Monday, May 25, 2026

May 25: Tony Carruthers: Tennessee: Anatomy of a botched execution: As the Nashville Banner reports, his death sentence was stopped, temporarily, at the last minute on Thursday. after a doctor was unable to administer IV, noting. that: "Sitting outside the prison after the execution was called off, (ACLU attorney Maria HL) DeLiberato told reporters that state executioners spent more than an hour trying to successfully insert the secondary IV line — according to protocol — including attempts on his left arm, feet, hand and jugular vein before attempting a central line in his upper chest. By the time that failed, DeLiberato said, Carruthers was “in agony.” Still, she said the execution team made one more attempt to insert a line, this time in his right shoulder, before the execution was called off."


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: Message to the people of Tennessee, and to all other American's: You can make this botched execution the last execution ever in your country. Learn from us. We ended capital punishment  in Canada after - and perhaps because of - the brutal botched execution of Arthur Lucas at Toronto's Don Jail, on December 11, 1962. Author Robert L Hoshowsky described the botched back-to-back execution and its aftermath, in his book "The last to Die: Ronald Turpin, Arthur Lucas, and the end of capital punishment in Canada.  Per Hoshowsky: "What happened next is the stuff of nightmares. Turpin and Lucas never heard the end of the word salvation.  The hangman sprung the trap, the platform falling beneath their feet with a deafening crash that echoed throughout the room as they plummeted to their deaths. No one who was at the hangings revealed what happened that night for many years, and newspapers at the time were not given the full story. "The hanging was bungled. Turpin died clean. But Lucas' head was torn off. It was hanging just by the sinews of the neck. There was blood all over the floor. The hangman had miscalculated his weight. What a way to die," said (Salvation Army Chaplain Cyril) Everitt in an interview published just before his own death many years later..... Toronto homicide detective Jim Crawford who attended the double hanging that cold December night. "Everybody was taken aback by the spray of blood that was literally like a water pipe had burst, and the walls were sprayed with blood." Howshowsky continues: " The Coroner's report made no mention of Lucas almost losing his head. Doubts about Lucas' conviction  lingered even to 1976 - the year capital punishment was abolished. The deaths of Ronald Turpin and Arthur Lucas may have marked the end of capital punishment in Canada;" Fortunately, Arthur Lucas survived the botched execution, although one can imagine the horror he must feel at the possibility of undergoing another one at the end  of the governor's reprieve. This is not about  guilt or innocence. Although, that said,  Tony Carruthers has protested his innocence from the start, and has been  denied the post-conviction drug-testing which he hopes will show that he is innocent.  It is rather about a  barbaric punishment, worthy of the middle ages, that has no place in a civilized state. Heed the words of Amnesty International: "Tennessee’s botched attempt to execute Tony Carruthers today spotlights how the death penalty truly is the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment. Nobody should be treated this way. Instead of issuing a one-year reprieve from execution, we call on Governor Lee to end this cruelty and commute Tony Carruthers death sentence."


See May 2, 2014  post on 'The Last to Die' at:



Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;

--------------------------------------------

QUOTE OF THE DAY: "“This was a tortured, botched execution. I mean, there’s no question about it,” Carruthers’ ACLU attorney Maria DeLiberato told the media. “By the grace of God, he’s still alive. But they tortured him, trying to find a vein."

-----------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Throughout that process, media witnesses were held in the viewing room adjacent to the execution chamber. With the lights off and the curtain closed, they could not see the extended struggle to establish IV lines. Some of the activity in the execution chamber could be heard, however. At one point, before the doctor on the execution team attempted to place the central line, he could be heard telling Carruthers that he was about to administer the local anesthetic lidocaine. Minutes later, in an exchange she later confirmed, DeLiberato could be heard questioning if the doctor was qualified to perform the procedure. “I am qualified,” he said. “Do your job, sir,” said Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Warden Kenneth Nelsen, according to DeLiberato.

--------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "Just after 11:20 a.m., almost an hour into the executioners’ struggle to place IV lines, Carruthers could be heard groaning in pain. “You all should have been in that room with me,” DeLiberato told the media afterward. “If the state of Tennessee is going to execute its own, there has to be full and complete transparency. There was no transparency here and this botched execution showed why there must be.”

----------------------------------------

STORY: "Tony Carruthers’ Execution Delayed After Doctor Unable to Administer IV,"" by  reporters  Mikeie Honda Reiland, Steven Hale and Steve Cavendish," published by The Nashville Banner, on May 21 2026.


SUB-HEADING: "Gov. Bill Lee issues one-year reprieve after emergency filing with Tennessee Supreme Court."


GIST: "Tony Carruthers’ death sentence was stopped, temporarily, at the last minute on Thursday.


As the state of Tennessee attempted to prepare Carruthers for execution by lethal injection, the doctor contracted by the Tennessee Department of Correction could not find a vein for a backup IV to administer the dose of pentobarbital. According to an emergency filing with the Tennessee Supreme Court, protocols called for putting in a central line, but the doctor was “not qualified” to perform the procedure.

“Shortly after the motion was filed, Governor Bill Lee issued a reprieve,” the court posted minutes later. 

The reprieve is for one year.

According to TDOC, an attempt to insert a central line “pursuant to the protocol” was unsuccessful. 

“This was a tortured, botched execution. I mean, there’s no question about it,” Carruthers’ ACLU attorney Maria DeLiberato told the media. “By the grace of God, he’s still alive. But they tortured him, trying to find a vein.”

Sitting outside the prison after the execution was called off, DeLiberato told reporters that state executioners spent more than an hour trying to successfully insert the secondary IV line — according to protocol — including attempts on his left arm, feet, hand and jugular vein before attempting a central line in his upper chest. By the time that failed, DeLiberato said, Carruthers was “in agony.” Still, she said the execution team made one more attempt to insert a line, this time in his right shoulder, before the execution was called off.

Throughout that process, media witnesses were held in the viewing room adjacent to the execution chamber. With the lights off and the curtain closed, they could not see the extended struggle to establish IV lines. Some of the activity in the execution chamber could be heard, however. At one point, before the doctor on the execution team attempted to place the central line, he could be heard telling Carruthers that he was about to administer the local anesthetic lidocaine. Minutes later, in an exchange she later confirmed, DeLiberato could be heard questioning if the doctor was qualified to perform the procedure.

“I am qualified,” he said.

“Do your job, sir,” said Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Warden Kenneth Nelsen, according to DeLiberato.

Just after 11:20 a.m., almost an hour into the executioners’ struggle to place IV lines, Carruthers could be heard groaning in pain.

“You all should have been in that room with me,” DeLiberato told the media afterward. “If the state of Tennessee is going to execute its own, there has to be full and complete transparency. There was no transparency here and this botched execution showed why there must be.”

The Banner is part of a media coalition suing the state for greater access in and around executions, including having a pool reporter witness the preparations for execution. A chancery court ruled in favor of greater transparency, but the Tennessee Supreme Court blocked that order on appeal.

The dramatic events capped a week of activity in state and federal courts and included a last-minute denial by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh to stop the execution. 

The state received further scrutiny this week about the quality of the lethal injection drugs. Prison officials refused to confirm whether or not the pentobarbital they planned to use to execute Carruthers was expired.

After a 1996 trial, Carruthers received three death sentences for the 1994 kidnapping and murder of three people: Marcellos Anderson, Anderson’s mother Delois and Anderson’s teenage friend Frederick Tucker. In 2000, co-defendant James Montgomery received a new trial, after which he pleaded guilty and received a 27-year sentence. Montgomery was released in 2015. 

Since the trial, in which Carruthers represented himself, he has maintained his innocence. Before the trial, he clashed with six appointed defense attorneys, after which the judge declined to appoint a seventh. Attorneys have argued that severe mental illness has prevented him from working with defense attorneys and preparing an effective defense in court. Carruthers’ attorneys said that during the trial, the state relied on the testimony of a paid informant who later recanted his testimony, saying prosecutors had coached him.

Carruthers’ attorneys exhausted potential paths to relief. Attorneys argued he is legally incompetent to be executed due to psychotic delusions. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, 130,000 people signed a petition asking Lee to postpone the execution until DNA and fingerprint analysis could be performed on still untested crime scene evidence, including the victims’ fingernails. On May 20, Lee declined to grant clemency. The ACLU also filed lawsuits in state and federal courts requesting a stay of the execution until the completion of DNA testing and fingerprint analysis, but the Tennessee Supreme Court and U.S. District Judge Eli Richardson denied the petitions within the last week.

On May 20, the ACLU applied directly to the U.S. Supreme Court for a stay of execution, once more requesting DNA and fingerprint testing. That appeal was denied on Thursday morning.

“Can this really be happening?” wondered Carruthers’ sister, Dr. Tonya Carruthers Hervey, at a public plea for her brother’s clemency on May 18 at the Tennessee State Capitol. “Has this been happening for so long? And why, when we have the technology to have gotten all of our questions answered a long time ago?”

Hervey recalled a brother who made money in the summer cutting lawns, then took his three siblings to Kroger to buy snacks with his earnings. 

Carruthers was set to be the 11th person killed by the state since Tennessee reinstated its death penalty in 2018. Anthony Darrell Dugard Hines, Christa Pike and Gary Wayne Sutton are all scheduled to be executed before the end of 2026. 

Following the litigation surrounding Byron Black’s execution in 2025 — in which the Tennessee Supreme Court overruled and reprimanded the trial court for its ruling — the high court has taken a more immediate role in execution litigation. An amended rule now requires “collateral litigation” related to the “method or timing” of an execution to be filed directly with the Tennessee Supreme Court. Pike’s legal challenge to her execution is currently pending."

The entire story can be read at: 

https://nashvillebanner.com/2026/05/21/tony-carruthers-execution-lethal-injection-issues/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=The%20Flyer%20--%20May%2022%2C%202026&utm_source=ae2961c671

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system.  Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog. FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project; FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;

May 25: Christopher Dunn: Missouri: Major (Welcome, if not long overdue) Development: A Missouri appeals court has upheld his exoneration, St, Louis Public Radio (General Assignment Reporter Chad Davis), noting that: Dunn was convicted of the murder of Ricco Rogers in 1990. He spent 34 years in prison and has maintained his innocence. The conviction was based on testimony from two boys who later recanted their statements and said prosecutors and police had coerced them."


BACKGROUND:  From the Davis Vanguard:  (October 16,  2021): "The police came looking for Dunn the following day and arrested him. He was held for 15 months in the city jail before his trial. His public defender, who spent about 20 minutes total with him before representing him in court, did not call his alibi witnesses, present phone records, test for gunshot residue, or conduct any other sort of crime scene analysis. No physical evidence linked him to the crime. The prosecution had only the testimony of two young boys, aged 12 and 14, who said that Dunn shot at them and hit their friend as the three sat on a porch around midnight. Both boys, now men, have recanted their testimonies and explained that they accused Dunn because they didn’t like him. Neither boy saw the person who fired shots from the dark, they admit. In exchange for their testimonies, both received generous deals on unrelated charges pending against them. Now that its only evidence against Dunn was revealed as false, the State no longer has a case. A 25th Circuit judge agreed that is Dunn is innocent after an evidentiary hearing in which both recantations were presented, and an independent witness testified that it would have been impossible to see where the shots came from—much less who fired them. The friend on the phone testified that she was talking with Dunn moments before the crime took place."


---------------------------------------------

STORY: Missouri Appeals Court upholds ruling overturning Christopher Dunn’s murder conviction," by published by STLPR (St. Louis Public Radio)  on May 19, 2026. (Chad Davis is a 2016 graduate of Truman State University where he studied Public Communication and English. At Truman State, Chad served as the executive producer of the on-campus news station, TMN Television.  In 2017, Chad joins the St. Louis Public Radio team as a general assignment reporter.)

SUB-HEADING:  "A Missouri appeals court ruled Tuesday that Christopher Dunn should remain free, upholding the ruling that overturned his decades-old murder conviction."


GIST: "The Missouri Eastern District Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that a reasonable judge would find “clear and convincing evidence” that Dunn was innocent of the murder of Ricco Rogers.

The decision came exactly 36 years and one day after Ricco Rogers was killed. In a phone interview Tuesday, Christopher Dunn called the ruling overwhelming.

“Ricco Rogers' family deserves justice,” Dunn said. “I'm tired, but [I know] that the fight must continue until it's over.”

A spokesperson for the Missouri attorney general’s office said it is reviewing the ruling and considering next steps.

Dunn was convicted of the murder of Ricco Rogers in 1990. He spent 34 years in prison and has maintained his innocence. The conviction was based on testimony from two boys who later recanted their statements and said prosecutors and police had coerced them.

In 2020, Missouri Circuit Judge William Hickle ruled it was unlikely a jury would convict Dunn based on the evidence. A Missouri statute passed a year later allowed prosecutors to file petitions on behalf of convicted people they believe are innocent.

In 2023, former St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner said she would file a motion to vacate Dunn’s conviction but resigned months later. Current Circuit Attorney Gabe Gore filed a motion to throw out the conviction a year later. Dunn was released later that year after St. Louis Circuit Judge Jason Sengheiser ruled Dunn was wrongly convicted.

However, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled the attorney general’s office could file an appeal. Oral arguments in the appeal began earlier this year.

On Tuesday, Dunn thanked his lawyers and legal team who have supported him over the years. He said even after his release, it’s difficult to feel truly free.

“My weight fluctuates, I go through my moments of anxiety, I have a stress level that goes beyond any comprehension,” Dunn said. “I still feel like I'm in prison to a degree and not knowing if waking up would be a better option for me or if I should just remain in that bed and just exist, because right now I feel like I'm not able to live.”

Dunn’s wife, Kira Dunn, echoed similar stressors, though she said they hope this is the end of their family’s legal challenges.

“I can only say that I am in awe of Chris and his resilience and his strength,” Kira Dunn said. “I'm just trying the best I can to be by his side and be as much of a help and support as I can during this time. We support each other, and at least for me, a lot of this I'm trying really not to feel it until we know for sure that his freedom is secured, and we know for sure that this is over.""

The entire story can be read at: 

https://www.stlpr.org/law-order/2026-05-19/missouri-appeals-court-upholds-ruling-overturning-christopher-dunns-murder-conviction

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system.  Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog. FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project; FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;

Sunday, May 24, 2026

May 24: Deb Nicholls: Boulder Colorado: Law firm (McCabe Law, Lawyer Janeen McCabe) states in a press release headed "Colorado Court Finds El Paso County District Attorney Withheld Evidence in Homicide Case," that, "The prosecution had worked with an analyst at CBI in 2006 and knew they sided with the defense expert, finding that there was no support for arson with an accelerant and withheld that information from the defense, the judge, and the jury. The prosecution hid the evidence, failed to call that witness at trial, and instead cast the defense expert as a hired gun who was unreliable. A Brady violation arises when prosecutors fail to disclose evidence favorable to the accused that is material to guilt or punishment."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "A Brady violation arises when prosecutors fail to disclose evidence favorable to the accused that is material to guilt or punishment. The obligation stems from the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Brady v. Maryland (1963). Courts recognize such violations as serious constitutional concerns because withheld evidence may affect a defendant’s ability to receive a fair trial. According to court findings, McCabe Law along with the Korey Wise Innocence Project (KWIP) spent years investigating the case, filing legal motions, and pursuing the evidentiary hearing that led to the ruling.  During the hearing, attorneys questioned witnesses under oath, cross-examined the former prosecutor, and presented evidence related to the withheld materials."

----------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "The case is currently scheduled for a status conference on March 27, 2026, during which the court is expected to address the next phase of proceedings following the Brady ruling. McCabe Law will continue representing its client as the matter proceeds. This ruling reflects the importance of thorough criminal defense representation in serious felony matters and highlights the role post-conviction litigation can play in reviewing constitutional concerns raised during criminal proceedings."

----------------------------------------------

RELEASE: "Colorado Court Finds El Paso County District Attorney Withheld Evidence in Homicide Case," by McCabe Law (Janeen McCabe) published in The National Law Review, on May 18, 2026. (McCabe Law’s team of Boulder criminal defense attorneys has represented clients throughout Colorado for more than 20 years. The firm focuses exclusively on criminal defense and protection order matters. McCabe Law attorneys have extensive trial experience handling serious felony and misdemeanor cases in courts across Colorado. Firm attorneys are active in Colorado’s legal community and hold leadership positions in organizations including the Colorado Criminal Defense Bar and the Boulder Bar Association.)


SUB-HEADING: "After fighting for this client since 2019, the judge found the DA withheld exculpatory evidence following a seven-day evidentiary hearing."


SUB-HEADING: "McCabe Law has represented Deb Nicholls since 2019, navigating years of complex litigation related to prosecutorial misconduct."

GIST: "In a significant ruling involving prosecutorial accountability in Colorado, an El Paso District court judge determined that the District Attorney’s Office withheld exculpatory evidence during a homicide trial.

 The court found that the prosecution committed a Brady violation, which refers to the failure to disclose evidence favorable to the defense.

The ruling followed a five-day evidentiary hearing during which multiple witnesses testified, including the former prosecutor involved in the original case (El Paso County CO 07CR5429). 

After reviewing testimony and evidence presented during the hearing, the presiding judge concluded that material evidence was withheld from the defense, which likely would have changed the outcome of the trial.

 The prosecution had worked with an analyst at CBI in 2006 and knew they sided with the defense expert, finding that there was no support for arson with an accelerant and withheld that information from the defense, the judge, and the jury. 

The prosecution hid the evidence, failed to call that witness at trial, and instead cast the defense expert as a hired gun who was unreliable.

A Brady violation arises when prosecutors fail to disclose evidence favorable to the accused that is material to guilt or punishment.

 The obligation stems from the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Brady v. Maryland (1963). Courts recognize such violations as serious constitutional concerns because withheld evidence may affect a defendant’s ability to receive a fair trial.

According to court findings, McCabe Law along with the Korey Wise Innocence Project (KWIP) spent years investigating the case, filing legal motions, and pursuing the evidentiary hearing that led to the ruling.

 During the hearing, attorneys questioned witnesses under oath, cross-examined the former prosecutor, and presented evidence related to the withheld materials.

The case is currently scheduled for a status conference on March 27, 2026, during which the court is expected to address the next phase of proceedings following the Brady ruling. McCabe Law will continue representing its client as the matter proceeds.

This ruling reflects the importance of thorough criminal defense representation in serious felony matters and highlights the role post-conviction litigation can play in reviewing constitutional concerns raised during criminal proceedings.

..................................

McCabe Law’s team of Boulder criminal defense attorneys has represented clients throughout Colorado for more than 20 years. The firm focuses exclusively on criminal defense and protection order matters. McCabe Law attorneys have extensive trial experience handling serious felony and misdemeanor cases in courts across Colorado. Firm attorneys are active in Colorado’s legal community and hold leadership positions in organizations including the Colorado Criminal Defense Bar and the Boulder Bar Association."

The entire story can be read at: 

https://natlawreview.com/press-releases/colorado-court-finds-el-paso-county-district-attorney-withheld-evidence

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system.  Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog. FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project; FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;

Saturday, May 23, 2026

May 23: Yvonne 'Missy' Woods: Colorado: Question of the day: The disgraced Colorado crime analyst’s review over 1,300 Denver sexual assault cases is six months delayed. Why won't anyone say why? As Staff Writer Hannah Metzger reports in Westword: "The full fallout of the Yvonne “Missy” Woods scandal is still unclear, over two years after the Colorado Bureau of Investigation revealed that its former star forensic scientist is accused of intentionally mishandling and manipulating DNA evidence."..."The CBI internally reviewed more than 10,000 cases that Woods handled during her 29-year career as a DNA analyst, identifying problems in 1,045 of them. In April 2025, the Denver Police Department announced that its crime laboratory would conduct an independent review of Denver-based cases, as well. DPD initially said the lab would re-examine reports from 422 sexual assault evidence kits handled by Woods. The department later expanded its review to over 1,300 sexual assault cases, without explaining the reason behind the massive addition, the Denver Gazette reported in August. Today, the findings of that review have still not been made public — six months after the anticipated release date. In August, DPD told the Gazette the findings would be released in around three months. Nine months later, DPD says there is now no estimated release date."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Denver’s review came after Woods admitted to cutting corners when testing Denver sex assault cases, according to a CBI internal investigation. Woods reportedly told investigators that she believed the Denver lab sent the CBI cases it did not expect to solve, so she took shortcuts, such as deleting data on low quantities of male DNA, to avoid conducting additional testing. “Denver PD gave us all the cases that they knew they weren’t going to prosecute, and they told us that,” Woods said in a 2023 interview with investigators, explaining that she was “overwhelmed” and “burned out” by the workload. Denver Police called its review a “proactive effort” in April 2025. “Our crime laboratory will determine the number of sexual assault evidence kits it will re-test,” DPD said in a statement at the time. “Any offender profiles that may be discovered through re-testing will be submitted to the Combined DNA Index System, CODIS, for potential investigative leads.”

----------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "The scandal has so far resulted in a murder conviction being vacated, and an impending lawsuit from a family who claims their father committed suicide in prison after being wrongfully convicted to life behind bars due to Woods’ influence on the evidence.

----------------------------------------------

PASSAGE THREE OF THE DAY: "Woods faces 52 counts of forgery, 48 counts of attempt to influence a public servant, one count of first-degree perjury and one count of cybercrime. She pleaded not guilty to all 102 felony charges in February. Woods’ trial is scheduled to begin on September 24. She is next due in court for a motions hearing on August 27."

----------------------------------------------

STORY: "Disgraced Colorado crime analyst’s case review is six months delayed. No one will say why," by Staff Writer Hannah Metzger. published by Westword, on May 22, 2026. "Hannah Metzger is a staff writer at Westword, reporting on news, arts and culture since joining the staff in October 2023. She previously worked at publications including Colorado Politics and the Denver Gazette, where she covered the Colorado Legislature, the Denver and Aurora city councils and breaking news. Hannah has been honored with numerous awards from the Society of Professional Journalists, Colorado Press Association, Colorado Student Media Association and Denver Press Club. She graduated from the University of Colorado Boulder with a major in journalism and a minor in political science."


SUB-HEADING: "The crime lab was expected to release results in November, after re-examining over 1,300 Denver sexual assault cases handled by the CBI." (Colorado Bureau of Investigation); 



GIST: "The full fallout of the Yvonne “Missy” Woods scandal is still unclear, over two years after the Colorado Bureau of Investigation revealed that its former star forensic scientist is accused of intentionally mishandling and manipulating DNA evidence.

The CBI internally reviewed more than 10,000 cases that Woods handled during her 29-year career as a DNA analyst, identifying problems in 1,045 of them. In April 2025, the Denver Police Department announced that its crime laboratory would conduct an independent review of Denver-based cases, as well.

DPD initially said the lab would re-examine reports from 422 sexual assault evidence kits handled by Woods. The department later expanded its review to over 1,300 sexual assault cases, without explaining the reason behind the massive addition, the Denver Gazette reported in August.

Today, the findings of that review have still not been made public — six months after the anticipated release date.

In August, DPD told the Gazette the findings would be released in around three months. Nine months later, DPD says there is now no estimated release date.

“The DPD Crime Lab’s initial findings have not been finalized as they are awaiting legal review. We do not have an anticipated date for when the findings will be finalized,” DPD says in a statement to Westword.

DPD did not respond to repeated inquiries about why the process is taking so much longer than anticipated, nor did the crime lab director, Greggory LaBerge. The Denver Department of Public Safety, which oversees DPD, similarly declined to offer an explanation.

“Because this matter is under review, the department is unable to provide comment at this time,” says Elizabeth White, spokesperson for the department.

Denver’s review came after Woods admitted to cutting corners when testing Denver sex assault cases, according to a CBI internal investigation. Woods reportedly told investigators that she believed the Denver lab sent the CBI cases it did not expect to solve, so she took shortcuts, such as deleting data on low quantities of male DNA, to avoid conducting additional testing.

“Denver PD gave us all the cases that they knew they weren’t going to prosecute, and they told us that,” Woods said in a 2023 interview with investigators, explaining that she was “overwhelmed” and “burned out” by the workload.

Denver Police called its review a “proactive effort” in April 2025.

“Our crime laboratory will determine the number of sexual assault evidence kits it will re-test,” DPD said in a statement at the time. “Any offender profiles that may be discovered through re-testing will be submitted to the Combined DNA Index System, CODIS, for potential investigative leads.”

The scandal has so far resulted in a murder conviction being vacated, and an impending lawsuit from a family who claims their father committed suicide in prison after being wrongfully convicted to life behind bars due to Woods’ influence on the evidence.

Woods faces 52 counts of forgery, 48 counts of attempt to influence a public servant, one count of first-degree perjury and one count of cybercrime. She pleaded not guilty to all 102 felony charges in February.

Woods’ trial is scheduled to begin on September 24. She is next due in court for a motions hearing on August 27.

The entire story can be read at:

https://www.westword.com/news/missy-woods-cbi-case-review-delayed-six-months-40884312

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system.  Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog. FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project; FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;