GIST: "Oscar Pistorius's defence team on Monday questioned why crime scene photographer Barend van Staden did not include some images in his testimony.........Defence Advocate Barry Roux claims van Staden took a "great number" of images when he arrived at the crime scene shortly before 5am on the day in question.  He said the warrant officer did not include as evidence a photograph of the bottom of Pistorius’s prosthetic legs or any photos from the garage area. Roux claimed that the exclusion of some images would point to tampering on the part of police. But prosecutors denied the defence’s claim."  



The entire story can be found at:
 
 
PUBLISHER'S NOTE:

Dear Reader. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog. We are following this case.

I have added a search box for content in this blog which now encompasses several thousand posts. The search box is located  near the bottom of the screen just above the list of links. I am confident that this powerful search tool provided by "Blogger" will help our readers and myself get more out of the site.

The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at:

http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith

Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:
 
http://smithforensic.blogspot.ca/2013/12/the-charles-smith-award-presented-to_28.html
 
I look forward to hearing from readers at:

hlevy15@gmail.com.

Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog;