Saturday, February 21, 2026

Maurice Pierce, Robert Springsteen, Mike Scott and Forrest Welborn: Texas: Coerced confessions and much more: (Major (Welcome) Development: These four men, who were accused, two of them convicted, in one of Texas' most infamous crimes have been declared officially innocent, KUT News (Reporter Andrew Weber) reports, noting that: "Earlier this year, police announced they believed Robert Eugene Brashers was guilty of the killing Amy Ayers, Eliza Thomas, and Jennifer and Sarah Harbison at an I Can't Believe It's Yogurt shop in December 1991. Brashers died in 1999, but police were able to tie him to the murders through forensic and DNA evidence after decades of searching for the real killer. Travis County District Attorney José Garza filed a motion to revisit the case and formally clear their names late last year.'..."Both Springsteen and Scott maintained for decades that their confessions were coerced by police. Assistant District Attorney Trudy Strassburger said Travis County’s wrongful prosecutions left defendants “screaming into the wind” for decades, and that it was “our turn to accept responsibility.” “Simply said, both the science and the confessions can’t be true,” Strassburger said. “The truth is that Robert Eugene Brashers is guilty, and he alone committed the yogurt shop murders.”


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: This Blog is interested in false confessions because of the disturbing number of exonerations in the USA, Canada and multiple other jurisdictions throughout the world, where, in the absence of incriminating forensic evidence the conviction is based on self-incrimination – and because of the growing body of  scientific research showing how vulnerable suspects are to widely used interrogation methods  such as  the notorious ‘Reid Technique.’ As  all too many of this Blog's post have shown, I also recognize that pressure for false confessions can take many forms, up to and including physical violence, even physical and mental torture.

Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog:

—————————————————————————————

QUOTE OF THE DAY: "Assistant District Attorney Trudy Strassburger said Travis County’s wrongful prosecutions left defendants “screaming into the wind” for decades, and that it was “our turn to accept responsibility.” “Simply said, both the science and the confessions can’t be true,” Strassburger said. “The truth is that Robert Eugene Brashers is guilty, and he alone committed the yogurt shop murders.” Farrelly said the lives of “the boys” were cratered by their arrests and imprisonment. That impact is still there for three, but not for Maurice Pierce, who had a mental health episode in 2010 and was shot by an Austin police officer he attempted to stab. “This case needs to change Austin. It needs to change Texas,” she said. “It is truly a miracle that we are here. A miracle that has come too late for Maurice Pierce — and has been denied for too long for Robert Springsteen, Michael Scott and Forrest Welborn.”


---------------------------------------------------


QUOTE TWO OF THE DAY: "In tearful testimony, Pierce’s daughter, Marisa, said she will continue her fight for people wrongfully accused of crimes in Texas. She said the “tunnel vision” of police and prosecutors robbed him of his dignity, and that he was just an innocent boy when he was arrested at 15 years old.

Marisa said nobody heard him, or believed him, until today. "Daddy, you have your name back," she said. "The world finally hears what you were trying to say all along."

-----------------------------------------------------



STORY: "Four men accused in Austin's yogurt shop murders have been exonerated," by Reporter Andrew Weber, published by KUT News, on February 19, 2026. (Andrew Weber is KUT'S government accountability reporter, focussing on criminal justice, policing, courts and homelessness in Austin and Travis County.)

Andrew Weber is KUT's government accountability reporter, focusing on criminal justice, policing, courts and homelessness in Austin and Travis CountyAndrew Weber is KUT's government accountability reporter, focusing on criminal justice, policing, courts nd homelessness in Austin and Travis CountyGISTGIST: "Four men who were accused, two of them convicted, in one of Texas' most infamous crimes have been declared officially innocent.

GIST: "Four men who were accused, two of them convicted, in one of Texas' most infamous crimes have been declared officially innocent.

Maurice Pierce, Robert Springsteen, Mike Scott and Forrest Welborn were the key suspects in the 1991 slayings of four teenage girls at a yogurt shop.

Now, more than 34 years later, Travis County Judge Dayna Blazey has stated that all are innocent, clearing their records and formally exonerating them after they were wrongfully accused in 1999.

Earlier this year, police announced they believed Robert Eugene Brashers was guilty of the killing Amy Ayers, Eliza Thomas, and Jennifer and Sarah Harbison at an I Can't Believe It's Yogurt shop in December 1991. Brashers died in 1999, but police were able to tie him to the murders through forensic and DNA evidence after decades of searching for the real killer.

Travis County District Attorney José Garza filed a motion to revisit the case and formally clear their names late last year.

All four suspects were implicated, investigated and later arrested in the aftermath of the murders that drew national attention and haunted Austin for decades.

Springsteen, who was sentenced to death and spent 10 years in prison, said in a written statement read by his attorney, Amber Farrelly, that his wrongful arrest turned his life into a cycle of “chaos and uncertainty."

“I have been persecuted every day,” Springsteen said. “I have lived every single day … being seen as a monster for something I did not do.”

Scott, the only exoneree who spoke in court, said the police who arrested him, and prosecutors who convinced a jury to give him life in prison, robbed him of his youth — of a full life.

"For decades I have carried the burden of wrongful conviction. Every day, I have carried the weight of a crime that I did not commit," he said. "No court ruling can return the years and the love that were taken from me, but it can acknowledge the truth: I am not guilty."

Both Springsteen and Scott maintained for decades that their confessions were coerced by police.

Assistant District Attorney Trudy Strassburger said Travis County’s wrongful prosecutions left defendants “screaming into the wind” for decades, and that it was “our turn to accept responsibility.”

“Simply said, both the science and the confessions can’t be true,” Strassburger said. “The truth is that Robert Eugene Brashers is guilty, and he alone committed the yogurt shop murders.”

Farrelly said the lives of “the boys” were cratered by their arrests and imprisonment. That impact is still there for three, but not for Maurice Pierce, who had a mental health episode in 2010 and was shot by an Austin police officer he attempted to stab.

“This case needs to change Austin. It needs to change Texas,” she said. “It is truly a miracle that we are here. A miracle that has come too late for Maurice Pierce — and has been denied for too long for Robert Springsteen, Michael Scott and Forrest Welborn.”

Springsteen and Scott were convicted of murder in 1999. Scott was sentenced to life, while Springsteen was given the death penalty. Those cases were both thrown out in 2006 by the state's highest criminal court.

Pierce spent more than three years in jail awaiting trial before his case was dismissed in 2003. Pierce later stabbed an Austin police officer and was fatally shot in 2010. Wellborn's charges were dropped in 2000.

In tearful testimony, Pierce’s daughter, Marisa, said she will continue her fight for people wrongfully accused of crimes in Texas. She said the “tunnel vision” of police and prosecutors robbed him of his dignity, and that he was just an innocent boy when he was arrested at 15 years old.

Marisa said nobody heard him, or believed him, until today.

"Daddy, you have your name back," she said. "The world finally hears what you were trying to say all along."

After the hearing, Travis County DA José Garza apologized to the exonerees and their families, saying the time for healing had begun.

"It is my sincere hope that with this closure, we can begin to heal," he said.""

The entire story can be read at:

https://dentonrc.com/news/state/four-men-accused-in-austins-yogurt-shop-murders-have-been-exonerated/article_c2f42b8e-7b22-42f1-9531-82cc8bd4b8a1.html

--------------------------------------------------

FROM NATIONAL REGISTRY OF EXONERATIONS ENTRY: LINK BELOW): "In February 1998, with the case gone cold, police decided to conduct a new investigation of the crime. They re-questioned Scott by telephone and he denied involvement. On September 9, 1999, Scott was questioned again, this time in a police station. At one point during a 12-hour interrogation, Scott said he knew the identities of the killers. On September 10, the interrogation resumed and ultimately, Scott said he had probably shot one of the girls, that he had fired a gun once and that he set the fire. On September 13, Scott was interviewed once more and said he remembered seeing Pierce with one of the girls in a separate room in the yogurt shop. He said he thought he had gagged one of the girls with paper towels or napkins.  Further, Scott said the .22-caliber pistol came from Springsteen. He remembered little about the other weapon, but thought it was a semi-automatic .38 caliber. Springsteen was arrested in Charleston, West Virginia, where he was living. Police videotaped him confessing to sexually assaulting and killing one of the victims. Scott, Springsteen, Pierce and Welborn were all charged with capital murder, but ultimately the charges against Pierce and Welborn were dismissed. Springsteen went to trial first and was convicted on May 30, 2001, largely on the basis of his confession. He had recanted the confession and claimed it had been coerced." (Read on at link) HL:

10875 (Maurice Possley: August 29 2011);

--------------------------------------------------

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system.   Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."

Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;


 FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!

Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;y

February 21: Former babysitter Meggin Van Hoof: On-going trial: The Toronto Star (Chief Investigator Kevin Donovan) reports that the deceased toddler's mother says that she has PTSD as the prosecutor is concerned that the defence is 'badgering' her, in a story sub-headed, “The nature of cross-examination when we broke for the day yesterday was verging on badgering,” Crown tells trial of toddler’s babysitter."..."Snow’s client, Meggin Van Hoof, is on trial in London, Ont., for manslaughter in Nathaniel’s October 2015 death. She has pleaded not guilty. The Crown alleges that Van Hoof, who ran an unlicensed daycare out of her home, either “overtly” caused the death or contributed to it by not calling 911 when he became unwell. Nathaniel died of a massive head trauma."..."Rose-Anne Van De Wiele, Nathaniel’s mother, has had to take breaks during almost two weeks of cross-examination, and this week, when recalled to the witness stand for a particular issue, testified she has “PTSD” as a result of her son’s death. She broke down on the stand Wednesday and had to leave court. Gardiner noted that during her earlier cross-examination, Snow was “actually yelling” at Van De Wiele. Judge Carnegie told Snow at that point that there was never a reason in court to do that."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: " (Judge) Carnegie, who has expressed exasperation with how long the trial is taking (he has frequently said that at some point the trial has to “move on,” said he will take action when needed. “When I believe that counsel has crossed the line, I will and I have addressed it with counsel.” Snow did not respond to Gardiner’s comments. But he did say he is concerned Van De Wiele is “controlling the narrative” and “controlling the trial” by only providing information that helps what he says is her desire to have his client found guilty. He has told court he believes she only provides information when it is “an advantage” for her. Van De Wiele repeated what she has said previously — that her goal is to find out what happened to her son."

---------------------------------------

STORY: "Nathaniel McLellan’s mother says she has PTSD as Crown concerned defence is ‘badgering’ her," by  Chief Investigative  Reporter Kevin Donovan, published by The Toronto Star, on February 19, 2026. "Kevin Donovan is the Toronto Star’s Chief Investigative Reporter. His focus is on journalism that exposes wrongdoing and effects change. Over more than three decades he has reported on the activities of charities, government, police, business among other institutions. Donovan also reported from the battlefields in the Gulf War and the war in Afghanistan following 9/11. He has won three National Newspaper Awards, two Governor General’s Michener Awards, the Canadian Journalism Foundation award and three Canadian Association of Journalists Awards. As the Star’s editor of investigations for many years, Donovan led many award-winning projects for the paper. He is the author of several books, including “Secret Life: The Jian Ghomeshi Investigation” and the “Dead Times” (a fiction novel)."


SUB-HEADING: “The nature of cross-examination when we broke for the day yesterday was verging on badgering,” Crown tells trial of toddler’s babysitter. 

Feb. 19, 2026


PHOTO CAPTION:Babysitter Meggin Van Hoof of Strathroy, Ont., is on trial for manslaughter in Nathaniel McLellan’‘s death in October 2015.


GIST: "The prosecutor in the Nathaniel McLellan manslaughter case told court Thursday that the lawyer for the accused babysitter is coming close to “badgering” Nathaniel’s mother, who has testified she has PTSD over her son’s death.

“The nature of cross-examination when we broke for the day yesterday was verging on badgering,” Crown Meredith Gardiner said Thursday, adding that she may ask Judge Michael Carnegie to “constrain” lawyer Geoff Snow’s cross-examination if it continues.

Snow’s client, Meggin Van Hoof, is on trial in London, Ont., for manslaughter in Nathaniel’s October 2015 death. She has pleaded not guilty. The Crown alleges that Van Hoof, who ran an unlicensed daycare out of her home, either “overtly” caused the death or contributed to it by not calling 911 when he became unwell. Nathaniel died of a massive head trauma.

Rose-Anne Van De Wiele, Nathaniel’s mother, has had to take breaks during almost two weeks of cross-examination, and this week, when recalled to the witness stand for a particular issue, testified she has “PTSD” as a result of her son’s death. She broke down on the stand Wednesday and had to leave court. Gardiner noted that during her earlier cross-examination, Snow was “actually yelling” at Van De Wiele. Judge Carnegie told Snow at that point that there was never a reason in court to do that. 

The trial began in September but only a few witnesses have testified, due to frequent breaks for legal reasons, and scheduling issues. Some witnesses have been cross-examined for days. There are typically no limits on the length of cross-examination, unless the defence is trying to repeatedly ask the same question.

With the first medical witnesses scheduled to testify this week, the trial took a detour because Van De Wiele provided new information to the court long after she finished testifying. The new information is a photo from Facebook she found in 2022 that was described to court as a picture of a red wagon that Van Hoof’s husband was selling years after Nathaniel’s death. The colour of the wagon is significant, as in earlier cross-examination Snow had suggested Van De Wiele and other witnesses were wrong when they said they spotted Van Hoof pulling a “red” wagon the day Nathaniel became unwell.

Rose-Anne Van De Wiele has had to take breaks during almost two weeks of cross-examination. Snow is using the colour of the wagon to challenge the credibility of these witnesses, who testified for the prosecution. Previously, court was shown a photo of a brown wagon in the Van Hoof garage — a photo taken by police in the days following Nathaniel’s death. Carnegie allowed this new information, which he described as a “possible post-offence sale of a red wagon.”


With no jury, it will be up to Carnegie to determine what weight he gives to the wagon’s colour in his ultimate determination of the case. Testimony is expected to last at least until June, with more breaks scheduled. 

Much of the day’s proceedings Thursday were taken up by arguments between the Crown and defence.

Crown Gardiner asked Carnegie to be mindful of the almost “two weeks” of cross-examination the mother has endured. 

“Your honour, Ms. Van De Wiele is a witness at this trial,” Gardiner said. “She is here to give evidence, to answer questions put to her in a truthful manner. She is not here to defend herself.”

Carnegie noted that at times, Snow has been “rehashing” his previous cross-examination.

Gardiner accused Snow of coming close to “badgering” Van De Wiele.

“It is not appropriate for my friend to be taking a hostile or disrespectful tone towards this witness,” Gardiner told court. “The questions that my friend legitimately needs to ask can be asked in a respectful and calm manner. Without resorting to aggression.”

If it continues, Gardiner said she will ask the court to “constrain the cross-examination.”

Carnegie, who has expressed exasperation with how long the trial is taking (he has frequently said that at some point the trial has to “move on,” said he will take action when needed. “When I believe that counsel has crossed the line, I will and I have addressed it with counsel.”

Snow did not respond to Gardiner’s comments. But he did say he is concerned Van De Wiele is “controlling the narrative” and “controlling the trial” by only providing information that helps what he says is her desire to have his client found guilty. He has told court he believes she only provides information when it is “an advantage” for her. 

Van De Wiele repeated what she has said previously — that her goal is to find out what happened to her son.""

The entire story can be read at:  

https://www.thestar.com/news/investigations/crown-concerned-defence-badgering-toddlers-mom/article_1d88334c-c1a1-47e1-acbf-16d1373427ac.html

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. 

Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."

Lawyer Radha Natarajan:

Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;


FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!


Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;you cannot defend against an enemy you c

February 21: Maria Margarita Rojas; Texas: Criminalizing Reproduction: Attacks on Science, Medicine and the Right to choose; All eyes on this appeal by a midwife accused of violating the state's abortion ban, ABC News (Reporter Mary Kekatos) reports, noting that: "Meanwhile, prosecutors have also accused Rojas of violating the state's abortion ban and charged her with a first-degree felony that carries a potential sentence of up to life in prison. "[Paxton] is accusing our client of basically operating abortion clinics, which the problem is that the allegations just aren't true and we think that the state completely failed to prove or show that any abortions were happening or that any unlawful practice was happening at the clinics," Marc Hearron, interim associate director of litigation with the CRR, who is representing Rojas in the civil case, told ABC News."

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  In recent years, I have taken on the  theme of 'criminalizing reproduction' - a natural theme for a Blog concerned with  flawed science in its myriad forms  - as I am utterly appalled by  the current movement in the United States (and some other countries) emboldened by the overturning of Roe V Wade,  towards imprisoning and conducting surveillance on women and their physicians and others who help them secure a safe abortion,  on the basis of sham science (or any other basis). I can’t remember the source, but agree  totally with the sentiment that control over their reproductive lives is far too important to women in America - or anywhere else -  so they can  participate  equally in the economic and social life of their nations without fear for  loss their freedom at the hands of political opportunists and fanatics. (Far too many of those those around these days.) '

Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.


-------------------------------------------


QUOTE OF THE DAY: "ABC News has also reached out to the attorney representing Rojas in the criminal case. Hearron said the case against Rojas is significant because it marks the first time a provider has been criminally charged in Texas for violating the state's abortion ban. He accused Paxton's office of conducting a "shoddy" investigation and said Rojas was using the abortion drug misoprostol to provide miscarriage care."


-------------------------------------------


SECOND QUOTE OF THE DAY: "Hearron said the effects of the investigation and of the charges have been devastating on Rojas. "I think this is a politically motivated case and the effect has been to completely upend my client's life," Hearron said. "She was arrested twice. She was held in jail for 10 days and had to post this exorbitant $1.4 million bond. She's now out, but she's got to wear an ankle monitor. There are extreme restrictions on her travel. Her midwifery license has been temporarily suspended pending the outcome of the criminal proceedings, which could take years.

------------------------------------------


THIRD QUOTE OF THE DAY: "He added that the proceedings have also affected the predominantly Spanish-speaking, low-income, uninsured patients who relied on care from Rojas and her clinics. "People who relied on Mrs. Rojas for midwifery care -- she delivered babies," Hearron said. "She was a caring, devoted midwife who delivered babies and provided care to her patients, and now her patients can't turn to her. So this has been devastating."

------------------------------------------

STORY: "Texas court to hear appeal in case of midwife accused of violating state abortion ban," by Reporter Mary Kekatos, published by ABC News, on February 19, 2026.

SUB-HEADING: "Maria Margarita Rojas is also facing criminal charges."


SUB-HEADING: "How post-Roe Texas abortion law has been put into practice."


A Texas appeals court will hear arguments on Thursday in a civil lawsuit brought against a woman accused by the state of illegally providing abortions in the Houston area.

GIST: "Maria Margarita Rojas allegedly provided abortions in violation of the state's abortion ban and was practicing medicine without a license at a network of clinics in northwestern Houston, according to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.

Last year, a lower court in Waller County issued an injunction against Rojas and the three clinics at which she worked, causing them to shut down.

The Center for Reproductive Rights is currently asking the appellate court to reverse that decision. 

Meanwhile, prosecutors have also accused Rojas of violating the state's abortion ban and charged her with a first-degree felony that carries a potential sentence of up to life in prison.

"[Paxton] is accusing our client of basically operating abortion clinics, which the problem is that the allegations just aren't true and we think that the state completely failed to prove or show that any abortions were happening or that any unlawful practice was happening at the clinics," Marc Hearron, interim associate director of litigation with the CRR, who is representing Rojas in the civil case, told ABC News.

ABC News has also reached out to the attorney representing Rojas in the criminal case.

Hearron said the case against Rojas is significant because it marks the first time a provider has been criminally charged in Texas for violating the state's abortion ban.

He accused Paxton's office of conducting a "shoddy" investigation and said Rojas was using the abortion drug misoprostol to provide miscarriage care.

In January 2025, an anonymous complaint was filed with the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, alleging that two abortions were performed at one of Rojas' clinics, according to the appellate brief.

The Medicaid Fraud Division within Paxton's office began investigating, with one investigator claiming to find a pill bottle of the drug misoprostol, according to the complaint. While misoprostol can be used as part of a two-drug combination to induce an abortion, it is also used to treat first-trimester miscarriages.

In filing an appeal, Rojas' attorneys argued that mifepristone, the drug given with misoprostol to induce an abortion, was never found by investigators, nor were tools found that would be used in a surgical abortion.

They also alleged the state investigators had no "medical training or expertise" to know what misoprostol could be used for and did not consult with a medical expert during the investigation.

Hearron said the effects of the investigation and of the charges have been devastating on Rojas.

"I think this is a politically motivated case and the effect has been to completely upend my client's life," Hearron said. "She was arrested twice. She was held in jail for 10 days and had to post this exorbitant $1.4 million bond. She's now out, but she's got to wear an ankle monitor. There are extreme restrictions on her travel. Her midwifery license has been temporarily suspended pending the outcome of the criminal proceedings, which could take years."

He added that the proceedings have also affected the predominantly Spanish-speaking, low-income, uninsured patients who relied on care from Rojas and her clinics.

"People who relied on Mrs. Rojas for midwifery care -- she delivered babies," Hearron said. "She was a caring, devoted midwife who delivered babies and provided care to her patients, and now her patients can't turn to her. So this has been devastating."

According to a press release last year from Paxton, Rojas is a midwife known as "Dr. Maria." She allegedly owned and operated multiple clinics, including Clinica Waller Latinoamericana in Waller, Clinica Latinoamericana Telge in Cypress and Latinoamericana Medical Clinic in Spring -- all in the northwest Houston area.

Rojas is accused of performing "illegal abortion procedures" in her clinics, which allegedly violated the Texas Human Life Protection Act, the attorney general's office said.

Abortions are banned in Texas except in limited, exception cases if the woman has a life-threatening condition or is at risk of "substantial impairment of a major bodily function."

In the limited exceptions when abortion is allowed, patients are required to make two trips, one for an in-person counseling session and then 24 hours later for the abortion, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that focuses on sexual and reproductive health

Paxton's office did not immediately return ABC News' request for comment.


In the limited exceptions when abortion is allowed, patients are required to make two trips, one for an in-person counseling session and then 24 hours later for the abortion, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research group that focuses on sexual and reproductive health

Paxton's office did not immediately return ABC News' request for comment."


The entire story can be read at:


https://abcnews.com/Health/texas-court-hear-appeal-case-midwife-accused-violating/story?id=130260004PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. 

The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."

Lawyer Radha Natarajan:

Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————


FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!


Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;


--------------------------------