Saturday, April 30, 2022

Jacques Delisle: Quebec: Bulletin: Retired ex-Quebec Court of Appeal Justice: Major (Unwelcome) Development: Earlier this month, Justice Jean-Francois Émond ruled that a retrial would be impossible because a Crown expert had made serious errors in a pathology report - and because there had been unreasonable delays in the case. Now prosecutors have announced they are contesting the decision to stay the case, and intend to send the 86-year-old to trial, arguing that the earlier 'stay' ruling would "likely compromise public confidence in the administration of justice." (Canadian Press report published by The Toronto Star)..."A former judge on the Quebec Court of Appeal, Delisle, now 86, was found guilty of first-degree murder in the death of his wife, Marie Nicole Rainville, and was sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for 25 years. Delisle said Rainville had taken her own life, while the Crown had argued the ex-magistrate had shot her in the head. Émond’s 99-page ruling cited the “gross negligence” of a pathologist who failed to photograph the brain or take samples that would’ve shown traces of the bullet that killed her. “The unavailability of this evidence is so damaging that the applicant’s right to make full answer and defence is violated,” the judge wrote."


STORY: "Crown appeals stay of proceedings in case of ex-Quebec judge accused of killing wife," by the Canadian Press, published  by The Toronto Star on April 28, 2022.


GIST: "Jacques Delisle walked out of the Quebec City courthouse a free man on April 8 after Quebec Superior Court Justice Jean-François Émond granted him a stay of proceedings. He spent nine years in prison before he was freed last year, after federal Justice Minister David Lametti ordered a new trial.

Émond agreed with Delisle’s lawyers, who argued that a retrial would be impossible because a Crown expert had made serious errors in a pathology report. They also said there had been unreasonable delays in the case.

The Crown, however, said in its filing that Émond’s decision to stay the case hampers the fundamental process of seeking truth, adding that the ruling “is likely to compromise public confidence in the administration of justice.”

Prosecutors François Godin and Julien Beauchamp-Laliberté argued that Émond erred by finding fault on the part of the state and concluding — before a jury has seen the evidence — that a future trial would be unfair.

A former judge on the Quebec Court of Appeal, Delisle, now 86, was found guilty of first-degree murder in the death of his wife, Marie Nicole Rainville, and was sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for 25 years. Delisle said Rainville had taken her own life, while the Crown had argued the ex-magistrate had shot her in the head.

Émond’s 99-page ruling cited the “gross negligence” of a pathologist who failed to photograph the brain or take samples that would’ve shown traces of the bullet that killed her. 

“The unavailability of this evidence is so damaging that the applicant’s right to make full answer and defence is violated,” the judge wrote.

The entire story can be read at:

https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2022/04/28/crown-appeals-stay-of-proceedings-in-case-of-quebec-judge-accused-of-killing-wife.html

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;



SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:




FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

Tyree Bowie: Pennsylvania: Bulletin: Dr. David Fowler, the retired chief medical examiner of Maryland, who testified for the defence at the trial of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin - and testified that he would have listed George Floyd's manner of death as undetermined - is assisting the defence at Bowie's trial in the killing of 2-year-old Dante Mullinex, The York Daily Record (USA Network) reports. (Reporter Dylan Segelbaum); The defence is seeking an adjournment to permit him to share medical scans with Dr. Fowler..."Farley Holt, Bowie’s attorney, said he recently received scans that he wanted to share with his forensic pathologist, Dr. David Fowler, the retired chief medical examiner of Maryland who testified for the defense at the trial of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin. Fowler testified that he would’ve listed George Floyd’s manner of death as undetermined. Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh later announced that his office would review all in-custody death determinations during Fowler’s tenure."

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: ""The trial of a man who’s accused of killing 2-year-old Dante Mullinix in 2018 in York was postponed on Thursday after both sides raised concerns over issues including pretrial publicity from a billboard off Interstate 83 that blames the York County Office of Children, Youth and Families for the child’s deathCommon Pleas Judge Gregory M. Snyder granted the defense’s request for a continuance in the case of Tyree Bowie and scheduled a status hearing for May 20. He’s charged with first- and third-degree murder and endangering the welfare of a childOn Sept. 14, 2018, Dante died at Penn State Hershey Medical Center. The boy experienced injuries including a compressed neck, bleeding on the brain and bruises all over his body, Dr. Wayne Ross, a forensic pathologist, later testified. Bowie, 43, of York, was watching the boy before he became unresponsive, York City police said. But some of Dante’s relatives, including his aunt, Sarah Mullinix, believe that Bowie is innocent.  She runs a Facebook page called Justice For Dante, which has more than 5,400 likes. (I am following this case. HL; 

-------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Trial in killing of 2-year-old Dante Mullinix is delayed over issues such as I-83 billboard," by Reporter Dylan Segelbaum, published by The York Daily Record. 

(Dylan Segelbaum is the courthouse reporter at the York Daily Record, part of the USA TODAY NETWORK.) 

SUB-HEADING: "Farley Holt, Tyree Bowie's attorney, said he also wanted to share medical scans with his forensic pathologist, Dr. David Fowler, to review."


GIST: "The trial of a man who’s accused of killing 2-year-old Dante Mullinix in 2018 in York was postponed on Thursday after both sides raised concerns over issues including pretrial publicity from a billboard off Interstate 83 that blames the York County Office of Children, Youth and Families for the child’s death.


Common Pleas Judge Gregory M. Snyder granted the defense’s request for a continuance in the case of Tyree Bowie and scheduled a status hearing for May 20. He’s charged with first- and third-degree murder and endangering the welfare of a child.


On Sept. 14, 2018, Dante died at Penn State Hershey Medical Center. The boy experienced injuries including a compressed neck, bleeding on the brain and bruises all over his body, Dr. Wayne Ross, a forensic pathologist, later testified.

Ad



Bowie, 43, of York, was watching the boy before he became unresponsive, York City police said.


But some of Dante’s relatives, including his aunt, Sarah Mullinix, believe that Bowie is innocent.  She runs a Facebook page called Justice For Dante, which has more than 5,400 likes.



Farley Holt, Bowie’s attorney, said he recently received scans that he wanted to share with his forensic pathologist, Dr. David Fowler, the retired chief medical examiner of Maryland who testified for the defense at the trial of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin.


Fowler testified that he would’ve listed George Floyd’s manner of death as undetermined.


 Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh later announced that his office would review all in-custody death determinations during Fowler’s tenure.



Meanwhile, Chief Deputy Prosecutor Erin Kraska said Holt had never asked for the scans.


Kraska, though, raised concerns over pretrial publicity stemming from the digital billboard, which is before the Emigsville exit of I-83 southbound, features two pictures of Dante and states, “I was murdered because York County Children Youth and Families left me to die — Even though a forensic nurse told them I should be taken 4 days prior! Why didn't my life matter?”


Court Administrator Paul Crouse also reported that his office sent out 125 jury summonses for next week — but he could not say how many people would show up.

Kraska said she did not oppose a continuance. Holt then asked for a delay, noting the severity and complexity of the case.


Bowie is being held without bail in York County Prison."


The entire story can be read at:


65352473007

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;



SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:




FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

Bulletin: Rodney Reed: Death Row; Texas: Major (Welcome) Development: The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear his challenge to a Texas law governing the post-conviction DNA-testing he says will establish his innocence, The American Bar Association (ABA) Journal reports (April 29, 2022)..."At issue is whether he filed the suit too late under the statute of limitations. Does the clock begin to run when a state court denies the DNA test? Or does the clock start when all state court DNA litigation, including appeals, have ended?"


Supreme Court will hear death row inmate’s DNA test bid: "The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear the case of a Texas death row inmate who said DNA testing would establish his innocence. After inmate Rodney Reed lost a bid in state court to obtain the test, he challenged the Texas law governing post-conviction DNA testing under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act. At issue is whether he filed the suit too late under the statute of limitations. Does the clock begin to run when a state court denies the DNA test? Or does the clock start when all state court DNA litigation, including appeals, have ended? Reed was convicted of the rape and murder of a woman married to a former police officer. He said he was having an affair with the murder victim, and that is why his DNA was found on her body. Reed’s lawyers have pointed to the woman’s fiance, a former police officer, as a possible suspect. He pleaded guilty in 2008 for kidnapping and improper sexual conduct with a woman while on duty. The case is Reed v. Goertz." (The New York TimesSCOTUSblogBloomberg Law, the Texas Tribune, SCOTUSblog case page:

)https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/weekly-briefs-scotus-to-hear-inmates-dna-test-appeal-courthouse-shooting-was-accident

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;



SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:




FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;


Melissa Lucio: Death Row; Texas: Law Prof. Valena Beety - author of the forth-coming book, "Manifesting Justice: Wrongly Convicted Women Reclaim Their Rights," says Melissa Lucio may have been convicted of murder, but she is 'the victim', "convicted as a result of a tragic death that was not a crime" - and she 'is not alone.'..."When confronted by police and accused of killing their loved ones, women caretakers frequently have a similar but surprising response: They confess. They internalize the idea that they must have committed some sort of harm to their loved one, particularly when confronted with scientific evidence. Police can lie to suspects, and the use of unreliable scientific evidence like an autopsy or emergency room report can convince women that the science must be right, that they somehow harmed their loved one or have a duty and obligation to take responsibility for what happened."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Lucio’s daughter Mariah had fallen down a flight of stairs. But police insisted the child's death was no accident.  Child deaths are tragic, so people look to blame someone, particularly the "bad mother."  I represent a woman in Mississippi, Tasha Mercedez Shelby, who was convicted of killing her stepson when he died from a shortfall and underlying medical issues. Similar to Lucio's case, a medical examiner said the injuries could only be caused by physical abuse and not the child’s underlying medical history. Fifteen years later, that medical examiner changed his opinion based on advances in science. He even changed the manner of death on the child’s death certificate from homicide to accident. Yet the Mississippi Court of Appeals affirmed Shelby’s conviction in 2020. Shelby is now waiting for her petition to be heard by a federal district court judge. Lucio and Shelby each became suspects precisely because they were the primary caretakers. They have lost years of freedom, years to be with their other children, over "crimes" that did not occur.  As a teenager, Sabrina Butler-Smith was wrongly convicted for the accidental death of her child and was sentenced to die. Now exonerated, she spoke at a recent Innocence Network conference on Lucio's behalf. Fellow exonerees, journalists, lawyers and activists applauded for Butler-Smith – and for Lucio, an innocent woman still on death row. "


-------------------------------------------------------------


PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "Another questionable execution: Nearly 20 years ago, Texas executed another person based on faulty scientific evidenceCameron Todd Willingham was found guilty of murdering his three young children by intentionally setting fire to their shared home. He was sentenced to death. Shortly before his execution, a scientific report showed the fire was not caused by arson. The report was sent to then-Gov. Rick Perry. He didn't intervene, and Willingham was executed Feb. 17, 2004. Evidence since his execution has demonstrated flaws in the prosecution and made a persuasive case for his innocence, and fire science is now rightly known for its unreliability.  When he was state attorney general, Abbott blocked the Texas Forensic Science Commission from further investigating Willingham's conviction and execution, saying the commission lacked the necessary authority. Now, Abbott won't need to decide on whether to spare Lucio's life, because the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has decided for him –  for the time being."


---------------------------------------------------------------

COMMENTARY: "The Texas Courts have saved Melissa Lucia's life. Now she can prove her innocence," by Valena Beety, published by USA Today. (Valena Beety is deputy director of the Academy for Justice, a law professor at Arizona State University's Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, and author of the forthcoming book "Manifesting Justice: Wrongly Convicted Women Reclaim Their Rights.)

GIST: Texas planned to execute Melissa Lucio on Wednesday. Republican and Democratic state legislators had prayed with her on death row and called for her execution to be halted. Sister Helen Prejean had spoken on her behalf. Even Kim Kardashian lent her support.  

Why? Because Melissa Lucio is innocent

Now the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has granted a request to stay her execution. Lucio will now have a hearing to prove that her conviction is wrongful and based on a coerced "confession," unscientific evidence and false testimony.  

Lucio has been convicted of capital murder. But she is the victim, convicted as a result of a tragic death that was not a crime. Lucio is not alone.  


Women caretakers often blamed 

When confronted by police and accused of killing their loved ones, women caretakers frequently have a similar but surprising response: They confess. They internalize the idea that they must have committed some sort of harm to their loved one, particularly when confronted with scientific evidence.


Police can lie to suspects, and the use of unreliable scientific evidence like an autopsy or emergency room report can convince women that the science must be right, that they somehow harmed their loved one or have a duty and obligation to take responsibility for what happened. 


Conservative women treated unfairly:We're successful in spite of it.

Amanda Knox, who was exonerated after being convicted of murder in Italy, has described the interrogation room as "a situation designed to amplify the absolute control and authority of investigators – an experience I know only too well." 


Melissa Lucio had just learned about her child’s death. As a girl, Melissa was raised in an abusive household, then she partnered with abusive men. In an interrogation room, where she was berated by police officers – stand-in authority figures – she finally broke down and simply took responsibility for whatever had happened to her 2-year-old daughter, Mariah.


Recognizing this disturbing sequence of events, three federal judges on the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals reversed Lucio's conviction in 2019. But prosecutors then asked the full court to reconsider, leading to a 10-7 decision last year that reinstated her conviction. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear her case.


Only 5.7% of death row convictions are reversed in Texas. 


Accidents mischaracterized as crimes 

Lucio’s daughter Mariah had fallen down a flight of stairs. But police insisted the child's death was no accident. 


Child deaths are tragic, so people look to blame someone, particularly the "bad mother." \


I represent a woman in Mississippi, Tasha Mercedez Shelby, who was convicted of killing her stepson when he died from a shortfall and underlying medical issues. Similar to Lucio's case, a medical examiner said the injuries could only be caused by physical abuse and not the child’s underlying medical history.


Fifteen years later, that medical examiner changed his opinion based on advances in science. He even changed the manner of death on the child’s death certificate from homicide to accident. Yet the Mississippi Court of Appeals affirmed Shelby’s conviction in 2020. Shelby is now waiting for her petition to be heard by a federal district court judge.


Lucio and Shelby each became suspects precisely because they were the primary caretakers. They have lost years of freedom, years to be with their other children, over "crimes" that did not occur. 


As a teenager, Sabrina Butler-Smith was wrongly convicted for the accidental death of her child and was sentenced to die. Now exonerated, she spoke at a recent Innocence Network conference on Lucio's behalf. Fellow exonerees, journalists, lawyers and activists applauded for Butler-Smith – and for Lucio, an innocent woman still on death row. 


Lucio has a chance to prove her innocence and save her own life. 


Another questionable execution

Nearly 20 years ago, Texas executed another person based on faulty scientific evidence. Cameron Todd Willingham was found guilty of murdering his three young children by intentionally setting fire to their shared home. He was sentenced to death. Shortly before his execution, a scientific report showed the fire was not caused by arson.


The report was sent to then-Gov. Rick Perry. He didn't intervene, and Willingham was executed Feb. 17, 2004. Evidence since his execution has demonstrated flaws in the prosecution and made a persuasive case for his innocence, and fire science is now rightly known for its unreliability

 

When he was state attorney general, Abbott blocked the Texas Forensic Science Commission from further investigating Willingham's conviction and execution, saying the commission lacked the necessary authority.


Now, Abbott won't need to decide on whether to spare Lucio's life, because the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has decided for him –  for the time being. 


The entire commentary can be read at:


https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2022/04/22/melissa-lucio-execution-texas-innocence/7381221001/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;



SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:




FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;


Beleaguered Doctor Barbara Knox: Dakota Black; Josh Gehde; Wisconsin Watch continues its on-going investigation of the notorious nationally certified child abuse pediatrician, "who has been suspended and investigated by two hospitals in two states," with a compelling story by Reporter Brenda Wintrode, headed, "A controversial doctor. A disputed abuse diagnosis. Two convicted Wisconsin men say they are innocent."..."Black and Gehde are serving lengthy sentences in Wisconsin prisons, convicted of murdering the children in their care. They pleaded not guilty and refused prosecutors’ plea deals, despite facing decades behind bars. Both have lost their appeals. The men insist they are innocent. Some family members of the children who died, including Turnbill, say they do not believe these men killed the children. And Wisconsin Watch has identified at least eight cases in which Knox determined a child had suffered head trauma from abuse that investigators and medical specialists said were caused by benign medical conditions, injuries from severe birth trauma, accidental falls, a bleeding disorder and a possible stroke."..."In March, online records show Knox was issued a medical license in Florida. In all, the joint investigation also found 12 cases in which Knox’s diagnoses of abuse were rejected by juries, court officials, child welfare workers, investigators and other doctors. Knox tied to 124 Dane County cases But hundreds more cases funneled into the criminal justice system. Dodge County District Attorney Kurt Klomberg said he stopped using Knox as an expert in 2017 after she failed to provide a timely report in an abusive head trauma case. He said he decided not to “support any child abuse or neglect cases for prosecution based on the work of Dr. Knox unless she had completed an opinion report prior to the decision to charge.” Klomberg said he also advised law enforcement and human services to seek experts from other hospitals. After he made that decision, Klomberg got one referral for child neglect that Knox alleged. He declined to pursue it for lack of evidence. “I seek to engage medical experts who I can rely upon,” Klomberg added. “I determined that I would not likely support a case involving Dr. Knox’s independent opinion several years ago.”


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Courts, legal experts and medical specialists are increasingly scrutinizing the abusive head trauma diagnosis, an umbrella term that includes the controversial diagnosis of shaken baby syndrome, for lacking a scientific basis and criteria for diagnosis. Earlier this year, a New Jersey judge labeled abusive head trauma “junk science” and refused to allow testimony about the diagnosis in his courtroom."

---------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "Knox’s fraught tenure: During her 13-year tenure in Wisconsin, Knox acted as a crucial liaison between the UW’s Child Protection Program and law enforcement, providing medical diagnoses, consultations or expert testimony in over 200 criminal cases, according to open records responses from 14 district attorneys in southern and central Wisconsin and an analysis of electronic court records by Court Data Technologies. One of about 350 nationally certified child abuse pediatricians trained in recognizing child   maltreatment and legal proceedings, Knox led the UW program until 2019, leaving after the hospital investigated whether she bullied her colleagues. Alaska CARES hired her that same year to lead the state’s forensic child abuse clinic. A joint investigation by Wisconsin Watch and the Anchorage Daily News found Knox generated similar allegations there." During her brief tenure, the entire medical staff of Alaska CARES left or had their jobs reassigned. Knox submitted her resignation from Alaska CARES in January, scheduled to take effect on April 1."

-----------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE THREE OF THE DAY: "Police: ‘She has credentials’After questioning Black at home for hours, police arrested him on an outstanding probation violation for a drug charge and took him to the Sun Prairie Police Department. Detective Frank Smith ran the interrogation. He told Black he believed everything Knox told police — the boy’s collapse from a massive brain injury happened within minutes of being abused, according to a transcript. “She’s an expert in her field,” Smith told Black. “She’s an expert witness for the state of Wisconsin. Okay? She has credentials.” Then the officer added: “Something happened in the house. You did something to him.” After Black denied harming Brayden — “I love that kid like he’s my own son” — the officer would have none of it. “If I had any doubt or reserve of what she (Knox) told me, I wouldn’t be accusing you of doing this,” Smith said. “But I am because I believe her. I have that much faith in her science and her training.” Black told Wisconsin Watch in a phone interview from Green Bay Correctional Institution that the interrogation was “intimidating” but “I wasn’t really scared, because . . . I didn’t have anything to hide.”

------------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: A controversial doctor. A disputed abuse diagnosis. Two convicted Wisconsin men say they are innocent,"  by Reporter Brenda Wintrode,   published by WisconsinWatch, on April 30, 2022. "Brenda Wintrode joined the Center in July 2021 as a Roy W. Howard fellow. She is a native of Shrewsbury, Massachusetts, and earned her bachelor’s degree in business administration at Bryant University in Rhode Island. After switching careers from finance, she was named the Philip Merrill College of Journalism’s outstanding master’s student when she graduated in 2020. As a reporter for the Howard Center, Wintrode was the lead writer on the award-winning investigation of the federal CARES Act’s failure to prevent evictions during the pandemic. She was also a key reporter on the center’s investigation of homelessness, documenting how cities treated people living in encampments. She covered Maryland state government for Capital News."
 
SUB-HEADING: "Dakota Black and Joshua Gehde are in prison for homicide after former UW (University of Wisconsin) Dr. Barbara Knox accused them of inflicting abusive head trauma.

GIST: Nearly nine years after her son, Brayden, died, Shannon Turnbill still replays the image of the 5-year-old lying on the bed, unresponsive. 


“It’s a picture I’ll never get out of my head,” she said of the encounter in October 2013. “His eyes were rolled back. It almost looked like he was having a seizure but not moving.”


After a University of Wisconsin doctor trained in identifying child abuse said Brayden had suffered from abusive head trauma, law enforcement blamed the only adult home with Brayden: Turnbill’s boyfriend, Dakota Black of Sun Prairie, Wisconsin.


In April 2016, Josh Gehde found his girlfriend’s 2-year-old daughter lying lifeless on the floor of their Madison, Wisconsin, apartment. 


Just minutes before, Gehde had given the toddler crackers and went to the bathroom to shave. 


When he came out, he saw chewed-up crackers on the rug near her face. He turned over her already cold body, struck her back to dislodge food and called 9-1-1.


The  9-1-1 operator coached him through CPR as he waited for paramedics.


 The girl died two days later after being removed from life support.


 Dr. Barbara Knox, the same UW child abuse pediatrician from Black’s case — who has been suspended and investigated by two hospitals in two states — said abusive head trauma caused the  brain injuries that killed the girl.


Courts, legal experts and medical specialists are increasingly scrutinizing the abusive head trauma diagnosis, an umbrella term that includes the controversial diagnosis of shaken baby syndrome, for lacking a scientific basis and criteria for diagnosis. Earlier this year, a New Jersey judge labeled abusive head trauma “junk science” and refused to allow testimony about the diagnosis in his courtroom.


In both cases, Knox said the injuries happened within minutes of the child’s collapse, blaming the last person with the child. Records show that police and prosecutors, confident in Knox’s credentials, looked no further. During each trial, attorneys and experts battled for the jury’s trust.


In the Gehde case, prosecutors showed jurors photos of a small, lifeless body still on life support, and in Black’s case, painted him as someone Brayden feared. Knox testified to a “reasonable degree of medical certainty” that each child died from abuse. Defense experts, who specialized in pediatric neurology and forensic neuropathology, blamed other possible conditions, saying they saw no signs of abuse. 


“It would be most unusual to have a fatal head injury without an obvious large bruise on the scalp and a skull fracture,” Black’s expert, neuropathologist Dr. Jan Leestma, said in a report. “This child doesn’t have any of these things.” 


But in the end, the juries in both cases believed Knox.


Black and Gehde are serving lengthy sentences in Wisconsin prisons, convicted of murdering the children in their care. They pleaded not guilty and refused prosecutors’ plea deals, despite facing decades behind bars. Both have lost their appeals.

 

The men insist they are innocent. Some family members of the children who died, including Turnbill, say they do not believe these men killed the children. 


And Wisconsin Watch has identified at least eight cases in which Knox determined a child had suffered head trauma from abuse that investigators and medical specialists said were caused by benign medical conditions, injuries from severe birth trauma, accidental falls, a bleeding disorder and a possible stroke.


Knox did not respond to attempts to reach her for comment.


A national debate

These controversies are not unique to Wisconsin. In late April, a Texas appeals court halted the execution of Melissa Lucio, convicted of killing her 2-year-old daughter — a death the state’s medical examiner said was caused by “blunt force trauma” to the head in 2007.


Lucio and other family members had told police the girl fell down the stairs and was not abused — but then Lucio confessed to killing her after five hours of interrogation. The high court, citing several factors including Lucio’s possible innocence, sent the case back to a lower court for review. 


Nationally, since 1992, 26 people have been exonerated following convictions on charges stemming from diagnoses of abusive head trauma or shaken baby syndrome, according to The National Registry of Exonerations


The human instinct to protect children can snowball momentum around a child abuse allegation, making it “all too easy to sweep innocent people up in the process,” said Keith Findley, co-director of the Wisconsin Innocence Project, who has written extensively about the problems of this type of diagnosis.


Knox’s fraught tenure

During her 13-year tenure in Wisconsin, Knox acted as a crucial liaison between the UW’s Child Protection Program and law enforcement, providing medical diagnoses, consultations or expert testimony in over 200 criminal cases, according to open records responses from 14 district attorneys in southern and central Wisconsin and an analysis of electronic court records by Court Data Technologies.


One of about 350 nationally certified child abuse pediatricians trained in recognizing child maltreatment and legal proceedings, Knox led the UW program until 2019, leaving after the hospital investigated whether she bullied her colleagues. Alaska CARES hired her that same year to lead the state’s forensic child abuse clinic. A joint investigation by Wisconsin Watch and the Anchorage Daily News found Knox generated similar allegations there.


During her brief tenure, the entire medical staff of Alaska CARES left or had their jobs reassigned. Knox submitted her resignation from Alaska CARES in January, scheduled to take effect on April 1.


 In March, online records show Knox was issued a medical license in Florida.

In all, the joint investigation also found 12 cases in which Knox’s diagnoses of abuse were rejected by juries, court officials, child welfare workers, investigators and other doctors. 


Knox tied to 124 Dane County cases

But hundreds more cases funneled into the criminal justice system.


Dodge County District Attorney Kurt Klomberg said he stopped using Knox as an expert in 2017 after she failed to provide a timely report in an abusive head trauma case. He said he decided not to “support any child abuse or neglect cases for prosecution based on the work of Dr. Knox unless she had completed an opinion report prior to the decision to charge.” 


Klomberg said he also advised law enforcement and human services to seek experts from other hospitals. After he made that decision, Klomberg got one referral for child neglect that Knox alleged. He declined to pursue it for lack of evidence.

“I seek to engage medical experts who I can rely upon,” Klomberg added. “I determined that I would not likely support a case involving Dr. Knox’s independent opinion several years ago.”


Criminal child abuse and neglect cases involving Dr. Barbara Knox in Wisconsin 2006-19

During her 13-year tenure as medical director of the Child Protection Program at American Family Children's Hospital in Madison, Knox was an expert witness, adviser or physician of record in 208 cases in 14 south and central Wisconsin counties.


Records obtained from 14 county district attorney's offices in south-central Wisconsin showed Knox's involvement in 210 criminal cases of child abuse or neglect during her 13-year tenure as the medical director of the Child Protection Program at American Family Children's Hospital.


County

Number of Cases

Dane

124

Juneau

19

Jefferson

15

Columbia

12

Rock

11

Dodge

10

Walworth

4

Marquette

3

Fond Du Lac

3

Iowa

2

Green

2

Sauk

1

Portage

1

Brown

1

Total

208


How and why we gathered this data: After a year-long investigation into wrongful child abuse allegations made by the nationally-recognized child abuse expert, Wisconsin Watch sought to uncover the potential reach of Knox’s medical practice across Wisconsin. Wisconsin Watch found criminal cases involving Knox using the state’s open records law and a search by Court Data Technologies. District attorneys in Sauk and Brown counties denied our records requests. Wisconsin Watch did not investigate all 208 cases.


A Flourish data visualization

Juneau County District Attorney Kenneth Hamm said his office still has pending cases that originated on Knox’s medical opinions. After Knox left Wisconsin, he requested second opinions from other doctors, which Hamm said were “generally in line with what Dr. Knox stated and did not change the outcomes.” He added that none involved abusive head trauma or shaken baby syndrome.


Hamm and Portage County District Attorney Louis Molepske Jr. both told Wisconsin Watch they would consider re-examining closed cases if new evidence or concerns about Knox’s diagnoses emerge.


Of the 208 cases found by Wisconsin Watch, the Dane County District Attorney’s Office brought 124, over 70% of them since Ismael Ozanne’s election in 2010.


In an interview, Ozanne expressed confidence in convictions made by his office involving Knox’s diagnoses and said reviewing the cases because of questions about Knox’s job performance was an “oversimplification.”


“We were not just speaking with Dr. Knox alone,” Ozanne told Wisconsin Watch. “We were having to reach out to other experts . . . And, to my knowledge, none of those diagnoses were ever called into question. The hospital has never called us and said any of these diagnoses you should be worried about to my knowledge; and law enforcement has not reached out to us to say there’s other evidence that we have that basically shows that what was referred to you is false.”


Ozanne said he had not reached out to the UW to discuss possible misdiagnosis, adding, “I would assume if there were questions, they would reach out to us.”


Findley said the fact other doctors agreed with Knox “does not resolve the matter” because of the “repeated allegations and findings that Dr. Knox bullied colleagues” and that “plenty of other doctors and experts have raised concerns about some of her determinations.”


Findley described Knox as “an unusually aggressive and prolific advocate for concluding a child was the victim of abuse on vague, non-specific medical findings, which the research shows can have multiple etiologies, not just abuse.”


The hospital and law enforcement not alerting Ozanne to possible mistakes is “hardly surprising,” given the potential legal liability, Findley said. He added that Knox’s work history “ought at the very least prompt serious concerns about what wreckage she might have left in her wake in this jurisdiction,” he said.


‘Not a diagnosis’: Doctors, legal experts, disagree on abusive head trauma

The American Academy of Pediatrics endorses the diagnosis, but a growing number of legal experts and doctors question its validity


The two criminal cases examined by Wisconsin Watch in this story relied largely on Knox’s opinion that a child was the victim of abusive head trauma.


When a child suddenly collapses, doctors may suspect that someone has inflicted abusive head trauma. The signs they look for are brain and eye bleeding and brain swelling, or even one of the three —  even if there are no external bruises or skull fractures.


But critics say the diagnosis — which is accepted by the American Academy of Pediatrics — remains an untested hypothesis.


Even one of the doctors who first proposed the hypothesis decades ago pleaded with the medical community in 2012 to stop using it in the courtroom, stating “these are simply hypotheses, not proven medical or scientific facts.” Dr. Norman Guthkelch, then 96, called for independent research on brain and eye bleeding “by individuals who have no personal stake in the matter.”


Dr. Joseph Scheller, a pediatric neurologist and epidemiologist, left the American Academy of Pediatrics in the 1990s because of the organization’s endorsement of shaken baby syndrome, which he says is “not a diagnosis.” The pediatrics academy later created a new term — abusive head trauma — to incorporate the increasingly controversial shaken-baby diagnosis. Scheller, seen here during a 2021 trial in Madison, Wis., also testified on behalf of Josh Gehde during his 2017 trial. 

Over his 30 years as a physician, Scheller has seen a big change in the child abuse field.

Decades ago, the criteria for abuse were based on a doctor’s common sense, he said. “If a child looked like he was in a barroom brawl, or had belt marks or had burns, and let’s say it’s a skull fracture, then, you know, there was nothing to discuss,” he said. “Somebody lost their temper.” 

But these days, child abuse pediatricians are diagnosing intentional head trauma without a skull fracture or external bruising. 

“Doesn’t that make you suspicious? he asked. “They (the abusers) were that careful to leave no trace?”


A New Jersey judge recently barred testimony about abusive head trauma in his courtroom. Summing up five days of expert testimony, New Jersey Superior Court Judge Pedro J. Jimenez concluded: “What the literature and testimony have clearly shown is that AHT is an assumption packaged as a medical diagnosis, unsupported by any medical or scientific testing.”


Most SBS reports unsubstantiated

Since the Wisconsin Legislature mandated tracking shaken baby syndrome in 2005, the Department of Children and Families has recorded over 2,000 allegations. But only 40% have been substantiated, according to reports obtained online and through an open records request.

Findley, who has been challenging  the use of the diagnosis in the courtroom for over a decade,  questions even the “substantiated” cases.


“No doubt many of them are real child abuse cases,” he said. “This notion of ‘substantiated’ really disguises all of the ambiguity, the uncertainty and the error that’s inherent in this whole system. So I would never accept, at face value, their cohort of cases as truly cases involving abuse.”


Thirteen years ago, the AAP urged doctors to use the broader term abusive head trauma instead of shaken baby syndrome, casting a wider net over the possible mechanisms of injury in addition to shaking.


In 2020, the group encouraged physicians to combat alternative diagnoses to abusive head trauma in court, reminding physicians that “legal burdens of proof (i.e., beyond a reasonable doubt) are not required for the diagnosis.”


In recent years, a growing body of research has revealed that a broad range of illnesses, genetic conditions, natural causes, birth trauma and accidents can cause the same brain and eye symptoms. And biomechanical modeling using dummy dolls has failed to show an adult could cause those symptoms by shaking.


And in over a dozen videotaped incidents where adults were caught abusively shaking children, the child did not suffer from the symptoms associated with abusive head trauma — and some of them were not injured at all.


Also in question: The assertion that catastrophic brain injuries always cause immediate collapse. People who suffer fatal brain trauma can appear normal for hours — even days — a phenomenon known as “lucid interval.”


Speaking on behalf of the American Academy of Pediatrics, Dr. Suzanne Haney said in a statement to Wisconsin Watch that those who disagree with the academy’s position on abusive head trauma are “pseudo-experts and defense attorneys who have something to gain.” 

Haney, a child abuse pediatrician, cited a survey of doctors likely to see cases of suspected abusive head trauma that found “a high degree of consensus” in the medical field around abusive head trauma and shaken baby syndrome.


Findley and his co-authors wrote in a 2020 Wisconsin Law Review article that despite a “weak and methodologically flawed research base,” the justice system has treated an abusive head trauma diagnosis as “all of the evidence necessary to satisfy all of the legal elements for criminal prosecution.” 


Four witnesses noticed something off

The day Brayden Turnbill collapsed, his mother remembers her son waking up “happy.” She helped Brayden dress in one of his favorite superhero T-shirts and tied his shoes. The little boy who loved the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles and the Green Bay Packers had yet to master shoelaces.


Four people who saw Brayden after school that day told Sun Prairie police they noticed something off with the normally cheerful, fun-loving kindergartner. Two, who were children, described Brayden as looking “sad,” and as if he had been “crying without tears.”


Black said he repeatedly asked Brayden if he was OK after he came home from school with “bloodshot” eyes and acting “whiny.” Patricia Garwo, Turnbill’s cousin who picked Brayden and her children up from the bus that day, also asked him several times if he was alright, according to police reports.


The boy’s 5-year-old cousin told police that she twice saw Brayden fall on the playground. The following year an investigator for the defense reported more detail: “She said Brayden fell once off the gray monkey bars and landed on his knees, and fell once off the red monkey bars and landed on his feet . . . She said she saw with her own eyes that Brayden hurt his back, and almost his arm, on the big gray pole.” The girl said Brayden told the teacher supervising recess and went to the school nurse.


But the jurors who convicted Black never heard the girl’s testimony. Dane County Circuit Judge Stephen Ehlke barred details of the reported fall, ruling it irrelevant since she did not see Brayden hit his head.


Once he got home from school, Brayden visited a neighbor’s house briefly, played for about 15 minutes with his infant brother before telling Black he was tired and going downstairs for a nap.


Black told police he stayed upstairs with couple’s baby. The next time he saw Brayden was after Turnbill found him unresponsive in his bed.


Devastating news

As the mother of eight children, Turnbill saw some of Brayden’s older siblings experience fever-induced seizures when they were young. But when Brayden didn’t recover as her other children had, Turnbill yelled for Black to call 9-1-1. When she got on the phone, the operator walked her through CPR. And when she lifted his shirt she and Black saw a diagonal mark across his chest. Black said it looked like “he got hit with a stick.”


Doctors at St. Mary’s Hospital in Madison rushed Brayden by helicopter to the UW where doctors performed emergency brain surgery in an unsuccessful attempt to save his life. Turnbill followed with a friend to the UW. 



Once there, Turnbill recalled how Knox delivered the devastating news: “We did what we could, but Brayden’s gone.” Turnbill remembered sliding off the chair to her knees and wailing.


Abuse was the only possible explanation for her son’s death. “ ‘Whoever was the last person with him is the one who did this.’ That’s exactly what she said,” Turnbill recalled.


Turnbill will never forget what Knox said next. Still standing over the grieving mother, the doctor said Brayden had bleeding on his brain “so severe that, that his, his brain pretty much fell into two pieces.” 


Turnbill stammered as she recounted the episode almost nine years later, asking:

“How the hell are you going to come in and tell a mother that about her son?”


Police: ‘She has credentials’

After questioning Black at home for hours, police arrested him on an outstanding probation violation for a drug charge and took him to the Sun Prairie Police Department.P


Detective Frank Smith ran the interrogation. He told Black he believed everything Knox told police — the boy’s collapse from a massive brain injury happened within minutes of being abused, according to a transcript.


“She’s an expert in her field,” Smith told Black. “She’s an expert witness for the state of Wisconsin. Okay? She has credentials.”


Then the officer added: “Something happened in the house. You did something to him.”


After Black denied harming Brayden — “I love that kid like he’s my own son” — the officer would have none of it.


“If I had any doubt or reserve of what she (Knox) told me, I wouldn’t be accusing you of doing this,” Smith said. “But I am because I believe her. I have that much faith in her science and her training.”


Black told Wisconsin Watch in a phone interview from Green Bay Correctional Institution that the interrogation was “intimidating” but “I wasn’t really scared, because . . . I didn’t have anything to hide.”


In court, Knox and pediatric radiologist Dr. Wilbur Smith testified for the state that the bruise across the boy’s chest looked to them like a “loop-mark injury” from someone striking him with a cord, like an extension cord or cell-phone charging cord. A police search of the home failed to find a cord fitting Knox’s description.


Ehlke’s ruling barring the testimony about falls on the playground kept defense experts from discussing how short falls can sometimes cause serious brain injuries in children, and in rare cases, death. In 12 of the 18 cases cited in that study, the children experienced a “lucid interval” of as long as two days before collapsing. 


Knox acknowledged the possibility of lucidity between injury and collapse and referenced the 2009 death of actress Natasha Richardson, whose health declined hours after hitting her head in a skiing accident and died two days later.


Asked whether that could have happened in Brayden Turnbill’s case, Knox responded: “Absolutely not” — because their brain bleeds occurred within different, yet proximal, layers of the brain. However, a 2018 Medscape article reported that more than half of the patients who had the same type of bleeding as Brayden “had lucid intervals and were able to make conversation between the time of their injury and subsequent deterioration.”


Black was convicted after a nine-day trial in Dane County Circuit Court. Turnbill refused to testify for the prosecution. “I still believe that something happened to him at school,” she said.

Black, now 32, won’t get out of prison until 2045. Then, he faces 21 more years of community supervision, finishing his sentence at age 76.


It was the scariest thing ever’

Joshua Gehde said he never minded watching his girlfriend’s daughter, who he described as “very bubbly, happy, always smiling.”


The three had lived together for six months in an apartment near Madison’s Reindahl Park. They loved to visit the city’s botanical garden and just get outside together, he said.


“It felt like we were becoming a family, like everything was coming into place,” Gehde said during a phone interview from Stanley Correctional Institution.


On the morning the 2-year-old collapsed, his girlfriend went to work, and Gehde took the toddler to the park. He snapped a photo of the girl with a pacifier in her mouth, wisps of blond hair surrounding her face beneath the hood of her pink coat, and sent it to her mother.


After about an hour at the park, they went back home for lunch. He broke up some Ritz crackers on the highchair tray and put it on the floor where she could reach. He heard her cough a few times while he was in the bathroom but “didn’t think anything of it,” he told police. He thought she was fine. Minutes later, she wasn’t.


A paramedic who arrived at the scene said the girl’s lips were blue, and a firefighter reported using forceps to remove regurgitated food from her airway. A police officer who arrived on the scene originally concluded the event was a “tragic accident,” according to court documents.


Two days later, the girl died at the UW. Doctors reported the girl had brain and eye bleeding and brain swelling. Knox documented multiple bruises, including on the back of the girl’s head, and a large red mark on the girl’s left buttock she described as a “handprint.” Citing the brain and eye findings as a “constellation” of injuries, and marks she labeled as bruises, Knox declared the girl suffered “definite abusive head trauma.”


The day after the toddler died, Gehde, shackled at the wrists and ankles and wearing blue prison scrubs, shuffled into a Dane County Sheriff’s Office interrogation room. The then-25-year-old and two Madison police detectives sat on upholstered furniture, a coffee table between them, while he recounted the events leading up to the girl’s collapse.


At the request of detectives, he reenacted how he gave her back blows to dislodge the food from her throat on a toddler-sized mannequin. 


“It was the scariest thing ever . . . she was lifeless,” he told the Madison detectives, as he sat back on the couch and reached for tissues to dry his eyes.


But detectives rejected his story based on what Knox told them. “We know for sure the doctors are going to say she didn’t choke on anything,” Detective Maya Krajcinovic said.


Since Gehde was the last one with her, he was the only one who could tell them what happened, they said.

“I’m not going to admit to something I didn’t do,” Gehde said, dissolving into tears. “I f***ing loved that girl.”


Later in the interview, Krajcinovic picked up the mannequin to demonstrate what she thought could cause the girl’s injuries. “If somebody grabs a kid and gets upset,” she said, shaking the dummy, its head flailing back and forth, then strikes its head on a couch, “ … that’s what causes bruises.”


Gehde looked at her confused and asked, “Who does that though?”


Defense offers other causes

Three medical specialists hired by the defense testified the girl died after blood clots in her brain caused a seizure, starving her brain and heart of oxygen. A neuroradiologist said small seizures can mimic a choking incident. And the girl’s autopsy report revealed she had bitten her tongue, a common occurrence in children having seizures.


Pediatric neurologist, Scheller, said he could not determine if the clots were hours or days old. Regarding her bruises, he wrote 2-year-olds “can easily become bruised while engaging in play activities.”


In her medical report, Knox acknowledged the girl’s brain scan showed blood clots and bleeding throughout her brain, but, coupled with the child’s multiple bruises, concluded the girl’s brain injury was due to abusive head trauma.


During a cross-examination at trial, Gehde’s attorney asked Knox if she’s ever made a mistake.

“I am not aware that I have ever had a mistaken diagnosis,” she answered.


Gehde and other members of his family independently told Wisconsin Watch that the day after his defense team’s experts testified, some of the girl’s family members, including the child’s mother, switched sides and sat near Gehde’s parents and his defense attorneys.


If he had pleaded guilty, Gehde said both families would have “never heard any of this, they would have never heard the evidence to let them know I didn’t do anything — for them to support my innocence.”


The girl’s mother did not respond to interview requests, and attempts to interview other family members were unsuccessful. Private messages shared with Wisconsin Watch between the Gehde family and some of the girl’s family members, as recently as 2020, revealed they believed Gehde is innocent.


However, the jury did not.


Gehde’s 20-year prison sentence ends in 2039, followed by 15 years of probation. He unsuccessfully appealed in 2019.


He wrote in an email from prison: “My whole life was stripped from me for something I didn’t do.”


Separated — but still close

Less than one year after Brayden died, a consultant hired by the Sun Prairie School District inventoried the district’s playground equipment. The study listed — in poor condition and as a high priority for replacement — three district play structures, one of which was the monkey bars  from which the girl said she saw Brayden fall.


A spokeswoman for the school district refused to answer questions about Brayden’s reported fall from the Royal Oaks Elementary School playground structure and the timing of the consultant’s hiring.


Black and Turnbill remain close and are trying to raise their two sons together, although the prison has banned her from visiting him because he was convicted of killing her son. 


Black talks to his sons several times a week on Turnbill’s phone. The boys, who are now 9 and 8, know their father is in prison because of something that happened to their brother, but she has spared them the details.


She tells them, “The police don’t always tell the truth . . .  the lawyers, the judges; the news doesn’t always tell you the truth.”


After Brayden died, Shannon and the boys lived with Black’s mother for three years, but have since moved from one living situation to the next. She now works as a housekeeper in a Madison hotel and rents a room there for her and the boys while she tries to get subsidized housing.


She hopes in sharing her story she can uncover the truth of what happened to her son that day — and find some justice for Black.


“Someday, I hope they figure out what really happened, and let him go.”

The Fund for Investigative Journalism provided financial support for this story. The nonprofit Wisconsin Watch (www.WisconsinWatch.org) collaborates with WPR, PBS Wisconsin, other news media and the University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Journalism and Mass Communication. 


The entire story can be read at:


https://wisconsinwatch.org/2022/04/a-controversial-doctor-a-disputed-abuse-diagnosis-two-convicted-wisconsin-men-say-they-are-innocent/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;



SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:




FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;