May 14: Thomas Rosa: Boston, Massachusetts: Exonerated in March after serving 34 years for a murder he did not commit: Judging from Adam Gaffin's report on the lawsuit Thomas Rosa has launched, his case could well serve as an anatomy of how to convict an innocent man..."In his complaint, Rosa's attorneys say that in addition to physical evidence, eyewitness accounts were faulty - they said the man last seen with Taylor had fine, straight hair and a missing or gap tooth, while Rosa had thick curly hair and no gap between his front teeth.

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "But the complaint also blasts Boston Police detectives for allegedly getting witnesses to change their stories when their accounts did not match Rosa's description. When police focused on Mr. Rosa as the suspect, they convinced the roommate to alter her physical description of the man she saw to avoid the obvious mismatch with Mr. Rosa. ... Police also convinced the roommate, and the roommate's siter who was in the apartment the night of Taylor's killing, to change their description of the coast they saw on the unfamiliar man after learning that Mr. Rosa had a different coat."

----------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "The Commonwealth argued to the jury that biologic evidence on Mr. Rosa's coat connected the victim to the coat, but DNA evidence refutes that claim. In contrast, the complaint continues, Rosa immediately cooperated with detectives once they began to go after him as the suspect - he willingly gave police hair, blood and saliva samples. And, the complaint alleges, the detectives made up statements by Rosa's wife, who did not speak English, but who was not provided a translator, to rebut his alibi."

------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Man sues state over the 34 years he spent in prison for a Dorchester murder he didn't commit, by Adam Gaffin, published by The Universal Hub on May 12, 2026.

.

GIST: Thomas Rosa of Chelsea, who was only officially absolved in March of the 1985 murder of Gwendolyn Taylor of Dorchester yesterday sued the state for the 34 years he spent in prison for her murder.

In his suit, filed in Suffolk Superior Court, Rosa is seeking the maximum $1 million fee state law allows for wrongful imprisonment, along with expungement of his conviction from state records, state-funded medical and mental-health care, at least 50% off any classes at state colleges, housing assistance and attorney's fees.

Rosa was charged with the  murder, rape and kidnapping of Taylor, an 18-year-old Talbot Avenue resident, whose body was found in a car parked at a repair garage on Norfolk Street in December, 1985.

His first trial, in 1986, ended in a mistrial. The next month, a Suffolk Superior Court jury convicted him, but the Supreme Judicial Court overturned the verdict and ordered a new trial, which resulted in a guilty verdict in 1993 - for first-degree murder and kidnapping, with an acquittal on the rape charge.

In 2020, a single justice of the Supreme Judicial Court ordered him freed as he pursued a new trial, based on new evidence, such as the fact that the man's DNA found on the victim's body was not his - and that DNA found on a coat at his home was not the victim's.

In 2023, a Suffolk Superior Court judge vacated his conviction and ordered a new trial. At the time, the Suffolk County District Attorney's office said it planned to retry him, but this past March filed a nolle prosequi form formally and finally dropping his case.

In his complaint, Rosa's attorneys say that in addition to physical evidence, eyewitness accounts were faulty - they said the man last seen with Taylor had fine, straight hair and a missing or gap tooth, while Rosa had thick curly hair and no gap between his front teeth.

But the complaint also blasts Boston Police detectives for allegedly getting witnesses to change their stories when their accounts did not match Rosa's description.

When police focused on Mr. Rosa as the suspect, they convinced the roommate to alter her physical description of the man she saw to avoid the obvious mismatch with Mr. Rosa. ...

Police also convinced the roommate, and the roommate's siter who was in the apartment the night of Taylor's killing, to change their description of the coast they saw on the unfamiliar man after learning that Mr. Rosa had a different coat. ...

The Commonwealth argued to the jury that biologic evidence on Mr. Rosa's coat connected the victim to the coat, but DNA evidence refutes that claim.

In contrast, the complaint continues, Rosa immediately cooperated with detectives once they began to go after him as the suspect - he willingly gave police hair, blood and saliva samples.

And, the complaint alleges, the detectives made up statements by Rosa's wife, who did not speak English, but who was not provided a translator, to rebut his alibi."

The entire story can be read at:

https://www.universalhub.com/2026/man-sues-state-over-34-years-he-spent-prison-murder-he-didnt-commit

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system.  Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;

May 13: Stefon Morant: Connecticut: Bulletin: Ongoing federal civil-rights wrongful conviction trial: Most Unusual Development: The New Haven Independent reports that Mayor Justin Elicker has been ordered by the judge trying the case to answer her questions about why he told Hearst Connecticut that the plaintiff in an ongoing wrongful-conviction trial had sought a settlement payment that was “well beyond what is reasonable.”..."The quote in question was first published Wednesday morning in an article written by Hearst’s Nathaniel Rosenberg. According to that article, Elicker said that Stefon Morant — who is suing the city and a group of former detectives for allegedly framing him for a 1990 double murder — had demanded a payment that was “well beyond what is reasonable.”

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "At 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday, Thomas Gerarde, the attorney representing the city in Morant’s civil-rights trial, promised Nagala that Elicker would make no further public statements about the settlement discussions.  The mayor is scheduled to speak in court at 4:15 p.m. (Judge) Nagala has ordered the 10-person jury to leave the room before Elicker enters.  At City Hall on Wednesday, Elicker declined to comment further on the matter, stressing that he wants to be “sensitive” to the ongoing trial while also “trying to be transparent.” He confirmed that he was accurately quoted in Rosenberg’s article. Beyond that, “I don’t want to make any comments.”

------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Judge Orders Mayor To Court Over Settlement Comment, by Reporters  MONA MAHADEVAN, DEREEN SHIRNEKHI and THOMAS BREEN, published earlier today.

GIST: "Mayor Justin Elicker on Wednesday afternoon will head to federal court in Hartford to answer a judge’s questions a

“I work really hard to be transparent and answer questions from the press,” Elicker told reporters after an unrelated press conference at City Hall on Wednesday. He said he is going to follow the judge’s order and and head to court to hear any concerns she might have.

“I haven’t talked with the judge. I want to make sure I don’t make comments before hearing about the concerns from the judge,” he added.

The quote in question was first published Wednesday morning in an article written by Hearst’s Nathaniel Rosenberg. According to that article, Elicker said that Stefon Morant — who is suing the city and a group of former detectives for allegedly framing him for a 1990 double murder — had demanded a payment that was “well beyond what is reasonable.”

Around 10:45 a.m. on Wednesday, Morant’s legal team discovered Hearst’s article and asked Judge Sarala Nagala to call Elicker into court. Nick Brustin, one of the plaintiff’s attorneys, described Elicker’s characterization of the settlement talks as a “lie.”

Hearst’s Rosenberg then posted another article with more quotes from the same conversation with Elicker. He is quoted as saying that Morant’s demands were “so far beyond what any other case has settled for” and that the city has been “forced into a position where we can’t settle.”

At 1:00 p.m. on Wednesday, Thomas Gerarde, the attorney representing the city in Morant’s civil-rights trial, promised Nagala that Elicker would make no further public statements about the settlement discussions. 

The mayor is scheduled to speak in court at 4:15 p.m. Nagala has ordered the 10-person jury to leave the room before Elicker enters. 

At City Hall on Wednesday, Elicker declined to comment further on the matter, stressing that he wants to be “sensitive” to the ongoing trial while also “trying to be transparent.”

He confirmed that he was accurately quoted in Rosenberg’s article. Beyond that, “I don’t want to make any comments.”

When the Independent asked Elicker last week why the city had settled with Morant’s alleged co-conspirator, Scott Lewis, in 2017, and not with Morant, the mayor responded, “Oftentimes, both parties want to reach a settlement agreement, but sometimes different parties have very different expectations as to what’s an appropriate settlement agreement.” At the time, he declined to share any further details about the settlement.""

The entire story can be read at:

https://www.newhavenindependent.org/2026/05/13/judge-orders-mayor-to-court-over-settlement-comment/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system.  Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;

May 13: Stefan Morant: New Haven: Connecticut: Ongoing federal civil-rights wrongful conviction trial: From our 'Something is wrong in this picture' department'...As the New Haven Independent (Reporter Mona Mahadevan) reports:"In 2013, a federal judge overturned Scott Lewis’s murder conviction on the basis of police misconduct. Four years later, the City of New Haven paid Lewis $9.5 million in a wrongful-conviction settlement. But in a federal courtroom on Tuesday, an attorney representing the City of New Haven questioned Lewis as if he were indeed the killer. “Did you threaten [Stefon Morant] not to say anything about your involvement with the Turner-Fields homicide?” asked Thomas Gerarde, an attorney representing the city. “I knew nothing about the Turner-Fields homicide,” responded Lewis." Go figure! HL;

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: Lewis was questioned by Gerarde, not as a defendant, but as a witness in an ongoing civil-rights trial for his alleged co-conspirator, Stefon Morant. Both Lewis and Morant were convicted of the 1990 double homicide of former alderman Ricardo Turner and his partner, Lamont Fields. Both spent two decades in prison. Both have long claimed they were framed by former city police Det. Vincent Raucci because of a drug debt. Almost 20 years after his criminal trial, Lewis’s conviction was overturned. Under the Toni Harp administration, the city later awarded $9.5 million to Lewis in a settlement. Morant, meanwhile, spent 21 years behind bars before receiving a sentence reduction and pardon. He eventually won a $5.84 million wrongful-conviction award from the state. Now, Morant is pressing a federal case called Stefon Morant v. City of New Haven in the Hartford courtroom of U.S. District Judge Sarala Nagala."

-------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "In contrast to the city’s claim in court that no wrongdoing took place in the investigations of Morant and Lewis, retired Det. Michael Sweeney and his lawyer, Michael Ryan, have admitted that police misconduct occurred. Since 1999, Sweeney has maintained that his former colleague, Raucci, coerced witnesses and fabricated evidence. Even so, he is one of the named defendants in Morant’s case. In court on Tuesday, Ryan asked Lewis if he was aware that Sweeney testified on his behalf at his habeas trial. Through tears, Lewis said yes. “I’m thankful,” he said. “I gave him a hug” earlier on Tuesday. “You wouldn’t have gone up and given Mr. Sweeney a hug if you thought he was a dirty cop, correct?” asked Ryan. Lewis responded, “Correct.""

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "City puts Lewis back on trial," by  Reporter Mona Mahadevan, published by The New Haven Independent, on May 13, 2026.

GIST: "In 2013, a federal judge overturned Scott Lewis’s murder conviction on the basis of police misconduct. Four years later, the City of New Haven paid Lewis $9.5 million in a wrongful-conviction settlement.

But in a federal courtroom on Tuesday, an attorney representing the City of New Haven questioned Lewis as if he were indeed the killer.

“Did you threaten [Stefon Morant] not to say anything about your involvement with the Turner-Fields homicide?” asked Thomas Gerarde, an attorney representing the city. 

“I knew nothing about the Turner-Fields homicide,” responded Lewis.

Lewis was questioned by Gerarde, not as a defendant, but as a witness in an ongoing civil-rights trial for his alleged co-conspirator, Stefon Morant.

Both Lewis and Morant were convicted of the 1990 double homicide of former alderman Ricardo Turner and his partner, Lamont Fields. Both spent two decades in prison. Both have long claimed they were framed by former city police Det. Vincent Raucci because of a drug debt.

Almost 20 years after his criminal trial, Lewis’s conviction was overturned. Under the Toni Harp administration, the city later awarded $9.5 million to Lewis in a settlement. Morant, meanwhile, spent 21 years behind bars before receiving a sentence reduction and pardon. He eventually won a $5.84 million wrongful-conviction award from the state.

Now, Morant is pressing a federal case called Stefon Morant v. City of New Haven in the Hartford courtroom of U.S. District Judge Sarala Nagala.

Lewis was first called as a witness for Morant on Monday. He returned to the stand on Tuesday to face questions from Gerarde.

Last week, the Independent asked Mayor Justin Elicker if the city was walking back its decision to settle with Lewis by going to trial with Morant. Elicker said the two cases should not be compared. “From the outside, looking at any court case, there’s a lot of information that people – including the press – don’t have,” he told the Independent. Elicker did not respond to a follow-up request for comment by the publication time of this story.

Meanwhile, former Mayor Toni Harp in 2017 acknowledged that the justice system had failed Lewis. “We felt we had to do it [settle],” she told the Independent. “When officers do something like that, and it impacts someone’s life, the judicial system is going to exact a price. It’s unfortunate. And we’re paying for it.”

The argument now advanced by the city during Morant’s trial conflicts with Harp’s position. Since opening statements, Gerarde has argued that Lewis and Morant committed the murders.

For instance, on Tuesday, Gerarde accused Lewis of lying to police in 1991 when giving a voluntary statement to avoid implicating himself in the crime.

“Is the reason why you lied about” your involvement with dealing cocaine “when you were giving this statement because you didn’t want to put yourself as a major player…knowing that there was cocaine dealing associated with the Turner-Fields homicide?” asked Gerarde. 

Lewis admitted that he “misplayed or misstated” his involvement with the cocaine trade. “But,” he added, “I certainly wasn’t going to tell [Raucci] anything about Frank Parise when I knew about [Raucci’s] relationship with him.”

Later, Lewis made clear that he declined to sign the statement he submitted to police. “That’s because I knew it wasn’t the truth — at least the complete truth,” he said. 

At another point, Gerarde questioned Lewis about Ovil Ruiz, the key witness in the state’s prosecution of Lewis and Morant and one of multiple witnesses who have recanted their testimonies.

“If Ovil Ruiz is believed, you and Stefon Morant went to the Turner-Fields apartment with guns, right?” pressed Gerarde.

“[Ruiz’s] criminal trial testimony was false. It’s the reason why I’m sitting here today as an exonerated person,” replied Lewis.

Gerarde then targeted a letter written by Lewis to Ruiz in July 1991. The letter reads in part, “All you have to do is tell the lawyer the only reason you’re saying those things is because the prosecutor threatened to charge you with the crime and give you crazy time.” Later, it says, “I might come to court [in October]. But remember. Don’t incriminate yourself for nothing.” The letter is signed Mike Love and Mac Tonight, which are the street names for two people that Lewis believed Ruiz knew.

“That was your attempt to warn [Ruiz] he better not testify, am I right?” asked Gerarde.

“No, sir,” responded Lewis. Later, he acknowledged that he should not have sent the letter but had been feeling desperate. “The letter was stupid, I can admit that to this day.”

For his part, Gerarde told the Independent that his purpose in court was not to stake out the city’s position but to provide them with “the best defense,” which involves challenging the plaintiffs to meet their burden of proof.

When asked if the city had reversed its position from the 2017 settlement, Gerarde clarified that his position throughout the case has been consistent. Since opening statements, he has argued that “this is not a case of wrongful conviction.”

He said he could not comment on the city’s 2017 settlement with Lewis because he was not the lawyer who negotiated the agreement. When asked if there are reasons why a party might settle a lawsuit without agreeing with the plaintiff’s claims, he said yes.

In the context of Elicker’s comment, the Independent also asked Gerarde if the city has undisclosed evidence linking Morant and Lewis to the crime. He said he was not sure what the mayor might have been referring to and could not comment.

After testifying on Tuesday, Lewis shared his frustrations with the city’s continued efforts to frame him for the murders. He said he feels so much trauma from his time in New Haven that he refuses to even drive through the city.

In contrast to the city’s claim in court that no wrongdoing took place in the investigations of Morant and Lewis, retired Det. Michael Sweeney and his lawyer, Michael Ryan, have admitted that police misconduct occurred.

Since 1999, Sweeney has maintained that his former colleague, Raucci, coerced witnesses and fabricated evidence. Even so, he is one of the named defendants in Morant’s case.

In court on Tuesday, Ryan asked Lewis if he was aware that Sweeney testified on his behalf at his habeas trial. Through tears, Lewis said yes. “I’m thankful,” he said. “I gave him a hug” earlier on Tuesday.

“You wouldn’t have gone up and given Mr. Sweeney a hug if you thought he was a dirty cop, correct?” asked Ryan.

Lewis responded, “Correct.""

The entire story can be read at: 

https://www.newhavenindependent.org/2026/05/13/city-puts-lewis-back-on-trial/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system.   Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;

May 13: Part 1: Forensic Science Lab Debacles series: Aftermath: ABC News (State Political Reporter Alex Brewster) reports that Forensic Science Queenland subject of two commissions of inquiry and two reports which found a litany of issues with the lab's testing of DNA evidence - has cleared a backlog of hundreds of sexual assault kits, noting that: "A backlog of more than 600 sexual assault kits has been processed at an overseas lab, following investigations into testing failures at Forensic Science Queensland (FSQ)."

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: A troubling example of the dangerous, if not catastrophic price  to be paid when a government  abdicates its responsibility to provide the high quality of DNA-testing the public (including crime victims and innocent individuals who  may be exonerated because of the testing)  is entitled to. Yes, the government deserves some credit for tackling the harmful backlog. But you shouldn't be reading this - and I  shouldn't have had to write it.

Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

----------------------------------------------------------

BACKGROUND: From a previous post of this Blog at the link below, under the heading, "Queensland DNA lab at 'point of critical failure' with victims of crime waiting years for testing, report finds. (August 3, 2025). A taste: 'Systemic contamination': "Recommendations from the first inquiry saw changes to the DNA testing method, but the report found this had been done incorrectly, noting a "poor quality culture". "We've found systemic contamination. We've found shortcuts are being taken. We've found that the accreditation standards aren't being adhered to as well," Dr Wright said. "Test methods are being used that haven't been properly tested.  Dr Wright found testing was being done in a "dirty lab", resulting in environmental contamination on a weekly basis. "There was evidence of this for at least a year, a year-and-a-half."

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-04/dna-report-dr-kirsty-wright-forensic-sciences-queensland/105609328

-----------------------------------------------------

QUOTE OF THE DAY: "FSQ director Mick Fuller says the Brisbane-based lab could resume testing rape kits in July. What's next? About 20,000 historic DNA samples still need to be retested."

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Failures in how testing was conducted at the lab, as well as regular environmental contamination over a year, meant tens of thousands of historic DNA samples needed to be retested."

----------------------------------------

STORY: "Queensland's beleaguered DNA lab clears backlog of hundreds of sexual assault kits, director says, by State Political Reporter Alex Brewster, published by ABC News on May 10, 2026. (Alex Brewster is the state political reporter for ABC News in Brisbane. He files across television, digital, social, and radio news platforms. Alex joined the ABC in 2021 and has worked as a video journalist in Ipswich, and covered court, crime, housing, and outer suburban issues.)

• Topic:

SUB-HEADING: "Forensic Science Queensland has been the subject of two commissions of inquiry and two reports which found a litany of issues with the lab's testing of DNA evidence." (ABC);

 

SUB-HEADING: "A backlog of more than 600 sexual assault kits has been processed at an overseas lab, following investigations into testing failures at Forensic Science Queensland (FSQ).

IN SHORT: "FSQ director Mick Fuller says the Brisbane-based lab could resume testing rape kits in July. What's next? About 20,000 historic DNA samples still need to be retested."

GIST: "Queensland's beleaguered forensics lab could soon resume testing of rape kits, after it was forced to export to a US facility.

Forensic Science Queensland's (FSQ) $50 million two-year outsourcing strategy to American lab Bode Technology has processed a backlog of more than 600 sexual assault kits.

The lab was the subject of two commissions of inquiry, over failures in testing and cultural issues which may have led to miscarriages of justice.

FSQ director Mick Fuller said the US facility had been turning around test results within 60 days, but local testing would be significantly quicker.

"The goal for me is to restart the sexual assault testing in probably July this year, which means that we could be turning around within 5 or 10 working days," he said.

"We never want another backlog with the sexual assault kits, and my guarantee is as long as the labs are standing, we won't have a backlog again in that place."

Attorney-General Deb Frecklington said it meant perpetrators would face swifter justice.

This means victims of violence in particular can get answers sooner," she said.

"It means police can get their evidence to courts sooner. And importantly, it means offenders being brought before the courts much quicker."

A backlog of DNA samples from major crimes which went untested due to issues at the lab has fallen by about 70 per cent, dropping from 11,703 samples in November 2024 to 3,488 in May 2026.

Hundreds of DNA samples were sent overseas amid an overhaul of Forensic Science Queensland. (ABC News)

Historic backlog will 'take some time'

Failures in how testing was conducted at the lab, as well as regular environmental contamination over a year, meant tens of thousands of historic DNA samples needed to be retested.

A backlog of DNA samples from major crimes which went untested due to issues at the lab has fallen by about 70 per cent, dropping from 11,703 samples in November 2024 to 3,488 in May 2026.

Hundreds of DNA samples were sent overseas amid an overhaul of Forensic Science Queensland. (ABC News) reducing that backlog, a significant amount was outstanding.

t started at a number around 40,000, and it's down to 20,000. I know that's a big number," he said.

"It's just not about grabbing a vial and retesting it. You really have to look at the continuity of all aspects of it, but we are reducing it."

"I'll make a promise to all the victims in Queensland. We are getting through them, but it does take an enormous amount of time."

A 2025 report found cases in the magistrates' court relying on DNA evidence were being delayed by up to three years.

Mr Fuller was appointed in August to overhaul operations at the lab after former director Dr Linzi Wilson-Wilde, resigned following "contamination issues" being identified.

The entire story can be read at:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-11/queensland-dna-lab-testing-backlog-reduced/106664810

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system.   Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;