Saturday, August 9, 2025

Neonatal Nurse Lucy Letby: UK: Journalist Williams Mata reports on the recently screened ITC Documentary 'Beyond Reasonable Doubt',in a story sub-headed, "Lucy Letby’s conviction has been questioned once more with a documentary providing new evidence to cast doubt on whether she killed seven babies."…"Letby joined the neonatal unit in 2012 and was one of a dozen members of staff in the department. Concerns were raised when hospital chiefs noticed a correlation between deaths of babies and Letby being on shift. She was removed from the ward in 2016 and reviews began. The documentary put forward evidence to show that the Countess of Chester Hospital was required suddenly to take sicker babies than it had done before and could not cope. In addition, the shift chart showed only fatalities and deterioration during which Letby was present. It did not show all the incidents that occurred during her employment. The documentary showed that the correlation disappears when that is factored in. Statistician Professor Jane Hutton told ITV: “It doesn’t tell you how the data has been selected, this is aimed to present a conclusion.” Other suspicious activities around babies on the unit did happen when Letby was on shift, and Professor Hutton said the chart used in evidence was “grossly misleading”. Mark Mcdonald, a barrister now representing Letby, said there was no direct evidence and the prosecution case was only “an educated guess” gathered by piecing together documents."


QUOTE OF THE DAY: "There were eight months of prosecution evidence before Letby herself was cross-examined. The first person called by the defence to give evidence was the hospital’s plumber. “It was surreal that the moment of knowing there would be no experts was so shocking and unexpected,” Mr Halliday said. It is not known why Letby’s team did not call forward more medical experts, despite having consulted with them. No expert witnesses challenged the insulin test results."

-------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE  DAY: "A key piece of evidence was that Letby had written down “hate” and “not good enough” in bold letters. She also wrote: “I am evil, I did this.” Her friend Dawn said that it had been a training exercise to get thoughts off her mind and that it should not be taken out of context. Dawn said: “So, all of the dark thoughts, all of those inner voices that you can’t silence. You write it all down on a piece of paper to get it off your mind.” She added: “Knowing Lucy, I think she wrote it down as a coping strategy for all she was feeling.” Letby also wrote: “I haven’t done anything wrong” and “Police investigation, slander, discrimination, victimisation.”

------------------------------------------------

STORY: "What did the ITV Lucy Letby documentary reveal",  by Journalist William Mata,  published by LBC (Leading Britain's Conversation), on August 4, 2025.

PHOTO CAPTION: "Lucy Letby upon her arrest: She is now serving several life sentences."

SUB-HEADING: "Lucy Letby’s conviction has been questioned once more with a documentary providing new evidence to cast doubt on whether she killed seven babies.

GIST: "Lucy Letby: Beyond Reasonable Doubt? was shown on Sunday night with a range of experts providing insight that disputed whether she had committed the crimes.

The 35-year-old was convicted of the murder of seven babies and the attempted murder of six more while working at the Countess of Chester Hospital neonatal unit in 2015 and 2016.

It comes after an expert panel claimed in April that “no criminal offences were committed” in Letby’s case.

Former Conservative Party chairman David Davis has told LBC that he is “convinced” that the former nurse was given life in prison due to a “tragedy of error” in light of the ITV programme.

Mr Davis said: "I came to the conclusion that this was probably a tragedy of error."

Letby was arrested in 2018 and is serving 15 whole-life orders after being convicted in 2023.

She lost two bids last year to challenge her convictions at the Court of Appeal and further charges could yet be brought against her.

Her lawyers have not given up, however, and on the back of the ITV documentary, there could be further efforts to overturn the convictions.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) confirmed to ITV that it was considering a file of evidence relating to further allegations in relation to deaths.


A statement read: "Lucy Letby was convicted of 15 separate counts following two jury trials.

"In May 2024, the Court of Appeal dismissed Letby's leave to appeal on all grounds rejecting her argument that expert prosecution evidence was flawed."Here is what the programme said.

Hospital was not equipped to cope with number of babies it received

Letby joined the neonatal unit in 2012 and was one of a dozen members of staff in the department.

Concerns were raised when hospital chiefs noticed a correlation between deaths of babies and Letby being on shift. She was removed from the ward in 2016 and reviews began.

The documentary put forward evidence to show that the Countess of Chester Hospital was required suddenly to take sicker babies than it had done before and could not cope.

In addition, the shift chart showed only fatalities and deterioration during which Letby was present. It did not show all the incidents that occurred during her employment. The documentary showed that the correlation disappears when that is factored in.

Statistician Professor Jane Hutton told ITV: “It doesn’t tell you how the data has been selected, this is aimed to present a conclusion.”

Other suspicious activities around babies on the unit did happen when Letby was on shift, and Professor Hutton said the chart used in evidence was “grossly misleading”.

Mark Mcdonald, a barrister now representing Letby, said there was no direct evidence and the prosecution case was only “an educated guess” gathered by piecing together documents.

Letby’s courtroom performance might have held sway


The Guardian’s Josh Halliday said that Letby showed little emotion in court.

“She presented completely dispassionately, she was expressionless… There were only a couple of moments where she showed emotion. It’s these human moments that figure quite heavily on the jury’s minds.”

Breathing tubes

Dr Ravi Jayaram, a key witness for the prosecution, had asserted that infants could not dislodge tubes themselves that somebody would have needed to do it.

Dr Richard Taylor who, unlike Dr Jayaram, is a neonatal specialist, said that the tube may well have been dislodged by the baby and there is nothing to say that a nurse did it.

The documentary also showed that Letby had called Dr Jayaram when she realised a baby’s oxygen level was dropping, with the doctor having later said that he saw her standing by and doing nothing when this happened.

He was only there, it was said, because she had emailed him. The jury was never told about this.

In another instance, Dr Dewi Evans had also changed his mind on a theory on how Baby C, one of the victims, had died.

It was said she had pumped air into its stomach but he later publicly went against this. He then said he would write a new report, after the murder conviction, and said she had instead injected air into the baby’s veins.

Dr Evans told ITV that his evidence had been agreed by a jury and was subject to cross-examination, and that he could not comment further.

Dr Jayaram was approached for comment by ITV.

Letby had been taught to write down her darkest thoughts

A key piece of evidence was that Letby had written down “hate” and “not good enough” in bold letters. She also wrote: “I am evil, I did this.”

Her friend Dawn said that it had been a training exercise to get thoughts off her mind and that it should not be taken out of context.

Dawn said: “So, all of the dark thoughts, all of those inner voices that you can’t silence. You write it all down on a piece of paper to get it off your mind.”

She added: “Knowing Lucy, I think she wrote it down as a coping strategy for all she was feeling.”

Letby also wrote: “I haven’t done anything wrong” and “Police investigation, slander, discrimination, victimisation.”

Letby went to a friend’s wedding while on bail

Dawn said that she had been at her wedding in 2020 while on bail, having been given permission by the police.

The photos show Letby laughing and dancing. Dawn said she couldn’t believe that her friend had committed the crimes.

Blood tests

A central piece of evidence is that blood tests for two babies showed high levels of insulin and low c-peptide, which the prosecution showed was proof that insulin was given externally.

Forensic scientist Professor Matt Johll said the tests were fast and imperfect, while in a forensic setting, they would be more rigorous.

“The jury was not told there would be any risk about a false positive result,” he said, adding: “That kind of test was never meant to put someone in prison.”

“It’s not good enough for drug testing for pilots, so if it’s not good enough to fire someone, how can it be good enough to put someone in prison.”

He also doubted the prosecution's argument that she spiked a fluid bag and left it for another nurse to give to a baby, saying “we’re going into the point of absurdity here to make it connect.”


LBC

What questions remain?

There were eight months of prosecution evidence before Letby herself was cross-examined. The first person called by the defence to give evidence was the hospital’s plumber.

“It was surreal that the moment of knowing there would be no experts was so shocking and unexpected,” Mr Halliday said. It is not known why Letby’s team did not call forward more medical experts, despite having consulted with them.

No expert witnesses challenged the insulin test results."

The entire story can be read at: 

10a6860a0001PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:


https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/120008354894645705/4704913685758792985


———————————————————————————————

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."

Lawyer Radha Natarajan:

Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;


—————————————————————————————————


FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!


Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;


-------------------------------------------------------------------

Friday, August 8, 2025

attacks on science,,,,,,,,,trump 400 plus - doesn't really show an inquiring mind,!!!!!

trump-admins-attacks-on-science

Roy Sobotiak: Alberta: A 'Mr. Big' sting operation; (A police operation which has been much criticized - and rightfully so - as having no place in a criminal justice system which values 'truth,' because it is employs undercover police officers who draw a suspect into a fictitious criminal organization. (HL)) …"In this case, the written arguments say, the operation came with implicit threats of violence and induced Sobotiak to confess by portraying membership in the fake criminal group as a path to emotional and financial security. "The officers preyed on his vulnerabilities: his poverty, his mental health problems and his addictions," the brief says. "It is surprising that Mr. Sobotiak held out as long as he did." Sobotiak consistently denied any involvement in Kaminsky's disappearance over nearly 11 months of the Mr. Big sting — which started after police investigated Sobotiak through surveillance, wiretaps and a police informant who lived with him for several months."


QUOTES OF THE DAY: "Innocence Canada lawyer) James Lockyer said today: “Of all the cases we have worked on, this is by far the longest a wrongly convicted person has been in prison. All of us at Innocence Canada are delighted by today’s development. We wish Mr. Sobotiak all the best and will be there whenever he needs help in the future.” Katie Clackson of Legal Aid Alberta said: “There is an important lesson to be learned from Mr. Sobotiak’s case. A justice system can go wrong and when it does, it can do irreparable harm.” Joanne McLean, another Innocence Canada lawyer who worked on Mr. Sobotiak’s case, said: “Innocence Canada has been helping wrongly convicted individuals for 33 years now. We are pleased to have helped Mr. Sobotiak in his quest to prove that he was wrongly convicted."

-------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: " Sobotiak told a variety of stories, first repeating the death was an accident but adding that he'd transported her body from his mother's home in a duffel bag, dismembered it in his apartment, and disposed of it in two dumpsters. Then, he said he'd strangled her after a sexual encounter. The fourth and final time, after the officer told Sobotiak about "the importance of his confession as a means of entry into their criminal organization," he repeated the story, claiming he "just went berserk." Sobotiak was arrested the next day. The man he had been spending time with was officially revealed to him as a police officer."

--------------------------------------------------------------

BACKGROUND: (On this 'Mr. Big' case): From CBC News report by Madeline Smith (link below), published on May 24,  2025. when  a new trial was ordered, under the heading, " Review of Sobotiak murder conviction revealed undisclosed police evidence, court filing says," and the sub-heading, "New trial ordered for Roy Sobotiak, 61, after he spent nearly 36 years in prison."…"Sobotiak's lawyers argued the Mr. Big operation that was used to elicit Sobotiak's original confession was abusive, and can't stand up to legal scrutiny. In a Mr. Big sting, undercover police officers draw a suspect into a fictitious criminal organization. A Supreme Court of Canada ruling in 2014 set new standards for how this evidence can be used, with stricter rules about the legal admissibility of confessions made during these kinds of investigations. In this case, the written arguments say, the operation came with implicit threats of violence and induced Sobotiak to confess by portraying membership in the fake criminal group as a path to emotional and financial security. "The officers preyed on his vulnerabilities: his poverty, his mental health problems and his addictions," the brief says. "It is surprising that Mr. Sobotiak held out as long as he did." Sobotiak consistently denied any involvement in Kaminsky's disappearance over nearly 11 months of the Mr. Big sting — which started after police investigated Sobotiak through surveillance, wiretaps and a police informant who lived with him for several months. Details of the investigation were revealed in court during the original trial. Starting in October 1988, an undercover Edmonton Police Service detective befriended Sobotiak and took him along to staged drug deals and fake scouting trips to search for places to hide a dead body. The detective also bought Sobotiak food and alcohol, and paid him for being a "lookout" during drug transactions. By September 1989, police decided to try getting Sobotiak drunk "to see if it would cause him to 'say something.'" The undercover officer then pushed for details about Kaminsky's death in a hotel room, while Sobotiak drank an entire 26-ounce bottle of vodka. In the videotaped meeting, Sobotiak becomes visibly intoxicated. The officer continued to press him with statements including, "'Our circle' knew he had killed Kaminsky and he needed to be honest if he wanted to be in their organization." Sobotiak then "adopted" the officer's suggestion that Kaminsky died by accident, the lawyers' brief says. He said she fell and broke her neck while he was trying to carry her down the stairs at his mother's house. The undercover detective prompted Sobotiak for details of Kaminsky's death in three more meetings over the following week. Sobotiak told a variety of stories, first repeating the death was an accident but adding that he'd transported her body from his mother's home in a duffel bag, dismembered it in his apartment, and disposed of it in two dumpsters. Then, he said he'd strangled her after a sexual encounter. The fourth and final time, after the officer told Sobotiak about "the importance of his confession as a means of entry into their criminal organization," he repeated the story, claiming he "just went berserk." Sobotiak was arrested the next day. The man he had been spending time with was officially revealed to him as a police officer."

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/roy-sobotiak-1987-disappearance-kaminsky-court-edmonton-police-1.7542743

————————————————————————————————

INNOCENCE CANADA RELEASE:  (Announcing recent staying of the charge): On recent staying  of the charge): "Almost 36 years after his arrest and 2 months after his release on bail, the Alberta Crown Prosecution Service has stayed the second degree murder charge against Roy Sobotiak. Arrested on September 27, 1989 for the 1987 murder of 34-year-old Susan Kaminsky, Mr. Sobotiak, then 26, had never had a moment of freedom until his release on bail on May 23 earlier this year. He acknowledged through his counsel then that it would not be easy to adjust to a very different world from what he knew in 1989. “I was 26 when I went in. I am 61 now. Everything will be different.” After his conviction in 1991 for second degree murder and after losing all his appeals, Mr. Sobotiak tirelessly championed his own cause. He wrote a 1000-page hand- written request to the Parole Board of Canada for a pardon. In 2021, he was told to write to the Minister of Justice. He did, and Department of Justice officials were sufficiently troubled by his case that they asked Innocence Canada to assist him. We did, and on February 25, 2025, then Minister of Justice Arif Virani quashed the second-degree murder conviction and directed a new trial. By the time of his release on bail in May, Mr. Sobotiak had spent more years in prison than any other victim of a wrongful conviction in Canadian history, a dubious honour. Mr. Sobotiak was to have appeared in King’s Bench Court in Edmonton this morning to set a date for his new trial. Instead, Alberta has entered a stay of proceedings, which means that the case is now over, and Mr. Sobotiak is a free man with no restrictions on him for the first time since the day of his arrest in 1989. In the 2 months since his release on bail, Ms. Sobotiak has been doing well in an assisted living environment in Fort McMurray. The Director tells Innocence Canada that he is welcome to continue living there, and Mr. Sobotiak intends to do so, at least for the time being, as he continues his readjustment to life in the outside world. James Lockyer said today: “Of all the cases we have worked on, this is by far the longest a wrongly convicted person has been in prison. All of us at Innocence Canada are delighted by today’s development. We wish Mr. Sobotiak all the best and will be there whenever he needs help in the future.” Katie Clackson of Legal Aid Alberta said: “There is an important lesson to be learned from Mr. Sobotiak’s case. A justice system can go wrong and when it does, it can do irreparable harm.” Joanne McLean, another Innocence Canada lawyer who worked on Mr. Sobotiak’s case, said: “Innocence Canada has been helping wrongly convicted individuals for 33 years now. We are pleased to have helped Mr. Sobotiak in his quest to prove that he was wrongly convicted”.

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#search/%22innocence+canada%22+and+roy/FMfcgzQbgcNCxqFtHxtGFxHvTwqckcQZ?projector=1&messagePartId=0.1

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:


https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/120008354894645705/4704913685758792985


———————————————————————————————

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."

Lawyer Radha Natarajan:

Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;


—————————————————————————————————


FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!


Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;


-------------------------------------------------------------------

Jessica Gasser: Dallas: Texas: Munchausen by Proxy: Cleared by the grand jury after being demonized by police, media and child welfare authorities, she explains that she wanted to tell the story herself, because it's different from the story others told about her," adding, understandably, that, “I don't think there are words to describe exactly what we went through."…"In a 24-page affidavit dated July 2023, the Tarrant County Sheriff’s Office accused Gasser of medical child abuse. The document said Gasser took the child, who was three years old at the time, to doctors in multiple states and exposed her to unnecessary treatments and procedures. The affidavit also alleged that several providers told investigators they suspected medical child abuse. Gasser and her husband lost custody of their daughter for eight months. But in 2024, the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services dismissed its case against the family, according to documents Schneider’s law office provided WFAA."


SEASONAL BREAK: (July 26, 2025):

Dear Readers. It's time for me take a seasonal break  and charge my batteries, so to speak, as it has been a very busy year, with over 450 posts to date, focussed on fascinating developments, cases, issues, whatever,  in the Charles Smith Blog arena, from around the world. Here's the plan: I  have pre-scheduled posts for publication during the break, and then, batteries fully charged, the rejuvenated me  (having given you a break!) will rejoin you once again with fresh material. One of my most important tasks from the outset will be to  use the Blog to unite  with others around the globe who are fighting to stop the execution of Robert Roberson set for October 16 -   an innocent man convicted by  junk science. Another, will be to continue our efforts to help  undo (as much as possible)  the damage caused by  the notorious South Australian former Chief pathologist Colin Manock, to so many innocent  individuals over the years -  including Derek Bromley, whose cases cry out for exoneration. 

Until my return, keep an eye on Jimmy Duncan's  bail hearing which is being reported by  Richard A. Webster, on Verite news. The Innocence Project: "A judge has already declared Jimmie Duncan "factually innocent", but prosecutors are still going after him. Now, the victim's mother is calling for his freedom at his July 22 bail hearing.")    His  most recent story as of July 25, 2025) can be read at: the link below:  (A verdict could come as early as Monday July 28). As  he has reported: "In April, Judge Alvin Sharp set aside Duncan’s 1998 conviction for murdering 23-month-old Haley Oliveaux, his then-girlfriend’s daughter. Sharp agreed with Duncan’s attorneys that an analysis performed on the girl that purported to match marks on her body to Duncan’s teeth — a key piece of evidence in the trial — was based on discredited science.  As ProPublica and Verite News reported in March, the effort to secure Duncan’s freedom has become more urgent in recent months due to a renewed push by Gov. Jeff Landry to restart executions in the state following a decade-plus pause. Attorney Scott Greene, who is part of Duncan’s legal team, said during the hearing that Duncan has “enormous support” from his family, the community and Haley’s mother, Allison Layton Statham. Now that his conviction has been vacated, Greene argued, Duncan should be freed on bail pending another trial." 


There is indeed  so much grist for the Charles Smith Blog mill! In the meantime please keep sending me your suggestions for future posts at hlevy15@gmail.com.   (Many of our posts have been triggered by our readers); Enjoy the summer. Cheers.

Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

—————————————————————

QUOTE OF THE DAY:  "The family has been reunited, and last month’s no-bill from the grand jury cleared Gasser. “Every single medical issue that Jessica was concerned about is shown in all the medical records to be completely true,” Schneider said. “And the thing is, CPS knew this, and law enforcement knew this. Some of the visits to the doctors that they complained about were actually part of a CPS investigation. Jessica was asked to go to a particular place and then got blamed for doctor shopping.” Schneider said he obtained text messages and email exchanges between investigators that he says suggest they knowingly mishandled the case in an attempt to elevate their profiles. “Fame is driving some of this,” Schneider said."

—————————————————————

SECOND QUOTE OF THE DAY: "Ellie still faces medical issues, Jessica said. She will soon turn five years old. “Any normal parent would do exactly as I did,” Jessica said. “If no one was helping your child, what would you do? You would go to somebody else who would. That is all I did."

———————————————————————————

STORY: "'I didn’t do anything wrong.'  North Texas mom cleared of medically abusing her child talks with WFAA," by Reporter Teresa Woodard, published by WFAA, on July 23, 2025. (Link to full interview provided.)

SUB-HEADING: “Any normal parent would do exactly as I did,” said Jessica Gasser, who was charged with injury to a child but no-billed by a Tarrant County grand jury.



DALLAS — Jessica Gasser wanted to tell her story herself, because it's different from the story others told about her.


“I didn’t do anything wrong,” she said in an interview with WFAA, after a Tarrant County grand jury issued a no-bill in her case, clearing her of two charges of injury to a child.


Her attorney, Mike Schneider, accused investigators of mishandling the case, and Gasser said she isn’t sure she’ll ever recover from the damage.


“I don't think there are words to describe exactly what we went through,” Gasser said.


In a 24-page affidavit dated July 2023, the Tarrant County Sheriff’s Office accused Gasser of medical child abuse.


The document said Gasser took the child, who was three years old at the time, to doctors in multiple states and exposed her to unnecessary treatments and procedures.


The affidavit also alleged that several providers told investigators they suspected medical child abuse. Gasser and her husband lost custody of their daughter for eight months.


But in 2024, the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services dismissed its case against the family, according to documents Schneider’s law office provided WFAA.


The family has been reunited, and last month’s no-bill from the grand jury cleared Gasser.


“Every single medical issue that Jessica was concerned about is shown in all the medical records to be completely true,” Schneider said. “And the thing is, CPS knew this, and law enforcement knew this. Some of the visits to the doctors that they complained about were actually part of a CPS investigation. Jessica was asked to go to a particular place and then got blamed for doctor shopping.”


Watch Jessica Gasser's full interview with WFAA below


Schneider said he obtained text messages and email exchanges between investigators that he says suggest they knowingly mishandled the case in an attempt to elevate their profiles.


“Fame is driving some of this,” Schneider said.


When asked to respond to those allegations, the Tarrant County Sheriff’s Office told WFAA, “We respect the grand jury’s decision. We have no further comment.”


The Department of Family and Protective Services told WFAA, “CPS cases are confidential per state statute.”


In the 2023 affidavit, investigators also accused Gasser of searching the internet using phrases like, “Is lying to a doctor about a child illegal?” And “How do you fix Munchausen by proxy?”


Munchausen by proxy is the medical term for a caretaker lying about an illness in someone who depends on them.


Gasser confirmed to WFAA she did search for answers to those questions.


“I’m not going to say I didn’t because look at the timeline. That was after they had taken my child, and I had been accused of this. So why wouldn’t I want to know more about what I’m accused of?” she said.


Jessica shared a recent family photo showing all four members of their family: Jessica, her husband, daughter Eillie, and Eliie's big brother.


Ellie still faces medical issues, Jessica said.


She will soon turn five years old.


“Any normal parent would do exactly as I did,” Jessica said. “If no one was helping your child, what would you do? You would go to somebody else who would. That is all I did.""


The entire story can be read at:


https://www.wfaa.com/article/news/local/tarrant-county/north-texas-mom-cleared-of-medically-abusing-her-child-talks-with-wfaa/287-17d18844-dabd-48e8-a4a1-07c408aeefaa


PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:


https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/120008354894645705/4704913685758792985


———————————————————————————————

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."

Lawyer Radha Natarajan:

Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;


—————————————————————————————————


FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!


Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;


-------------------------------------------------------------------