Saturday, August 7, 2021

Louise Woodward; Massachusetts: Shaken Baby Syndrome: Villain or victim? Bulletin: Her controversial trial is to be re-examined in a new three-part documentary titled 'Louise Woodward: Villain or Victim?' by Channel Four, Daily Mail Online (Reporter Jessica Green) reports..."During her trial Woodward’s expressionless demeanour led to vitriolic criticism about her supposed coldness and lack of emotion. And feelings about the case still run high in America; a decade after her case Woodward was dubbed ‘the most notorious criminal in Massachusetts’ by an American magazine - beating a drug dealer who had topped the FBI’s most wanted list. Woodward has always maintained her innocence, and her claims have been backed by various medical experts in recent years. However, her case saw Woodward in an all-or-nothing trial, where no charge lesser than second degree murder would be considered, according to the documentary makers."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY:  "With unprecedented access to both defence and prosecution lawyers, detectives, paramedics and journalists, Louise Woodward: Villain or Victim? will detail and re-examine the case, the trial and its conclusion which saw the judge throwing out the jury’s decision, reducing Woodward's murder conviction to involuntary manslaughter and releasing her from prison. Fatima Salaria, Managing Director of Naked, said: ‘The media circus around this story means it has remained in the public consciousness for over 20 years. 

 'With the opportunity to look back with fresh eyes alongside exclusive access to both sides of the story, this documentary offers a new perspective on the case.’ Daniel Fromm, Commissioning Editor for Factual Entertainment at Channel 4, said: ‘With privileged access to some of those close to the case, this three-part documentary boxset offers fascinating insights into a trial that gripped the public’s attention on both sides of the Atlantic.’ "


---------------------------------------------------------------------- 


STORY: "'Killer' nanny's Louise Woodward murder trial to be re-examined in new Channel 4 documentary," by Reporter Jessica Green, published by  Daily Mail Online on August 5, 2021.

SUB-HEADING: 'Killer' nanny's controversial murder trial to be re-examined: Infamous US case of Louise Woodward, the British teen jailed over death of 'shaken' baby in her care, is to be probed in new Channel 4 documentary.

KEY POINTSIn 1997, Louise Woodward was found guilty of killing eight-month-old Matthew:

  • Aged 19, she was working as an au pair for his family in Newton, Massachusetts 
  • The baby died of brain injuries just 10 weeks after Wirral student started the job
  • Now, the controversial trial is to be re-examined in a new three-part documentary titled Louise Woodward: Villain or Victim? by Channel 4 

It was a murder trial that made headlines around the world, after a British teenage nanny was jailed over the death of an American infant in her care.

In 1997, Louise Woodward, then 19, from Wirral, was found guilty by a jury of killing eight-month-old Matthew Eappen while working as an au pair for his family in Newton, Massachusetts.

The baby died of brain injuries just 10 weeks after she started the job, with prosecutors alleging Matthew had shown classic symptoms of shaken baby syndrome.


However, the defence team argued his death had been caused by an injury he sustained weeks before, and Woodward, who is now mother to her own young daughter and goes by Mrs Elkes after taking her husband's name, has always maintained her innocence.


She was initially found guilty of second-degree murder and given a life sentence but after an appeal, her conviction was reduced just 10 days later to involuntary manslaughter and she was released after serving 279 days in jail.


Now, the controversial trial is to be re-examined in a new three-part documentary titled Louise Woodward: Villain or Victim? by Channel 4, set to air later this year.



Woodward was 18-years-old when she travelled 3,100 miles to work as an au pair for an agency in Boston after finishing her A-levels in 1996 and wanting to take a gap year.

She was soon hired by Sunil and Deborah Eappen, both 30-year-old doctors, to take care of their young son Matthew.


However within two months, the concerned parents reportedly cautioned Woodward against her late nights staying out and drew up a list of expectations in January 1997 to ensure ‘the safety and well-being of our kids’, according to the Irish Times.


But on February 4, Woodward called an ambulance to the Eappens' home after Matthew stopped breathing and he was put on a life-support machine at Boston Children's Hospital. He died of a brain haemorrhage on February 10.


Woodward was arrested five days earlier, with police saying she admitted to having shaken Matthew and thrown him on a pile of towels - but she pleaded not guilty to battery of a child.


On March 5, a grand jury decided Woodward must face a murder charge, and in October that year, a jury finds her guilty of second-degree murder, with the British teenager collapsing into tears when the verdict is given.


She was jailed for 15 years, but released after just 279 days when she won an appeal to reduce her conviction to involuntary manslaughter.


During her trial Woodward’s expressionless demeanour led to vitriolic criticism about her supposed coldness and lack of emotion.


And feelings about the case still run high in America; a decade after her case Woodward was dubbed ‘the most notorious criminal in Massachusetts’ by an American magazine - beating a drug dealer who had topped the FBI’s most wanted list.


Woodward has always maintained her innocence, and her claims have been backed by various medical experts in recent years.


However, her case saw Woodward in an all-or-nothing trial, where no charge lesser than second degree murder would be considered, according to the documentary makers.


After a guilty verdict, justice protest rallies followed in both the UK and US, on separate sides of the argument. 


In recent years, Woodward has embraced family life after marrying her businessman husband Anthony Elkes in 2013 and now works as a dance teacher.


Before her child was born Woodward told The Daily Mail: 'I know there are some people waiting for me to have a baby so they can say nasty things.


'It upsets me but that is not going to stop me leading my life. I am innocent. I have done nothing wrong. I am entitled to enjoy my life. I am not going to apologise for being happy.'

After news of Woodward's pregnancy emerged, Matthew's aunt Mary Wong said the law graduate had a 'right to have a child', but suggested she take parenting classes and learn to control her temper.


She said: 'For the sake of her family I hope her parenting skills have come a long way. I think that she needs to have parenting skills and support for her baby. I hope no harm comes to the child.' 


With unprecedented access to both defence and prosecution lawyers, detectives, paramedics and journalists, Louise Woodward: Villain or Victim? will detail and re-examine the case, the trial and its conclusion which saw the judge throwing out the jury’s decision, reducing Woodward's murder conviction to involuntary manslaughter and releasing her from prison.

Fatima Salaria, Managing Director of Naked, said: ‘The media circus around this story means it has remained in the public consciousness for over 20 years. 


'With the opportunity to look back with fresh eyes alongside exclusive access to both sides of the story, this documentary offers a new perspective on the case.’


Daniel Fromm, Commissioning Editor for Factual Entertainment at Channel 4, said: ‘With privileged access to some of those close to the case, this three-part documentary boxset offers fascinating insights into a trial that gripped the public’s attention on both sides of the Atlantic.’  


The entire story can be read at: 


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9865037/Killer-nannys-Louise-Woodward-murder-trial-examined-new-Channel-4-documentary.html

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;