Wednesday, December 8, 2021

Scott Watson: New Zealand: Development: Having served more than 23 years behind bars - and protested his innocence in the murders of Olivia Hope and Ben Smart - he has been denied parole for the fourth time. A two -day hearing on complex forensic evidence has been set for August 31, 2022..."Hope, 17, and Smart, 21, disappeared after attending a party at Furneaux Lodge in the Marlborough Sounds on New Year’s Day, 1998. Their bodies have never been found. Watson had been at the lodge after sailing there on his yacht, Blade. Two hairs, later said to be from Hope, were found on a blanket when his yacht was seized by police."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Last year, retired High Court Judge Sir Graham Panckhurst recommended Watson’s case be reconsidered by the Court of Appeal, which the justice minister and governor-general agreed to. Watson asked the Court of Appeal for bail so he could help his lawyers prepare his case for the court, but the application was refused in OctoberThe families of Hope and Smart strongly opposed his release on bail unless his conviction was overturned. Delays with reviews of the complex forensic evidence pushed Watson's appeal out to a two-day beginning August 31 next year."

--------------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: Convicted murderer Scott Watson denied parole for the fourth time, by Reporters Conan Young and Sam Sherwood, published by stuff.co on November 30, 2021.

PHOTO CAPTION: "Ben Smart and Olivia Hope were last seen on New Year’s Day 1998. Their bodies have never been found."


Scott Watson, the man convicted of murdering friends Olivia Hope and Ben Smart after a New Year's Eve party in the Marlborough Sounds, fears he will be stuck in prison forever.


On Tuesday, the now 50-year-old Watson was denied parole for the fourth time after the Parole Board said he remained an undue risk to the public.


Watson, who has served more than 23 years behind bars, has always maintained his innocence. This prevented the “core risk” at the heart of his offending from being addressed, board chairman Sir Ron Young said.


“You've killed two people in callous circumstances ... and that's never been explored,” he said.


Watson, wearing a prison-issued sweatshirt and mask, was notably nervous at the hearing on Tuesday. He had two supporters with him in the room, and another appearing remotely.


In his submissions, Watson's lawyer, Kerry Cook, pointed to a sound release plan with many “protective elements”, including his client having the “spotlight on him” because of the high-profile nature of the case.


Describing Watson’s family as being “pro-social”, Cook said they and Watson’s partner would play a central role in supporting him upon his release from prison.

Watson was described as mature and the “go-to person” in the prison workshop, where he had shown a good work ethic, Cook said.

Watson said he would behave in the same way outside prison that he had done inside it.

“I eat, sleep, work and repeat.”


Reading a submission he had prepared, Watson said he no longer posed an undue risk to the public. He listed skills he had learnt while behind bars, including painting, gib-stopping, carpentry and gaining a forklift licence.


One of his supporters who spoke to the board was a man who said he had a job for Watson upon his release.


Cook pointed to comments made by Justice Stephen Kos during Watson’s application for bail, where he described his risk of reoffending as “moderate”.


Board member Alan Hackney was concerned at Watson's high score in his psychopathy report.


Asked what he made of that, Watson replied that he thought he had done well in it and that he presented as being “normal”.


When asked how he had coped in prison for as long as he had given his belief that he was innocent, Watson said he experienced a range of emotions “waking up next to a brick wall every day”, but that he tried to stay positive.


“I've got to believe in the justice system – it's all you've got,” he said.

However, in relation to the psychologist's report he said he feared he would be “stuck here forever”.


Young said Watson’s risk remained high as long as the issue at the core of his violent offending remained unaddressed.


He noted that Watson’s family were also of the belief he had not committed any crime, and this reduced the benefit of the support they would offer him on the outside.


Watson replied that he wanted to look forward to the future and live his life with his partner and his family. “I want to move on with my life.”


Watson won't be able to put forward his case for release again for another two years. His next appearance is scheduled for October 2023.


Watson’s father, Chris Watson, told Stuff the family were “trapped in a time warp”.


“You’ve got to admit you’re guilty, or you don’t get out … It looks like he’s there forever.”


Chris Watson, who was at the hearing on Tuesday, said he was “pretty down and out” when the Parole Board announced its decision. 


His son appeared “disgusted” by the decision.


“We went in there with high hopes after the last one and good prison reports, good psychologist reports.”


The family's focus had now shifted to the appeal next year, he said.


“I think this appeal has merit. I think obviously it wouldn't have got past the judge that authorised it and for the minister of justice, so hopefully we’re going to win that.”


Watson's sister, Sandy Watson, said the board's decision was "disgusting".


“Why is Scott still in jail? Why are they keeping him there? It's pretty obvious he didn't commit any crimes – there's not even a murder weapon or a crime scene or anything. They just insist upon keeping him there.”


Watson said she had not felt “this sick” since when her brother was found guilty.


“It's 24 years ... When you continuously get s... poured over your head, over a long period of time you get dragged down, it's hard.”


She believed her brother would eventually be released from prison.


“I hold hope that one day someone in a position of authority is going to do the right thing.”


Hope, 17, and Smart, 21, disappeared after attending a party at Furneaux Lodge in the Marlborough Sounds on New Year’s Day, 1998. Their bodies have never been found.

Watson had been at the lodge after sailing there on his yacht, Blade.


Two hairs, later said to be from Hope, were found on a blanket when his yacht was seized by police.


Watson was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum non-parole period of 17 years. He has always maintained his innocence.


Last year, retired High Court Judge Sir Graham Panckhurst recommended Watson’s case be reconsidered by the Court of Appeal, which the justice minister and governor-general agreed to.


Watson asked the Court of Appeal for bail so he could help his lawyers prepare his case for the court, but the application was refused in October.


The families of Hope and Smart strongly opposed his release on bail unless his conviction was overturned.


Delays with reviews of the complex forensic evidence pushed Watson's appeal out to a two-day beginning August 31 next year."


The entire story can be read at: 

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/127131673/convicted-murderer-scott-watson-denied-parole-for-the-fourth-time

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;


FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: "It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.