Thursday, January 2, 2025

0000000000000000000000000000000Hideko Hakamata: Japan: A truly selfless warrior: BBC Tokyo correspondent Shaina Khalid details her 56-year fight to free her innocent brother Iwao from his death sentence - and shines a light on the systemic brutality underpinning Japan's justice system, where death row inmates are only notified of their hanging a few hours in advance, and spend years unsure whether each day will be their last. She also describes how forensic science played an important role in securing his ultimate release…"A key piece of evidence against Mr Hakamata were red-stained clothes found in a miso tank at his workplace. They were recovered a year and two months after the murders and the prosecution said they belonged to him. But for years Mr Hakamata's defence team argued that the DNA recovered from the clothes did not match his - and alleged that the evidence was planted. In 2014 they were able to persuade a judge to release him from prison and grant him a retrial."


Publisher's note: There appear to be two ways of spelling the exonerated boxer's surname, as will be noticed in the numerous articles in this blog about the case: 'Hakamada'  and 'Hakamata.' 

Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

-------------------------------------------------


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Prolonged legal proceedings meant it took until last October for the retrial to begin. When it finally did, it was Hideko who appeared in court, pleading for her brother's life. Mr Hakamata's fate hinged on the stains, and specifically how they had aged. The prosecution had claimed the stains were reddish when the clothes were recovered - but the defence argued that blood would have turned blackish after being immersed in miso for so long. That was enough to convince presiding judge Koshi Kunii, who declared that "the investigating authority had added blood stains  and hid the items in the miso tank well after the incident took place". Judge Kunii further found that other evidence had been fabricated, including an investigation record, and declared Mr Hakamata innocent. Hideko's first reaction was to cry. "When the judge said that the defendant is not guilty, I was elated; I was in tears," she says. "I am not a tearful person, but my tears just flowed without stopping for about an hour."

————————————————————————————


STORY: "One woman's 56-year fight to free her innocent brother from death sentence," by  Tokyo Correspondent Shaina Khalid, published by The BBC,  


SUB-HEADING: "Hideko Hakamata, 91, fought half her life to free her brother - the world's longest serving death row inmate."


GIST: "When a court declared Iwao Hakamata innocent in September, the world's longest-serving death row inmate seemed unable to comprehend, much less savour the moment.


"I told him he was acquitted, and he was silent," Hideko Hakamata, his 91-year-old sister, tells the BBC at her home in Hamamatsu, Japan.


"I couldn't tell whether he understood or not."


Hideko had been fighting for her brother's retrial ever since he was convicted of quadruple murder in 1968.


In September 2024, at the age of 88, he was finally acquitted - ending Japan's longest running legal saga.


Mr Hakamata's case is remarkable.


 But it also shines a light on the systemic brutality underpinning Japan's justice system, where death row inmates are only notified of their hanging a few hours in advance, and spend years unsure whether each day will be their last.


Human rights experts have long condemned such treatment as cruel and inhuman, saying it exacerbates prisoners' risk of developing a serious mental illness.


And more than half a lifetime spent in solitary confinement, waiting to be executed for a crime he didn't commit, took a heavy toll on Mr Hakamata.


Since being granted a retrial and released from prison in 2014, he has lived under Hideko's close care.


When we arrive at the apartment he is on his daily outing with a volunteer group that supports the two elderly siblings. He is anxious around strangers, Hideko explains, and has been in "his own world" for years.


"Maybe it can't be helped," she says. "This is what happens when you are locked up and crammed in a small prison cell for more than 40 years.


"They made him live like an animal."


Life on death row


A former professional boxer, Iwao Hakamata  was working at a miso processing plant when the bodies of his boss, the man's wife and their two teenage children were found. All four had been stabbed to death.


Authorities accused Mr Hakamata of murdering the family, setting their house in Shizuoka alight and stealing 200,000 yen (£199; $556) in cash.


"We had no idea what was going on," Hideko says of the day in 1966 when police came to arrest her brother.


The family home was searched, as well as the homes of their two elder sisters, and Mr Hakamata was taken away.


He initially denied all charges, but later gave what he came to describe as a coerced confession following beatings and interrogations that lasted up to 12 hours a day.


Two years after his arrest, Mr Hakamata was convicted of murder and arson and sentenced to death. It was when he was moved to a cell on death row that Hideko noticed a shift in his demeanour.


One prison visit in particular stands out.


"He told me, 'there was an execution yesterday - it was a person in the next cell'," she recalls. "He told me to take care - and from then on, he completely changed mentally and became very quiet."


Mr Hakamata is not the only one to be damaged by life on Japan's death row, where inmates wake each morning not knowing if it will be their last.


"Between 08:00 and 08:30 in the morning was the most critical time, because that was generally when prisoners were notified of their execution," Menda Sakae, who spent 34 years on death row before being exonerated, wrote in a book about his experience.


"You begin to feel the most terrible anxiety, because you don't know if they are going to stop in front of your cell. It is impossible to express how awful a feeling this was."


James Welsh, lead author of a 2009 Amnesty International report into conditions on death row, noted that "the daily threat of imminent death is cruel, inhuman and degrading". The report concluded that inmates were at risk of "significant mental health issues".


Hideko could only watch as her own brother's mental health deteriorated as the years went by.


"Once he asked me 'Do you know who I am?' I said, 'Yes, I do. You are Iwao Hakamata'. 'No,' he said, 'you must be here to see a different person'. And he just went back [to his cell]."


Hideko stepped up as his primary spokesperson and advocate. It wasn't until 2014, however, that there was a breakthrough in his case.


A key piece of evidence against Mr Hakamata were red-stained clothes found in a miso tank at his workplace.


They were recovered a year and two months after the murders and the prosecution said they belonged to him.


 But for years Mr Hakamata's defence team argued that the DNA recovered from the clothes did not match his - and alleged that the evidence was planted.


In 2014 they were able to persuade a judge to release him from prison and grant him a retrial.


Prolonged legal proceedings meant it took until last October for the retrial to begin. When it finally did, it was Hideko who appeared in court, pleading for her brother's life.


Mr Hakamata's fate hinged on the stains, and specifically how they had aged.


The prosecution had claimed the stains were reddish when the clothes were recovered - but the defence argued that blood would have turned blackish after being immersed in miso for so long.


That was enough to convince presiding judge Koshi Kunii, who declared that "the investigating authority had added blood stains  and hid the items in the miso tank well after the incident took place".


Judge Kunii further found that other evidence had been fabricated, including an investigation record, and declared Mr Hakamata innocent.


Hideko's first reaction was to cry.


"When the judge said that the defendant is not guilty, I was elated; I was in tears," she says. "I am not a tearful person, but my tears just flowed without stopping for about an hour."


Hostage justice


The court's conclusion that evidence against Mr Hakamata was fabricated raises troubling questions.


Japan has a 99% conviction rate, and a system of so-called "hostage justice" which, according to Kanae Doi, Japan director at Human Rights Watch, "denies people arrested their rights to a presumption of innocence, a prompt and fair bail hearing, and access to counsel during questioning".


"These abusive practices have resulted in lives and families being torn apart, as well as wrongful convictions," Ms Doi noted in 2023.


David T Johnson, a professor of sociology at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, whose research focuses on criminal justice in Japan, has followed the Hakamata case for the last 30 years.


He said one reason it dragged on is that "critical evidence for the defence was not disclosed to them until around 2010".


The failure was "egregious and inexcusable", Mr Johnson told the BBC. "Judges kept kicking the case down the road, as they frequently do in response to retrial petitions (because) they are busy, and the law allows them to do so."


Hideko  says the core of the injustice was the forced confession and the coercion her brother suffered.


But Mr Johnson says false accusations don't happen because of a single mistake. Instead, they are compounded by failings at all levels - from the police right through to the prosecutors, courts and parliament.


"Judges have the last word," he added. "When a wrongful conviction occurs, it is, in the end, because they said so. All too often, the responsibility of judges for producing and maintaining wrongful convictions gets neglected, elided, and ignored."


Against that backdrop, Mr Hakamata's acquittal was a watershed - a rare moment of retrospective justice.


After declaring Mr Hakamata innocent, the judge presiding over his retrial apologised to Hideko for how long it took to achieve justice.


A short while later, Takayoshi Tsuda, chief of Shizuoka police, visited her home and bowed in front of both brother and sister.


"For the past 58 years… we caused you indescribable anxiety and burden," Mr Tsuda said. "We are truly sorry."


Hideko gave an unexpected reply to the police chief.


"We believe that everything that happened was our destiny," she said. "We will not complain about anything now."


The pink door


After nearly 60 years of anxiety and heartache, Hideko has styled her home with the express intention of letting some light in.


 The rooms are bright and inviting, filled with pictures of her and Iwao alongside family friends and supporters.


Hideko laughs as she shares memories of her "cute" little brother as a baby, leafing through black-and-white family photos.


The youngest of six siblings, he seems to always be standing next to her.


"We were always together when we were children," she explains. "I always knew I had to take care of my little brother.  And so, it continues."


She walks into Mr Hakamata's room and introduces their ginger cat, which occupies the chair he normally sits in. Then she points to pictures of him as a young professional boxer.


"He wanted to become a champion," she says. "Then the incident happened."


After Mr Hakamata was released in 2014, Hideko wanted to make the apartment as bright as possible, she explains. So she painted the front door pink.


"I believed that if he was in a bright room and had a cheerful life, he would naturally get well."


It's the first thing one notices when visiting Hideko's apartment, this bright pink statement of hope and resilience.


It's unclear whether it has worked – Mr Hakamata still paces back and forth for hours, just as he did for years in a jail cell the size of three single tatami mats.


But Hideko refuses to linger on the question of what their lives might have looked like if not for such an egregious miscarriage of justice.


When asked who she blames for her brother's suffering, she replies: "no-one".

"Complaining about what happened will get us nowhere."


Her priority now is to keep her brother comfortable. She shaves his face, massages his head, slices apples and apricots for his breakfast each morning.


Hideko, who has spent the majority of her 91 years fighting for her brother's freedom, says this was their fate.


"I don't want to think about the past. I don't know how long I'm going to live," she says. "I just want Iwao to live a peaceful and quiet life.""


The entire story can be read at: 

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c24nrr0mv4go

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:


https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/120008354894645705/4704913685758792985


———————————————————————————————


FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."

Lawyer Radha Natarajan:

Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;


—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!

Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

Wednesday, January 1, 2025

Carmen Mejia: Travis County. Texas: An awful start to 2025: Austin Chronicle Reporter Brant Bingamon takes us into the New Year with the disturbing possibility that another woman convicted of murder In Travis County is actually innocent - as prosecutors reevaluate a case similar to that of Rosa Jimenez, noting that: "Over a span of six months in 2003, two young, undocumented women living in Austin were accused of murder. Prosecutors charged Rosa Jimenez with murdering a toddler in her care in January after he choked on a wad of paper towels. Carmen Mejia was accused of murdering an infant she was babysitting in July by scalding him in a bathtub. There were no eyewitnesses to either alleged murder, but both women were convicted in 2005 on testimony from medical experts and sentenced to life in prison. Jimenez was freed and exonerated last year after the Travis County District Attorney’s Office agreed with experts hired by the Innocence Project that the scientific testimony offered against her at trial was incorrect – that it was, in criminal justice parlance, junk science. Now the Innocence Project is working on Mejia’s case, and the same process is underway."


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: Texas also goes into the New Year with plans to kill Robert Roberson, and innocent man, based on Shaken Baby Syndrome (AKA junk science) - now that Attorney General   has blocked a bipartisan legislative committee's efforts to have  Robert Roberson testify before it.  What a terrible start to 1925. Thank goodness The innocence Project, and others like it, are there to help rectify these terrible wrongs.

Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

QUOTE OF THE DAY: "The Innocence Project’s Vanessa Potkin was instrumental in getting Rosa Jimenez exonerated, and she is now convinced that Mejia is innocent as well. “These women were presumed and adjudicated guilty based on less-than-complete, incorrect evidence,” Potkin told the Chronicle. “The fact that these two innocent women were prosecuted in the same jurisdiction within months of each other demonstrates the problem and prevalence of wrongful conviction in cases where children die as the result of accident or illness. Thankfully we now have the opportunity for the truth to come to light and this terrible injustice to be corrected.”

--------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "At a hearing in Travis County district court on Dec. 16, prosecutors from the D.A.’s office presented affidavits from two of the experts who testified against Mejia in 2005, a burn specialist and the emergency-room doctor who treated the scalded child, stating they could no longer say his injuries were caused intentionally. The prosecutors also presented testimony from the medical examiner who performed the child’s autopsy, stating she now believes the infant’s death was accidental. Experts hired by the Innocence Project also testified.

According to the D.A.’s office, that testimony followed a hearing earlier this year in which a witness who was a child at the time the baby was burned, and who was also being supervised by Mejia, told the court that she had turned on the hot water which scalded the infant and that Mejia was not present when the injury occurred."

-------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Is Another Woman Convicted of Murder In Travis County Actually Innocent? Prosecutors reevaluate a case similar to that of Rosa Jimenez," by Reporter Grant Bingaman, published by The Austin Chronicle on December 26, 2024.  (Grant Bingamon began writing for the Chronicle in 2019, covering criminal justice, the death penalty, and public school issues.)


GIST: "Over a span of six months in 2003, two young, undocumented women living in Austin were accused of murder.

Prosecutors charged Rosa Jimenez with murdering a toddler in her care in January after he choked on a wad of paper towels. Carmen Mejia was accused of murdering an infant she was babysitting in July by scalding him in a bathtub.

There were no eyewitnesses to either alleged murder, but both women were convicted in 2005 on testimony from medical experts and sentenced to life in prison. Jimenez was freed and exonerated last year after the Travis County District Attorney’s Office agreed with experts hired by the Innocence Project that the scientific testimony offered against her at trial was incorrect – that it was, in criminal justice parlance, junk science. Now the Innocence Project is working on Mejia’s case, and the same process is underway.

At a hearing in Travis County district court on Dec. 16, prosecutors from the D.A.’s office presented affidavits from two of the experts who testified against Mejia in 2005, a burn specialist and the emergency-room doctor who treated the scalded child, stating they could no longer say his injuries were caused intentionally. The prosecutors also presented testimony from the medical examiner who performed the child’s autopsy, stating she now believes the infant’s death was accidental. Experts hired by the Innocence Project also testified.

According to the D.A.’s office, that testimony followed a hearing earlier this year in which a witness who was a child at the time the baby was burned, and who was also being supervised by Mejia, told the court that she had turned on the hot water which scalded the infant and that Mejia was not present when the injury occurred.

The Innocence Project’s Vanessa Potkin was instrumental in getting Rosa Jimenez exonerated, and she is now convinced that Mejia is innocent as well. “These women were presumed and adjudicated guilty based on less-than-complete, incorrect evidence,” Potkin told the Chronicle. “The fact that these two innocent women were prosecuted in the same jurisdiction within months of each other demonstrates the problem and prevalence of wrongful conviction in cases where children die as the result of accident or illness. Thankfully we now have the opportunity for the truth to come to light and this terrible injustice to be corrected.”

Visiting Judge David Wahlberg is expected to make a recommendation on Mejia’s case at its next hearing on Jan. 23. It will then be sent to the Texas Criminal Court of Appeals, which can deny a new trial, grant a new trial, find Mejia actually innocent, or return the case to Wahlberg for further fact-finding. Mejia will remain in custody pending the decision, the D.A.’s office said."


The entire story can be read at:

https://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/news/2024-12-26/is-another-woman-convicted-of-murder-in-travis-county-actually-innocent/


PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:


https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/120008354894645705/4704913685758792985


———————————————————————————————


FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."

Lawyer Radha Natarajan:

Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;


—————————————————————————————————


FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!

Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;


-------------------------------------------------------------------

Dallas Radio KRDL:Top Stories of 2024: 'The fight to keep Robert Roberson alive': ( Update)…"Fast forward to Dec. 20th, when Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton blocked a Texas House subpoena that would have allowed Roberson to testify before a committee for a second time. The committee has recessed indefinitely. The election happened, and come Jan. 1st there will be a new house committee with new members who may not be inclined to hear more about Roberson. The Supreme Court ultimately lifted its stay, but the House committee succeeded in pushing the case into the next year when three new justices will come onto the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Only one has to vote in favor or Roberson to scuttle an execution."



QUOTE  OF THE DAY:   "Roberson still has not testified. But others have. Dr. Phil McGraw, known as TV's Dr. Phil, is a psychologist who reviewed the entire case and talked with Roberson. "I am 100% convinced that we're facing a miscarriage of justice here," Dr. Phil said. He says the jury never was told about the girl's medical condition and that the only thing presented as an explanation was Shaken Baby Syndrome. Even one of the original jurors said she never would have voted to convict had she known about the lung disease."

-----------------------------------------------------

STORY: KRLD  of Dallas (Reporter Lp Phillips) chooses the fight to keep Robert Roberson alive as one of its top stories of 2024. (L.P. Phillips is an Edward R. Murrow Award winning investigative reporter who has spent more than 30 years in radio and television news.)

GIST:  "Among the year's most intriguing legal fights has been the effort to keep an Anderson County man from being executed.


On October 17th, Robert Roberson was supposed to have been put to death for the 2002 shaking death of his daughter. It didn't happen.

"The Texas House stood up and spoke up," Texas Senator Jeff Leach said.

Leach is a member of the Texas House Committee that oversees criminal law. Roberson's case has been through all the courts including the U.S. Supreme Court, and all affirmed the conviction and death sentence. But the committee is convinced his conviction was based on the debunked shaken baby syndrome.

The committee believed Roberson was innocent and his daughter actually died from an ongoing lung illness. Out of options, the committee issued a subpoena for Roberson to testify days after the execution would have happened. It worked. The Texas Supreme Court stepped in.

"The Texas Supreme Court said, we are going to affirm the decision by the district judge, at least in part, that basically triggered a stay of the execution," Owsley said.

But then another fight erupted over how the testimony was to be taken. Roberson still has not testified. But others have. Dr. Phil McGraw, known as TV's Dr. Phil, is a psychologist who reviewed the entire case and talked with Roberson.

"I am 100% convinced that we're facing a miscarriage of justice here," Dr. Phil said.

He says the jury never was told about the girl's medical condition and that the only thing presented as an explanation was Shaken Baby Syndrome. Even one of the original jurors said she never would have voted to convict had she known about the lung disease.

Fast forward to Dec. 20th, when Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton blocked a Texas House subpoena that would have allowed Roberson to testify before a committee for a second time.

The committee has recessed indefinitely. The election happened, and come Jan. 1st there will be a new house committee with new members who may not be inclined to hear more about Roberson. The Supreme Court ultimately lifted its stay, but the House committee succeeded in pushing the case into the next year when three new justices will come onto the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

Only one has to vote in favor or Roberson to scuttle an execution."

The entire story can be read at: 

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/news/content/ar-AA1wmfOp?ocid=sapphireappshare

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:


https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/120008354894645705/4704913685758792985


———————————————————————————————


FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."

Lawyer Radha Natarajan:

Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;


—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!

Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;