Saturday, March 27, 2021

Sue Neill-Fraser: Australia: The aftermath interview: (Part Two): Andrew L. Urban, author of an authoritative book on the Neill-Fraser case provides more reasons for his view that, "Sue Neill-Fraser’s is arguably the most famous but least trusted murder conviction in Tasmanian legal history."..."I have argued that the trial of Sue Neil-Fraser should never have gone ahead under the circumstances, until the DNA evidence at the crime scene had been properly dealt with. Threatening to derail the prosecution’s case against Sue Neill-Fraser, it was left on the shelf."… "The focus on Sue Neill-Fraser as the murderer resulted in what is – in the opinion of legal academic Dr Bob Moles of Flinders University, eminent barristers of the stature of the recently deceased Chester Porter QC (March 15, 1926 – March 15, 2021) among others – a grave and fermenting miscarriage of justice."

BACKGROUND: Sue Neill-Fraser was convicted of murdering her partner Bob Chappell on Australia Day 2009, on board their yacht, Four Winds. She has maintained her innocence. She has been granted leave to appeal (in March 2019) after a three year process in which then homeless 15 year old Meaghan Vass admitted she was a witness to the murder and Neill-Fraser was not involved. Vass’ DNA was found on the deck.  As per Yahoo News: 2020:  Neill-Fraser is serving 23 years' jail for killing Mr Chappell on Australia Day 2009 on the couple's yacht in Hobart. Her legal team argues there is "fresh and compelling" evidence that places then-homeless teenager Meaghan Vass on board the boat the night in question.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: When she took the stand at her recent appeal, Meaghan Vass confirmed to her lawyer  at the outset of her testimony that she was indeed on board the  Four Winds, as her DNA showed,  when and where Sue Neill-Fraser was alleged to have murdered  Bob  Chappell. However,  under withering   cross-examination she backed away from this testimony, agreeing with every proposition put to her by the prosecution that conflicted with her testimony. In an interview with  Author/Blogger Andrew L. Urban (Subject of a recent post on this Blog) Meaghan Vass explained  'why'... In this follow-up post (Part Two)  he explains why the entire court abandoned its duty of care to this witness.

Read  'The aftermath interview" (Part One) at: 


-----------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Was it the truth that the Crown was seeking? Or to protect the conviction. I think most people know the answer. There in Hobart’s Supreme Court, the altar of justice one would think, the onus of proof was again flipped; Meaghan Vass’ evidence was required to prove Sue Neill-Fraser’s innocence. Just as it had been at trial, where in the absence of any primary evidence, Neill-Fraser was effectively required to prove her innocence. Justice was not served that day, either.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

POST: 'The aftermath interview: Meaghan Vass abandoned by the court', by  author/blogger  Andrew L. Urban,  published by The Wrongful Convictions Report on March 27, 2021.


GIST: "Our interview with Meaghan Vass, published yesterday, answers the question why she panicked. It doesn’t explain why the entire court abandoned its duty of care to this witness. 

Sue Neill-Fraser’s is arguably the most famous but least trusted murder conviction in Tasmanian legal history; and her new appeal is now in the hands of the three judges. Surely it is important to have Meaghan Vass on the public record after how the hearing ended – with her testimony excluded from the grounds of appeal. Our interview canvasses why and how that happened. One lawyer let her down, another lawyer (the DPP) brought her down.

But no lawyer in the court – and no judge, either – acknowledged that her testimony on the Tuesday – conflicting with the day before – was being given under duress. Her confidence had been betrayed – by another lawyer, and she felt her safety was at risk. 

Justice was not served that day.

Was it the truth that the Crown was seeking? Or to protect the conviction. I think most people know the answer. There in Hobart’s Supreme Court, the altar of justice one would think, the onus of proof was again flipped; Meaghan Vass’ evidence was required to prove Sue Neill-Fraser’s innocence. Just as it had been at trial, where in the absence of any primary evidence, Neill-Fraser was effectively required to prove her innocence. Justice was not served that day, either.

As a key witness – THE key witness – she has been at the centre of the case from the very beginning. She made mistakes, like at first denying she had been on Four Winds at the relevant time, when she was 16. More mistakes followed, like the prosecution treating her DNA at the crime scene ‘as a red herring’.

I have argued that the trial of Sue Neil-Fraser should never have gone ahead under the circumstances, until the DNA evidence at the crime scene had been properly dealt with. Threatening to derail the prosecution’s case against Sue Neill-Fraser, it was left on the shelf…

The focus on Sue Neill-Fraser as the murderer resulted in what is – in the opinion of legal academic Dr Bob Moles of Flinders University, eminent barristers of the stature of the recently deceased Chester Porter QC (March 15, 1926 – March 15, 2021) among others – a grave and fermenting miscarriage of justice.  (Porter famously assisted the Chamberlain Royal Commission and was the author of The Conviction of the Innocent – How the Law Can Let Us Down (Random House, 2007.)

The entire post - including comments on 'the aftermath interview new - can be read at: 

https://wrongfulconvictionsreport.org/2021/03/27/meaghan-vass-abandoned-by-the-court/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD (FOR NOW!): "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Justin Volk: San Francisco: Alleged crime lab theft: (Here we go again? HL): The former forensic analyst with the San Francisco medical examiner’s office has been charged in connection with stealing methamphetamine, Courthouse News (Reporter Mario Dinzeo) reports. Significance? "Volk’s actions jeopardize thousands of law enforcement investigations. Last November, Boudin said Volk, who worked in the forensic lab for more than 13 years, had a hand in more than 2,500 investigations; including 500 deaths, 1,200 sexual-assaults, and 800 DUIs. Boudin’s office has published a list of cases that could possibly be affected."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Volk is accused of stealing evidence from the lab between June 14, 2020 and Aug. 31, 2020, conduct that came to light after a traffic stop in Utah, where sheriff’s deputies spotted narcotics in evidence bags labeled by the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner while searching his car. Boudin told the San Francisco Chronicle that his office is currently reviewing any case they prosecuted in which Volk played a role, and that Volk had testified in at least two dozen cases in the past eight years. “This couldn’t have come at a worse time for our office,” he said in an interview with the Chronicle back in September. Volk turned himself in Thursday morning."

-----------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "San Francisco Forensic Lab Worker Charged With Evidence Theft,"  by Reporter Mario Dinzeo, published by Courthouse News on March 25,  2021.

SUB-HEADING: San Francisco prosecutor must review thousands of potentially tainted cases stemming from Volk's alleged theft of evidence from the medical examiner's office, where he worked.

GIST: "A former forensic analyst with the San Francisco medical examiner’s office has been charged in connection with stealing methamphetamine, prosecutors announced Thursday. 

San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin announced Thursday that Justin Volk has been charged with misdemeanor theft and receipt of stolen property. 

Volk, 40, had been responsible for processing and storing of evidence collected at death scene investigations as part of his job. He was arrested back in August by authorities in Utah, who found evidence bags containing the drug in his vehicle. Volk purportedly had unrestricted access to the medical examiner’s evidence room.

“In addition to ensuring conviction integrity, we are now seeking to hold Mr. Volk accountable for violating the trust the public places in those who handle evidence related to criminal cases,” Boudin said in a statement. 

"Volk’s actions jeopardize thousands of law enforcement investigations. Last November, Boudin said Volk, who worked in the forensic lab for more than 13 years, had a hand in more than 2,500 investigations; including 500 deaths, 1,200 sexual-assaults, and 800 DUIs. Boudin’s office has published a list of cases that could possibly be affected.

“My office has acted with great urgency in responding to the allegations against Justin Volk, and we have prioritized working to review all convictions in cases in which he was involved,” Boudin said at the time. “Ensuring the integrity of our convictions is of the utmost importance, and for that reason, we are publishing this information as part of our commitment to integrity and transparency in the criminal legal system.”

Volk is accused of stealing evidence from the lab between June 14, 2020 and Aug. 31, 2020, conduct that came to light after a traffic stop in Utah, where sheriff’s deputies spotted narcotics in evidence bags labeled by the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner while searching his car.

Boudin told the San Francisco Chronicle that his office is currently reviewing any case they prosecuted in which Volk played a role, and that Volk had testified in at least two dozen cases in the past eight years.

“This couldn’t have come at a worse time for our office,” he said in an interview with the Chronicle back in September.

Volk turned himself in Thursday morning.

The entire story can be read at the link below


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD (FOR NOW!): "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Friday, March 26, 2021

Sue Neill-Fraser: Australia: Major Development: Meaghan Vass explains, in a dramatic interview with author/blogger Andrew L. Urban, why, under withering cross-examination, she backed away from her testimony that she was on board the 'Four Winds', as her DNA showed, where and when Sue Neill-Fraser was alleged to have murdered Bob Chappell..."The entire subject makes me upset. I was upset because I was hounded and had words put in my mouth….he (Mr Coates) was trying to confuse me and butt in with what he thought and cutting me off. I didn’t want the names out in public. I panicked and was so scared. It was all I could think of to do."

BACKGROUND: Sue Neill-Fraser was convicted of murdering her partner Bob Chappell on Australia Day 2009, on board their yacht, Four Winds. She has maintained her innocence. She has been granted leave to appeal (in March 2019) after a three year process in which then homeless 15 year old Meaghan Vass admitted she was a witness to the murder and Neill-Fraser was not involved. Vass’ DNA was found on the deck.  As per Yahoo News: 2020:  Neill-Fraser is serving 23 years' jail for killing Mr Chappell on Australia Day 2009 on the couple's yacht in Hobart. Her legal team argues there is "fresh and compelling" evidence that places then-homeless teenager Meaghan Vass on board the boat the night in question.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "I didn't f...ing murder anybody, why are they treating me like this...so I just wanted to shut it all down and get out of there."


--------------------------------------------------------------

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: When she took the stand at her recent appeal, Meaghan Vass confirmed to her lawyer  at the outset of her testimony that she was indeed on board the  Four Winds, as her DNA showed,  when and where Sue Neill-Fraser was alleged to have murdered  Bob  Chappell. However,  under whithering   cross-examination she backed away from this testimony, agreeing with every proposition put to her by the prosecution that conflicted with her testimony. Now, in an interview with Andrew L. Urban, author of 'Murder by the prosecution - an authoritative book on the Neill-Fraser case - Meaghan Vass explains 'why'.


Harold Levy: Publisher: The Wrongful Conviction Report:

---------------------------------------------------------------------

POST: 'Meaghan Vass: The aftermath interview', by Andrew L. Urban, published by The Wrongful Conviction Report on March 26, 2021.

GIST: “My 2019 60 mins interview + affidavit is true and correct.” – Meaghan Vass In the aftermath of the dramatic Tasmanian Supreme Court appeal against Sue Neill-Fraser’s conviction for the murder of her partner Bob Chappell, the key witness, a traumatised and betrayed Meaghan Vass, sought safety and comfort among her close friends. But she agreed to this written Q&A with Andrew L. Urban. 

Meaghan Vass had previously admitted on 60 Minutes that it was her on the deck of Four Winds – her admission is anchored by her DNA discovered there. Her eye witness testimony under oath in court would confirm that it was not Neill-Fraser but males in Vass’ company who were responsible.

It went more or less according to plan – at first. But on the morning after her initial testimony in response to Robert Richter QC (for Neill-Fraser), media reports revealed the names of the men – in splash front page headlines. That was not according to plan. Vass had been promised by lawyer Stuart Wright that their identities would be suppressed. She feared consequences … and she wanted to take it all back. Under withering cross examination by Tasmania’s DPP, Daryl Coates SC, she agreed to every proposition he put to her that contradicted her earlier evidence. The result was that none of her evidence given in court will be considered by the judges – a blow to the appeal.

Q1 You were terribly upset in court; what upset you most? Why did you agree to the propositions he put to, contradicting what you had said earlier?
The entire subject makes me upset. I was upset because I was hounded and had words put in my mouth….he (Mr Coates) was trying to confuse me and butt in with what he thought and cutting me off. I didn’t want the names out in public. I panicked and was so scared. It was all I could think of to do.
(Meaghan later added:) I didn’t f….ing murder anybody, why are they treating me like this…so I just wanted to shut it all down and get out of there.

Q2 Mr Coates SC suggested (among other things) that you probably went on board Four Winds a day or two after the murder, probably at Goodwood. What do you say to that?
Mr Coates is wrong. He doesn’t want to hear the truth. I know where I was and I know where the boat was and it wasn’t at Goodwood. He has a job to do but it’s not listening to the truth.

Q3 What would you say now to the court if given a chance?
I’d say it was wrong of the lawyer (Stuart Wright) not to suppress my information from the affidavit from 2019 as promised. I’m not crazy and I’m not a liar. I’m telling the truth and no one is listening.

Q4 Mr Coates also tried to imply that you may have been paid to say you were at the crime scene. What do you say to that?
I was never paid to do anything. 60 mins was also zero dollars, for those implying it wasn’t. As if I’d risk implicating myself in something for money if I was no part of it. I was stood over and threatened by people, but not regarding that I was there. They wanted me to make up a big story of how it happened, that wasn’t true. Karen Keefe was the main one. Telling me to say i was on the piss having a party on the boat with bob when things turned sour. That was bullshit. She is evil. But Jeff thompson (Hobart solicitor) has been so good to me. I love jeff. He’s such a sweet man who only wants the truth as well.

Q5 Has anyone at all contacted you since your court appearance?
Yes a few people from Tas Police to ask if I was safe – and mostly people have been ok. I’ve received nasty messages on facebook which I block.

Q6 You were said to have apologised to Sue Neill-Fraser and her lawyers – is that true? Can you put into words why you felt sorry?
Because I feel like I tried to do what was right but it seemed doomed from the start, from Andy not being allowed (to be her support person in the witness box), to the suppression etc…I tried again and again to say that the 2019 affidavit was true. Then I spoke with fabiano (Cangelosi, MV’s barrister from 2017) about it but by then it was too late. My evidence was not of any use, so they said.

Q7 Do you feel the need for police protection?
No way. Police protection. That’s funny. I don’t want them anywhere near me. I don’t trust them at all.

Q8 What would you like to see happen next?
I’d like to see the appeal seen for what it was by the judges. Surely they can. I want the lawyer who promised me suppression be reprimanded as he is the only reason things turned (out) the way they did on the Tuesday.

To everyone. My 2019 60 mins interview + affidavit is true and correct. 

       —     Meaghan Vass."

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Refer to our report for details of the appeal hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The entire interview can be read at:

https://wrongfulconvictionsreport.org/2021/03/26/meaghan-vass-the-aftermath-interview-2/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD (FOR NOW!): "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Flawed Fire investigation: Antiquated investigative techniques in urban settings grounded in now disproven science have led to widespread wrongful arson convictions. (Many of them reported on the pages of this Blog.) Now the spotlight could be shifting to 'wildfires'' as Worcester Polytechnic Institute announces that Researcher Albert Simeoni has been awarded $519,893, to evaluate the reliability of burn pattern indicators used by investigators to determine the starting point of wildfires...“Investigations are based on burn pattern indicators that have not been scientifically verified, and those investigations have consequences for the people who are impacted by fire, for government agencies, and for companies,” said Simeoni, who is principal investigator of the three-year project. “We want to be sure that investigations are done with the best tools available. We’re not reinventing tools with this study, but we’re looking at the reliability of the tools currently used.”


QUOTE OF THE DAY: “Understanding where a wildfire starts can help determine how it started and who, if anyone, may be criminally or financially liable for damages,” Simeoni said. “As a researcher and scientist, I also know that understanding how fires start can help us determine how to prevent, manage, and stop them.”

------------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "The project could, Simeoni said, validate existing forensic tools and help fire investigators work more efficiently and with fewer errors. He plans to make the study’s results available to private and public fire investigators. “Understanding where a wildfire starts can help determine how it started and who, if anyone, may be criminally or financially liable for damages,” Simeoni said. “As a researcher and scientist, I also know that understanding how fires start can help us determine how to prevent, manage, and stop them.”

---------------------------------------------------------

STORY: “Where did that wildfire start? Worcester  Polytechnic Institute (WPI) researcher awarded grant to access reliability of burn patterns as a forensic tool,” published by WPI on March 22, 2021.


SUB-HEADING: "National Institute of justice awards $519,893 to improve training guidelines for wildfire investigation."


GIST: "Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) researcher Albert Simeoni has been awarded $519,893 from the National Institute of Justice to evaluate the reliability of burn pattern indicators used by investigators to determine the starting point of wildfires.

Simeoni, professor and head of the Department of Fire Protection Engineering, will use a laboratory wind tunnel at WPI, field studies in a New Jersey forest, and data analysis to determine if scars on a landscape, ash deposits, and other indicators widely used by investigators reliably point to the place where a wildfire originates.


“Investigations are based on burn pattern indicators that have not been scientifically verified, and those investigations have consequences for the people who are impacted by fire, for government agencies, and for companies,” said Simeoni, who is principal investigator of the three-year project. “We want to be sure that investigations are done with the best tools available. We’re not reinventing tools with this study, but we’re looking at the reliability of the tools currently used.”


Wildfires burn millions of acres annually in the United States, causing extensive and costly damage to natural ecosystems, homes, and businesses. Simeoni, a former firefighter, has previously studied how wind impacts wildfires, and he has coordinated training for Greek firefighters combatting wildfires.


Finding the origin of a wildfire can help explain how it started and who might be responsible. Investigators typically examine the shape of burnt grass, the angle of char left behind, craters formed into rocks, marks on buildings, and other physical signs of damage to trace a fire across a landscape and back to its origin point.


Simeoni will study fire indicators in the field in collaboration with firefighters from the New Jersey Forest Fire Service, who manage controlled fires in the New Jersey pine barrens. Controlled fires, also known as prescribed burns, help manage vegetation. Simeoni also will conduct studies in a 20-foot wind tunnel at WPI, burning pine needles and other materials under varying conditions such as wind speed, fire intensity, and moisture. Finally, he will compare results from field and lab studies with the results of investigations conducted into fires that burned under similar conditions.


Nicholas Skowronski, a research forester with the U.S. Forest Service, will be co-principal investigator of the project. The project is funded by the National Institute of Justice, which is the research arm of the U.S. Department of Justice. 


The project could, Simeoni said, validate existing forensic tools and help fire investigators work more efficiently and with fewer errors. He plans to make the study’s results available to private and public fire investigators.


“Understanding where a wildfire starts can help determine how it started and who, if anyone, may be criminally or financially liable for damages,” Simeoni said. “As a researcher and scientist, I also know that understanding how fires start can help us determine how to prevent, manage, and stop them.”

The entire announcement can be read at:


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD (FOR NOW!): "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thursday, March 25, 2021

Kathleen Folbigg: Australia. (Aftermath): She looks to a 'pardon' now that her appeal has been dismissed..."Australia’s worst female serial killer, convicted child murderer Kathleen Folbigg, has spent the last 14 years fighting to clear her name through the courts, using every avenue open to her. On Wednesday, it took less than a minute for the NSW (New South Wales) Court of Appeal to dash her hopes once more. Folbigg, appearing briefly by video link, sat in stunned silence as her appeal was dismissed and she was ordered to pay the NSW Attorney-General’s costs. Her last hopes are now pinned on the same Attorney-General advising the NSW Governor to pardon her."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "There is just one final slice of hope left for the woman once dubbed “Australia’s most hated” and her growing army of supporters, which now includes dozens of eminent scientists. Last month, a 14-page petition containing the signatures of 90 medical and science leaders – among them, Australian Academy of Science president John Shine, AC, 2009 Nobel laureate Emeritus Professor Elizabeth Blackburn, AC, and former chief scientist for Australia, Emeritus Professor Ian Chubb, AC – was presented to the Governor of NSW calling for Folbigg’s immediate pardon and release from jail."


---------------------------------------------------


QUOTE OF THE DAY:  "Folbigg’s long-time friend and supporter, Tracy Chapman, said “today wasn’t our day” but that she and Folbigg were “content that we respectfully challenged the system” and the decision “only strengthens our resolve to keep going”. Ms Chapman said the medical evidence has grown since the inquiry, and “many more Australians are rightly asking why Kath’s still in prison after 18 years when there’s mounting scientific evidence relating to her innocence.”"


----------------------------------------------------


QUOTE TWO OF THE DAY: "Mr Cordner, who wrote the 2013 report, said the significance of the gene mutation “was not understood at the time, even by the geneticists.” He said at the time of the inquiry “it was a more theoretical possibility”, but since then, “those mutations have been shown to be actually disease causing”."


-----------------------------------------------------


STORY: "'Today wasn't our day': Baby killer Folbigg looks to pardon after appeal," by Reporter Jenny Noyes,  published by The Sydney Morning Herald on March 24, 2021;


GIST: Australia’s worst female serial killer, convicted child murderer Kathleen Folbigg, has spent the last 14 years fighting to clear her name through the courts, using every avenue open to her. On Wednesday, it took less than a minute for the NSW Court of Appeal to dash her hopes once more.


Folbigg, appearing briefly by video link, sat in stunned silence as her appeal was dismissed and she was ordered to pay the NSW Attorney-General’s costs. Her last hopes are now pinned on the same Attorney-General advising the NSW Governor to pardon her.


The appeal court on Wednesday found there was “no error of law” in the 2019 judicial inquiry by the Honourable Reginald Blanch AM, QC, which reinforced Folbigg’s guilt for the manslaughter of her first son, Caleb, and the subsequent murders of Patrick, Sarah and Laura.


The children were all aged between 19 days and 18 months when they each died suddenly in the family’s Newcastle home between February 1989 and March 1999, and post-mortems were unable to establish what caused them to stop breathing.


Folbigg was found guilty of the homicides in 2003 and sentenced on appeal to at least 25 years jail. She appealed her conviction without success in 2005, and was unsuccessful again in the Court of Criminal Appeal in 2007.


She maintains her innocence and claims damning diary entries in which she expresses guilt for her children’s deaths were not literal confessions.


The diary entries were key in her trial and ultimate guilty verdict – and they again sealed her fate at the 2019 inquiry, along with Folbigg’s own testimony, in which she said her writing was taken out of context and blamed what she wrote on her “depressed state”.


Mr Blanch found Folbigg, who had not given evidence at trial, had been “untruthful, unbelievable and made deliberate attempts to obscure the fact that she committed the offences of which she was convicted.”


That inquiry was conducted at a cost of $2.4 million, launching three years after Folbigg’s lawyers petitioned for a re-examination – in light of a report they commissioned from forensic medical investigator Professor Stephen Cordner that cast doubt on the medical evidence presented at the trial.


Mr Blanch, a former Supreme Court Justice and Chief Judge of the NSW District Court, was not persuaded that the report raised a reasonable doubt as to her guilt.


New evidence that arose after the inquiry’s conclusion – of a genetic mutation affecting Sarah and Laura that could have triggered Sudden Infant Death Syndrome – was addressed in an addendum, with Mr Blanch again finding it did not change the outcome.


In the Court of Appeal judgment delivered on Wednesday, Justices John Basten, Mark Leeming and Paul Brereton wrote that Mr Blanch’s 2019 conclusion was not at odds with the scientific evidence, which had “raised a theoretical possibility that there were innocent explanations for the deaths of the two girls.”



Despite the existence of the CALM2 genetic mutation in Ms Folbigg and the two girls, “their circumstances departed from the reported cases of deaths associated with CALM abnormalities,” they wrote.


“The girls’ deaths were thus ‘outliers’ when compared with those reported in the literature. Further, the boys’ genomes provided no common cause.”


When weighed alongside Ms Folbigg’s diary entries and “her evidence in seeking to present innocent explanations” for them, “there was an ample basis, consistent with the scientific evidence, for the judicial officer to conclude that there was no reasonable doubt as to Ms Folbigg’s guilt.”


Folbigg’s long-time friend and supporter, Tracy Chapman, said “today wasn’t our day” but that she and Folbigg were “content that we respectfully challenged the system” and the decision “only strengthens our resolve to keep going”.


Ms Chapman said the medical evidence has grown since the inquiry, and “many more Australians are rightly asking why Kath’s still in prison after 18 years when there’s mounting scientific evidence relating to her innocence.”


Mr Cordner, who wrote the 2013 report, said the significance of the gene mutation “was not understood at the time, even by the geneticists.”


He said at the time of the inquiry “it was a more theoretical possibility”, but since then, “those mutations have been shown to be actually disease causing”.


ANU immunologist Carola Vinuesa, who gave evidence at the inquiry, said it was “unfortunate” the NSW Court of Appeal had adopted “incorrect conclusions about the genetic evidence” from Mr Blanch.


There is just one final slice of hope left for the woman once dubbed “Australia’s most hated” and her growing army of supporters, which now includes dozens of eminent scientists.


Last month, a 14-page petition containing the signatures of 90 medical and science leaders – among them, Australian Academy of Science president John Shine, AC, 2009 Nobel laureate Emeritus Professor Elizabeth Blackburn, AC, and former chief scientist for Australia, Emeritus Professor Ian Chubb, AC – was presented to the Governor of NSW calling for Folbigg’s immediate pardon and release from jail.


A spokesperson from Government House in Sydney said the matter had been referred to NSW Attorney-General Mark Speakman and the Governor would await his advice.


Mr Speakman declined to comment on the outcome of the appeal on Wednesday, saying it would be inappropriate as the petition “remains under consideration.”


Folbigg will be eligible for parole in 2028."

The entire story can be read at:

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/today-wasn-t-our-day-baby-killer-folbigg-looks-to-pardon-after-appeal-loss-20210324-p57dm6.html

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD (FOR NOW!): "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wednesday, March 24, 2021

Abolition: Major (Very Welcome) Development). Governor signs..."Virginia, the state that has executed more people than any other in the nation, has abolished the death penalty," 'The Appeal' (Senior Reporter Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg) reports..."The legislation abolishing the death penalty, which passed the House and Senate in February, was signed this afternoon by Governor Ralph Northam. “It is the moral thing to do,” he said during the signing ceremony. “The death penalty is fundamentally flawed.” Virginia becomes the first formerly Confederate state to abolish capital punishment."...(All too many flawed Virginia death penalty cases with significant forensic issues have been featured in posts on this Blog. HL);

QUOTE OF THE DAY: "Even those who once defended executions have embraced abolition. State Senate Majority Leader Richard Saslaw, a Democrat, was among the 21 senators who voted to abolish the death penalty. But throughout his career, he had supported capital punishment, and in 2016 he joined then Governor Terry McAuliffe in protecting pharmacies that supply lethal injection drugs. “There’s only two people on death row; juries are just not handing out the sentences anymore,” said Saslaw about his vote, the Washington Post reported. “That option’s not there right now.”

---------------------------------------------------------

QUOTE TWO OF THE DAY: "In January, Sutphin and about 20 other family members of murder victims released an open letter to members of the Virginia General Assembly, calling on lawmakers to abolish capital punishment. Among the signatories were three state legislators who lost loved ones to murder, including Senator Janet Howell. Howell supported the death penalty until her father-in-law was killed. “I don’t buy the idea that we would support the death penalty for the benefit of victims’ families,” Howell told legislators last month, the Associated Press reported. “It doesn’t work that way. Trust me, it doesn’t work that way.”

---------------------------------------------------------

QUOTE THREE OF THE DAY: "Because of the protests, criminal justice reform became the “preeminent political issue in Virginia and in many other states,” said Michael Stone, executive director of Virginians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty. “The police murder of George Floyd changed everything.”

-----------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: 

STORY: "Virginia becomes the first Southern State to abolish the death penalty," by Reporter Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg, published by 'The Appeal' on March 24, 2021. (Elizabeth Weill-Greenberg  has also written for The Nation, The Washington Blade, and TruthOut. She writes on prison conditions, the sex offender registry, wrongful convictions, and extreme sentences for young people.)

SUB-HEADING: "Abolition advocates are celebrating a milestone for racial justice,

GIST: "Virginia, the state that has executed more people than any other in the nation, has abolished the death penalty.

The legislation abolishing the death penalty, which passed the House and Senate in February, was signed this afternoon by Governor Ralph Northam. “It is the moral thing to do,” he said during the signing ceremony. “The death penalty is fundamentally flawed.” Virginia becomes the first formerly Confederate state to abolish capital punishment. 

“That’s a really clear and powerful denunciation of the death penalty,” said Cassandra Stubbs, director of the Capital Punishment Project at the American Civil Liberties Union.

Virginia has executed more than 1,300 people since its founding as a colony in the 1600s. It executed 113 of those people in the years since the U.S. Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment in 1976, according to the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC). Only Texas has executed more people in the last 45 years.  

But the death penalty, both in use and popularity, has steadily declined in Virginia and throughout the country. In addition to the 22 states that had already abolished capital punishment, another 12 have not carried out an execution in at least 10 years, according to DPIC. In Virginia, a death sentence has not been handed down since 2011. 

There are only two people on death row in Virginia, Anthony Juniper and Thomas Porter. Under the new legislation, their sentences will be changed to life in prison. Because they were 18 or older at the time of their offenses, they will not be eligible for parole or conditional release. 

Even those who once defended executions have embraced abolition. State Senate Majority Leader Richard Saslaw, a Democrat, was among the 21 senators who voted to abolish the death penalty. But throughout his career, he had supported capital punishment, and in 2016 he joined then Governor Terry McAuliffe in protecting pharmacies that supply lethal injection drugs. 

“There’s only two people on death row; juries are just not handing out the sentences anymore,” said Saslaw about his vote, the Washington Post reported. “That option’s not there right now.”

McAuliffe, who is running for governor again, announced his support for abolition in December. As governor, although he said he personally opposed the death penalty, he oversaw three executions during his tenure, including that of William Morva, the last person to be executed in Virginia. Rachel Sutphin, a daughter of one of Morva’s victims, asked McAuliffe to stop the execution, but he ignored the request. 

In January, Sutphin and about 20 other family members of murder victims released an open letter to members of the Virginia General Assembly, calling on lawmakers to abolish capital punishment. Among the signatories were three state legislators who lost loved ones to murder, including Senator Janet Howell. Howell supported the death penalty until her father-in-law was killed. 

“I don’t buy the idea that we would support the death penalty for the benefit of victims’ families,” Howell told legislators last month, the Associated Press reported. “It doesn’t work that way. Trust me, it doesn’t work that way.”

—

Capital punishment in Virginia, and throughout the country, is entrenched in white supremacy; its origins reach back to slavery, the Confederacy, and lynchings. Its demise in the formerly Confederate state was precipitated by last year’s Black Lives Matter demonstrations. 

“It’s a major step in the right direction because this is a very biased judicial system, especially here in Virginia, the birthplace of racism, the birthplace of Confederacy,” said JaPharii Jones, president of Black Lives Matter 757 and an organizer of last year’s protests. 

“It’s very significant, but there is still a whole lot more work to be done,” said Jones. 

Police brutality and wrongful arrests remain a threat to Black Virginians, he said. And although the Virginia legislature advanced several criminal justice reforms after the protests, it voted down bills to limit qualified immunity. Qualified immunity protects public officials from lawsuits unless the victim can show that they violated a right that had been “clearly established” by previous court decisions. Progressive and conservative critics of the doctrine say it has allowed officers to escape accountability for even the most egregious abuses. 

Because of the protests, criminal justice reform became the “preeminent political issue in Virginia and in many other states,” said Michael Stone, executive director of Virginians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty. “The police murder of George Floyd changed everything.” 

Since the reinstatement of capital punishment, more than 45 percent of those executed in Virginia have been Black, according to DPIC. The two remaining people on the commonwealth’s death row are Black. 

“It’s just heartening to see that hearts and minds are being changed,” said state Senator Jennifer Boysko, a longtime death penalty opponent. “When George Floyd died last year a lot of people took a lot of hard looks at their own biases, at their own beliefs, and they educated themselves.”

Prior to the Civil War, Virginia law delinated capital punishment by race: White people could only be executed for first-degree murder, but enslaved Black people could be executed for non-homicide offenses, according to DPIC. This segregated system continued into the 20th century. Between 1900 and 1969, more than 70 Black men were executed for rape, attempted rape, or robbery in Virginia; no white men were executed for these crimes during this time, according to DPIC. During the same time period, 185 Black and 46 white people were executed for murder. 

In 1908, Virginia replaced execution by public hanging with the electric chair, but extrajudicial lynchings of Black residents continued. Between 1877 and 1950, there were 84 documented lynchings of Black people in Virginia, according to the Equal Justice Initiative. 

Activists with the Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy held anti-death penalty prayer vigils in January at locations where lynchings had occurred. 

“Virginia’s death penalty is rooted in racial oppression,” LaKeisha Cook, an organizer with the Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy, told The Appeal: Political Report. “We stopped lynching Black people and instead started executing them so we just traded in the noose for the electric chair.”

The death penalty still remains on the books in a majority of states, including three states that have gubernatorial moratoriums: Pennsylvania, Oregon, and California. These moratoriums cease executions for the duration of a governor’s term, but the people on death row remain at risk of execution under future governors. 

At the federal level, a de facto moratorium existed for 17 years, until last July. In the last seven months of Donald Trump’s presidency, his administration executed 13 people. Two days after President Biden’s inauguration, 37 members of Congress sent him a letter urging him to commute the sentences of all federal death row prisoners. Biden opposes the death penalty.

“Moratoriums are welcome, but they are insufficient,” said Stubbs. “That is absolutely why governors and executives like Biden absolutely should use their powers to grant clemency to ensure we don’t see the kinds of things that we saw under President Trump.”

This legislative session, bills to abolish the death penalty have been introduced in the federal government, in Nevada, in Ohio, and in former Confederate states South Carolina, Texas, and Florida, according to DPIC.

“When Virginia abolishes the death penalty we’ll be the first state in the South to do so,” said Cook, who talked to the Political Report before the governor signed the law. “We can provide the example for other Southern states to follow behind us.”

The story has been updated with news that the governor signed the legislation into law."

https://theappeal.org/politicalreport/virginia-death-penalty/?utm_source=The+Appeal&utm_campaign=573df9fcb9-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_08_09_04_14_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_72df992d84-573df9fcb9-58434439

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD (FOR NOW!): "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------