Tuesday, August 20, 2024

Pune Porsche Crash: Pune, India: Tampering with evidence: Bulletin: An official 'chargesheet' against seven accused asserts that, "Doctors with Sassoon General Hospital, who are now behind bars for swapping the blood sample of the minor accused in the Pune Porsche Crash case, had swapped the blood samples of two of his friends who were in the car at the time of the accident… Police said that when the blood samples were swapped some policemen were also present."


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: Since I began  publishing this Blog there have been dozens, if not hundreds of posts involving tampering with physical evidence by individuals - and most often, by police, crime lab personnel and other public servants. So many, in fact, that I have concluded that tampering of physical evidence  occurs much more often than I imagined. So much more in fact that I have decided to pay considerably more attention to them in this Blog, as with today's post containing serious allegations of tampering made agains an ex-senior  Deputy Inspector, then commanding officer. Indeed, one of the most serious set of allegations over the years, if not the most serious I have come upon relates to disgraced  former doctor Charles Smith, the namesake of this Blog, who testified  that during an autopsy of a 2 and a half year-old baby,  he had  pocketed what appeared to be  a dark, curly  male-type pubic hair which he had found in the baby's vagina -   rather than handing it over to the police officer who was present so that it could be tested. This conduct prejudiced a police murder investigation and played a role in the wrongful conviction of the bathe baby's mother. (The Brenda Waudby case);    WIKIPEDIA ENTRY: "Tampering with evidence, or evidence tampering, is an act in which a person alters, conceals, falsifies, or destroys evidence w ith the intent to interfere with an investigation (usually) by a law-enforcement, governmental, or regulatory authority.[1] It is a criminal offense in many jurisdictions.[2] Tampering with evidence is closely related to the legal issue of spoliation of evidence, which is usually the civil law or due processversion of the same concept (but may itself be a crime). Tampering with evidence is also closely related to obstruction of justice and perverting the course of justice, and these two kinds of crimes are often charged together. The goal of tampering with evidence is usually to cover up a crime or with intent to injure the accused person."

----------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "The investigation led to the arrest of seven individuals, including the minor’s parents—Dr. Ajay Taware and Dr. Shrihari Harnol—along with Atul Ghatkamble, Ashpak Makandar, and Amar Gaikwad. In the 900 page chargesheet, the investigation team has said that accused Dr Halnor had swapped the blood samples of two friends of the minor who were present in the car during the accident with that of others to prevent detection of alcohol in their bloodstream. “The swapping was done on Dr Taware’s order, with the help of a female junior doctor. At this time, some policemen were even present in CMO’s office,” claims the chargesheet. The chargesheet comprises statements of around 50 witnesses, FSL reports and other investigation papers."

---------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Docs swapped blood samples of 2 friends of the minor to prevent detection of alcohol: Chargesheet," published by Express News Service,  

SUB-HEADING: "On July 26, Pune city police filed the chargesheet in the Porsche car accident case against seven accused persons, including the parents of the minor boy.


PHOTO CAPTION: "Police said that when the blood samples were swapped some policemen were also present. 


GIST: "Doctors with Sassoon General Hospital, who are now behind bars for swapping the blood sample of the minor accused in the Pune Porsche Crash case, had swapped the blood samples of two of his friends who were in the car at the time of the accident, Pune Police have said, in the chargesheet submitted to the court against seven accused.


Police said that when the blood samples were swapped some policemen were also present.


On July 26, Pune city police filed the chargesheet in the Porsche car accident case against seven accused persons, including the parents of the minor boy.

The case


On May 19, 2024, at around 2:30 a.m., IT engineers Aneesh Awadhiya and Ashwini Koshta, both 24 and from Madhya Pradesh, were tragically killed when their motorcycle was struck by a speeding Porsche driven by a 17-year-old boy who was intoxicated. 


The accident occurred at the Kalyani Nagar junction in Pune. An FIR was filed against the minor driver at the Yerwada police station, citing multiple charges under the Indian Penal Code and the Motor Vehicle Act.


Docs arrested


The investigation led to the arrest of seven individuals, including the minor’s parents—Dr. Ajay Taware and Dr. Shrihari Harnol—along with Atul Ghatkamble, Ashpak Makandar, and Amar Gaikwad.


In the 900 page chargesheet, the investigation team has said that accused Dr Halnor had swapped the blood samples of two friends of the minor who were present in the car during the accident with that of others to prevent detection of alcohol in their bloodstream.


“The swapping was done on Dr Taware’s order, with the help of a female junior doctor. At this time, some policemen were even present in CMO’s office,” claims the chargesheet.


 The chargesheet comprises statements of around 50 witnesses, FSL reports and other investigation papers.


Evidence

The police could confirm the ‘swapping of blood’ charge as they had taken a second blood sample of the minor, which was sent to another government-run hospital in Aundh for DNA sampling. 


The earlier blood sample did not match the minor’s, while his second sample matched. A subsequent DNA analysis revealed that the original sample belonged to the minor’s mother. 

The evidence collected by the police in this regard is a part of the chargesheet, said police sources."


The entire story can be read at: 

https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/pune/docs-swapped-blood-samples-friends-minor-to-prevent-detection-alcohol-chargesheet-9493027/#:~:text=The%20case,Kalyani%20Nagar%20junction%20in%20Pune.

PUBLISHER'S NOTE:  I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

  • SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:

    https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/120008354894645705/4704913685758792985

    ———————————————————————————————

    FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
    Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
    Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;

    —————————————————————————————————
    FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!


    Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------