Randox Testing Services Scandal: (Manchester): U.K. Forensics scandal in centre of storm reported by Daily Mail to have hit 10,000 cases... Paper alleges rogue scientists may have tampered with blood tests in suspect cases including murder and rape, experts re-examine blood tests that may have been doctored at Randox Testing Services in Manchester, full extent of scandal is far greater than 484 cases claimed by police in February, it could take up to five years for all of the falsified data to be sifted through."..." It can also be revealed today that Greater Manchester Police have interviewed a further five suspects in the case, in addition to the two Randox employees who were arrested earlier this year. An insider told this newspaper last night: ‘Of the 10,000 cases being looked at, 7,500 are drug-driving and will all be retested in 21 months. But the rest include crimes such as murder and rape which will take five years to retest as there are only 12 experts qualified nationally. It could mean that people are locked up unfairly.’ The scandal centres around the Manchester laboratory of Randox Testing Services, where scientists analysed samples of blood for traces of drugs on behalf of police forces across the country, as well as for family courts that decide adoption and custody cases. In January this year, Randox, part of a health giant based in Northern Ireland, spotted what it said was an anomaly in some of the results and called in police. It was suspected that disaffected workers had been falsifying critically important quality control data that verified the accuracy of the test results, rather than doctoring the samples themselves. The doctored test results might then make innocent people look like they had drugs in their system, potentially leading to them being wrongly convicted of serious crimes. Others may have unfairly lost their driving licences or even had children taken from them. Alternatively, guilty people may have walked free. Two Randox employees were questioned on suspicion of perverting the course of justice and still remain under investigation, while the company was stripped of its Home Office accreditation to carry out tests for police. At first, police chiefs said that only 484 positive tests had to be reviewed to see if the results should have been clean, but in May they admitted that 6,000 cases were being looked at again, and they could include cases of rape or murder. The investigation stretches back several years to also cover work carried out by the suspects before they joined Randox. Now, the number of positive samples being retested stands at more than 10,000, watchdog Dr Gillian Tully told experts at a recent meeting."

STORY: "Forensics scandal now hits 10,000 cases," by reporter Martin Beckford, published by The Mail on October 14, 2107.

SUB-HEADING: "Forensics scandal now hits TEN THOUSAND cases: Rogue scientists may have tampered with blood tests in suspect cases including murder and rape;  Experts re-examine blood tests that may have been doctored at Randox Testing Services in Manchester;  Full extent of scandal is far greater than 484 cases claimed by police in February;  It could take up to five years for all of the falsified data to be sifted through."

GIST: "Rogue scientists may have tampered with forensic evidence in more than 10,000 cases – raising fears that innocent people could languish in jail for up to another five years after being falsely convicted for serious crimes, including rape and murder. Experts are now painstakingly going back over the vast number of blood tests that it is feared have been doctored by employees at Randox Testing Services. The full extent of the scandal is vastly greater than the 484 cases originally claimed by police in February when The Mail on Sunday exclusively revealed how evidence had been manipulated.  Up to a quarter of the affected samples were used in trials for serious crimes such as rape and murder. Experts are going back over the vast number of blood tests it is feared have been doctored by employees at Randox Testing Services. Police investigations, trials and inquests, including the investigation into the death of former Premier League footballer Dalian Atkinson (above, forensics officers at the scene), have been delayed because critical evidence provided by Randox cannot be relied upon.  Because there are only a dozen experts in the country who are qualified to check the blood samples, it could take up to five years for all of the falsified data to be sifted through and for miscarriages of justice to be rectified by the courts. Already, important police investigations, trials and inquests, including the investigation into the death of former Premier League footballer Dalian Atkinson, have been delayed because critical evidence provided by Randox cannot be relied upon. Three policemen face an anxious wait to find out if they face criminal charges over the death of a former Premier League footballer, as a result of the Randox scandal. The West Mercia Police officers shot Dalian Atkinson with Taser stun guns outside his father’s home in Telford, Shropshire, in August 2016.  They have been interviewed under caution but the Independent Police Complaints Commission cannot yet decide whether to send a file to the Crown Prosecution Service because a toxicology report on Atkinson is still being worked on.  The original tests were done by Randox Testing Services and so cannot be relied upon. A pre-inquest review in September was told the retesting of toxicology samples taken from the former Aston Villa star would not be complete until this month. Avon & Somerset Police, which is organising the retesting, has been told the case is ‘urgent’. After the new results are obtained, a final post-mortem can be produced and the IPCC can then decide whether to send a file to the CPS for a charging decision to be made. It can also be revealed today that Greater Manchester Police have interviewed a further five suspects in the case, in addition to the two Randox employees who were arrested earlier this year. An insider told this newspaper last night: ‘Of the 10,000 cases being looked at, 7,500 are drug-driving and will all be retested in 21 months.  But the rest include crimes such as murder and rape which will take five years to retest as there are only 12 experts qualified nationally. It could mean that people are locked up unfairly.’ The scandal centres around the Manchester laboratory of Randox Testing Services, where scientists analysed samples of blood for traces of drugs on behalf of police forces across the country, as well as for family courts that decide adoption and custody cases. In January this year, Randox, part of a health giant based in Northern Ireland, spotted what it said was an anomaly in some of the results and called in police. It was suspected that disaffected workers had been falsifying critically important quality control data that verified the accuracy of the test results, rather than doctoring the samples themselves. The doctored test results might then make innocent people look like they had drugs in their system, potentially leading to them being wrongly convicted of serious crimes.  Others may have unfairly lost their driving licences or even had children taken from them. Alternatively, guilty people may have walked free. Two Randox employees were questioned on suspicion of perverting the course of justice and still remain under investigation, while the company was stripped of its Home Office accreditation to carry out tests for police. At first, police chiefs said that only 484 positive tests had to be reviewed to see if the results should have been clean, but in May they admitted that 6,000 cases were being looked at again, and they could include cases of rape or murder. The investigation stretches back several years to also cover work carried out by the suspects before they joined Randox. Now, the number of positive samples being retested stands at more than 10,000, watchdog Dr Gillian Tully told experts at a recent meeting.  She said: ‘Prioritisation was being given to those relating to live cases or where the individual in question was currently serving a custodial sentence. In addition, negative samples would also have to be retested.’ The watchdog added in an industry newsletter last month: ‘The most substantial impact thus far has been that all forensic toxicology testing undertaken by them during the affected period must be considered to be unreliable.’...Anita Stevenson went missing from her home in Birkenhead a year ago and her remains were found in woodland weeks later. Relatives of a tragic mother had to wait months to find out how she died while blood tests carried out by Randox were double-checked. Anita Stevenson went missing from her home in Birkenhead a year ago and her remains were found in woodland weeks later. Blood tests carried out by Randox Testing Services suggested she had died of a cocaine overdose but they had to be redone by another company after suspicions emerged in January that many of the toxicology results produced by the firm had been manipulated.  The inquest into the 39-year-old’s death had been due to take place in June but was put back until last week. Area coroner Anita Bhardwaj told a hearing in June that ‘an issue’ had arisen over the tests, explaining: ‘The samples will be retested across the board by a different company so there’s no doubt it’s been carried out appropriately.’ Dr Mark Piper, head of toxicology at RTS, said at the time of the adjourned hearing: ‘We regret the concerns that these developments will inevitably cause.’ Dr Tully also raised the possibility that the problem may spread wider than just Randox. She said: ‘The organisation concerned held accreditation to the appropriate quality standard, but the malpractice was not discovered by the usual quality checks.  'This raises a number of questions, including: a, whether or not malpractice is more widespread than at one organisation; and b, whether or not the quality standards need to be strengthened.’ But she went on: ‘No reasonable set of quality standards could guarantee to prevent determined malpractice by skilled but corrupt personnel and the inevitable cost of adding additional safeguards should be balanced against risk.’ Randox said last night it is paying for the retesting to be carried out in independent labs...Paul Green is alleged to have been racing in his car against motorcyclist Aiden Davies (above), who collided with a lamp-post in Runcorn in August 2015. A motorist's trial over a fatal crash was postponed at the last minute because of the huge backlog of Randox blood tests that must be double-checked. Jurors had been sworn in at Chester Crown Court in June to hear the case against Paul Green, who is accused of causing death by dangerous driving.  He is alleged to have been racing in his car against motorcyclist Aiden Davies, who collided with a lamp-post in Runcorn in August 2015. But just before the trial date, it emerged that Randox Testing Services had carried out the key analysis of the deceased’s blood to see if he had been drinking. The sample had come back clean, contradicting the defendant’s claim that he had seen Mr Davies drink alcohol before getting on his motorbike. An ‘urgent’ fresh test was ordered but the court heard that the lab in question had 1,000 other samples to get through. As a result, the case – due to last four days – has now been put back until February. A spokesman said: ‘When RTS identified that data manipulation was being carried out, it immediately alerted the relevant authorities. RTS continues to assist the police, Forensic Service Regulator and Home Office in the investigation, which now dates beyond RTS. ‘It is currently managing the process of retesting samples at appropriately accredited laboratories, as well as covering the associated costs.’ The National Police Chiefs Council, which is monitoring the effect of the scandal across the criminal justice system, said: ‘We are continuing to work with Forensic Services Regulator, Crown Prosecution Service and the Home Office to identify, and prioritise for retesting, forensic samples that may have been affected by data manipulation by two individuals who worked for RTS. We will be able to provide a full and accurate update to the public in the coming weeks.’ Greater Manchester Police confirmed its investigation has widened to include five new suspects. A spokesman said: ‘We are conducting a criminal investigation into forensic results issued by Randox Testing Services.  'Our investigation concerns the manipulation of quality control data around sample analysis. We do not have any information or evidence to suggest that samples themselves have been directly tampered with. ‘Randox Testing Services have provided forensic services to police forces, including GMP, for the past two years. ‘The organisation is being fully co-operative of the investigation, and brought the issue to GMP’s attention in the first instance.

‘Two men – a 47-year-old and a 31-year-old – have been arrested on suspicion of perverting the course of justice and released on bail until November pending further enquiries.  'The men were not arrested on site. Five further people – two women and three men – have been interviewed under caution in connection with the investigation.’ A spokesman for the Crown Prosecution Service said: ‘We continue to work with the Home Office, police and the Office of the Forensic Science Regulator to assess the impact of issues relating to Randox Testing Services. ‘As there is an ongoing police investigation into these issues, it would be inappropriate for us to comment in detail. ‘Our priority is to establish the impact of these issues on both completed and ongoing cases, in order to ensure that appropriate action is taken.’ Business had been booming at Randox Testing Services as a result of a Government crackdown on drug-driving. Scientists at its Manchester laboratory worked with the Home Office to develop sophisticated blood and urine tests needed to establish if motorists had been taking illegal substances such as cocaine and cannabis. A new law, introduced in March 2015, meant anyone who tested positive for one of 16 specified drugs could be prosecuted rather than police having to prove they were unfit to drive. Randox Testing Services (its Manchester lab, above) dismissed one employee and suspended another, and both were arrested at home and questioned on suspicion of perverting the course of justice RTS, part of Northern Ireland-based health giant Randox, was contracted by police forces to analyse samples taken from suspects by officers. Thousands of the tests were sent to the firm’s lab at the Hexagon Tower in Blackley. But in January this year, RTS began an internal investigation when bosses suspected a ‘rogue operator’ had been manipulating quality control data needed to double-check a test result. RTS dismissed one employee and suspended another, and both were arrested at home and questioned on suspicion of perverting the course of justice. All suspect tests had to be re-checked and RTS was stripped of its Home Office accreditation while investigations were carried out by the forensics watchdog as well as police. The criminal investigation has now widened to include five other people recently questioned under caution.

However, no one has yet worked out what the possible motivation could be. RTS described the events as ‘bizarre’ and said that it ‘truly regrets the fact a rogue operator or operators existed in RTS Manchester’."

The entire story can be found at:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4980962/Forensics-scandal-hits-10-000-cases.html

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.