BACKGROUND: From a previous post of this Blog: (September 29, 2025): "Court heard the men were beaten by police and forced to sign false confessions written in English, despite none of them being fluent in the language. Clarence Woodhouse required the assistance of a Saulteaux interpreter to testify. All four told the court they were not involved in the murder of Ting Fong Chan, a restaurant worker and father of two. They said their confessions had been extorted. Brian Anderson said police slapped and punched him. The judge refused to believe him. “The story is incredible unless one accepts the fact that these things do go on in police headquarters at the Public Safety Building but there is no evidence of that beyond what this young man says,” said Justice James E. Wilson in his ruling. “I reject as a complete fabrication this evidence that police officers, certainly in the circumstances which were detailed to me here, would lay themselves open to the difficulties which they could face if statements were obtained in this fashion.”
https://draft.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/120008354894645705/4524086414004907539
----------------------------------------------
PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "The men, who ranged in age from 17 to 21, according to newspaper coverage at the time, were rounded up by police largely because of eyewitness accounts after Chan's killing that mentioned Indigenous people."
----------------------------------------------
STORY:"Manitoba pays $4M to men wrongfully convicted in 1973 killing: financial document Update comes after Winnipeg city council approved total $7M payment toward settlement," by Reporter Caitlyn Gowriluk, published by CBC News, on September 22, 2026. (Caitlyn Gowriluk has been writing for CBC Manitoba since 2019. Her work has also appeared in the Winnipeg Free Press, and in 2021 she was part of an award-winning team recognized by the Radio Television Digital News Association for its breaking news coverage of COVID-19 vaccines.)
GIST: "The Manitoba government paid $4 million to three First Nations men who were wrongfully convicted in a Winnipeg murder more than 50 years ago, a recently released financial document says.
Brian Anderson, Allan Woodhouse and Clarence Woodhouse were convicted in the 1973 killing of Ting Fong Chan, a 40-year-old father of two who was stabbed and beaten to death near a downtown Winnipeg construction site as he walked home one night after his shift at the Beachcomber restaurant.
Though concerns about the men's innocence were raised early on, it took decades for their names to be cleared: Anderson and Allan Woodhouse in 2023 and Clarence Woodhouse in 2024.
The judge who exonerated them said the case was "infected" by systemic racism, from the police investigation to the trial.
The update on the province's payment to the men was revealed in the Manitoba's government's most recent list of vendor payments over $50,000.
It comes after the City of Winnipeg announced last year that it was proposing a $7-million payment toward a global settlement to compensate the three men. Council later agreed with that recommendation.
Spokesperson David Driedger said the city moved "as quickly as possible" to conclude the settlement proceedings and hopes it "brings some closure to" the people involved.
"We cannot speak to the specifics of the global settlement beyond what was previously shared with Council," Driedger said in an email.
The men's lawsuits also included the federal government. However, it's still unclear what Ottawa paid.
"To respect the confidentiality provisions of the settlement agreement, the Department of Justice Canada will not be providing specific figures," a spokesperson said.
"We can, however, confirm that the matter was settled to the satisfaction of all parties."
Clarence Woodhouse's brother, Russell Woodhouse, was also convicted in the case. A new appeal for him is still underway, after he died in 2011.
The men, who ranged in age from 17 to 21, according to newspaper coverage at the time, were rounded up by police largely because of eyewitness accounts after Chan's killing that mentioned Indigenous people.
They were all from Pinaymootang First Nation, in Manitoba's Interlake area.
The men were convicted in Chan's death based mostly on confessions written in fluent English that police said they got from the young men — even though some of them barely spoke the language. All said they had been forced or tricked into signing the admissions of guilt by officers who assaulted them.
The case was prosecuted by George Dangerfield, who was the Crown attorney in four other wrongful conviction cases.
'No amount of money' will replace time lost: chief
Chief Cornell McLean, chairman of the Interlake Reserves Tribal Council, said while he was happy to hear the men reached a settlement, "no amount of money will ever replace the time that they spent in custody" and away from their families.
"Because you can't turn back time on that, right?" he said in an interview.
McLean said he thinks much has changed since the wrongful conviction case, which was marked by racism and "lazy police work," including within the Winnipeg Police Service.
"Every time you see something in the news about the Winnipeg police, whether it's positive or negative, I think the positives are outweighing the negatives today, which is good to see, you know, in Manitoba."
A spokesperson for the Southern Chiefs' Organization said in an email the case is "a reminder of the need to confront and eliminate systemic racism within all areas of the justice system and prevent other First Nations people from experiencing the same injustice."
James Lockyer, a founding director at Innocence Canada, the non-profit organization behind the exonerations in the case, declined to comment on the update.
The entire story can be read at:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/wrongfully-convicted-settlement-woodhouse-anderson-9.7354219
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue/resource. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com. Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog. FINAL WORD: (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases): "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."Lawyer Radha Natarajan: Executive Director: New England Innocence Project; FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions. They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true;
