This moving "post-script" - described as a "Conviction Quashed Addendum - appeared on a Web-Site dedicated to freeing Donna Anthony under the heading: "Look at all the suffering since then."
It describes the horrific consequences caused to innocent parents, caregivers and their families when societies abandon reason, go on crusades, and rely on so-called experts like Drs. Charles Smith, Roy Meadow, and David Southall to achieve their misguided ends.
"On Monday, April 11, 2004, Donna Anthony finally walked free after the Appeal Court quashed her “guilty” verdict as unsafe and unsound," the post-script begins.
"The legal ruling was something of a formality; the crucial breakthrough had come 18 months earlier when the same court had cleared Angela Cannings of murdering her two babies," it continues.
"It had taken six years and sends the 31 year old out into a world where she is effectively homeless and has no family.
Her mother died when she was in prison.
Her husband, from whom she is divorced, had originally said he believed she had smothered her 11 month old daughter Jordan and a year later four month old Michael.
Throughout her questioning, trial and imprisonment Ms Anthony had maintained they were victims of cot death.
Her former husband now says he “accepts the appeal court’s judgement.”
Outside the Appeal Court, it was left to Donna Anthony’s solicitor, George Hawkes, to speak for her.
She was, he said “overwhelmed by her freedom”.
”She was condemned by theory based on suspicion masquerading as medical opinion, which was completely wrong”, he added.
Mr Hawkes said the whole episode” had completely shattered her life”.
“There are immense problems facing her out there which she has got to cope with, and she is going to need a lot of help and assistance” he added, as Ms Anthony, a silent, shadowy figure, was ushered into a waiting car.
The smiling young mother in the baby photographs reproduced at her trial seems a lifetime away. No amount of compensation can buy her back.
As the ruling was announced, newspapers were already reporting that the discredited paediatrician Sir Roy Meadow whose evidence had effectively sealed her conviction, has been paid £50,000 to testify in court.
The head of the Royal College of Paediatricians, Sir Alan Craft, says “lessons are being learned” from what he called “these difficult cases.”
My interest in forensic pathology began with my Toronto Star investigative reporting into once famed since disgraced former doctor Charles Smith. I began this Blog after retiring from the Star in 2006 in order to follow the aftermath into the independent Goudge inquiry into many of Smith's cases. I have now begun to focus on cases involving flawed forensic science no matter where they occur (the recent Amanda Knox prosecution in Italy, for example) and am fascinated by the interest in the Blog from people in countries throughout the world. In another development, my interest in "junk science" "pseudo-experts" and the miscarriages of justice they all too often cause has drawn me deeply into the on-going U.S. death penalty debate where so many troubling cases involve issues relating to DNA and other developments in the world of forensic science. For all of this I rely on my experience as a reporter at the Toronto Star, my work as a lawyer in Ontario's criminal courts, and my abhorrence of injustice. Please send cases and developments which may be of interest to this Blog to firstname.lastname@example.org. Read on! Harold Levy.