Wednesday, October 6, 2021

Albert "Ian" Schweitzer; Hawaii: Look like an intriguing case to begin following: Reason 1: A lot at stake for Ian Schweitzer: Serving a life sentence with a minimum term of 130 years in prison: Reason two: A pending defence motion to unseal DNA testing on a bloody Jimmy Z T-shirt. (The shirt, which several witnesses said belonged to defendant Frank Pauline Jr., was a critical piece of evidence in separate trials convicting Pauline — who was killed in a New Mexico prison in 2015 — and brothers Albert “Ian” Schweitzer and Shawn Schweitzer. All were charged with the 1991 Christmas Eve rape and murder of Ireland in lower Puna. The blood on the T-shirt was (Dana) Ireland’s (The deceased), but additional DNA on the shirt didn’t match any of the three defendants.)...Reason three: A legal battle between two innocence groups over conduct of the exoneration application; 'Judges for Justice' (Retired Seattle judge Mike Heavey) and 'The Hawaii Innocence Project.' Keep an eye on this site for developments; Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Heavey believes Pauline and the Schweitzers were innocent and that the evidence points to a lone assailant obsessed with the 23-year-old Ireland, who had just graduated from George Mason University in Virginia and planned to move to Puna to be with her older sister, Sandy. Heavey, however, has been at odds with the Hawaii Innocence Project, which sought a cease-and-desist order against him from a previous state attorney general in 2018, claiming Heavey’s efforts were interfering with their attempts to exonerate Ian Schweitzer. “Bottom line is, I think the information is forthcoming, and I think the file’s going to be unsealed. I don’t know when. It might be two months, might be a year,” Heavey said."

-------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Seattle group wins appeal in quest to overturn Ireland murder convictions,"  by Reporter John  Burnett, published by The Hawaii Herald-tribune on June 21, 2021.


The state Intermediate Court of Appeals on Tuesday ruled Hilo Circuit Judge Henry Nakamoto erred when he denied a group seeking to overturn convictions in the Dana Ireland murder trial a hearing on a motion to unseal post-conviction DNA testing conducted on a piece of key evidence.


The ruling by the three-judge appellate panel vacates an order by Nakamoto denying a motion by Seattle-based Judges for Justice to set a hearing on a motion to unseal DNA testing on a bloody Jimmy Z T-shirt.


The shirt, which several witnesses said belonged to defendant Frank Pauline Jr., was a critical piece of evidence in separate trials convicting Pauline — who was killed in a New Mexico prison in 2015 — and brothers Albert “Ian” Schweitzer and Shawn Schweitzer. All were charged with the 1991 Christmas Eve rape and murder of Ireland in lower Puna.


The blood on the T-shirt was Ireland’s, but additional DNA on the shirt didn’t match any of the three defendants.


Ian Schweitzer is serving a life sentence with a minimum term of 130 years in prison.


Shawn Schweitzer, who was 16 when the crime occurred, became a witness for the state and was sentenced to five years of probation and a year in jail, which had already been served, for manslaughter.


Pauline’s death, on his 42nd birthday, occurred a day after it became public that the Hawaii Innocence Project had taken up the case of Ian Schweitzer and had post-conviction DNA testing performed on evidence in the case.


Mike Heavey, a retired Seattle judge who spearheads Judges for Justice, said he’s “delighted” with the appellate decision.


The appellate court also overturned an order by Nakamoto that Judges for Justice pay more than $17,000 in legal fees to Ian Schweitzer’s Hawaii Innocence Project lawyers.


On June 28, 2019, Nakamoto declined to provide a hearing date because Heavey was “not a party or counsel for a party” in the 2007 post-conviction DNA testing case.


The appeals court cited two cases, Oahu Publications Inc. (the Tribune-Herald’s parent company) vs. Ahn (2014) and Grube vs. Trader (2018) — both dealing with public access to court proceedings and records — in its decision to remand the motions back to circuit court for a hearing.


“We conclude that the circuit court erred by not setting a hearing on Judges for Justice’s motion …,” the opinion states. “We express no opinion on the merits of Judges for Justice’s request to unseal the DNA testing.”


“Those cases hold that there’s a constitutional right for any person to see what’s in the court files, unless there’s a compelling interest (for sealing) say, like, a 15-year-old rape victim’s name. That might be a compelling interest to keep secret,” Heavey said. “So what they’re saying is Judge Nakamoto, if you want to keep some of that sealed, you better have a hearing. It’s in accord with well-established Hawaii Supreme Court law, and Judge Nakamoto, with all due respect, was in error on several issues.”


Heavey believes Pauline and the Schweitzers were innocent and that the evidence points to a lone assailant obsessed with the 23-year-old Ireland, who had just graduated from George Mason University in Virginia and planned to move to Puna to be with her older sister, Sandy.


Heavey, however, has been at odds with the Hawaii Innocence Project, which sought a cease-and-desist order against him from a previous state attorney general in 2018, claiming Heavey’s efforts were interfering with their attempts to exonerate Ian Schweitzer.

“Bottom line is, I think the information is forthcoming, and I think the file’s going to be unsealed. I don’t know when. It might be two months, might be a year,” Heavey said.


The entire story can be read at:

https://www.westhawaiitoday.com/2021/06/17/hawaii-news/seattle-group-wins-appeal-in-quest-to-overturn-ireland-murder-convictions/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: “It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.