Monday, April 11, 2022

Lizelle Herrera: Texas: (Very Welcome Development): Murder charges are to be dropped against the Texas woman arrested over abortion as this is not a 'criminal matter,' The Washington Post (Reporter Caroline Kitchener) reports..."The case had confounded activists on both sides of the abortion debate because, although Texas has taken measures to restrict access to abortion, it was not clear which legal statute Herrera was alleged to have violated. Texas law also explicitly exempts a woman from a criminal homicide charge for aborting her pregnancy. In a statement made to the Associated Press last week, the Starr County Sheriff’s Office merely stated that Herrera was charged after “intentionally and knowingly causing the death of an individual by self-induced abortion.” On Sunday, the district attorney’s office stated that this was 'not a criminal matter.' “In reviewing applicable Texas law, it is clear that Ms. Herrera cannot and should not be prosecuted for the allegation against her,” District Attorney Gocha Allen Ramirez wrote. The case was brought to the attention of the sheriff’s office by a hospital, according to Ramirez’s statement." (I will be following developments closely. HL);



CRIMINALIZING REPRODUCTION: (Attacks on Science, Medicine and the Right To Choose): I have taken on the  theme of criminalizing reproduction - a natural theme for a Blog concerned with  flawed science in its myriad forms,   and its flawed devotees (like Charles Smith) - as I am utterly opposed to the current movement in the United States and some other countries - towards imprisoning women and their physicians on the basis of sham science (or any other basis). Control over their reproductive lives is far too important to women in America or anywhere else so they can  participate  equally in the economic and social life of their nations without fear for  loss their freedom at the hands of political opportunists and fanatics. I will continue to follow relevant cases and the mounting wave of  legislative attacks aimed at criminalizing women who exercise their constitutional right to freedom of choice.

Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.

-----------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Herrera’s arrest comes as Republican-led states across the country are passing a flurry of antiabortion legislation ahead of a Supreme Court decision this summer that could overturn or significantly weaken Roe v. Wade, the case that has protected the constitutional right to abortion for nearly 50 years. Her case could be an early sign of what is to come if Roe is overturned, Vladeck said. When prosecutors charged Herrera, they might have been thinking of a pre-Roe abortion ban that is still on the books in Texas, Vladeck added, but has not been in effect since 1973 because it is unconstitutional under RoeNine states still have pre-Roe bans, which could come back to life depending on what the Supreme Court decides in June. “We could see more of this,” Vladeck said."

-----------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Murder charges to dropped against Texas woman arrested over abortion," by Reporter Carolin Kitchener, published by The Washington Post on April 10, 2022.

SUB-HEADING: 'The district  attorney's office overseeing the car  said, this was 'not a criminal matter.'

GIST: “The district attorney’s office in a Texas border county said Sunday it intended to dismiss the case against Lizelle Herrera, a 26-year-old who was arrested on murder charges after what authorities said was a “self-induced abortion."


The case had confounded activists on both sides of the abortion debate because, although Texas has taken measures to restrict access to abortion, it was not clear which legal statute Herrera was alleged to have violated. Texas law also explicitly exempts a woman from a criminal homicide charge for aborting her pregnancy.


In a statement made to the Associated Press last week, the Starr County Sheriff’s Office merely stated that Herrera was charged after “intentionally and knowingly causing the death of an individual by self-induced abortion.”


On Sunday, the district attorney’s office stated that this was “not a criminal matter.”


“In reviewing applicable Texas law, it is clear that Ms. Herrera cannot and should not be 

prosecuted for the allegation against her,” District Attorney Gocha Allen Ramirez wrote.


The case was brought to the attention of the sheriff’s office by a hospital, according to Ramirez’s statement.


Calixtro Villarreal, Herrera’s attorney, declined to comment when reached by phone Sunday.


Texas enacted a law in September that bans abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, using a novel legal strategy that empowers private citizens to enforce the law through civil litigation.


But that law does not appear to have applied in this case. Herrera faced a criminal charge, not a lawsuit. Additionally, that law does not allow lawsuits to be filed against the person who had an abortion, only those who helped facilitate it.


“If [prosecutors] are literally charging her with murder under Texas law, it’s likely they either forgot about the exception for murder or they have some other theory for why this could apply,” Steve Vladeck, a professor at the University of Texas School of Law who specializes in the federal courts and has closely followed the Texas abortion ban, said Saturday.


Abortion rights organizations quickly mobilized to support Herrera. The Frontera Fund, a group that raises money for Texas patients to access abortions, organized a rally Saturday morning outside the Starr County jail and raised awareness of the case on social media.


“This arrest is inhumane,” Rockie Gonzalez, founder of the Frontera Fund, said in a statement Saturday. "We stand in solidarity with you Lizelle, if you are reading this, and we will not stand down until you are free.”


Herrera’s arrest comes as Republican-led states across the country are passing a flurry of antiabortion legislation ahead of a Supreme Court decision this summer that could overturn or significantly weaken Roe v. Wade, the case that has protected the constitutional right to abortion for nearly 50 years.


Her case could be an early sign of what is to come if Roe is overturned, Vladeck said.


When prosecutors charged Herrera, they might have been thinking of a pre-Roe abortion ban that is still on the books in Texas, Vladeck added, but has not been in effect since 1973 because it is unconstitutional under Roe.


Nine states still have pre-Roe bans, which could come back to life depending on what the Supreme Court decides in June.


“We could see more of this,” Vladeck said."


The entire story can be read at:


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/04/10/texas-abortion-murder-arrest/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;




SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:




FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;