Friday, April 1, 2022

Broward County; Florida: Question of the day: Conflict of interest? Should police and medical examiners staff be housed under the same roof as proposed in Broward County? Staff Writer Alex Deluca; Miami New Times..."It's unclear where the new building will be located; original plans to build the facility on county-owned land in a historically Black community in Fort Lauderdale were scrapped in October 2021 following residents' fierce opposition to the prospect of having dead bodies shuttled in and out of their neighborhood. But critics of the new forensic center are also concerned that a joint facility could lead to conflicts of interest — particularly when it comes to investigating deaths of people while in police custody. A 2011 survey by the National Association of Medical Examiners found that 22 percent of pathologists have experienced pressure from political officials to alter findings in an investigation. "


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "In an opinion piece published in the Washington Post in 2020 Justin Feldman, now a public health researcher at Harvard University's FXB Center for Health and Human Rights who studies police violence and medical examiners, wrote that there's been evidence of police pressuring medical examiners to minimize blame when investigating deaths in police custody and a real need for more independent medical examiners and coroners. "We found that coroners and medical examiners throughout the United States routinely report findings that minimize the responsibility of police," he noted in the op-ed, describing a study in which he and his fellow researchers "identified 71 people who died in police custody after they had been subject to a Taser shock, chokehold or other form of restraint; after being transported in a police vehicle; or after being denied water while in detention. Medical examiners and coroners determined that only 24 of those people lost their lives because force was applied to them." Feldman, who holds a doctorate in social epidemiology, tells New Times he's apprehensive about Broward's proposed forensic science center. "This is, at the very least, a signal to the public that they are not trying to create independence between the death investigation process and law enforcement," Feldman says. "Those processes should be separate from each other."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Critics say Broward's joint police and medical examiner centre is a conflict of interest," by Staff Writer Alex Deluca, published by Miami New Times, on March 18, 2022.

----------------------------------------------------------

GIST: "For now, the Broward County Sheriff's Office Crime Laboratory and the Broward County Office of Medical Examiner and Trauma Services reside at two separate locations roughly seven miles apart — the former at the county courthouse in downtown Fort Lauderdale and the latter at a single-story facility in Dania Beach. 


But now that both offices have "outgrown" their current locations, Broward County has announced the Broward County Forensic Science Center, a new "state-of-the-art" forensics and criminology facility slated to open in 2026 that would bring both offices under the same roof. The City of Fort Lauderdale Police Department also plans to build a police substation on the property. It's believed to be the first time police and medical examiners' staff will work in the same building in South Florida. 


In the recent legislative session, the county asked lawmakers for more than $3 million, though the total price tag is ballparked at $210.5 million. The new forensic center is a pricey endeavor, but also an unpopular one: It's unclear where the new building will be located; original plans to build the facility on county-owned land in a historically Black community in Fort Lauderdale were scrapped in October 2021 following residents' fierce opposition to the prospect of having dead bodies shuttled in and out of their neighborhood.  


But critics of the new forensic center are also concerned that a joint facility could lead to conflicts of interest — particularly when it comes to investigating deaths of people while in police custody. A 2011 survey by the National Association of Medical Examiners found that 22 percent of pathologists have experienced pressure from political officials to alter findings in an investigation. 


In an opinion piece published in the Washington Post in 2020 Justin Feldman, now a public health researcher at Harvard University's FXB Center for Health and Human Rights who studies police violence and medical examiners, wrote that there's been evidence of police pressuring medical examiners to minimize blame when investigating deaths in police custody and a real need for more independent medical examiners and coroners.


"We found that coroners and medical examiners throughout the United States routinely report findings that minimize the responsibility of police," he noted in the op-ed, describing a study in which he and his fellow researchers "identified 71 people who died in police custody after they had been subject to a Taser shock, chokehold or other form of restraint; after being transported in a police vehicle; or after being denied water while in detention. Medical examiners and coroners determined that only 24 of those people lost their lives because force was applied to them."


Feldman, who holds a doctorate in social epidemiology, tells New Times he's apprehensive about Broward's proposed forensic science center. 


"This is, at the very least, a signal to the public that they are not trying to create independence between the death investigation process and law enforcement," Feldman says. "Those processes should be separate from each other."

click to enlarge


It's standard for medical examiners and law enforcement to collaborate on death investigations — but only to a certain extent. 


The standards of the National Association of Medical Examiners state that coroners and medical examiners “must investigate cooperatively with, but independent from, law enforcement and prosecutors," in order to allow "neutral and objective medical assessment" of a person's cause and manner of death. 




Florida, in particular, has encountered issues in the past with medical examiners developing alternative explanations for deaths in police custody, Feldman says. The most notable cases, he explains, involve the presence of "excited delirium," a controversial condition the American Medical Association (AMA) opposes as a diagnosis and one that AMA president Gerald E. Harmon, M.D., said last year "[has] been misused during law enforcement interactions and outside of medical settings – a manifestation of systemic racism that has unnecessarily dangerous and deadly consequences for our Black and Brown patients.”


According to a 2020 Florida Today investigation, two-thirds of deaths Florida medical examiners determined were caused by "excited delirium" involved people who were in custody or interacting with law enforcement in other settings.


"There's a whole world out there of medical researchers and technologists who try to develop alternative explanations as to how people who died in police custody died in ways that had nothing to do with police," Feldman says. "So yeah, there's a lot under the surface."


In response to questions about the potential conflicts of interest between the two offices at Broward County's forensic science center, Broward County spokesperson Gregory Meyer tells New Times that the merger will help "streamline collaboration" between BSO and the medical examiner's office. He says the two agencies will "remain independent entities" and that "each have their own dedicated space within the building." 


"We do not see a conflict of interest between the two agencies," Meyer wrote in an email to New Times. "Both offices have an extremely high level of professionalism and accountability."


Feldman remains skeptical. 


"The conflict of interest already exists right now, even if they're not merged," the researcher says. "But physically merging the facilities would be a step even further."


The entire story can be read at:

https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/critics-say-broward-countys-new-forensic-science-center-is-a-conflict-of-interest-14094031

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;




SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:




FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;