Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
Her pleading guilty to four felony charges was an agreement she made after initially putting in a plea of not guilty. So why is she leading guilty now?
Because it was agreed that they would drop hundreds of charges against her,.
It would only be serving 8 to 16 years - a woman who intentionally ruined victims cases and put innocent people behind bars."
The entire post can be read at:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/942757155439321
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog. FINAL WORD: (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases): "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project; FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions. They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------
POST: "Yvonne "Missy Woods: Deleted DNA evidence to make her day easier,' published on Facebook at the link below: by writer Bo Grant, a bright, stimulating, well rounded author with an obvious passion for life - and a special interest in 'breaking news'.
POST: "Yvonne "Missy Woods: Deleted DNA evidence to make her day easier,' published on Facebook at the link below: by writer Bo Grant, a bright, stimulating, well rounded author with an obvious passion for life - and a special interest in 'breaking news'.
SUB-HEADING: Missy Woods accepts plea deal, avoids trial on 100 felonies.
Yvonne "Missy Woods" is a monster who just rocked our justice system to its core.
Yvonne "Missy" woods just pled guilty to four felony counts so that she wouldn't have to plead guilty to the hundreds of counts she actually committed.
Has this not made national headlines yet?
Because this is breaking news.
This was a forensic scientist who was manipulating and deleting DNA evidence while working for the Colorado Bureau of Investigation as (a) DNA analyst for nearly 30 years.
What they found in this one investigation of this forensic scientist is absolutely heartbreaking, and utterly infuriating.
Although they are pointing this woman as if she just did the honourable thing to plead guilty to four felony charges, what the investigation found was: that this one woman was intentionally leaving DNA samples out, repeatedly testing the same DNA samples out until she got the results she wanted, intentionally not reporting the DNA findings in cases - and in at least 30 assault cases simply deleted the DNA evidence.
The whole thing in her reports: stating that the male DNA she received didn't actually have any male DNA. when in fact the sample she had did have male DNA.
(We're) not just talking (about) victims having their cases dropped because of the lack of DNA evidence.
it's a fact that some of these victims weren't believed because the proof in the DNA never actually made it to the right hands.
You're talking in some of these cases (about) innocent people (who) were sent to jail for crimes they never committed.
One Colorado man who has spent the last 12 years in prison thanks to his DNA being mishandled by Missy Woods, Michael Clark, has since been freed of a crime he says he never committed.
But his kids who were children when he went to jail now grown up and he'll never get that time back,
thanks to what this woman intentionally and repeatedly did over the course of decades.
(We're) talking (about) cases where the DNA evidence played a pivotal role in people being found guilty versus not guilty - then trying to paint this woman as if she is now doing the right thing by accepting responsibil
Yvonne "Missy" woods just pled guilty to four felony counts so that she wouldn't have to plead guilty to the hundreds of counts she actually committed.
Has this not made national headlines yet?
Because this is breaking news.
This was a forensic scientist who was manipulating and deleting DNA evidence while working for the Colorado Bureau of Investigation as (a) DNA analyst for nearly 30 years.
What they found in this one investigation of this forensic scientist is absolutely heartbreaking, and utterly infuriating.
Although they are pointing this woman as if she just did the honourable thing to plead guilty to four felony charges, what the investigation found was: that this one woman was intentionally leaving DNA samples out, repeatedly testing the same DNA samples out until she got the results she wanted, intentionally not reporting the DNA findings in cases - and in at least 30 assault cases simply deleted the DNA evidence.
The whole thing in her reports: stating that the male DNA she received didn't actually have any male DNA. when in fact the sample she had did have male DNA.
(We're) not just talking (about) victims having their cases dropped because of the lack of DNA evidence.
it's a fact that some of these victims weren't believed because the proof in the DNA never actually made it to the right hands.
You're talking in some of these cases (about) innocent people (who) were sent to jail for crimes they never committed.
One Colorado man who has spent the last 12 years in prison thanks to his DNA being mishandled by Missy Woods, Michael Clark, has since been freed of a crime he says he never committed.
But his kids who were children when he went to jail now grown up and he'll never get that time back,
thanks to what this woman intentionally and repeatedly did over the course of decades.
(We're) talking (about) cases where the DNA evidence played a pivotal role in people being found guilty versus not guilty - then trying to paint this woman as if she is now doing the right thing by accepting responsibil
Her pleading guilty to four felony charges was an agreement she made after initially putting in a plea of not guilty. So why is she leading guilty now?
Because it was agreed that they would drop hundreds of charges against her,.
It would only be serving 8 to 16 years - a woman who intentionally ruined victims cases and put innocent people behind bars."
The entire post can be read at:
https://www.facebook.com/reel/942757155439321
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog. FINAL WORD: (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases): "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project; FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions. They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
