Friday, April 19, 2024

The West Memphis Three: Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin, and Jessie Misskelley: Arkansas: Major (Welcome) Development: Innocence Project reports that yesterday (April 19, 2024), more than 30 years after their wrongful convictions, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled, in a 4-3 opinion, that Damien Echols is entitled to petition an Arkansas court for new DNA testing on crime-scene evidence that could clear his name and that of his co-defendants - noting that the ruling not only opens up the door for the West Memphis Three to identify the true perpetrator in their case, but hopefully will also help countless other people who have been wrongly convicted in Arkansas seek justice.

-------------------------------------------------------------

MESSAGE FROM:  THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: 

Learn more about yesterday's ruling and Damien, Jessie, and Jason's case — and then share the news of the DNA decision with your friends and family on social media.

---------------------------------------------------------------

RELEASE: 'Breaking news in the West Memphis Three case.' The Innocence Project: April 19, 2024.

GIST: "In 1993, teenagers Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin, and Jessie Misskelley were wrongly arrested for the murders of three eight-year-old boys in West Memphis, Arkansas — and became known as the West Memphis Three. Although no physical evidence tied them to the crimes, all three teens were convicted and ended up spending 18 years behind bars for something they didn't do.

But yesterday, more than 30 years after their wrongful convictions, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled, in a 4-3 opinion, that Damien Echols is entitled to petition an Arkansas court for new DNA testing on crime-scene evidence that could clear his name and that of his co-defendants.

The Arkansas Supreme Court ruling not only opens up the door for the West Memphis Three to identify the true perpetrator in their case, but it hopefully will also help countless other people who have been wrongly convicted in Arkansas seek justice. Last June, the Innocence Project filed an amicus brief to the Court, supporting Damien's appeal for new DNA testing based on our decades of experience using advancements in DNA technology to establish innocence. This brief emphasized that such testing is critical even after a wrongly convicted person has been released from prison, given the collateral consequences of criminal convictions can significantly restrict a person's opportunities and it should never be too late to get to the truth.

Last June, the Innocence Project filed an amicus brief to the Court, supporting Damien's appeal for new DNA testing based on our decades of experience using advancements in DNA technology to establish innocence. This brief emphasized that such testing is critical even after a wrongly convicted person has been released from prison, given the collateral consequences of criminal convictions can significantly restrict a person's opportunities and it should never be too late to get to the truth.

A Crittenden County judge had erroneously denied Damien's request for new DNA testing because he is no longer in prison — but Arkansas' DNA access statute does not limit access to post-conviction DNA testing to only those who are incarcerated. 

The West Memphis Three deserve to be officially cleared of this crime. Yesterday's ruling brings justice one step closer for the West Memphis Three, and for many more wrongly convicted people seeking DNA testing in Arkansas."

——————————————————————————————

Journalist Pamela Colloff: (An astute commentator on America's criminal justice system) on 'X'..."The only reason that advanced DNA testing will *finally* be performed in this case is because one of the men wrongfully convicted of the murders pushed for it. The victims were killed 31 years ago. As recently as two years ago, a judge denied the testing.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:


https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/120008354894645705/4704913685758792985


---------------------------------------------------------------


FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."

Lawyer Radha Natarajan:

Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;


—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!

Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

————————————————————————————


YET ANOTHER FINAL WORD:


David Hammond, one of Broadwater's attorneys who sought his exoneration, told the Syracuse Post-Standard, "Sprinkle some junk science onto a faulty identification, and it's the perfect recipe for a wrongful conviction.


https://deadline.com/2021/11/alice-sebold-lucky-rape-conviction-overturned-anthony-broadwater-12348801

————————————————————————————————