Friday, May 22, 2026

Stefon Morant: Connecticut: Ongoing federal civil rights wrongful conviction trial: The New Haven Independent (Reporter Mona Mahadevan) reports on testimony from Kim Morant (Stefon's wife) who talked about how they met in fifth grade, and later got married in prison, noting that: "After 17 years of marriage, Kim took the stand in a Hartford federal courtroom Wednesday to support her husband’s wrongful-conviction claim against the City of New Haven. She told the bittersweet story of their love, describing how Stefon’s incarceration still shapes their lives together. “We have a beautiful home. We can’t even enjoy it…because he carries this with him,” she said through sobs. “I want to know: when will this be over?”..."Stefon is pressing a wrongful-conviction lawsuit against the City of New Haven and six former police detectives. He alleges that he and Scott Lewis were framed by former Det. Vincent Raucci for the 1990 double homicide of former alderman Ricardo Turner and his partner, Lamont Fields. Morant was convicted in 1994 and received a 70-year sentence. He was released on a sentence reduction in 2015 and later won a full pardon. He eventually received a $5.84 million wrongful-conviction award from the state.Morant’s ongoing civil-rights trial began three weeks ago before U.S. District Judge Sarala Nagala. The case is expected to go to the jury next week."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "She spoke as a wife and as a mother about how Stefon’s conviction changed the lives of everyone around him. As a partner, Kim cannot “move forward until [Stefon] knows” that he has been heard. “I tell him, ‘You’re not gonna have to carry this on your name, because we know who you are.’” At this point, the audience in the courtroom began to pass around a tissue box. People took off their glasses and dabbed away their tears.  As a mother, Kim fears for her children. “If it could happen to Stefon, it could happen to any one of us.” She begs her kids to always tell her where they are, just in case something happens.  Then she turned to the jury box. “Can you imagine, just like that — you’re a young man, and your life changes, just like that?”

-----------------------------------------

STORY: "Decades of love, decades in prison," by Reporter Mona Mahadevan, published by The New Haven Independent, on May 21, 2026. (Kim Morant takes the stand in her husband’s wrongful-conviction trial and talks about how they met in fifth grade, and later got married in prison.)

GIST: On the first day of fifth grade, Stefon Morant asked Kim to be his girlfriend. Nearly 30 years passed, and they drifted apart. Then, in 2007, Kim wrote Stefon a letter in prison. They wed two years later in a small room at the Cheshire Correctional Institution. 

After 17 years of marriage, Kim took the stand in a Hartford federal courtroom Wednesday to support her husband’s wrongful-conviction claim against the City of New Haven. She told the bittersweet story of their love, describing how Stefon’s incarceration still shapes their lives together. 

“We have a beautiful home. We can’t even enjoy it…because he carries this with him,” she said through sobs. “I want to know: when will this be over?”

Stefon is pressing a wrongful-conviction lawsuit against the City of New Haven and six former police detectives. He alleges that he and Scott Lewis were framed by former Det. Vincent Raucci for the 1990 double homicide of former alderman Ricardo Turner and his partner, Lamont Fields. 

Morant was convicted in 1994 and received a 70-year sentence. He was released on a sentence reduction in 2015 and later won a full pardon. He eventually received a $5.84 million wrongful-conviction award from the state.

Morant’s ongoing civil-rights trial began three weeks ago before U.S. District Judge Sarala Nagala. The case is expected to go to the jury next week.

Throughout the proceedings, Kim has watched from the back row. On Wednesday, when she was called to testify, she walked from her usual seat in tan platform wedges — her go-to court shoes.

She told Amelia Greene, one of Morant’s attorneys, about her first encounter with Stefon in 1979.

“I walk[ed] into the classroom, and this little cutie sits behind me and taps me on the shoulder,” said Kim. Stefon and his friends had been debating who would ask Kim to be their girlfriend. “He let them know — let me know, that I was gonna be his girlfriend.”

Their fifth-grade romance did not last long. “I didn’t mind being Stefon’s girlfriend, but as he says, he was a ladies’ man,” she recalled. “But he also forgets that I was the girl that everyone wanted.”

Kim married a different man and had three children with him. He died in 2005. Two years later, she decided to write a letter to Stefon in prison. Soon afterwards, she got a call from Stefon’s mother, Linda, who helped connect Stefon and Kim by phone.

The next few months were filled with many more letters and phone calls. Kim was able to visit Stefon for the first time in 2008.

When Stefon walked into the room, “it blew my mind,” she said. “I was in shock to see that this man that was in prison for all these years looked and appeared to be the way that he was.”

What most moved her about Stefon was his faith. Men in prison often explore religion without truly becoming faithful, she said. “But there was something different about the way Stefon presented [his faith] to me.”

She also loved seeing Stefon develop close connections with her three children, which they “needed” after their father’s passing. Stefon is their stepfather, she said, and “that man stepped up.” She broke into sobs describing how her second daughter “just opened her heart to Stefon.”

In 2009, Kim and Stefon married in a small room at the Cheshire state prison. In the days before the ceremony, Kim was panicked because the package with their rings had been delayed. It was delivered the night before the wedding. “That was my sign that this was the man I was supposed to marry,” said Kim.

Kim and Stefon were allowed to invite only two guests each. Kim gave her slots to Stefon so his brothers and mother could attend. They did not know it then, but it marked the last time the brothers would all be together.

When Stefon took the stand in his own wrongful-conviction trial on Tuesday, he said he wore “the best prison suit that they gave me” when he got married at Cheshire.

Stefon came home in 2015, but his release was “bittersweet,” said Kim. With a felony conviction on his record, “he wasn’t coming totally free.”

The conviction was expunged in 2021. After he won the pardon, Kim remembered meeting Stefon outside of the courthouse — and how he “jumped with joy” and called out, “Jesus!”

“I Have Never Felt So Ashamed To Be A Citizen Of New Haven”

The wins have meant a lot to Stefon, but they have not given him back the 21 years that were taken. He “wears a mask” most of the time, said Kim. He is “very gentle” with his grandchildren, but he can be short with Kim and Linda.

“We take the licks,” said Kim. “But he comes back, and realizes, and that’s what I love about him.”

He also struggles with physical touch. He jumps when Kim touches him, as if she is “someone coming to invade his space.” They switched from a queen bed to two twins so he could sleep without being on edge. 

On date nights, Stefon wants to visit ten different restaurants in an hour. When you spend 21 years with no control over your life, she said, deciding what to eat and where to spend your time becomes a hard question.

What weighs on them the most, said Kim, is that Stefon sometimes forgets that he is no longer in prison. When he came home, she hoped that they would have a completely normal relationship. “But I think Stefon still lives with the rules” of prison, she said — including the one that prohibits touching in public.

Greene asked Kim how the ongoing trial itself has affected Stefon. Kim’s answer came in bursts, as she struggled to form words through her sobs.

“I have never felt so ashamed to be a citizen of New Haven,” she said. “This is eating Stefon alive, day and night — to hear and to feel people still don’t believe him.” 

She spoke as a wife and as a mother about how Stefon’s conviction changed the lives of everyone around him.

As a partner, Kim cannot “move forward until [Stefon] knows” that he has been heard. “I tell him, ‘You’re not gonna have to carry this on your name, because we know who you are.’”

At this point, the audience in the courtroom began to pass around a tissue box. People took off their glasses and dabbed away their tears. 

As a mother, Kim fears for her children. “If it could happen to Stefon, it could happen to any one of us.” She begs her kids to always tell her where they are, just in case something happens. 

Then she turned to the jury box. “Can you imagine, just like that — you’re a young man, and your life changes, just like that?”

James Tallberg, the attorney representing Raucci, objected. He said Kim’s answer exceeded the scope of Greene’s question. Kim apologized, clearly overwhelmed with emotion. 

Greene ended with one final question: After everything — the decades of incarceration and endless legal battles — has Stefon ever given up?

Kim did not hesitate. “I’ve never seen him, from the day I met him, give up,” she said. “He won’t quit. He won’t stop.""

The entire story can be read at:

decades-of-love-decades-in-prison

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system.  Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog. FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project; FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true.

Thursday, May 21, 2026

Tony Carruthers: Tennessee: Very Welcome Development; Emily Cochrane and Nicolas Bogel-Burroughs, report in The New York Times that Tennessee has called off his execution (scheduled for earlier today) when prison staff could not find the death row prisoner's vein after a series of attempts - noting that, "Bill Lee, a Republican, issued a reprieve on Thursday, delaying any execution for a year."...'Mr. Carruthers’s case had already drawn attention as his allies and his lawyers argued that he was wrongfully convicted'...“Tennessee has effectively made the case against the death penalty,” said Laura Porter, the executive director of the U.S. Campaign to End the Death Penalty."...'The renewed fight starts right now to have the untested DNA and fingerprint evidence that could prove he is innocent tested. A year can go by oh, so quickly. HL);

AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL: End the cruelty:  I
"Tennessee’s botched attempt to execute Tony Carruthers today spotlights how the death penalty truly is the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment. Nobody should be treated this way. Instead of issuing a one-year reprieve from execution, we call on Governor Lee to end this cruelty and commute Tony Carruthers death sentence."
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I couldn't agree more - (and test the DNA):
Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
---------------------------------------------------------
WORDS TO HEED: FROM OUR POST ON KEVIN COOPER'S  APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION DNA TESTING; CALIFORNIA: (Applicable wherever a state resists DNA testing): "Blogger/extraordinaire Jeff Gamso's blunt, unequivocal, unforgettable message to the powers that be in California: "JUST TEST THE FUCKING DNA." (Oh yes, Gamso raises, as he does in many of his posts, an important philosophical question: This post is headed: "What is truth, said jesting Pilate."...Says Gamso: "So what's the harm? What, exactly, are they scared of? Don't we want the truth?" 

------------------------------------------------------------------

BACKGROUND: From a previous post of this Blog: (May 18, 2026); "Carruthers was one of three men convicted of a brutal 1994 triple murder in Memphis, where three people were shot and then buried under a shallow grave at a cemetery. Advocates argue untested DNA and fingerprint evidence could point to another suspect. The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union)  is now fighting in both state and federal courts to delay the execution while more forensic testing is done. The nonprofit says he was wrongfully convicted on a jailhouse informant's testimony, adding that there's no physical evidence. Advocates have argued that untested DNA and fingerprint evidence could point to another suspect, but it never came up during trial because Carruthers represented himself."


https://draft.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/120008354894645705/989087439323936592


----------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "The American Civil Liberties Union said Mr. Carruthers would have been the first person in more than a century to be executed after representing himself at trial. Lawyers wrote in a petition for clemency that he has mental illnesses that “continue to impair his understanding of his legal situation and his impending execution.”

-----------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: Several states have similarly canceled executions in recent years because executioners were unable to find a vein. Alabama suspended all executions for several months from 2022 into 2023 after several executions in which officials could not access prisoners’ veins. Those Alabama cases, as well as others in Arizona and elsewhere, led the Death Penalty Information Center to describe 2022 as the “year of the botched execution.”

------------------------------------

STORY: Tennessee Calls Off Execution After Staff Can’t Find Prisoner’s Vein," by Emily Cochrane (reporting from Nashville)  and Nicolas Bogel-Burroughs, (Reporting from New York)  published by The New York Times, on May 21, 2026. (Emily Cochrane is  one of the reporters responsible for covering the South, including Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, the Carolinas and Tennessee. She has  driven or flown hundreds of miles to write about the latest natural or man-made disaster, dissect state and local politics and explore the varied music, food and cultural trends of this region.  Nicolas Bogel-burroughs writes that he is  an investigative reporter at The New York Times writing on a broad range of topics in the United States. He travels  around the country to write about natural disasters, protests, unsolved mysteries, high-profile criminal cases and more. These are often tragic stories but, hopefully, also ones that shed light on something important.")


SUB-HEADING: "Tony Carruthers, convicted in connection with three 1994 murders, was scheduled to be executed Thursday morning."

GIST: "Tennessee called off the execution of Tony Carruthers, convicted in connection with three 1994 murders, after staff members were unable to find a vein to administer lethal injection drugs.

The state Department of Corrections said in a statement on Thursday that medical staff members were unable to find a “suitable vein” to administer the drugs after a series of attempts. Lawyers for Mr. Carruthers had asked in emergency filings for the execution to be delayed.

Gov. Bill Lee, a Republican, issued a reprieve on Thursday, delaying any execution for a year.

Mr. Carruthers’s case had already drawn attention as his allies and his lawyers argued that he was wrongfully convicted.

“Tennessee has effectively made the case against the death penalty,” said Laura Porter, the executive director of the U.S. Campaign to End the Death Penalty.


The American Civil Liberties Union said Mr. Carruthers would have been the first person in more than a century to be executed after representing himself at trial.

Lawyers wrote in a petition for clemency that he has mental illnesses that “continue to impair his understanding of his legal situation and his impending execution.”

Several states have similarly canceled executions in recent years because executioners were unable to find a vein.

Alabama suspended all executions for several months from 2022 into 2023 after several executions in which officials could not access prisoners’ veins. Those Alabama cases, as well as others in Arizona and elsewhere, led the Death Penalty Information Center to describe 2022 as the “year of the botched execution.”

States have recently begun authorizing alternative methods, including the firing squad, largely because of problems obtaining lethal drugs. South Carolina executed three people last year by firing squad, the first such executions in the United States since 2010.


The entire story can be read at: 

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system.  Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog. FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project; FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;

John Doe: Toronto: (Accused's anonymity is explained at the end of this story HL) Toronto Star Courts Reporter Betsy Powell, my friend and former Toronto Star Colleague - a consummate journalist - raises the question of the day: "Did Toronto police conspire to plant a man’s ID as evidence in a gun case — or was it one officer’s ‘honest lie?,’ in a story sub-headed, "The accused walked out of court not only a free man, but with the $5,100 police had seized as alleged proceeds of crime - noting that: "The plea also ends a potentially explosive Charter motion. (The accused's lawyer HL) Hussain had asked a different judge to stay the proceedings entirely, arguing officers lied about finding the ID in a backpack located inside the downtown apartment of his client’s girlfriend. The defence position is that during a debrief, the officers in the case realized that there was “virtually nothing” linking the man to the contraband. The officers then “conspired to lie” that his ID was found inside the apartment, (Defence Lawyer) Hussain wrote in a factum filed with the court."


QUOTE OF THE DAY: "Toronto police spokeswoman Stephanie Sayer wrote in an email Friday that she can’t comment on the specifics of the case, but added that the man “pleaded guilty to possession of a loaded prohibited firearm.” She added, more broadly, if the Crown believes misconduct occurred involving a police officer in court proceedings, that information is brought forward for review by Toronto police. “We take allegations of this nature very seriously and any concerns related to officer misconduct will be addressed through the appropriate processes.”

-----------------------------------------


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "The officer’s evidence was “plainly wrong and contradicted” by police photos and videos, the prosecutors wrote in their court filings. “It is unclear how this factual inaccuracy came about, but it is most likely an honest confabulation, not a deliberate fabrication.” Hussain calls this a “pseudo-scientific explanation,” noting that “confabulation” can refer to a medical disorder. Often associated with a brain injury, such as a stroke, confabulation is when a patient “generates a false memory without the intention of deceit,” according to the U.S. National Institutes of Health — “The patient believes the statement to be truthful, hence the descriptive term ‘honest lying.’”

-------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "Earlier this month, when Hussain cross-examined a Toronto officer during the pretrial motion, he learned more photographs had been taken on the day of the arrest. One of them showed his client’s ID on a table, taken April 7, 2024, in a police office during a debrief with all of the officers involved in the search. “The IDs were photographed amongst all the evidence taken from the search of the apartment in order to paint the picture that they were seized in the apartment. No one is willing to explain how they ended up amongst the evidence,” Hussain’s court document argued. Days later, the defence and prosecution had a deal."

--------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Did Toronto police conspire to plant a man’s ID as evidence in a gun case — or was it one officer’s ‘honest lie?’, by my former Toronto Star Colleague Courts Reporter Betsy Ross, published by The Toronto Star, on May 19, 2026. (Betsy Powell is a reporter with the crime, courts and justice team at the Star. She is the author of Bad Seeds: the True Story of Toronto’s Galloway Boys Street Gang.)

SUB-HEADING: "The accused walked out of court not only a free man, but with the $5,100 police had seized as alleged proceeds of crime."

GIST: Did a Toronto police officer “honestly lie” about finding a suspect’s driver’s licence and health card inside a backpack along with fentanyl, cocaine, cash and two loaded firearms?

Or did he deliberately fabricate the damning evidence — and get backed up in court by lying colleagues — as defence lawyer Humza Hussain alleges.

It’s likely we’ll never know for sure, but this past week, Hussain’s client — who had previous convictions for firearm possession and drug offences — walked out of the downtown courthouse a free man after prosecutors agreed to drop a set of serious charges; he instead pleaded guilty to a single firearms offence.


He had been in custody since his arrest on April 7, 2024, and Superior Court Justice Rob Goldstein accepted the joint Crown‑defence submission that the appropriate sentence was time served.

The plea also ends a potentially explosive Charter motion. Hussain had asked a different judge to stay the proceedings entirely, arguing officers lied about finding the ID in a backpack located inside the downtown apartment of his client’s girlfriend.

The defence position is that during a debrief, the officers in the case realized that there was “virtually nothing” linking the man to the contraband. The officers then “conspired to lie” that his ID was found inside the apartment, Hussain wrote in a factum filed with the court.



The Toronto police gun and drug investigation

The Crown insisted the police had no reason to fabricate evidence because the case was so strong. The man had been seen carrying the Guess backpack on video. It also contained his bank card, and a lease agreement with his name was found inside the room where the backpack was found. The woman also told police the night of the search that the backpack belonged to the accused.

After the seizure, his DNA and fingerprint evidence were found on the drugs and one of the guns.

Prosecutors conceded that the defendant’s wallet was discovered in the purse of his co-accused girlfriend — but argued it was only one officer who “incorrectly stated” that the man’s driver’s licence and health card had been found, loose, in the backpack. The officer also wrote in his notes and testified at the preliminary hearing and during the pretrial motion that he found the ID in the backpack.

----------------------------------

PHOTO CAPTION: "Evidence from the backpack seized from the apartment. An officer later wrote down that the man’s driver’s licence had been found in the backpack — it hadn’t.

Ontario Superior Court Exhibit;

----------------------------------

The officer’s evidence was “plainly wrong and contradicted” by police photos and videos, the prosecutors wrote in their court filings. “It is unclear how this factual inaccuracy came about, but it is most likely an honest confabulation, not a deliberate fabrication.”

Hussain calls this a “pseudo-scientific explanation,” noting that “confabulation” can refer to a medical disorder. Often associated with a brain injury, such as a stroke, confabulation is when a patient “generates a false memory without the intention of deceit,” according to the U.S. National Institutes of Health — “The patient believes the statement to be truthful, hence the descriptive term ‘honest lying.’”

Earlier this month, when Hussain cross-examined a Toronto officer during the pretrial motion, he learned more photographs had been taken on the day of the arrest. One of them showed his client’s ID on a table, taken April 7, 2024, in a police office during a debrief with all of the officers involved in the search.

“The IDs were photographed amongst all the evidence taken from the search of the apartment in order to paint the picture that they were seized in the apartment. No one is willing to explain how they ended up amongst the evidence,” Hussain’s court document argued.

Days later, the defence and prosecution had a deal.

In court last Wednesday, prosecutors told Goldstein the trial date — set for next month — was going to have to be rescheduled over “disclosure issues,” which would put at “significant risk” the man’s right to be tried within a reasonable time of 30 months.

“That’s the primary reason why the Crown has agreed to the resolution,” prosecutor Benjamin Janzen told the judge.

Defence allegations ‘certainly not frivolous’

During the brief hearing, the judge agreed to Hussain’s request to file a defence “memo” as an exhibit, described as a “timeline of events that have taken place in this proceeding.” Goldstein said he was admitting it “not for the truth of its contents,” but so it’s clear for the record what the defence position was.

Federal prosecutor Anna Martin said the statement was “largely opinion,” adding that some of the claims didn’t line up with the evidence she recalled from earlier proceedings.

Among other things, the memo states that all the officers who attended the debrief testified in court that they had no knowledge of the IDs. Those officers “lied under oath to protect their participation in the coverup,” Hussain wrote. 

Toronto police spokeswoman Stephanie Sayer wrote in an email Friday that she can’t comment on the specifics of the case, but added that the man “pleaded guilty to possession of a loaded prohibited firearm.” She added, more broadly, if the Crown believes misconduct occurred involving a police officer in court proceedings, that information is brought forward for review by Toronto police.

“We take allegations of this nature very seriously and any concerns related to officer misconduct will be addressed through the appropriate processes.”

Before granting the man’s release, Goldstein noted the accused had a 2011 conviction for firearm possession and that he “would have been in line for a more significant sentence” if he’d been convicted.

The judge refrained from commenting on the defence allegations, other than to say Humza’s application for a stay was “certainly not frivolous.”

The accused walked out of court that day not only a free man, but with the $5,100 police had seized as alleged proceeds of crime returned to him. (The Star is not naming him because his case is completed and he is no longer facing a period of incarceration.) 

https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/did-toronto-police-conspire-to-plant-a-mans-id-as-evidence-in-a-gun-case--or-was-it-one-officers-honest-lie/article_d7d9cab5-fe23-489a-91d7-8f86fa3ac2e5.html

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system.  Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog. FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project; FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;

Stefon Morant: Connecticut: Ongoing civil rights wrongful conviction trial: The New Haven Independent (Reporter Mona Mahadevan) reports that Stefon Morant told a federal jury this week that he was hundreds of miles away from New Haven at the time of the Hill double murder that sent him to prison for two decades, in a story headed, "Morant details N.C. (North Carolina)alibi, "coerced statement" - also noting that, "Several hours after being in the interrogation room, Morant said Raucci (who Stefon Morant has labelled "a corrupt cop" HL) turned on the tape recorder. “If I didn’t give the correct answer he wanted, he would stop and rewind it [the tape],” said Morant. “He would give me the words,” and “he wanted me to make it sound like me.”


QUOTE OF THE DAY: "Stefon Morant told a federal jury this week that he was hundreds of miles away from New Haven at the time of the Hill double murder that sent him to prison for two decades. “Where were you at 4 a.m. on Oct. 11, 1990?” asked Morant’s attorney, Nick Brustin.“Fayetteville, North Carolina, sleeping,” he replied."

--------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Morant’s statement from that interview with Raucci implicated both Morant and Lewis in the crime. It stated that the two of them drove together to the Turner-Fields apartment and that Lewis threw the murder weapon, a gun, into the river near Criscuolo Park.   Morant said he left the police station around 4 a.m. on Jan. 16, 1991. He told a few people about the experience, who all urged him to recant. He returned to the station with his mother.  He recalled a large, bald police officer insisting that he sign the statement. “I said, ‘I’m not signing nothing, because it’s not true.’ Me and my mother left.” “Even though the statement was coerced and fed to you, how do you feel about having made it, even today?” asked Brustin.  It “destroyed not only my life but Scott’s life, allowing these people to do this to me,” said Morant. He pulled out a tissue and dabbed away his tears.

--------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "After that jury handed down a 70-year prison sentence, Morant spent 21 years behind bars. In 2015, he was released after receiving a sentence reduction in a Connecticut Superior Court. He eventually won a full pardon and a $5.84 million wrongful-conviction award from the state."

--------------------------------------------

STORY: "Morant details N.C.  (North Carolina) alibi, "coerced statement," by Reporter Mona Mahadevan, published by The New Haven Independent, on May 20, 2026.

GIST: Stefon Morant told a federal jury this week that he was hundreds of miles away from New Haven at the time of the Hill double murder that sent him to prison for two decades.

“Where were you at 4 a.m. on Oct. 11, 1990?” asked Morant’s attorney, Nick Brustin.

“Fayetteville, North Carolina, sleeping,” he replied.

Morant and two of his aunts first presented that alibi during his original criminal trial in 1994; a jury nevertheless convicted him of the 1990 murders of former alderman Ricardo Turner and his partner Lamont Fields.

On Tuesday, Morant and one of his aunts told the same alibi to a different jury — this time one that is hearing Morant’s claim that he was wrongfully convicted after a “corrupt cop” framed him and Scott Lewis over a drug debt.

They testified in U.S. District Judge Sarala Nagala’s Hartford courtroom in the ongoing civil-rights case that Morant is advancing against the City of New Haven and six former city police detectives.

On Tuesday, Morant donned a tailored white blazer. After swearing to tell the truth, he took a seat in the wood-paneled witness box.


On Oct. 10, 1990, Morant said, he was on a mission to help his older brother, who had just been arrested in New Jersey. “I was trying to get a notary to get my big brother out of jail,” he said.

In the fall of 1990, Morant and one of his brothers had been living with their aunt, Eunice Johnson, in Fayetteville. On Oct. 10, he said he drove from Fayetteville to Summerville, South Carolina to ask for help from another aunt, Vernell Frasier. Johnson and Morant’s then-girlfriend were also in the car, he said.

On Monday, Frasier testified in federal court that Morant had asked her to notarize a bond-related document. She recalled the date clearly because it was her birthday, she said.

“We sat around for a little while, talked,” Morant recalled on Tuesday. He said a florist came by to drop off a bouquet of birthday flowers.

Johnson, Morant, and Morant’s then-girlfriend ended up driving to Georgetown, South Carolina to ask another aunt, Albertha Linnen, to sign paperwork for the bond. They returned to Fayetteville after midnight and went to sleep, he said.

That same night, Turner and Fields were murdered in their Hill apartment — hundreds of miles away from North Carolina.

On the morning of Oct. 11, 1990, Morant said he called his mother from a payphone.

Brustin displayed Linda Morant’s call records on screens in front of the jury in the Hartford courtroom. According to the document, Linda Morant received multiple collect calls from Fayetteville on Oct. 11, 1990.

Brustin also presented a fax that Linda sent from New Haven to Fayetteville on the same day. The document was something that would help secure a bond for her older son, Morant’s brother.

Morant said he stayed in Fayetteville until Oct. 16, 1990, when he took an overnight train to Connecticut.

Three months later, former police Det. Vincent Raucci left his card with Linda Morant and asked to speak with her son, Stefon.

After downing a few drinks and smoking some pot, Morant met Raucci at a gas station on State Street. Raucci drove them to the police station, where Morant said he spent the next six to eight hours.

Morant recalled telling the police dozens of times that he had “no knowledge of the crime.” Raucci “just kept saying he knew I didn’t have anything to do with it [the Turner-Fields murders]. He just wanted Scott Lewis.” 

Several hours after being in the interrogation room, Morant said Raucci turned on the tape recorder.

“If I didn’t give the correct answer he wanted, he would stop and rewind it [the tape],” said Morant. “He would give me the words,” and “he wanted me to make it sound like me.”

Morant’s statement from that interview with Raucci implicated both Morant and Lewis in the crime. It stated that the two of them drove together to the Turner-Fields apartment and that Lewis threw the murder weapon, a gun, into the river near Criscuolo Park. 

Morant said he left the police station around 4 a.m. on Jan. 16, 1991. He told a few people about the experience, who all urged him to recant. He returned to the station with his mother. 

He recalled a large, bald police officer insisting that he sign the statement. “I said, ‘I’m not signing nothing, because it’s not true.’ Me and my mother left.”

“Even though the statement was coerced and fed to you, how do you feel about having made it, even today?” asked Brustin. 

It “destroyed not only my life but Scott’s life, allowing these people to do this to me,” said Morant. He pulled out a tissue and dabbed away his tears.

The key witness who placed Morant in the Hill at the time of the Turner-Fields murder was Ovil Ruiz. Over the years, Ruiz has recanted his testimony, un-recanted his testimony, and recanted once again. During Morant’s ongoing wrongful-conviction trial, Ruiz said Morant had nothing to do with the Turner-Fields murders.

Thomas Gerarde, the attorney representing the City of New Haven in this trial, did not counter Morant’s alibi in court on Tuesday. Instead, he questioned whether Morant ever told police about his alibi.

In January 1991, “You did not say to them, ‘Hey, I was securing a bond for my brother Frank when all of this happened?” asked Gerarde.

“No, sir,” responded Morant.

“What you did say to them was that you were with Scott Lewis” on Oct. 11, 1990, driving towards Howard Avenue, said Gerarde.

Morant agreed.

“A jury heard all of the evidence,” including multiple witnesses placing Morant in North Carolina and South Carolina, and Ruiz saying Morant was in New Haven. “That jury convicted you of felony murder?” asked Gerarde.

Morant replied, “Yes, sir.”

After that jury handed down a 70-year prison sentence, Morant spent 21 years behind bars. In 2015, he was released after receiving a sentence reduction in a Connecticut Superior Court. He eventually won a full pardon and a $5.84 million wrongful-conviction award from the state."

The entire story can be read at: 

https://www.newhavenindependent.org/2026/05/20/morant-details-n-c-alibi-explains-statement-coerced-by-detective/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system.  Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog. FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project; FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;