Thursday, January 13, 2022

Forensics reform: California: Important development reported by The Davis Vanguard: (If this recently proposed "End Wrongful Convictions Act,'" which would amend the standards used for evaluating expert testimony and forensics in court pre- and post-conviction, ultimately passes into law and is proclaimed.) The bill was introduced by Senator Scott Weiner (Democrat) who says: “Faulty forensic and scientific evidence, provided by expert witnesses, is the second most common reason that individuals are wrongfully convicted. Today, courts have discretion over which expert testimony is admissible. “Studies show that courts accept most forensic science and expert testimony without sufficient scrutiny, leaving significant room for imprecision and human error. This error leads to the high rate of wrongful convictions. Expert testimony that fails to rely on sound logic should not be considered in court."


QUOTE OF THE DAY: "Wiener noted, “A shocking number of innocent people are sitting in our jails and prisons right now because of faulty ‘expert’ witness testimony. That’s why I’m continuing to fight for stronger standards for expert witness testimony.” “The End Wrongful Convictions Act will get us closer to having a justice system that no longer relies on faulty or outdated science. No person should have to spend even one moment wrongfully incarcerated. That’s simply a miscarriage of justice. We can and will ensure that expert witness testimony actually relies on expertise,” Wiener argued."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Wiener’s office explained SB 467 “clarifies that the definition of false testimony includes opinions based on flawed scientific research or outdated technology that is now unreliable or moot, and  opinions about which a reasonable scientific dispute has emerged regarding its validity.” The measure would also clarify that “opinions that fail to use valid methodology, research, peer-reviewed studies, or scientifically sound data do not satisfy the requirements for admissible testimony.” Those wrongfully convicted based on “unreliable” expert testimony could, under AB 467, seek post-conviction relief – this provision will help exonerate innocent people across California, claimed Wiener."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMENTARY: 'End Wrongful Convictions Act' Introduced at Capitol, Could Help 'Exonerate Innocent People Across CA,' Predicts Lawmakerm' published by The  Davis Vanguard (staff), on January 4, 2022.

 GIST: "A new criminal justice reform bill announced Monday by Sen. Scott Wiener (D-SF) would amend the standards used for evaluating expert testimony and forensics in court pre- and post-conviction –and could lead to exonerations across the state, the lawmaker predicted.

Wiener said, “Faulty forensic and scientific evidence, provided by expert witnesses, is the second most common reason that individuals are wrongfully convicted. Today, courts have discretion over which expert testimony is admissible.

“Studies show that courts accept most forensic science and expert testimony without sufficient scrutiny, leaving significant room for imprecision and human error. This error leads to the high rate of wrongful convictions. Expert testimony that fails to rely on sound logic should not be considered in court.

Wiener’s office explained SB 467 “clarifies that the definition of false testimony includes opinions based on flawed scientific research or outdated technology that is now unreliable or moot, and 

opinions about which a reasonable scientific dispute has emerged regarding its validity.”

The measure would also clarify that “opinions that fail to use valid methodology, research, peer-reviewed studies, or scientifically sound data do not satisfy the requirements for admissible testimony.”

Those wrongfully convicted based on “unreliable” expert testimony could, under AB 467, seek post-conviction relief – this provision will help exonerate innocent people across California, claimed Wiener.

Recent studies from the National Academy of Science (NAS) and cognitive neuroscientist Dr. Itiel Dror have proven that fingerprint analysis, often part of expert witness testimony, is highly unreliable and subject to cognitive bias, said the author. 

The measure uses the NAS to evaluate the so-called “CSI effect,” where jurors lean towards “unrealistic and preconceived notions about the availability and precision of forensic evidence in criminal trials” based on portrayals of expert witnesses in popular culture.

Wiener noted, “A shocking number of innocent people are sitting in our jails and prisons right now because of faulty ‘expert’ witness testimony. That’s why I’m continuing to fight for stronger standards for expert witness testimony.”

“The End Wrongful Convictions Act will get us closer to having a justice system that no longer relies on faulty or outdated science. No person should have to spend even one moment wrongfully incarcerated. That’s simply a miscarriage of justice. We can and will ensure that expert witness testimony actually relies on expertise,” Wiener argued."

Th entire story can be read at:


https://www.davisvanguard.org/2022/01/end-wrongful-convictions-act-introduced-


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;



SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:



FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: "It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------