit, we can see something. I don’t know what that is, but it looks a lot like scrambled egg to me," said defense attorney Doug Hyldahl while addressing the jury. The defense contends the choking accident is what caused brain injuries that led to her death in November 2019, not abuse prosecutors are accusing Dixon of. They said one testimony that was never heard during trial was from an investigator with the King County Medical Examiner’s Office, the department that performed Hazel’s autopsy. "All of the experts agreed that when you’re assessing whether there’s been some sort of inflicted trauma—abusive head trauma, child abuse—whatever label is put on it, that an investigation is important. You didn’t hear from [the investigator] and the reason you didn’t hear from him is that no investigation was done. He didn’t go to the scene, he didn’t talk to any witnesses, not to Kamee, not to Brandon. No investigation was done," said Hyldahl."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Many times, Hazel’s many injuries were mentioned in trial, like her bruises, burned hand and infected eye; injuries the prosecution claimed were at the hands of Dixon. However, the defense expert witnesses said the child had a vitamin D deficiency, making her more prone to injuries and fractures. (Defence attorney) Hyldahl reminded the jury of testimony from Dr. Evan Matshes, a forensic pathologist who tested Hazel’s bones and blood samples. During closing arguments, Hyldahl said the doctor, "Testified that the child had under-mineralized bones. He said that his opinion was based on three things: the gross appearance of the bones under the naked eye, the appearance of the bones under the microscope and a vitamin D test. The vitamin D test, if you’ll recall, was so low… the level was so low that it was below the ability of the test to pick it up." During a rebuttal to the defense’s closing arguments, prosecutors argued Dixon abused Hazel over the course of five months. They noted the medical examiner’s office found 50 injuries—all at various stages of healing."

STORY: "Jury deliberations begin for Whatcom County woman accused of deadly child abuse,"  by Reporter France Thompson, published by Fox 13, on June 23, 2022.

GIST: "The fate of a Whatcom County woman accused of deadly child abuse is now in the hands of a jury.


Kamee Dixon was accused of killing her boyfriend’s three-year-old daughter in November 2019. The trial has gone on for nearly three months, with the prosecution saying the victim suffered repeated injury at Dixon’s hands.


The defense used its closing arguments Wednesday to reinforce its version of events—the child’s death was an accident. 


Since the start of the trial, Dixon and her defense claimed three-year-old Hazel Holman’s death is the result of her choking on a breakfast sandwich. Dixon previously testified saying she opened the child’s locked jaw with her hand, "scooped out" food and attempted to perform CPR. During closing arguments, the defense showed a video recorded by doctors inside the child’s throat. 


"If we go forward a little bit, we can see something. I don’t know what that is, but it looks a lot like scrambled egg to me," said defense attorney Doug Hyldahl while addressing the jury.

The defense contends the choking accident is what caused brain injuries that led to her death in November 2019, not abuse prosecutors are accusing Dixon of. They said one testimony that was never heard during trial was from an investigator with the King County Medical Examiner’s Office, the department that performed Hazel’s autopsy.


"All of the experts agreed that when you’re assessing whether there’s been some sort of inflicted trauma—abusive head trauma, child abuse—whatever label is put on it, that an investigation is important. You didn’t hear from [the investigator] and the reason you didn’t hear from him is that no investigation was done. He didn’t go to the scene, he didn’t talk to any witnesses, not to Kamee, not to Brandon. No investigation was done," said Hyldahl.


Many times, Hazel’s many injuries were mentioned in trial, like her bruises, burned hand and infected eye; injuries the prosecution claimed were at the hands of Dixon. However, the defense expert witnesses said the child had a vitamin D deficiency, making her more prone to injuries and fractures.


Hyldahl reminded the jury of testimony from Dr. Evan Matshes, a forensic pathologist who tested Hazel’s bones and blood samples. During closing arguments, Hyldahl said the doctor, "Testified that the child had under-mineralized bones. He said that his opinion was based on three things: the gross appearance of the bones under the naked eye, the appearance of the bones under the microscope and a vitamin D test. The vitamin D test, if you’ll recall, was so low… the level was so low that it was below the ability of the test to pick it up."


During a rebuttal to the defense’s closing arguments, prosecutors argued Dixon abused Hazel over the course of five months. They noted the medical examiner’s office found 50 injuries—all at various stages of healing.


"The defense would have you believe that the head trauma is just a coincidence. That multiple bruises—just a coincidence. 50 blows—just a coincidence. Multiple fractures—just a coincidence. Hand burn—just a coincidence. Serious chemical alkaline burn—just a coincidence. Bruising noticed by Hazel’s cousin—just a coincidence. Bruising noticed by the defendant's best friend—just a coincidence," said Erik Sigmar, Whatcom County Deputy Prosecutor.


Prosecution mentioned the defense paid $30,000 for their star witness to review the case, travel to Washington and testify in person. Dr. Satish Chundru, a forensic pathologist in Texas, said Hazel’s death should be ruled an accident or undetermined. However, the deputy prosecutor said the doctor’s contradictory opinions weren’t credible.


"Dr. Chundru testified that he can’t tell if an injury is inflicted or accidental. But then he proceeded to correlate all of Hazel’s injuries to accident or trauma inflicted by EMTs or doctors. You can’t have it both ways. He ignored evidence as well. He reached for an explanation to support the defendant’s version of events. For instance, Kamee’s attempt to dislodge food by patting Hazel on the back is incompatible with bruising and substantial trauma to Hazel’s low back," said Sigmar.


Hazel’s father, Brandon Holman, was in court during the closing arguments. Dixon is his girlfriend. The court could hear Holman crying while he viewed pictures and videos of his daughter as exhibits.


Dixon is charged with homicide by abuse and second-degree murder."


The entire story can be read at:


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;



SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:




FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;