Friday, November 12, 2021

Jeremy Marquez: Wisconsin: Shaken baby syndrome case: Jury convicts him of a lesser/included offence: Prosecutions 'triad' arguments prevail - in spite of defence arguments that the infants injuries stemmed from an infection on the brain, possibly meningitis, The Kenosha News (reporter Dee Holzel) reports..."Because A.H. had the symptoms associated with abusive head trauma, Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin doctors notified authorities. Referred to as “the triad,” the three injuries most associated with abusive head trauma are swelling of the brain, subdural hematoma (blood building up on the surface of the brain), and bleeding in the retinas of the eyes. However, the defense argued there were other causes associated these symptoms, and the medical investigators did not go far enough in their testing to confirm that shaking may not have been what caused A.H.’s death. The first doctor to examine baby A.H. at Ascension Hospital found minimal subdural hematoma (blood building up on the surface of the brain) and little bleeding in the retinas of the eyes, the defense noted, meaning those symptoms probably occurred later."


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: "I will be following developments through sentencing and beyond, if this troublesome  verdict ((only three hours of deliberations after a two week trial - and goes to appeal.


Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.


---------------------------------------------------------


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Jason Sanders gave closing remarks for the defense by arguing it was a reasonable hypothesis that all of baby A.H.’s symptoms were just as likely caused by disease. He went over the evidence that showed baby A.H. had underlying health issues at the time of his death. The infant was born a little early and was in the 15th percentile on the growth chart at that time. He was born with a formula intolerance, had difficulty eating and dropped to the 6th percentile in size. In January 2019, he developed a respiratory virus and had a persistent cough. At the time of his death, he was in the 1 percentile on the growth chart.

 Sanders said the baby may have had a weakened immune system from his underlying health problems. He reminded the jury of the statement made by Marquez to the police in the hours after the baby stopped breathing in which he described his son’s symptoms. Marquez told police his son was fussy, hot and sweaty — so much so he had to have his clothes changed. The baby could not hold down formula, so his father had to change his clothes a second time. A.H. finally fell asleep in his swing but woke up choking; Marquez used the word “choking” more than a dozen times to police. He also said the baby was throwing up violently, so much so formula came gushing out of his nose. These are symptoms consistent with meningitis, an infection of the meninges. Sanders took the time to refute the framing of the case by ADA Donohoo, who told the jury the defendant admitted to shaking the baby, and therefore should be found guilty. However, Sanders argued that was not quite right. The taped interview showed Marquez saying the baby had already stopped breathing when he patted him on the back and chest — Marquez did not know infant CPR — before placing him on his knee and giving him a shake in an effort to revive him. Specialists hired by the defense showed slides to illustrate the infection in A.H.’s brain, which was not visible to the naked eye, but could be seen when magnified. The defense noted as soon as baby A.H. was transported to the hospital in Racine, he was put on antibiotics, which continued for four days, and therefore the infant might have had an infection at the time he stopped breathing."


----------------------------------------------------


STORY: "Local man found guilty of second degree reckless homicide in death of infant, " published by Kenosha News (Reporter Dee Hölzel) on November 11,  2021.


GIST: "The man charged in connection to the death of his infant son has been found guilty of a lesser-included charge.


Jeremy Marquez, 27, was convicted of second-degree reckless homicide on Thursday in Racine County Circuit Court.


Second-degree reckless homicide means the defendant acted recklessly and as a result caused the death of another person.


He had originally been charged with first-degree reckless homicide, which, in contrast, would have meant the defendant acted with utter disregard to human life.


The Racine County District Attorney’s Office alleged Marquez shook the baby, which caused internal damage to the brain that led to the death of A.H., the defendant’s son.


The Wisconsin Public Defender’s Office argued the internal injuries stemmed from an infection on the brain, possibly meningitis.


Marquez was also convicted of bail jumping and possession of marijuana as a second offense.


A jury deliberated for about three hours Thursday before returning with a verdict.


Case history:

Marquez is accused of shaking his son, causing damage to the baby’s brain that led to his death. He was caring for his son while the baby’s mother was out for the day on Feb. 22, 2019.


Shortly before 3 p.m., he called the baby’s mother to say the infant was not breathing. She called 911.


Officers from the Racine Police Department were dispatched to the duplex where the baby lived with his mother.


At the door, they were met by Marquez, who handed over A.H. The officers began infant CPR until paramedics arrived and took over.



Paramedics intubated the baby but, according to courtroom testimony, the tube was placed incorrectly, so oxygen was actually pushed into his stomach, not his lungs.


The infant underwent 45 minutes of CPR.


A.H. was taken first to Ascension All-Saints Hospital and then transferred to Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin in Wauwatosa.


Two tests confirm A.H. was brain-dead. He was kept alive on life support until his organs could be donated.


There is no debate among the many doctors who testified that A.H. died when the oxygen to his brain was hindered for enough time that cardiac arrest ensued.


Because A.H. had the symptoms associated with abusive head trauma, Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin doctors notified authorities.


Referred to as “the triad,” the three injuries most associated with abusive head trauma are swelling of the brain, subdural hematoma (blood building up on the surface of the brain), and bleeding in the retinas of the eyes.


However, the defense argued there were other causes associated these symptoms, and the medical investigators did not go far enough in their testing to confirm that shaking may not have been what caused A.H.’s death.


The first doctor to examine baby A.H. at Ascension Hospital found minimal subdural hematoma (blood building up on the surface of the brain) and little bleeding in the retinas of the eyes, the defense noted, meaning those symptoms probably occurred later.


Prosecution"

Diane Donohoo, an assistant district attorney, presented evidence the baby’s injuries stemmed from shaken baby syndrome, or as the doctors referred to it, abusive head trauma.


She reminded the jury of what the doctors from Wisconsin Children’s Hospital testified to: The pattern of retinal hemorrhaging, and the fact that it occurred in both eyes, was a strong indicator of abusive head trauma.


Further, the doctors are aware there could be more than one cause for the symptoms they were seeing, so they ran many tests to rule out any other cause.


The doctors drew blood and looked at the white blood count, which could increase if there is an infection, and ordered up an MRI and CT scan.


Donohoo argued the defendant displayed an utter disregard for human life.

“We all knew, and he knew, you don’t shake a baby,” she said. “There is no excuse.”


Of baby A.H. she said, “He deserved to be protected and taken care of — not shaken.”


Because marijuana was found in the house, and the house smelled of burnt marijuana, Donohoo alleged the defendant was stoned when he was supposed to be taking care of his infant son, 

which is a reckless act, as well.


Defense


Jason Sanders gave closing remarks for the defense by arguing it was a reasonable hypothesis that all of baby A.H.’s symptoms were just as likely caused by disease.


He went over the evidence that showed baby A.H. had underlying health issues at the time of his death.


The infant was born a little early and was in the 15th percentile on the growth chart at that time. He was born with a formula intolerance, had difficulty eating and dropped to the 6th percentile in size.


In January 2019, he developed a respiratory virus and had a persistent cough. At the time of his death, he was in the 1 percentile on the growth chart.



Sanders said the baby may have had a weakened immune system from his underlying health problems.


He reminded the jury of the statement made by Marquez to the police in the hours after the baby stopped breathing in which he described his son’s symptoms.


Marquez told police his son was fussy, hot and sweaty — so much so he had to have his clothes changed. The baby could not hold down formula, so his father had to change his clothes a second time.


A.H. finally fell asleep in his swing but woke up choking; Marquez used the word “choking” more than a dozen times to police. He also said the baby was throwing up violently, so much so formula came gushing out of his nose.


These are symptoms consistent with meningitis, an infection of the meninges.


Sanders took the time to refute the framing of the case by ADA Donohoo, who told the jury the defendant admitted to shaking the baby, and therefore should be found guilty.


However, Sanders argued that was not quite right. The taped interview showed Marquez saying the baby had already stopped breathing when he patted him on the back and chest — Marquez did not know infant CPR — before placing him on his knee and giving him a shake in an effort to revive him.


Specialists hired by the defense showed slides to illustrate the infection in A.H.’s brain, which was not visible to the naked eye, but could be seen when magnified.


The defense noted as soon as baby A.H. was transported to the hospital in Racine, he was put on antibiotics, which continued for four days, and therefore the infant might have had an infection at the time he stopped breathing."


Sentencing:


Marquez will be sentenced at 10 a.m. on Jan. 14, 2022.

He will remain in custody until that time without the ability to post bond.


The entire story can be read at:


article_d4be812e-36d1-55ff-af7b-3870bdc275f6.html

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: "It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.