Thursday, December 2, 2021

Chester Weger: Illinois; Bulletin: On parole after serving almost 60 years in prison, forensic evidence from the "Starved Rock Murders" is to be shipped to a lab for analysis "next week."..."Forty-seven year old Frances Murphy, 50-year old Mildred Lindquist, and 50-year old Lillian Oetting were beaten to death. Weger is on parole after serving almost six decades in prison. He confessed to the crime all those years ago but recanted almost immediately and has said ever since that he was pressured into saying he did it. In late October, Judge Michael C. Jansz ruled that some of the evidence can be examined using techniques that didn’t exist when Weger was prosecuted. Weger’s attorneys believe some of the items that have been saved for 61 years avoided the contamination imposed on other evidence after the public was allowed to touch it. In hearings earlier this year, they and a forensic analyst said hair and fibers sealed onto microscope slides would have been protected."


STORY: "Starved Rock murders evidence to be shipped to lab for analysis next week," by Reporter Rick Koshko, published by WCMY on  November 30, 2021.

GIST: "The DNA analysis won’t be done by Christmas as defense attorney Celeste Stack had hoped, but evidence in the Starved Rock murders case should be undergoing examination at a lab in Virginia by then. Stack and the lawyers for the state plan to meet with LaSalle County Sheriff’s Department personnel next Thursday to package evidence. Hair, string, and cigarette butts will be analyzed in an attempt to find out if someone other than Chester Weger and the victims were there when three women were killed in St. Louis Canyon in 1960.

Forty-seven year old Frances Murphy, 50-year old Mildred Lindquist, and 50-year old Lillian Oetting were beaten to death. Weger is on parole after serving almost six decades in prison. He confessed to the crime all those years ago but recanted almost immediately and has said ever since that he was pressured into saying he did it.

In late October, Judge Michael C. Jansz ruled that some of the evidence can be examined using techniques that didn’t exist when Weger was prosecuted. Weger’s attorneys believe some of the items that have been saved for 61 years avoided the contamination imposed on other evidence after the public was allowed to touch it. In hearings earlier this year, they and a forensic analyst said hair and fibers sealed onto microscope slides would have been protected.

A different lawyer for Weger abandoned an attempt to get new analyses in 2004 while he was still in prison. She concluded that so many people had handled the evidence, identifying other DNA wouldn’t prove anything. Even earlier this year, lawyers acknowledged that Girl Scouts who tried on Weger’s jacket could have left as much DNA in it as Weger did.

The lawyers are to be in court again in February to update Judge Jansz on the testing’s progress."

The entire story can be read at:

https://1430wcmy.com/2021/11/30/starved-rock-murders-evidence-to-be-shipped-to-lab-for-analysis-next-week/
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: "It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.