Tuesday, November 2, 2021

Ken Middleton; Missouri: Having shouted out his innocence in the shooting death of his wife for thirty years - sentenced to life plus 200 years - he is seeking a hearing under a new law, The Associated Press (Reporter Margaret Stafford) reports. (September 26, 2021): "He has always maintained his innocence and turned down a plea deal in 2004 that could have led to his release. After a hearing in 2005 that included testimony and evidence, then-Jackson County Circuit Court Judge Edith Messina, who presided over the first trial, vacated Middleton’s 1991 conviction and ordered that he should have a new trial. But in 2006, a Missouri appeals court denied the new trial, ruling only on jurisdictional grounds, not the question of Middleton’s guilt. His requests for clemency or a pardon have been unsuccessful. Middleton’s legal options seemed to be exhausted until the Missouri Legislature passed a bill this year that allows local prosecutors to seek to have convictions set aside if there is evidence the person was innocent or that a constitutional error occurred in previous legal proceedings. “We can prove both, if given the opportunity,” Middleton’s attorney Kent Gipson said in an interview. Gipson sent a letter in June to Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker asking her to reconsider Middleton’s case and file a motion for a new hearing that might lead to a judge exonerating him. “His last and probably only hope to be exonerated rests under this law,” Gipson said. “The ball is in her court.”


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: How horrible it out be for a son to be caught in a nightmarish situation where his father has been charged with murdering his mother. That's where Cliff Middleton finds himself. Cliff contacted me a few weeks ago, providing me with some background on the case  which has convinced me that this is yet another Missouri case loaded with important forensic and quality of representation issues  that is well worth following.  He believes firmly in his father's innocence. So I will be keeping a close eye on the case and bringing developments to my reader's attention, wherever they may lead. Cliff writes on the 'Free Ken Middleton' Web site (link below): "Dear Reader: "My father Ken married my stepmother Kathy when I was five years old. I was twenty when this tragedy occurred. Kathy was a wonderful stepmother and I loved her very much. She was always very good to me. I have many memories of water-skiing at Bull Shoals Lake and weekends at the home place in Arkansas. She was loved and is still missed by my father and I, as well as our whole family. The tragic death of Kathy on Feb 12, 1990 devastated our whole family. But the injustice that followed has made us angry and bitter. If the evidence showed my father did this I would not have spent my entire adult life working to exonerate him. I do believe in justice and punishment if the evidence is proven. After serving 14 years of a life without parole sentence, my father was offered his freedom and immediate release IF he would plead no contest via an Alford Plea… and he refused! What guilty man would have turned down his freedom? Please take the time to contact Governor Blunt and request a full pardon for my father. Please help end this injustice."

http://www.free-kenmiddleton.com/cliffmiddleton/

---------------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE ONE OF THE DAY: "When Middleton was tried, prosecutors argued that he pushed his wife against a wall and shot her as they argued after she discovered he had an affair. Middleton said his wife grabbed a gun and walked away from him during the argument.  He said she was in another room when she apparently dropped the gun and grabbed it as it fell, accidentally pulling the trigger. Court records raise questions about the police investigation, with the crime scene disturbed and no physical evidence linking Ken Middleton to the shooting. For example, it appeared police altered a report on gunshot residue on Kathy Middleton to show testing was done only on one hand when it actually had been done on both. "

-----------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "Middleton’s attorneys at his original trial and initial appeal presented little or no evidence or witnesses in his defense.  (A current attorney) Gipson said evidence and testimony at the 2005 hearing was not presented in Middleton’s trial or first appeal and “I don’t know how something presented more than a decade after a conviction is not new evidence.”  Middleton’s supporters note Peters Baker is using the new law to seek an evidentiary hearing for Kevin Strickland, who she and others say was wrongfully convicted of a triple murder in Kansas City more than 40 years ago. She has cited new evidence that was not heard by a jury before Strickland was convicted.  “It’s very frustrating that she says it’s OK to argue that Strickland was wrongfully convicted and kept in prison on procedural grounds but then turn around and step over the fact that my dad’s been in prison all these years just on jurisdictional grounds,” Middleton’s son Cliff Middleton said."

-----------------------------------------------------------------

PHOTO CAPTION: "This undated image taken from video, provided by KCTV in Kansas City, Mo., shows Ken Middleton, a Missouri inmate who has insisted for 30 years that he didn’t kill his wife and is clinging to hope that Missouri Gov. Mike Parson will grant him clemency. Kathy Middleton died from a gunshot wound in her Blue Springs home on Feb. 20, 1990, and her husband, Ken, was sentenced to life and 200 years for first-degree murder. 

STORY: "Missouri man convicted of murder in wife's 1990 death seeks hearing under new law," by Associated Press Reporter Margaret Stafford, published on September 26, 2021.

GIST: "Supporters of a man who has been in prison for more than 30 years for killing his wife are upset that the Jackson County prosecutor hasn’t been willing to use a new law to give him another chance to prove his innocence, but her office says there is no new evidence to consider in the case.

 Ken Middleton, 77, was sentenced in 1991 to life plus 200 years in the shooting death of his wife, Kathy Middleton, at their Blue Springs home on Feb. 20, 1990. 

He has always maintained his innocence and turned down a plea deal in 2004 that could have led to his release. 

After a hearing in 2005 that included testimony and evidence, then-Jackson County Circuit Court Judge Edith Messina, who presided over the first trial, vacated Middleton’s 1991 conviction and ordered that he should have a new trial.

 But in 2006, a Missouri appeals court denied the new trial, ruling only on jurisdictional grounds, not the question of Middleton’s guilt.

 His requests for clemency or a pardon have been unsuccessful. 

Middleton’s legal options seemed to be exhausted until the Missouri Legislature passed a bill this year that allows local prosecutors to seek to have convictions set aside if there is evidence the person was innocent or that a constitutional error occurred in previous legal proceedings.

 “We can prove both, if given the opportunity,” Middleton’s attorney Kent Gipson said in an interview. Gipson sent a letter in June to Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker asking her to reconsider Middleton’s case and file a motion for a new hearing that might lead to a judge exonerating him. “His last and probably only hope to be exonerated rests under this law,” Gipson said. “The ball is in her court.” 

Peters Baker spokesman Mike Mansur said the office has reviewed the Middleton case several times and would consider it again if new evidence that was not known at trial was presented. Mansur said Messina’s ruling did not say Middleton was innocent and the prosecutor’s office does not consider evidence presented at the 2005 hearing to be new evidence. 

The Missouri Gun Violence Project The Missouri Gun Violence Project focuses on stories about the causes and possible solutions to gun violence.

When Middleton was tried, prosecutors argued that he pushed his wife against a wall and shot her as they argued after she discovered he had an affair. Middleton said his wife grabbed a gun and walked away from him during the argument. 

He said she was in another room when she apparently dropped the gun and grabbed it as it fell, accidentally pulling the trigger.

 Court records raise questions about the police investigation, with the crime scene disturbed and no physical evidence linking Ken Middleton to the shooting.

 For example, it appeared police altered a report on gunshot residue on Kathy Middleton to show testing was done only on one hand when it actually had been done on both. 

Middleton’s attorneys at his original trial and initial appeal presented little or no evidence or witnesses in his defense. 

Gipson said evidence and testimony at the 2005 hearing was not presented in Middleton’s trial or first appeal and “I don’t know how something presented more than a decade after a conviction is not new evidence.”

 Middleton’s supporters note Peters Baker is using the new law to seek an evidentiary hearing for Kevin Strickland, who she and others say was wrongfully convicted of a triple murder in Kansas City more than 40 years ago.

 She has cited new evidence that was not heard by a jury before Strickland was convicted. 

“It’s very frustrating that she says it’s OK to argue that Strickland was wrongfully convicted and kept in prison on procedural grounds but then turn around and step over the fact that my dad’s been in prison all these years just on jurisdictional grounds,” Middleton’s son Cliff Middleton said.

The entire story can be read at: 

https://www.kansascity.com/article254543952.html

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;

-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: "It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.