"In a declaration under oath, filed on July 21, 2011, Gray County D.A. Lynn Switzer stated:
"...At least some of the evidence that Skinner seeks for testing still exists and is in my custody, such as Twila Busby's vaginal swabs and fingernail clippings. That evidence is either at GeneScreen or in the evidence locker at the Gray County Sheriff's Department. I have not sought expert opinion on that question..."
Ms. Switzer clearly confirms that the chain of custody she is responsible for has not been maintained and she also admits to be in possession of only two pieces of evidence. As for the rest of the evidence, she does not know where it is located or whether it still exists."
RELEASE FROM HANK SKINNER SUPPORTERS WEB-SITE; "JUSTICE4HANK."
--------------------------------------------------------------
PUBLISHER'S VIEW: (EDITORIAL); In a rational world that values both justice and science it would be inconceivable to think that Texas would execute Hank Skinner before conducting important DNA tests that bear directly on his guilt or innocence. However, to this Blog, past history suggests that the irrational may be the order of the day - even on matters involving life and death. For a start, this is the state where Governor Rick Perry allowed the execution of Cameron Todd Willingham to proceed - even though he had been presented with a report casting serious doubt on the arson science that had been used to convict him. Secondly, this is the state where the governor did not even try to disguise raw political manoeuvres aimed at castrating the Texas Forensic Science Commission so that it would be unable to expose the rot at the heart of Willingham's conviction. Thirdly, this is the state that has been so eager to embrace DNA technology that can convict someone - yet so reluctant to use the same technology to exonerate those who have been wrongfully convicted of the most serious crimes. Lastly, Texas has shown that it values procedural correctness (the filing of court applications on time) - over certainty and human life. Governor Perry could hold off the execution - and instruct his prosecutors to back off and expedite the tests (as he very much should) - but who can be confident that this will happen? The only hope is that Perry will postpone the execution for thirty days (even if it is out of pure political expedience) - as is his power - and that the Texas courts will come to their senses and order the tests to proceed. That failing, I wonder if the anger of Americans concerned over repeated injustices leading to loss of life and liberty in their criminal justice system will ever prompt them to occupy their courts.
HAROLD LEVY; PUBLISHER; THE CHARLES SMITH BLOG;
---------------------------------------------------------
BACKGROUND: "Hank Skinner faces execution for a 1993 murder he's always maintained he didn't commit. He wants the state to test whether his DNA matches evidence found at the crime scene, but prosecutors say the time to contest his conviction has come and gone......Reporter Brandi Grissom, author of the Tribune series on Hank Skinner, writes: "I interviewed Henry "Hank" Watkins Skinner, 47, at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice — death row — on January 20, 2010. Skinner was convicted in 1995 of murdering his girlfriends and her two sons; Skinner has always maintained that he's innocent and for 15 years has asked the state to release DNA evidence that he says will prove he was not the killer." Texas Tribune;
---------------------------------------------------------"HOUSTON, TEXAS, Nov. 6, 2011 – In less than two days, more than 129,000 people called on Texas Governor and presidential candidate Rick Perry to stay the execution and test the evidence in the murder case of Hank Skinner, who is set to be executed on November 9," the release published earlier today begins.
"On November 4, Justice4Hank, a coalition of family and supporters of Skinner, delivered 16,000 signatures (more than half of which stemming from Texans voters) to Gray County D.A. Lynn Switzer, urging her to reconsider her position in this case and to grant Mr. Skinner the DNA testing he has been seeking for a decade. There has been no reaction from Ms. Switzer's office" the release continues.
"In a declaration under oath, filed on July 21, 2011, Gray County D.A. Lynn Switzer stated: "...At least some of the evidence that Skinner seeks for testing still exists and is in my custody, such as Twila Busby's vaginal swabs and fingernail clippings. That evidence is either at GeneScreen or in the evidence locker at the Gray County Sheriff's Department. I have not sought expert opinion on that question..." Ms. Switzer clearly confirms that the chain of custody she is responsible for has not been maintained and she also admits to be in possession of only two pieces of evidence. As for the rest of the evidence, she does not know where it is located or whether it still exists. Less than 7 days later, on July 27, 2011, the sentencing judge, Judge Emmert, signed a new death warrant for November 9, 2011, although the courts had to be fully aware that Mr. Skinner's attorneys would file a new DNA motion as soon SB 122 became applicable. On November 2, without any explanation, Judge Emmert denied the new motion for DNA testing. This decision is currently on appeal with the Court of Criminal Appeals in Austin. Immediately after, more than 85,000 added their names on a new petition asking Governor Perry to withdraw the execution warrant and to grant DNA testing to Mr. Skinner. In May 2011, the Texas legislators approved new standards for crime labs, compensation for the exonerated and revised statutes for post-conviction DNA. Gov. Perry signed those bills into law to improve and scrutinize a criminal justice system in need of reform. Considering that DNA testing has exonerated 275 prisoners in the United-States since 1989, including 43 in Texas, the overwhelming vote, both in the House and the Senate, in favor of the revised post-conviction DNA statute certainly was a welcome addition to the ongoing reforms Gov. Perry is promoting. Governor Perry signed SB 122 into law on June 17, 2011. This bill is intended to ensure that if DNA evidence is available to prove someone's innocence, it can and will be tested. This revised post-conviction DNA law was authored and sponsored by legislators who strongly supported the bill for cases like Hank Skinner's who is set for execution on November 9, 2011. Senator Ellis, who authored the bill, stated in an interview this week that he does not understand how the court could continue to deny Mr. Skinner's request, which he said his recent legislation would allow. Gov. Perry, who has presided over 237 executions since taking office in 2001, must ensure that the criminal justice reforms he supports be implemented. In this respect, 17 former and current Texas elected officials as well as 27 exonerees have sent letters to Governor Perry to express their serious concerns about the lack of justice in Mr. Skinner's case. While Rick Perry campaigns for the GOP presidential nomination, Justice4Hank urges him to do the right thing for justice and for the truth in Texas, before it is too late.
Live signature totals from Justice4Hank's campaign: http://chn.ge/HankSkinner http://chn.ge/pbzhyZ
Timeline:
All legal documents quoted below are available in the "Legal Documents" section of the website at http://www.hankskinner.org March 7, 2011 - The U.S. Supreme Court rules in Mr. Skinner's favor by 6 votes to 3. April 4, 2011 - The U.S. Supreme Court lifts the stay and remands the case to the lower court. May 20, 2011 - The Texas House approves SB 122, legislation by Senator Rodney Ellis (D-Houston) to strengthen Texas' post-conviction DNA testing law. June 2, 2011 - Gray County D.A. Lynn Switzer, the defendant in the civil lawsuit, files a motion for summary judgment as well as a brief in support of her motion. June 17, 2011 - Governor Perry signs SB 122 into law. July 21, 2011 - Gray County D.A. Lynn Switzer files a declaration under oath. July 27, 2011 - Sentencing Judge Emmert issues a new death warrant for a November 9 execution. September 1, 2011 - SB 122 becomes effective. September 2, 2011 - Hank Skinner's attorneys file a motion for DNA testing under the revised statutes as well as a motion to withdraw the death warrant. November 2, 2011 - Judge Emmert, without any explanation, denies the new motion for DNA testing."
WEB http://www.hankskinner.org
The release can be found at:
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at:
http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith
Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:
http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html
Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog; hlevy15@gmail.com;