Thursday, December 2, 2021

Shuttered Austin Police Forensic lab: Aftermath: The 2016 Texas Forensic Science Commission found a litany of "significant issues" with the handling and analysis of DNA at the lab. Major concern: Investigating cases potentially affected by improper testing and other problematic behaviour. The solution? 'Forensic Magazine' reports that the Department of Justice has awarded over $500,000 to retest cases in order to determine if any wrongful convictions were caused by the tainted lab..."After much discussion and budget reallocations, in February of this year, the Austin City Council voted to officially transfer the forensic laboratory out from under police control, finally turning it into the independent entity Texas officially began hoping for back in 2016. However, the county is still dealing with all fallout from the audit. In the five years since then, hundreds of closed criminal cases have been looked at, with hundreds to thousands more still pending. Some of the cases go as far back as 2000. Travis County officials said they anticipate 20 to 30 cases will require testing, while 175 will require reanalysis. “This grant will help our conviction integrity unit determine whether anyone is wrongfully imprisoned due to faulty DNA evidence. Our community must work to undo past wrongs, and we are honored to be a recipient of this grant,” said Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza."


GIST: "The Department of Justice has awarded over $573,637 in grant funding to Travis County (Texas) to help the district investigate cases potentially affected by improper testing and other problematic behavior by the Austin Police Department’s forensic laboratory in 2016. The grant covers DNA testing and re-testing, as well as salaries for two additional attorneys.

In 2016, an audit by the Texas Forensic Science Commission found significant issues with the handling and analysis of DNA evidence at the Austin Police Department Forensic Laboratory. Findings included the use of scientifically inappropriate stochastic threshold, use of validation studies that lacked data to support the use of that stochastic threshold, suspect-driven bias, and deviation from protocols and procedures by analysts. The audit revealed the issues were particularly extensive in the DNA section. In 2017, the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) took control of the lab, completing all DNA work and outsourcing the extensive backlog of rape kits.

After much discussion and budget reallocations, in February of this year, the Austin City Council voted to officially transfer the forensic laboratory out from under police control, finally turning it into the independent entity Texas officially began hoping for back in 2016.

However, the county is still dealing with all fallout from the audit. In the five years since then, hundreds of closed criminal cases have been looked at, with hundreds to thousands more still pending. Some of the cases go as far back as 2000.

Travis County officials said they anticipate 20 to 30 cases will require testing, while 175 will require reanalysis.

“This grant will help our conviction integrity unit determine whether anyone is wrongfully imprisoned due to faulty DNA evidence. Our community must work to undo past wrongs, and we are honored to be a recipient of this grant,” said Travis County District Attorney Jose Garza.

The grant provides $61,689 for the outsourcing of DNA testing, and $438,311 for the hiring of two full-time attorneys.

“With hundreds of requests in pending status, the attorneys will conduct a parallel review of cases to identify possible wrongful convictions, assist with fact investigations, and navigate DNA issues related to criminal investigations,” explains collateral from the Austin/Travis County APD DNA Review Project.

Travis County originally asked for only $500,000 is assistance, but the Bureau of Justice Assistance determined the county was eligible for an additional $73,637. The grant is valid for three years, after which time costs associated with the APD DNA Review Project fall to the county and the city of Austin. Officials could, however, seek additional funding from the Bureau of Justice Assistance and/or other grant opportunities."

 The entire story can be read at:

https://www.forensicmag.com/581505-DOJ-Awards-500-000-to-Retest-Evidence-from-Shuttered-Austin-Police-Forensic-Lab/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: "It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.