GIST: "Justice Robert Maranger, who presided over Diab's two-year extradition hearing, ruled last June that Diab should be committed for extradition on the basis of much-disputed French handwriting evidence — but said the evidence was so weak that the case likely would be thrown out if Diab was tried in Canada. Evidence in extradition cases has a lower legal threshold than in domestic criminal cases. Much of the evidence French prosecutors sent to Canada in the case, including intelligence reports, was withdrawn during the extradition hearing and Diab's palm impression and fingerprints were found not to match impressions found around the bomb scene. Three handwriting experts brought in by Diab's lawyer Donald Bayne all criticized the analysis produced by a French specialist, saying it was incompetent and not produced to international standards."
THE ENTIRE STORY CAN BE FOUND AT:
http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/11983THE ENTIRE STORY CAN BE FOUND AT:
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at:
http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith
Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:
http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html
Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog; hlevy15@gmail.com;
