NOTA BENE: Check out the latest post on my weekly 'Selfless Warriors Blog' published earlier today at the link below. It is about Marlene Truscott's inspiring battle to clear her husband Steven's name...According to the IMDB (an online film database): "Marlene' (premiered on December 18 at the Whistler Film Festival) is a film inspired by Marlene Truscott, a housewife who fought to exonerate her husband from a crime he didn't commit. Marlene became involved in the fight for justice at a young age, when Steven was arrested at 14 and sentenced to be hung. When Steven was released from prison ten years later, she fell in love with him. Marlene's story is a story of hiding, living under an assumed name and protecting her children. He was free, but now she was in prison. Through it all Marlene was determined that Steven would get justice, that they would find light in the darkness, a darkness that buried the truth. Surrounded by boxes of files Marlene found a world of lies, cover-ups, and secrets. A very female story about an extraordinary woman, written and directed by women." 'Marlene' is based on the book, "Until you are dead: Steven Truscott's long ride into history," by Canadian investigative journalist Julian Sher.
https://selflesswarriors.blogspot.com
----------------------------------------------------------
Back to the Charles Smith Blog:
|
GIST: "Elijah McClain, a 23-year-old Black man who was killed by police in Aurora, Colorado in August of 2019, was pronounced brain dead immediately following an encounter with Aurora law enforcement. He died from a heart attack three days after being placed in a chokehold and then receiving a high dose of ketamine in order to sedate him. Police have justified their brutality against McClain by saying that McClain was in a state of “excited delirium” that warranted the lethal force used against him, CBS reported. Since “excited delirium” is becoming a constant wolf cry when cops are accused of brutality, let’s break down what the term means.
Firstly, if “excited delirium” sounds familiar, it could be because it was also used as a justification for the police killing of George Floyd. It’s definitely not because it’s a legitimate and well-researched medical condition. In fact, “excited delirium” is not recognized by the World Health Organization, the American Psychiatric Association, or the American Medical Association. In other words, you won’t find this term in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or indeed anywhere else in medical literature, CBS reported. Spoiler alert: This should clue you in that the science on this “condition” is flimsy as hell.
“Excited delirium,” is less a medical condition and more a police term, then. In fact, all the studies about “excited delirium” that I could find in my research for this piece specifically concerned the use of the term when used to describe someone who died or was injured in police custody. To be fair, some of the descriptions of delirium in the DSM could be interpreted as “excited” states, but that doesn’t mean that cops are qualified to diagnose them. But even if you’re willing to set aside the dubious delirium diagnosis, some experts are even skeptical about how law enforcement seems to be using the word “excited,” because there is no scientific consensus about what excited means.10
Ending Hair Discrimination with The CROWN
Loosely defining “excitement” gives law enforcement a lot of leeway. “The problem with the lacking criterion for an excited state is that it allows for room for law enforcement to create the excited state that they are then diagnosing as problematic,” says says Dulcinea Pitagora, New York City-based psychologist. In other words, cops may say that they killed a suspect because he was in a state of “excited delirium” and was therefore dangerous, but actually he could have been in an anxious or excited state because of his interaction with the cops.
“If the general public weren’t afraid of law enforcement due to excessive force, interactions with them may not incite an excited state that could be read as excited delirium,” says Pitagora. In other words, cops could be creating the state of mind in people that they are then using as a justification for using force against them.
This — and the fact that police involved in a tense situation will probably also be in a state of excitement — makes it extremely unlikely for law enforcement to accurately diagnose an alleged perpetrator, Pitagora says. “Because law enforcement aren’t trained to psychologically diagnose anyone, it’s impossible for them to know what sort of mental status they’re dealing with, therefore it doesn’t seem to be an appropriate or accurate way to justify using lethal force,” Pitagora explains."
The entire story can be read at:
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
