Thursday, September 15, 2022

Adnan Syed: Maryland: Prof. Jeff Kukucka, a specialist in wrongful convictions attributes prosecutor's move to grant Syed a new trial and release him to progress in science over the past twenty years, noting that, "We know a lot more know about the flaws of eyewitness memory, the shortcomings of forensics science than we did back in the late 90's,” 2 abc Baltimore (Reporter Ashley McDowell), reports..."Prosecutors are stating that Syed’s conviction was based on one witness's unreliable testimony along with misleading forensic science. They are now questioning unreliable cell phone tower data and pointing toward two other suspects who they say had motive, one in which threatened to make the victim disappear, material that was never disclosed during the trial. "A Brady violation basically just means that the prosecution in the case failed to turn over relevant information to the defense so the defense did not have that information available to them," said Kukucka. Doctor Kukucka says these are some of the most common factors found in wrongful conviction cases and when all three happen at the same time it brings reason to doubt the conviction."


QUOTE OF THE DAY: "Doctor Kukucka says these are some of the most common factors found in wrongful conviction cases and when all three happen at the same time it brings reason to doubt the conviction. "It really feels like the perfect storm for a wrongful conviction, you have a prosecutorial misconduct in the form of a Brady violation, you have unreliable witness testimony, and you also have flawed or misleading evidence," said Kukucka."

--------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "'You have flawed evidence': Prosecutors request new trial in the Adnan Syed case," by ReporterAshley McDowell, published by 2abc Baltimore, on September 14, 2022. 

GIST: "Baltimore City State's Attorney has filed a motion to vacate the conviction for Adnan Syed, a man who was found guilty for the murder of his ex-girlfriend Hae Min Lee back in 1999.


Court documents state Lee was last seen at Woodlawn High School in January, weeks later her body was discovered buried in Leakin Park. Her cause of death was found to be strangulation.


Syed was sentenced to life in prison, but questions were raised in the case about some of the evidence used, after national recognition from the podcast "Serial" in 2014.


Now, after a year long investigation, prosecutors say new evidence is being presented and they are calling for a new trial.


"It's not every day that the prosecutors office is the one that files the motion in the interest of justice and I tip my hat to them for pursuing justice rather for pursuing a conviction here," said Dr. Jeff Kukucka, Professor of Psychology at Towson University.


Doctor Kukucka is a professor of psychology at Towson University, specializing in the study of wrongful convictions.


He says science has progressed significantly in the last 20 years.

"We know a lot more know about the flaws of eyewitness memory, the shortcomings of forensics science than we did back in the late 90's,” said Kukuka.


Syed was 17-years-old when the murder occurred.


Prosecutors are stating that Syed’s conviction was based on one witness's unreliable testimony along with misleading forensic science.


They are now questioning unreliable cell phone tower data and pointing toward two other suspects who they say had motive, one in which threatened to make the victim disappear, material that was never disclosed during the trial.


"A Brady violation basically just means that the prosecution in the case failed to turn over relevant information to the defense so the defense did not have that information available to them," said Kukucka.


Doctor Kukucka says these are some of the most common factors found in wrongful conviction cases and when all three happen at the same time it brings reason to doubt the conviction.


"It really feels like the perfect storm for a wrongful conviction, you have a prosecutorial misconduct in the form of a Brady violation, you have unreliable witness testimony, and you also have flawed or misleading evidence," said Kukucka.


Prosecutors say they are not stating Syed is innocent, he just deserves a fair trial.


Syed is still claiming his innocence.


Back in March, Lee's clothing was tested for “touch DNA” which was unavailable at the time of the trial. No useful results were found.


More samples are still being reviewed."


The entire story can be read at:


https://www.wmar2news.com/news/local-news/you-have-flawed-evidence-prosecutors-request-new-trial-in-adnan-syed-murder-case


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue/resurce. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;



SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:




FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;