PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I found the "frequently asked question" section of the "Justice for David Camm" Blog to be very illuminating - and borne out by the acquittal at the recently concluded third trial. The replies to the almost three dozen questions are highly readable and provide great insight into the heart of this tainted prosecution - and are worth a close read.
Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog.
POST: "Frequently asked questions," published by the "Justice for David Camm" web site before his recent acquittal on the third trial.
GIST:
(Here, for example, is one of the questions and its related response): Q: How many theories has the prosecution had about when and who committed the murders of Kim, Brad and Jill? A: At least four: The first theory was that Dave left the gym around 9:00PM and that
three sounds interpreted (by Sgt. Clemons) as gunshots were heard by a
neighbor between 9:15-9:30PM, indicating that he committed the murders
during that 15 minute window. He was the sole perpetrator. After a
myriad of evidence (time needed for blood/serum separation; children
still in the Bronco; Brad still in swim trunks; etc.) was finally
weighed, including conclusive evidence that Dave didn't even leave the
gym until the alarm was set at 9:22PM that theory changed. The second theory was based upon telephone records obtained by the
State regarding a call that occurred from the Camm residence at 7:19PM.
That telephone call was to a prospective client of Camm's. That's one
pretty cool guy. He sneaks out of basketball after only a few minutes
(not to mention there's only 10 players, meaning that he leaves a 5 on 5
game in progress in which he is playing), is not missed, drives home,
waits at home to murder his family (again, by himself), places an
unanswered call to a client, (the Bronco driven by Kim according to a
neighbor/eyewitness doesn't even enter the road to the house until
around 7:35PM), and he then murders the family, drives back to the gym,
returns to the game (from which he had to have been gone for at least
20-25 minutes) without anyone noticing the blood on his shirt or shoes,
and has the same demeanor throughout the night. The only problem with
that theory is that the call occurred at 6:19PM, or an hour prior to
when the prosecution claimed it occurred. The State was off by an hour
on the phone call. Nonetheless, the basketball players, who didn't play a
role in the first theory, are now labeled as liars who are covering for
Camm when their stories don't change that he never left the gym. The third theory is that David Camm, somehow or another, at some time
or another, snuck out of the gymnasium, wasn't missed, drove home, was
lucky enough to know when the family was going to arrive, murders the
family (he being the lone perpetrator), drives back to the game, is cool
and calm, and no one notices the blood on his shirt or shoes. Oh, and
all three of the first three theories include the allegation that Camm
also manipulated or cleaned up the crime scene, including adding bleach
to the blood, throwing the used bleach over the back porch, and placing
the shoes on top of the Bronco. Several minutes must be added to the
time it took to commit the crime. The fourth theory is that Camm and Boney were together during the
commission of the crime, somehow or another, at some time or another and
that Camm did something and Boney did something. The State never did
actually make any type of specific assertion as to who did what, other
than David Camm shot and killed Jill, his daughter, while squatting
directly in front of her, or between her and the back of the front
passenger seat, which resulted in 8 tiny dots of blood being deposited
on the lower left of his T-shirt (does that even pass the common sense
smell test? However, that's the only way that they can get the blood on
his T-shirt to be blowback from Jill's gunshot wound). The State never
specifically said what time the crime occurred, who killed Kim or Brad,
or what role Charles Boney had in the murders. They did allege that
Dave and Boney conspired with one another to commit murder, but there
was no evidence of that ever presented and that charge was summarily
dismissed by Camm's trial judge. The glue that held all four theories together, however, was the
heinous and completely unsubstantiated allegation that Dave had molested
his daughter. That trumped any need to provide specific evidence about
who, what, when, where, and how the crimes were committed. Once a
person, and indeed, a jury, is told that a father violated his daughter,
the die has been irrevocably cast."
The entire post can be found at:
http://www.justicefordavidcamm.com/faq.shtml
PUBLISHER'S NOTE:
Dear Reader. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog. We are following this case.
I have added a search box for content in this blog which now encompasses
several thousand posts. The search box is located near the bottom of
the screen just above the list of links. I am confident that this
powerful search tool provided by "Blogger" will help our readers and
myself get more out of the site.
The
Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty
incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the
harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into
pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology
system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent
stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at:
http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith
Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:
http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html
I look forward to hearing from readers at:
hlevy15@gmail.com;
