Saturday, November 3, 2018

Back in action: Catch-up: Clemente Aguirre-Jarquin: Florida; Major Development: (From our 'when you think you've seen everything department'); State insists on proceeding with new trial - in face of exculpatory DNA evidence - even though the judge who originally sentenced Aguirre-Jarquin to death—has since come forward and voiced his opposition to the retrial, citing the new evidence that has surfaced since the original conviction..."On Monday morning, jury selection began in the double murder retrial of Clemente Aguirre-Jarquin, who was sentenced to death in 2006 for the murder of his two neighbors. After he was sent to death row, Aguirre-Jarquin’s new lawyers, with assistance from the Innocence Project, secured DNA evidence revealing that the daughter of one of the victims committed the crime. Her blood was found in multiple locations at the crime scene, and she explicitly confessed to the crime to independent witnesses on several occasions."



PUBLISHER'S NOTE: The trial is temporarily on hold  on while these developments are being sorted out.'
Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.
-----------------------------------------------------------

 PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "In the wake of the retrial, retired Seminole County Judge O.H. Eaton—the judge who originally sentenced Aguirre-Jarquin to death—has since come forward and voiced his opposition to the retrial, citing the new evidence that has surfaced since the original conviction. “The evidence I heard during the trial [in 2006] substantiated the verdict,” Eaton told Orlando Sentinel columnist Scott Maxwell. “The evidence I’ve heard now does not.” Added Eaton: “If I knew then what I know now, I probably would have ordered the jury’s verdict overturned.” Eaton said he “struggles to understand why the state is going after this case again.” He doesn’t believe there is sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction—and especially one that would result in a death sentence."

RELEASE: "Judge Who Once Sentenced Clemente Aguirre-Jarquin to Death Speaks Out Against His Retrial," by Innocence Project staff, published on October 17, 2018.

GIST: "On Monday morning, jury selection began in the double murder retrial of Clemente Aguirre-Jarquin, who was sentenced to death in 2006 for the murder of his two neighbors. After he was sent to death row, Aguirre-Jarquin’s new lawyers, with assistance from the Innocence Project, secured DNA evidence revealing that the daughter of one of the victims committed the crime. Her blood was found in multiple locations at the crime scene, and she explicitly confessed to the crime to independent witnesses on several occasions. In the wake of the retrial, retired Seminole County Judge O.H. Eaton—the judge who originally sentenced Aguirre-Jarquin to death—has since come forward and voiced his opposition to the retrial, citing the new evidence that has surfaced since the original conviction. “The evidence I heard during the trial [in 2006] substantiated the verdict,” Eaton told Orlando Sentinel columnist Scott Maxwell. “The evidence I’ve heard now does not.” Added Eaton: “If I knew then what I know now, I probably would have ordered the jury’s verdict overturned.” Eaton said he “struggles to understand why the state is going after this case again.” He doesn’t believe there is sufficient evidence to obtain a conviction—and especially one that would result in a death sentence. Eaton went so far as to describe Aguirre-Jarquin’s case as the “poster child for why the death penalty is flawed,” said Maxwell. When State Attorney Phil Archer was asked about why he was proceeding with the retrial, he said he has “sufficient evidence” to do so, noting one victim’s blood being on Aguirre-Jarquin’s clothing (which Aguirre-Jarquin explained came from rolling her over to check for a pulse) and Aguirre-Jarquin, who feared deportation, initially failing to tell police that he found the bodies on the night of the murders. In response to the multiple confessions to the murders made by the daughter of one of the victims, Archer said they lack credibility due to her “significant mental health issues.” Maxwell points out the inconsistency in Archer’s statement: “Her confessions shouldn’t be believed now…even though her testimony helped put him on death row before. That seems like flawed logic to me.” Even the Florida Supreme Court recognized this inconsistency. After reviewing the new evidence in the case, the Florida Supreme Court overturned Aguirre-Jarquin’s conviction in 2016, saying new evidence raised substantial doubts about Aguirre-Jarquin’s role in the crimes and would likely lead a jury to acquit him. But, despite this ruling by the Supreme Court, Eaton’s opposition and the new evidence that overwhelmingly shows that Aguirre-Jarquin did not commit the crime, the state is trying to, once again, convince a jury that Aguirre-Jarquin committed the murders and that he deserves to be put to death."

The entire release can be read at: 
https://www.innocenceproject.org/tag/clemente-aguirre/
--------------------------------------------------------

Read also the subsequent story at the link below:

STORY: "New statement casts doubt on key witness' alibi in death-penalty retrial of Clemente Aguirre-Jarquin," by reporter Michael Williams, published by The Orlando Sentinel on October 30, 2018.




GIST: "After Samantha Williams’ mother and grandmother were stabbed to death in their Altamonte Springs trailer in 2004, Williams’ then-boyfriend vouched for her alibi, saying he and Williams were both fast asleep at his home the night of the killings. The story by Williams’ boyfriend, Mark Van Sandt, was partially why authorities never considered her a suspect in the case. Her next-door neighbor, an immigrant prep cook named Clemente Aguirre-Jarquin, was arrested, convicted and sentenced to die for the murders of Cheryl Williams and Carol Bareis. In 2016, Aguirre-Jarquin’s conviction and sentence were overturned by the Florida Supreme Court after new evidence emerged, raising doubt to his role in the crime — including repeated confessions made by Williams and DNA evidence indicating her blood was at the scene. And on Monday — in the midst of jury selection for Aguirre-Jarquin’s new trial — his lawyers provided a statement from Van Sandt’s current wife claiming Van Sandt had told her Williams left his home at some point during the night of the slayings Van Sandt’s wife, Nicole Bouzigard, said in a sworn statement Van Sandt had told her Samantha Williams woke him up the night of the murders, saying she “had a bad feeling about her mother,” according to the affidavit. Van Sandt recalled offering Williams a ride, but she insisted on taking a taxi and told Van Sandt to wake up early the next morning to pick up a load of laundry from Williams’ home, he told Bouzigard, according to her statement. “Mark saw Samantha leave through the window of the bedroom where she and Mark had been sleeping that night,” Bouzigard said in the affidavit. Aguirre-Jarquin’s lawyers have long accused Williams of being the true killer. She has not been charged with a crime in connection to the slayings. Van Sandt discovered the bodies the next morning. “When [Bouzigard] told us, ‘Yeah, Mark saw Samantha crawl through his window on the night of the murder,’ I’d like to be able to tell the court we were shocked, but it’s only confirmed what we thought all along,” said Josh Dubin, one of Aguirre-Jarquin’s lawyers, after presenting the affidavit Monday. Despite Bouzigard’s statement, Todd Brown, a spokesman for State Attorney Phil Archer, said the prosecution of Aguirre-Jarquin “will continue.” He declined to comment further during the trial. “Doing so may adversely impact the victims we represent, or the defendant's right to a fair trial,” Brown said. Bouzigard said Van Sandt told her about the killings in October 2016, one month after the couple had met and around the same time Aguirre-Jarquin’s conviction was overturned by the state Supreme Court. A couple of months after the first conversation about the killings, Bouzigard said she asked Van Sandt to show her the Vagabond Way trailer where they took place. In front of that trailer, Bouzigard said Van Sandt told her that Williams had confessed to killing her mother and grandmother, the affidavit said. Initially, Van Sandt told Bouzigard that Samantha Williams had also been killed, she said. She would later find out that Williams was alive. “My memory of my conversations with Mark on these topics is clear,” Bouzigard said in the affidavit. “And it is especially clear about Samantha’s leaving through the bedroom window of his parents’ house during the night of June 16-17, 2004, because Mark said that to me repeatedly and consistently.” Aguirre-Jarquin’s lawyers found Bouzigard after reviewing more than 1,000 recorded phone calls Van Sandt made as an inmate at the Seminole County Jail. “He … alluded to something when he was talking with his wife that led us to believe he had told her something about Samantha Williams on the night of this crime that he wasn't going to talk about over the phone,” Dubin said in court Monday. Aguirre-Jarquin’s lawyers presented the affidavit to the State Attorney’s Office and Circuit Judge John Galluzzo late Monday afternoon. Assistant State Attorney Stewart Stone asked that he be able to speak with Bouzigard. She’s expected to appear for questioning Wednesday. Van Sandt had been in the Lake County jail on a drug charge, but was transferred to the Seminole County jail in preparation for Aguirre-Jarquin’s trial. He’s also expected to be questioned Wednesday. “This is a search for the truth — it always is.” Galluzzo said in court after reading the affidavit Monday. “And the obligation for both sides is to find that truth. And it may very well be that after this is over and done with, you all discover a different truth than what you’ve been following.”"
https://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/breaking-news/os-ne-clemente-aguirre-jarquin-samantha-williams-alibi-20181030-story.html

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog;