PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Historically, Oklahoma County judges have almost never let a defendant out of jail while awaiting trial in a murder case. Mai wrote that in granting bail, she was following a clear mandate in the Oklahoma Constitution and a 1998 Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals decision. She wrote she could only deny Glossip bail if there was clear and convincing evidence that "proof of guilt is evident, or the presumption thereof is great." She pointed in her order to issues with the key witness against Glossip."
----------------------------------------------
PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "Justin Sneed, a motel maintenance man, confessed to killing Van Treese with a baseball bat in the motel room. He said Glossip pressured him into doing it and offered him $10,000 as payment. Sneed was the key witness against Glossip at the first two trials and is expected to testify again at the third trial. Glossip's attorneys claim Sneed actually killed the motel owner during a botched robbery for drug money. They claim he incriminated Glossip to avoid getting the death penalty himself and later considered recanting his testimony."
----------------------------------------------
PASSAGE THREE OF THE DAY: "Judge Mai noted in her order that the Court of Criminal Appeals in 2001 described the evidence at the first trial, corroborating Sneed's testimony as "extremely weak." She noted the Court of Criminal Appeals was closely divided about the corroborating evidence in a 2007 opinion upholding his second conviction. She also noted that the U.S. Supreme Court determined last year that Sneed gave false testimony about why he was prescribed lithium after his arrest and that prosecutors did not correct it. She wrote that the Supreme Court found that "had the prosecution corrected Sneed on the stand, his credibility plainly would have suffered." Finally, she pointed out that Drummond himself told the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board in a 2023 letter that "the record ... does not support that he is guilty of first degree murder beyond a reasonable doubt."
--------------------------------------------
STORY: "Former Oklahoma death row inmate Richard Glossip goes free on $500k bond," by Staff Writer Nolan Clay, published by The Oklahoman, on May 14, 2025.
GIST: Richard Glossip was released from jail Thursday, May 14, on a $500,000 bond, a major victory for the former death row inmate who has come so close to execution that he has had three last meals.
Glossip, 63, is awaiting his third trial in his 1997 murder-for-hire case.
He walked out the front door of the Oklahoma County jail, holding hands with his wife, Lea Glossip, as a stiff Oklahoma breeze whipped his hair. "I'm just thankful for my wife and my attorneys," he told reporters. "I'm just happy."
His release came hours after Oklahoma County District Judge Natalie Mai set bail in a 13-page order that pointed to issues with the key witness against him.
"It is the bedrock principle of Oklahoma law that bail is not used as a form of punishment," the judge wrote. "Rather, bail is simply the means to ensure that a defendant will appear to face the charges pending against him."
Glossip had been expected to be able to post bond because he has had support both nationally and internationally, including from celebrities like Kim Kardashian. His financial status has not been disclosed, but eight attorneys appeared on his behalf at a hearing in April.
Glossip has always maintained he is innocent of murder in the 1997 beating death of his boss at an Oklahoma City motel.
His lead attorney, Don Knight, said Glossip "now has the chance to taste freedom while his defense team continues to pursue justice on his behalf."
The attorney said the judge, in setting bail, "rejected the State’s claim that there is a strong case for guilt."
Glossip is out of custody for the first time since January 1997. Much of his time locked up has been at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester. He has been held in the Oklahoma County jail for more than a year.
The judge's order was filed around 10 a.m. Thursday. Glossip was released from jail at 3:36 p.m. He walked out the jail's front door after 5 p.m. after an issue with his ankle monitor was addressed.
His attorneys had asked for a fair bond and said he would live in Oklahoma County with his wife. Prosecutors with the attorney general's office had asked the judge to deny bond.
Glossip and his wife wed on March 29, 2022, while he was confined at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary.
The judge ordered Glossip to reside only at the marital home, wear an ankle monitor, observe a nightly curfew and not travel outside the state.
She also ordered him not to use any alcohol, illegal drugs or marijuana.
Historically, Oklahoma County judges have almost never let a defendant out of jail while awaiting trial in a murder case.
Mai wrote that in granting bail, she was following a clear mandate in the Oklahoma Constitution and a 1998 Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals decision.
She wrote she could only deny Glossip bail if there was clear and convincing evidence that "proof of guilt is evident, or the presumption thereof is great." She pointed in her order to issues with the key witness against Glossip.
Prosecutors said they remain focused on retrying the case.
"Ultimately, the question of the defendant's guilt or innocence will be decided by a jury of Oklahoma citizens − not a judge," Attorney General Gentner Drummond's press secretary, Leslie Berger, said.
For years, Glossip was the state's highest-profile death row inmate because of the celebrity support for his innocence claim, his close calls and a 2017 documentary about his case.
Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed his 2004 murder conviction on prosecutorial misconduct grounds.
In an unusual move, Drummond joined Glossip's attorneys in asking the high court for that relief.
In June, Drummond said Glossip will be prosecuted again for murder. However, he said the death penalty will no longer be sought.
In July, his original judge for the third trial denied Glossip bond.
A month later, District Judge Heather Coyle stepped down from the case after defense attorneys raised concerns about her. Mai took over the case in December after five other Oklahoma County district judges also recused.
In April, Mai rejected Glossip's request to enforce a "plea deal" that might have resulted in his release.
Drummond in 2023 had discussions with Knight about a deal. The AG claimed the deal was never finalized and is now off.
The judge agreed the deal was not complete, in part because the murder victim's family had not been consulted about it.
Had the deal gone through, Glossip would have been sentenced to 45 years in prison after pleading guilty to accessory after the fact to first-degree murder. His attorneys believed he would have been released immediately under credits for time served.
Background of Richard Glossip's case
Glossip is accused of having his boss, Barry Van Treese, an Oklahoma City motel owner, killed in 1997 to keep from being fired for embezzlement. Glossip was the motel manager.
Van Treese was found beaten to death in Room 102 of the Best Budget Inn on Jan. 7, 1997. The victim was 54 and lived in Lawton.
Justin Sneed, a motel maintenance man, confessed to killing Van Treese with a baseball bat in the motel room. He said Glossip pressured him into doing it and offered him $10,000 as payment. Sneed was the key witness against Glossip at the first two trials and is expected to testify again at the third trial.
Glossip's attorneys claim Sneed actually killed the motel owner during a botched robbery for drug money. They claim he incriminated Glossip to avoid getting the death penalty himself and later considered recanting his testimony.
Glossip was convicted and sentenced to death the first time in 1998. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals threw out that conviction in 2001 because of issues with his defense attorney. He was convicted and sentenced to death the second time at a 2004 retrial.
Judge Mai noted in her order that the Court of Criminal Appeals in 2001 described the evidence at the first trial, corroborating Sneed's testimony as "extremely weak."
She noted the Court of Criminal Appeals was closely divided about the corroborating evidence in a 2007 opinion upholding his second conviction.
She also noted that the U.S. Supreme Court determined last year that Sneed gave false testimony about why he was prescribed lithium after his arrest and that prosecutors did not correct it.
She wrote that the Supreme Court found that "had the prosecution corrected Sneed on the stand, his credibility plainly would have suffered."
Finally, she pointed out that Drummond himself told the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board in a 2023 letter that "the record ... does not support that he is guilty of first degree murder beyond a reasonable doubt."
Glossip came the closest to being executed on Sept. 30, 2015. He was three hours away from execution when a doctor realized a pharmacist had supplied the wrong drug for the lethal injection. The execution ended up being called off.
The mistake contributed to a hiatus in executions in Oklahoma that lasted years.
Near the end of her order, Mai wrote, "The Court hopes that a new trial, free of error, will provide all interested parties, and the citizens of Oklahoma, the closure they deserve.""
The entire story can be read at:
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog. FINAL WORD: (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases): "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project; FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions. They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;
