Thursday, October 7, 2021

Superdog? "Neighbor attacked by K-9, mistaken for person of interest," Firstcoast News (Reporter Leah Shields) reports..."Thompson says the night of the shooting he was at his uncle's house and he went outside to check the fire. "Next thing I know I had a dog on my arm and about 10 cops beating me up," Thompson explained. His arms are severely scratched up with what appears to be claw marks. Thompson lifted his shirt to show bruising on his ribs. He says he was put in handcuffs and then taken to UF Health where he received stitches in his lip and ear and treatment for his broken ribs. Nassau County Sheriff's Office spokesperson Ashley Spicer confirms a Jacksonville Sheriff's Office K-9 attacked Thompson, but she says JSO believed him to be a person of interest because they saw him run and hide after the shooting. "


QUOTE OF THE DAY: "They accused me of being in the van and stuff," Thompson said. "Then they finally found out the truth and turned me loose at the hospital. They took the handcuffs off me and told me to leave." Thompson says he was in the hospital for two days and only released once JSO  (Jacksonville Sheriff's Office) cleared his name."

----------------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Callahan man beaten up by police after being mistaken for accused Nassau Deputy killer,"  by Reporter Leah Shields, published by Firstcoast News on September 28, 2021.

SUB-HEADING: Matthew Thompson stays he's nursing broken ribs and received stitches in his lip and tear after police mistook him for accused deputy killer Patrick McDowell."

SUB-HEADING: "Neighbour attacked by K-9, mistaken for person of interest

GIST: "Matthew Thompson lives in the search area off Old Baldwin and Sandy Ford roads in Callahan where hundreds of law enforcement officers are searching for Patrick McDowell, the man accused of shooting and killing Nassau County Deputy Joshua Moyers. 

Thompson matches a similar descriptions as McDowell. He’s a white man with a beard and tattoos.

Thompson says the night of the shooting he was at his uncle's house and he went outside to check the fire. 

"Next thing I know I had a dog on my arm and about 10 cops beating me up," Thompson explained. His arms are severely scratched up with what appears to be claw marks.

Thompson lifted his shirt to show bruising on his ribs. He says he was put in handcuffs and then taken to UF Health where he received stitches in his lip and ear and treatment for his broken ribs. 

Nassau County Sheriff's Office spokesperson Ashley Spicer confirms a Jacksonville Sheriff's Office K-9 attacked Thompson, but she says JSO believed him to be a person of interest because they saw him run and hide after the shooting. 

"They accused me of being in the van and stuff," Thompson said. "Then they finally found out the truth and turned me loose at the hospital. They took the handcuffs off me and told me to leave."

Thompson says he was in the hospital for two days and only released once JSO cleared his name. 

Thompson says said he hopes police find McDowell before someone else has to pay for it. 

"I hope they catch the guy to be honest with you because he will hurt more people, innocent people. It don't matter. I believe he will hurt anybody," said Thompson.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

For context: Five takeaways from our investigation of Indianapolis police dogs," by Ryan Martin, Andrew Fan, Dana Brozost-Kelleher, and Ellen Glover, published  on October 10, 2020, by The Marshall Project in corroboration with AL.com. IndyStar and The Invisible Institute (Chicago). 


(PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  This story was part of a  superb, eye-opening Pulitzer prize winning  (National Reporting)  Marshall Project series called  'Mauled'- When police dogs are weapons'. It is about the damage police digs inflict on Americans.) 


GIST: "In Indianapolis, police dogs are biting people at a rate unseen in the other largest 19 U.S. cities.


And it’s not even close. Whereas some major cities such as Chicago and San Francisco saw one bite over the last three years, Indianapolis saw one every five days.


From 2017 to 2019, the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department had more bites than New York; Chicago; Philadelphia; San Antonio; Dallas; Austin; San Francisco; Fort Worth; Columbus; Seattle; and Washington, D.C. combined.


Those are some of the biggest takeaways from a yearlong investigation by journalists at IndyStar, The Invisible Institute in Chicago, The Marshall Project and AL.com.


The news organizations are collaborating in a series titled “Mauled: When police dogs are weapons.” The first story, published last week, began exploring the hidden world of police K-9 units..............................................................


Here are some of the key findings:

Most people were unarmed:

IMPD, like many other police departments, use police dogs to track down people on the run. Once the dogs find the person, occasionally hiding among some brush or in a shed or in any other number of places, K-9 officers often rely on dogs to rush in and bite the person to subdue them as part of an arrest.


If these suspects did not resist arrest, IMPD leadership says, then a dog bite would not be necessary. IMPD repeatedly defended its high number of dog bites by emphasizing how dangerous it is to be a police officer.


As it turns out, the investigation revealed that most people bitten by an IMPD K-9—at least 65 percent of those bitten—were unarmed and not acting violently.


Journalists reviewed thousands of pages of use-of-force reports, police records and court documents to arrive at that figure.


One civil rights attorney, who acknowledged K-9s can be necessary in some situations, believed police dogs are used often as a form of street justice.


"What I find is that police officers let the dog chew on the person,” said Mike Sutherlin, who has represented someone bitten by K-9 in Hamilton County, “to teach him a lesson for running."


Indianapolis police had comparably weak K-9 policies:

IMPD’s high number of bites can be attributed, in part, to the department’s lax policy governing the use of police dogs. Some other major police departments take a different approach—and their bite numbers are much lower.


In New York, for example, K-9 deployments are restricted largely to felony cases. NYPD has just 10 percent of the bites of IMPD.


The police departments in Seattle and Washington D.C. have even stricter policies. They limit the use of police dogs to serious felonies or specific violent crimes. If IMPD implemented similar rules, nearly 60 percent of the police dog bites would be out of policy.


There are several other ways IMPD could reduce the number of bites. For example, in an effort to minimize unnecessary bites, Seattle urges officers not to use dogs on minors or people under the influence of drugs or alcohol except under a few circumstances, such as if a violent crime has occurred.


Dogs were used even for petty crimes and traffic infractions:

IMPD officers are sending police dogs to bite people suspected in some of the most common and lowest-level crimes found in any city.


One man was passed out behind a public library branch and then ran when a police officer woke him up. Another man shoplifted three bottles of alcohol from a department store. Yet another swiped a $5 tip from a table at a pancake restaurant.


IMPD officers commanded their dogs to bite each of those people.


Many other bites begin with routine traffic stops. Reporters found numerous examples of people who were drunken driving or not coming to a complete stop at a stop sign or driving without a license or driving a moped without a headlight.


All of those people were bitten by K-9s after they fled from the traffic stops. None had weapons; none threatened officers or anyone else.


"If you're going to put a dog on somebody, it should be reserved for people who have committed or are committing serious crimes," said the Rev. David W. Greene Sr., president of the Concerned Clergy of Indianapolis, "not because somebody rolled through a stop sign."

Greene went on: "They’re not hardened criminals."


Police dogs cause serious injuries:

These are not the bites of a pet dog. Many police dogs are trained for weeks on how to lose any inhibition to see people as prey—and how to bite harder and faster and with little reservation.


The results, if left unchecked, can be devastating.


In Minnesota, in 2017, a police dog ripped away at least a third of the scalp of a homeless man who was asleep under a tree. In Lafayette, western Indiana, a police dog in May bit into a man's neck for 30 seconds, ripping into his trachea and cutting the man’s artery.


Police dogs on rare occasions have even killed people, including in Alabama, where a man died of a ruptured artery in his thigh after a bite in July 2018.


To what extent such injuries are occurring in Indianapolis is unclear. IMPD declined to release records that would describe the nature of their dogs’ bites in detail.

And unlike most other major police departments, where such incidents are routinely caught on video, IMPD does not have dash cameras on most patrol cars, and IMPD has for years decided against a body camera program.


IMPD recently decided to buy cameras. An IMPD spokeswoman said K-9 officers will eventually wear them.


Black people are disproportionately affected:

More than half of those bitten in Indianapolis are Black, which is a disproportionately high number compared to the Black population in the city.


The disparity is even starker among people bitten who are younger than 18. Three-fourths of them are Black.


The figures, while not necessarily surprising to Black leaders interviewed for the investigation, were still painful to hear because of the legacy of police dogs in America.


Starting in the 1700s, dogs were used to hunt enslaved people who had escaped. In the civil rights movement in the 1960s, police attacked demonstrators with dogs.


"White people and Black people, generally speaking, tend to have different approaches to animals, particularly domestic dogs and K9s, simply because dogs have been used as a tool of state violence against people because of their race," said Tyler D. Parry, an assistant professor of African American and African diaspora studies at the University of Nevada in Las Vegas. "The utilization of a K-9 against a Black suspect hearkens back to an era where Black people were viewed as a lower order of human."


IMPD’s K-9 unit has 26 people on it. Only one of them is Black; the rest are white."


The entire story can be read at: 


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: “It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.