Sunday, February 8, 2026

February 8: Technology: 'Project South.' Ontario: Abuse of confidential police data-bases: (AKA 'leaking): Safeguards? Punishment? Blind eyes? Police Corruption Scandal: Toronto Star (Investigative Reporter Frédérik Plante) wades into recent revelations of corruption within Ontario police, in a story headed, "Stalking exes and a Toronto corruption case: Why allegations of internal database abuse have dogged Ontario police for decades," and sub-headed, "The Toronto Police corruption scandal spotlights the sensitive information that officers have at their fingertips and the rules governing access," - noting that, "York Regional Police alleged that several members of the Toronto Police Service (TPS) used an internal database for criminal purposes, including an attempted murder. Investigators noticed that addresses queried in the database later became scenes of crimes — “including extortion, commercial robberies and shootings,” according to the Project South allegations. The new charges again spotlight the personal information that police have at their fingertips and the rules governing their access to it."...More than a decade ago, a Star investigation found that at least 25 officers had been busted in the previous five years for improper searches of internal databases. These cops checked on former lovers, colleagues and business partners. Some then shared confidential information to outsiders to help with custody battles or court disputes."

--------------------------------------------------

BACKGROUND: Toronto Star: February 5: 2026: A black day for policing in Ontario:  "Toronto police corruption Case: Explosive allegations against officers accused of leaking information to criminals'; By Crime Reporter Jennifer Pagliaro and Staff Reporters Abby O'Brien and Calvi Leon;  "The seven-month investigation, dubbed Project South, is one of the largest probes of criminal corruption in the Toronto Police Service’s history, involving longtime constables and sergeants as well as younger officers.  As reported by Toronto Star Staff Reporters Peter Edwards and Sadeen Mohsen) in a story referred to below:  "Part of the allegations announced in Project South on Thursday included the leaking of confidential information by police officers to criminal actors, who then facilitated shootings, extortions and robberies. The investigation stemmed, authorities explained, from an alleged conspiracy to kill a senior corrections officer from the Toronto South Detention Centre at his home in Markham last year."

-----------------------------------------

PASSAGE ONE OF THE DAY: "Kash Heed, a former West Vancouver police chief, said the fact that several officers were charged with computer misuse in Project South raises a question about whether colleagues noticed the alleged misconduct but turned a blind eye. He called for stiff disciplinary sanctions not only for the officers who face criminal charges, but also for their fellow officers who might have ignored concerning behaviour."

-----------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "Among cases surfaced by the Star in 2015 was Const. Hezekiah Tai, a Durham Region officer who chatted up a waitress at a Richmond Hill bar in 2013 and learned she lived in Ajax, near his patrol zone. She wouldn’t give him her number. The next day, while on duty, he searched the waitress and her family on a police database. He left his post and parked his cruiser outside her family home. He was docked 120 hours pay. Const. Ian Parker, a veteran OPP officer, made inappropriate searches on a police database of 124 people — including former girlfriends, private citizens, fellow OPP officers, their spouses and their children. On seven different shifts, he spent upwards of nine hours of taxpayer-funded time making these improper computer searches. He was docked 20 hours pay. Const. Lisa Peck, another OPP officer, checked internal databases for non-police reasons more than 550 times, accessing everything from photographs to confidential driver profiles and addresses. She was docked 30 hours pay. More recently, Const. Andrew Corkill, a veteran TPS officer, admitted in 2023 that he used official police stationery in a personal dispute with his tenant. Corkill performed an unauthorized search of CPIC to run a background check on a possible tenant.

------------------------------------------

STORY: "Stalking exes and a Toronto corruption case: Why allegations of internal database abuse have dogged Ontario police for decades," by Investigative Reporter Frédérik Plante. published by The Toronto Star, on February 7, 2026.(Frédérik Plante is a Toronto-based reporter on the Star’s investigations team. He previously worked for The Globe and Mail, La Presse and CBC/Radio-Canada in Montreal and Vancouver. His 2023 series on Montreal fire safety gaps was a finalist for the Michener Award for public service journalism. He has also investigated illegal detentions, housing, racial profiling and at-risk species protection. Plante holds law degrees from McGill University and the Université de Montréal.)

SUB-HEADING: "The Toronto Police corruption scandal spotlights the sensitive information that officers have at their fingertips and the rules governing access.


GIST: "When police brass revealed the disturbing details of the Project South corruption case against seven active officers Thursday, the allegations resurfaced a problem that has dogged forces in Ontario for years.

York Regional Police alleged that several members of the Toronto Police Service (TPS) used an internal database for criminal purposes, including an attempted murder.

Investigators noticed that addresses queried in the database later became scenes of crimes — “including extortion, commercial robberies and shootings,” according to the Project South allegations.


The new charges again spotlight the personal information that police have at their fingertips and the rules governing their access to it.

In a letter to Ontario’s Inspector General of Policing sent ahead of the Project South news conference Thursday, TPS Chief Myron Demkiw and TPS Board Chair Shelley Carroll asked for an inspection of “access to police databases and information systems, including permissions, controls, and clearances,” among other areas.

“Please consider the extent to which these issues are not unique to any one police service and the extent to which they highlight the need for a sector-wide strategy,” they wrote.

More than a decade ago, a Star investigation found that at least 25 officers had been busted in the previous five years for improper searches of internal databases. These cops checked on former lovers, colleagues and business partners. Some then shared confidential information to outsiders to help with custody battles or court disputes.

Clayton Campbell, president of the Toronto Police Association, said accessing police databases, whether CIPC or others, leaves traces. “Meaning the police service can tell every time you’ve accessed any piece of information,” he said. So while police have access to sensitive information, there are “policies and technology in place to make sure there’s proper tracking.”

The Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC) is one of the systems officers have access to and that have featured in cases that have landed cops in trouble. It is not known if CPIC is the system that the officers charged by Project South allegedly inappropriately used. York police did not immediately answer questions about the database used. The TPS referred questions to York police.

Law enforcement uses CPIC to access information on individuals and vehicles, among other things. A York Regional Police directive cited in a 2021 court case explains that CIPC information is classified as “Confidential — For Police Only.”

The directive says officers can’t access the database “for any purpose” other than police business. Unauthorized use “will not be tolerated” and can lead to disciplinary action, it says.

“Consequently, it is an offence under the Police Services Act for a member to divulge or show any CPIC information to an unauthorized person or organization,” the directive says.

The 2021 case also describes the existence of other police databases, including MTO-ISS, which is controlled by the Ministry of Transportation and allows officers to check licence plates, names, tickets, and insurance and registration details on their cruiser’s terminal.

In this case, Richard Senior, a Constable with York Regional Police, was found guilty of unauthorized use of a police computer for conducting CPIC queries to pass along licence plate information to third parties.

Among cases surfaced by the Star in 2015 was Const. Hezekiah Tai, a Durham Region officer who chatted up a waitress at a Richmond Hill bar in 2013 and learned she lived in Ajax, near his patrol zone. She wouldn’t give him her number. The next day, while on duty, he searched the waitress and her family on a police database. He left his post and parked his cruiser outside her family home. He was docked 120 hours pay.

Const. Ian Parker, a veteran OPP officer, made inappropriate searches on a police database of 124 people — including former girlfriends, private citizens, fellow OPP officers, their spouses and their children. On seven different shifts, he spent upwards of nine hours of taxpayer-funded time making these improper computer searches. He was docked 20 hours pay.

Const. Lisa Peck, another OPP officer, checked internal databases for non-police reasons more than 550 times, accessing everything from photographs to confidential driver profiles and addresses. She was docked 30 hours pay.

More recently, Const. Andrew Corkill, a veteran TPS officer, admitted in 2023 that he used official police stationery in a personal dispute with his tenant. Corkill performed an unauthorized search of CPIC to run a background check on a possible tenant.

Kash Heed, a former West Vancouver police chief, said the fact that several officers were charged with computer misuse in Project South raises a question about whether colleagues noticed the alleged misconduct but turned a blind eye. He called for stiff disciplinary sanctions not only for the officers who face criminal charges, but also for their fellow officers who might have ignored concerning behaviour.

A previous  Star investigation found that police databases such as CPIC contained information on hundreds of thousands of people who had not been charged with any crimes yet was routinely held against them after being accessed through background checks."

The entire story can be read at: 

https://www.thestar.com/news/investigations/stalking-exes-and-a-toronto-corruption-case-why-allegations-of-internal-database-abuse-have-dogged/article_37bd7397-5a1e-4846-8738-5d673d3329ae.html

-----------------------------------------------------

READ ALSO: Toronto Star story, "Retired Toronto cop charged in corruption probe also tied to case involving alleged debt collector ‘Frank the Tank,’" by  Staff Reporters Peter Edwards (my friend, colleague and top-notch author and reporter on organized crime, with whom I partnered on many stories)  and Sadeen  Mohsen, published on February 6, 2026:  (Link Below): A taste:  Retired Toronto police officer John Madeley Sr. was charged alongside an alleged underworld debt collector nicknamed “Frank the Tank” in an extortion investigation last month, weeks before he was named in a sweeping corruption probe that also saw the arrests of seven other cops on ThursdayAmong those also charged this week in that large-scale York police-led investigation, dubbed Project South, was Madeley’s son, John Madeley Jr., 29, an active officer with Toronto police. Both men are from Barrie.  Part of the allegations announced in Project South on Thursday included the leaking of confidential information by police officers to criminal actors, who then facilitated shootings, extortions and robberies. The investigation stemmed, authorities explained, from an alleged conspiracy to kill a senior corrections officer from the Toronto South Detention Centre at his home in Markham last year."

https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/retired-toronto-cop-charged-in-corruption-probe-also-tied-to-case-involving-alleged-debt-collector/article_cb95ae01-f35f-486f-b47d-553a4b7f312b.html-----------------------------------------------------

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:

https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/120008354894645705/4704913685758792985

——————————————————————————————

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."

Lawyer Radha Natarajan:

Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————


FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!


Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

------------------------------------------------------------------



Saturday, February 7, 2026

February 7: Neonatal Nurse Lucy Letby: Part Six: Netflix: Dr. Dewi Evans: 'The recently released 'Investigation of Lucy Letby' documentary: Professional Expert Witness Dr. Dewi Evans: Question Of The Day: Where is he today? Addressed by Reporter Kriti Mehrotra; Published by The Cinemaholic, on February 4, 2026.


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: Reporter Mehotra: "As of writing, the 76-year-old is leading a quiet life in Carmarthen, Wales, surrounded by his loved ones. Per reports, he has been enjoying his retirement since closing down Dewi Evans Paediatric Consulting Ltd. in June 2024." Publisher Levy: I would  have ended the story with a very different picture, as follows:    "As of writing, neonatal nurse Lucy Letby,  now 36 years old, who has been convicted of killing seven babies, largely because of Dewi Evan's  so-called  'expert' evidence which has so seriously been called into question,  faces the torturous nightmare of spending the rest of her life in prison.

Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog; 

-----------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "It was in 2023 when she was found guilty of 7 counts of murder and 7 counts of attempted murder in connection with the high number of infant deaths at her workplace at the Countess of Chester Hospital between 2015 and 2016. However, the ordeal remains far from closed, partly because the credibility of the lead prosecutorial professional expert witness, Dr. Dewi Evans, has since reportedly come into question."

----------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "Dr. Dewi’s testimony against former neonatal nurse Lucy Letby was key in her August 2023 conviction on 7 counts of murder as well as 7 counts of attempted murder. Even though there was no physical evidence tying her to the alleged crimes and no witnesses to her actions, there was a mountain of circumstantial evidence that pointed fingers at her alone. However, since then, many have expressed doubts over her convictions, especially because a team of other medical experts reevaluated the clinical evidence and indicated there was no crime or murder committed.?

--------------------------------------------

PASSAGE THREE OF THE DAY: "It has been reported that during the court proceedings, a Justice from the Court of Appeals wrote an email to the trial judge expressing concerns about Dr. Dewi’s testimony. In the email, the former reportedly wrote that he believed Dr. Dewi breached his duty as an expert by deciding on the outcome he wanted, then “working out an explanation” to achieve it. “Of greatest concern,” he continued, “Dr. Evans makes no effort to provide a balanced opinion…, (which can be considered) a breach of proper professional conduct.” In other words, the Justice questioned Dr. Dewi’s credibility by suggesting he could be biased, but the latter has since asserted that he stands by his report.

--------------------------------------------

STORY: "Dr. Dewi Evans: Where is the Professional Expert Witness Today?, by Reporter Kriti Mehrotra, published by Cinemaholic, on February 4,   2026.

GIST: Directed by Dominic Sivyer, Netflix’s ‘The Investigation of Lucy Letby’ is a documentary exploring the case of the titular former neonatal nurse who is a convicted serial child killer. It was in 2023 when she was found guilty of 7 counts of murder and 7 counts of attempted murder in connection with the high number of infant deaths at her workplace at the Countess of Chester Hospital between 2015 and 2016. However, the ordeal remains far from closed, partly because the credibility of the lead prosecutorial professional expert witness, Dr. Dewi Evans, has since reportedly come into question.

Dr. Dewi Evans Served as a Consultant Pediatrician For Three Decades

Hailing from a loving, supportive household in Carmarthen, Wales, Dewi Evans was just a young boy when he developed a keen interest in the world of healthcare as well as medicine. Therefore, as soon as he graduated from Carmarthen Grammar School in 1966, he enrolled at Cardiff Medical School to pursue a Bachelor’s degree in Medicine and Surgery in the class of 1971. Following this, he went on to attend the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists for his specialization/Master’s diploma. It was another two years later, in 1975, that he became a member of the Royal College of Physicians before really kick-starting his career in 1980 as a full-time NHS Consultant Paediatrician.

Dr. Dewi served at Morriston Hospital in Cwmrhydyceirw, Wales, until 1991. He then spread his wings and worked at Singleton Hospital in Swansea, Wales, until he retired in 2009. During this period, he not only became a fellow of the Royal College of Paediatrics & Child Health in 1997 but also led the development of neonatal intensive care services across the nation. As if that’s not enough, the childhood diabetes and endocrinology specialist also gave back to his community by serving as an active member of the Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council. According to records, he was elected Councillor around the 1990s, shortly before he stood in the 1992 general elections, and he unsuccessfully campaigned to be national chair in 2019 too.


Dr. Dewi Evans Has Been a Key Figure in Many Legal Proceedings Involving Medical Aspects

Since Dr. Dewi Evans had served as the Clinical Director of Paediatrics & Neonatology for years before his retirement, it was hard for him to step away, even though he was ready for a new chapter. Thus, in September 2010, he established Dewi Evans Paediatric Consulting Ltd. with the sole aim of focusing on being an independent witness in cases of child abuse and/or negligence. He had started dabbling as a medical expert witness in 1989, and his ability to explain technical nuances in court was so well received that it soon became part of his full-time profession. Hence, he formed the company to handle his steadily growing work in this field. After reading reports about the case in 2017, he reached out to the authorities to offer his expertise in the Lucy Letby case.

By the mid-2010s, Dr. Dewi had long earned a significant reputation as a medical expert witness thanks to his extensive testimonies in criminal court, especially in high-profile cases. These include the 1989 death of 9-year-old Robert “Robbie” Powell, the 2009 death of Lindsay Alvarez, several cases of the removal of kids from parental care, and a 2018 murder by neglect case of a 6-week-old boy. He was also a key figure in the 1996-1998 case of tween Bonnie Lewis and her mother, Linda Lewis, which involved several misdiagnoses, claims of Munchausen by proxy, and more.

Dr. Dewi was one of the professionals who had claimed Linda suffered from the syndrome of “attention seeking by proxy,” which later raised several debates on mistakes in medicine. Nevertheless, owing to most of his other work, he was still well respected in the field, so the police accepted his help when he contacted them in 2017 after reading about the Lucy Letby case in the newspaper. So, he ended up being the paediatric/neonatal expert throughout the investigation, meaning he reviewed all the clinical records, prepared reports on the causes of death for the infants, and served as the star prosecutorial witness during the 10-month trial that commenced in October 2022.

Dr. Dewi Evans Maintains His Opinions in the Lucy Letby Case To This Day

Dr. Dewi’s testimony against former neonatal nurse Lucy Letby was key in her August 2023 conviction on 7 counts of murder as well as 7 counts of attempted murder. Even though there was no physical evidence tying her to the alleged crimes and no witnesses to her actions, there was a mountain of circumstantial evidence that pointed fingers at her alone. However, since then, many have expressed doubts over her convictions, especially because a team of other medical experts reevaluated the clinical evidence and indicated there was no crime or murder committed.

It has been reported that during the court proceedings, a Justice from the Court of Appeals wrote an email to the trial judge expressing concerns about Dr. Dewi’s testimony. In the email, the former reportedly wrote that he believed Dr. Dewi breached his duty as an expert by deciding on the outcome he wanted, then “working out an explanation” to achieve it. “Of greatest concern,” he continued, “Dr. Evans makes no effort to provide a balanced opinion…, (which can be considered) a breach of proper professional conduct.” In other words, the Justice questioned Dr. Dewi’s credibility by suggesting he could be biased, but the latter has since asserted that he stands by his report.

In late 2024, Lucy’s team claimed that Dr. Dewi had altered his view on how three infants had died at her place of work between 2015 and 2016. They asserted they will ask the Court of Appeal to immediately review all of her convictions based on this new revelation, yet the medical professional quickly came forward to deny it. He said their “observations regarding my evidence is unsubstantiated, unfounded, inaccurate… It’s highly disrespectful to the families of babies murdered and harmed by Lucy Letby.” Today, his focus is on maintaining his standing and supporting what he believes to be the truth. As of writing, the 76-year-old is leading a quiet life in Carmarthen, Wales, surrounded by his loved ones. Per reports, he has been enjoying his retirement since closing down Dewi Evans Paediatric Consulting Ltd. in June 2024."

The entire story can be read at:

https://thecinemaholic.com/dr-dewi-evans/


PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:

https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/120008354894645705/4704913685758792985

FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."

Lawyer Radha Natarajan:

Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————


FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!

Friday, February 6, 2026

February 6: Neonatal Nurse Lucy Letby: UK: (Part Five): Prof. Gisli Gudjonsson; The Sun (Investigations Editor Rob Pattison) reports that 'The world’s top confession expert has quit the National Crime Agency to give evidence that Lucy Letby’s scrawled notes are NOT admissions of guilt, noting that: "He feels so strongly about the case – claimed by experts to be the greatest miscarriage of justice of the century – he has quit the National Crime Agency over conflicts of interest with the case so he could give evidence to try and clear Letby’s name. Prof. Gudjonsson said: “I had to resign to do justice to this case – it was in the interests of justice and fairness."


PASSAGE ONE  OF THE DAY: "After meeting her he was persuaded her notes did not amount to confessions. Prof Gudjonsson said: “It is an admission, not a confession. A confession requires explanation of why and how. That is not present here.”He add(s): So why does she write,  ‘I killed them on purpose’? Because she is not good enough, and therefore if she had been better, if she had realised she was not good enough, then it must have been her fault. “This is about self-blame. It is not about an intention to kill babies. I do not believe it has anything to do with that. “It has to do with her feeling she was not good enough, and that the babies died because she was not good enough as a nurse or in her job. “That is how I read the note. When I look at that so-called incriminating note, what I see is complete despair."

------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "“If you take one word or one sentence out of context, such as ‘I’m evil, I did this,’ it may appear incriminating.“But you have to look at the rest of the note, where she says, ‘I didn’t do anything wrong,’ ‘I hate myself,’ ‘I’m not good enough.’“That note, in my opinion, has no evidential value. It has personal meaning. It expresses distress. She even expresses uncertainty.“Taking sentences out of it and saying ‘this is all there is’ is misleading.”He adds: “So when she uses words like ‘murderer’ or ‘evil,’ these have personal meaning."“You cannot take ‘I’m a murderer’ as a factual confession. If she had written, ‘I murdered those babies, this is why I did it, and this is how I did it,’ that would be different. But there is nothing like that."

-----------------------------------------------

PASSAGE THREE OF THE DAY: “There is no explanation of why or how. Therefore, this is not a confession. It is an admission of feeling evil, but not a confession. “A confession requires explanation. This does not have that. These are spontaneous thoughts from someone being psychologically tormented.” Prof. Gudjonsson’s incredible reputation has seen him give evidence for the Guildford Four, the Birmingham Six and, last year, Oliver Campbell, who had his conviction for murder quashed by the Court of Appeal."

------------------------------------------

STORY: | The world's top confession expert has quit the National Crime Agency to give evidence that Lucy Letby's scrawled notes are NOT admissions of guilt, by Investigations Editor Rob Pattinson, published by The Sun, on February 4, 2026. (Award-winning journalist and documentary producer. He is Investigations Editor at The Sun. In 2025 he revealed the Madeleine McCann files, culminating in a Sun documentary on suspect Christian Brueckner that aired on Channel 4’s Dispatches and attracted 3million viewers. He continues to investigate the case alongside other topics including society, scandal, politics, public figures, footballers, celebrities, lottery wins, Royals and cold case crimes. Rob was a double ‘Scoop of the Year’ winner in 2022 for the investigation that revealed Health Secretary Matt Hancock’s lockdown-breaching affair and was previously nominated for his work on exploding Vauxhalls in 2016.He broke the scandal of Captain Tom’s daughter pocketing donated cash to build a spa in the back garden of the home and unmasked the ‘last Nazi’. He revealed toddler Bronson Battersby being allowed to ‘starve’ to death in modern-day Britain and been written to by Austrian cellar monster Josef Fritzl. Rob notably exposed the notoriously secret Piers Gaveston parties at Oxford University for the first time. Rob worked extensively on The Sun’s coverage of the death of the Queen, revealing King Charles’ first words in person to his subjects and William’s touching admission the death reminded him of losing his mum. Rob has been at The Sun and Sun on Sunday since 2013 and covers the East, South and Midlands. He has also worked extensively in France and Germany. He is an accomplished videographer, scripter, presenter and editor. He studied Politics and holds a Masters in International Journalism. He is committed to protecting sources at all times.)

GIST: "The world’s top confession expert has quit the National Crime Agency to give evidence that Lucy Letby’s scrawled notes are NOT admissions of guilt.

The neonatal nurse’s scribbled notes, which were found in her home by police, included the phrases: “I am evil I did this” and “I killed them on purpose because I’m not good enough to care for them and I am a horrible evil person.

They were put before the jury as confessions by the prosecution and formed a cornerstone  of convicting Letby of seven murders, for which she is now serving 15 whole-life sentences.

But Professor Gisli Gudjonsson – THE world expert on the forensic psychology of confessions – has said the notes should not be seen as a confession.

He feels so strongly about the case – claimed by experts to be the greatest miscarriage of justice of the century – he has quit the National Crime Agency over conflicts of interest with the case so he could give evidence to try and clear Letby’s name.

Prof. Gudjonsson said: “I had to resign to do justice to this case – it was in the interests of justice and fairness.

“I had already seen Lucy, and later realised there was a potential conflict of interest because of my role at the NCA.

“I didn’t know they had been involved in the case so I had to decide whether to withdraw from the case or resign from a job I loved.

“I couldn’t just withdraw because there was a case in Northern Ireland where I declined to produce a report and it was misinterpreted as evidence of guilt.

“I became concerned that withdrawing from this case

“So I faced a choice: do I give up a job I love, or do I risk jeopardising the case? I could not risk jeopardising the case.

“I made a sacrifice in good faith and resigned. I do not regret it, although I am sad because I loved the job and my colleagues.”

Prof. Gudjonsson, 78, was working for the NCA as a ‘special,’ providing consultancy.

However, the agency had ties to the Letby case which means he would not have been able to give evidence on her behalf.

After meeting her he was persuaded her notes did not amount to confessions.

Prof Gudjonsson said: “It is an admission, not a confession. A confession requires explanation of why and how. That is not present here.”

He add(s): So why does she write,  ‘I killed them on purpose’? Because she is not good enough, and therefore if she had been better, if she had realised she was not good enough, then it must have been her fault.

“This is about self-blame. It is not about an intention to kill babies. I do not believe it has anything to do with that.

“It has to do with her feeling she was not good enough, and that the babies died because she was not good enough as a nurse or in her job.

“That is how I read the note. When I look at that so-called incriminating note, what I see is complete despair.

“If you take one word or one sentence out of context, such as ‘I’m evil, I did this,’ it may appear incriminating.

“But you have to look at the rest of the note, where she says, ‘I didn’t do anything wrong,’ ‘I hate myself,’ ‘I’m not good enough.’

“That note, in my opinion, has no evidential value. It has personal meaning. It expresses distress. She even expresses uncertainty.

“Taking sentences out of it and saying ‘this is all there is’ is misleading.”

He adds: “So when she uses words like ‘murderer’ or ‘evil,’ these have personal meaning.

“You cannot take ‘I’m a murderer’ as a factual confession. If she had written, ‘I murdered those babies, this is why I did it, and this is how I did it,’ that would be different. But there is nothing like that.

“There is no explanation of why or how. Therefore, this is not a confession. It is an admission of feeling evil, but not a confession.

“A confession requires explanation. This does not have that. These are spontaneous thoughts from someone being psychologically tormented.”

Prof. Gudjonsson’s incredible reputation has seen him give evidence for the Guildford Four, the Birmingham Six and, last year, Oliver Campbell, who had his conviction for murder quashed by the Court of Appeal.

His view of the Letby confession notes could now be crucial to the case being referred back to the Court of Appeal by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC).

He added: “Lucy told me that the notes she had written were private and had nothing to do with the babies.

“They had to do with her organising whether she had made mistakes in her work, whether she had not been entirely competent, and whether there was something she could have done to save the baby.

“It was about self-doubt. It was about whether she had made a mistake, whether she had not been good enough.”

The entire story can be read at.


PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AMFINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."

Lawyer Radha Natarajan:

Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

———————————————————————————————


FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."

Lawyer Radha Natarajan:

Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————


FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!


Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

-------------------------------------------------------------------