Showing posts sorted by relevance for query "east kent". Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query "east kent". Sort by date Show all posts

Sunday, May 30, 2021

East Kent Hospital: UK: An estimated 200 baby deaths in recent history in one British hospital - yet you hardly read a word about it outside the UK - even though it is under high level criminal investigation and reportedly considering manslaughter charges..."Detectives are examining a series of baby deaths at a troubled NHS (National Health Service) trust as the number of cases being investigated by an independent inquiry nears 200 – making it one of the worst maternity scandals in NHS history," The Independent (Health Correspondent Shaun Lintern) reports..."The original independent inquiry into East Kent was set up last year after The Independent revealed scores of babies had died at the trust between 2014 and 2018, while more than 100 others suffered brain damage during birth."


PUBLISHER'S NOTE: An estimated 200 baby deaths in the East Kent hospital over a period of just four years. That is utterly numbing.  When four babies were reported to have died in the cardiac ward of the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto -  between July 1980 and March 1981 - the city went into a state of shock, which reverberated throughout the entire country. The thought of 4 dead babies - and the blow to their respective families - is devastating. 200 dead babies is unthinkable. I will be following developments closely. So much more to make one weep. I hope the story will be picked up by others far beyond Britain's borders. As the Independent reports, the UK has experienced a crisis in its maternity wards for years before East Kent - and not much has changed. Perhaps international attention will lead to lasting reform (this time)  and help save baby's lives.

Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Concerns over maternity safety nationally have prompted an inquiry by MPs on the Health Committee which is due to publish in the coming months. Mr Hunt, chair of the committee, told The Independent: “Many of these serious incidents [at East Kent] were taking place at the very same time we were tackling the horrors of Morecambe Bay, where 11 babies died avoidably between 2004 and 2013. Coming on the back of the Shrewsbury and Telford scandal – which probably spanned 40 years and potentially thousands of incidents of poor maternity care – it is impossible to dismiss any of these as isolated events.” He added: “I believe we must face up to the fact that there are deep-seated cultural and systemic issues in our maternity care."

-----------------------------------------------------------

PASSAGE TWO OF THE DAY: "East Kent maternity services have already come under fire this year, after admitting in April that they failed to provide safe care to baby Harry Richford and his mother Sarah in a landmark case brought by the Care Quality Commission. It is due to be sentenced in June and faces an unlimited fine."
--------------------------------------------------------------

QUOTE OF THE DAY: "Helen Gittos, whose baby Harriet died in August 2014 when she was just eight days old, said she had feared for a long time that there were more families affected and that she felt regret for not doing more. She said: “I feel very confident that the way the inquiry is proceeding will get to the heart of how and why things went so wrong. It’s horrifying that our private life-changing tragedy was something so almost routine.”

-----------------------------------------------------------

STORY: Detectives contemplate company manslaughter in NHS maternity scandal involving 200 families,"  By Health Correspondent Shaun Lintern. published by The Independent on May 24, 2021.

SUB-HEADING: "Exclusive:  Second major  NHS maternity scandal involves almost 200 families whose cases are being investigated."

GIST: "Detectives are examining a series of baby deaths at a troubled NHS trust as the number of cases being investigated by an independent inquiry nears 200 – making it one of the worst maternity scandals in NHS history.

The Independent has learned officers in the serious crime directorate at Kent Police are looking at unsafe maternity care at the East Kent Hospitals University Trust and have held a series of high-level meetings, including with the Crown Prosecution Service.

The discussions are believed to centre on the possibility of opening a criminal investigation and bringing charges related to corporate manslaughter and/or gross negligence manslaughter.

If this goes ahead, it would be only the second time an NHS trust had faced a corporate manslaughter charge.

Today, former health secretary Jeremy Hunt said he was “deeply concerned” about the new revelations and added that this latest scandal showed “deep-seated cultural and systemic issues” in maternity care.

It is understood that the number of cases now being formally looked into by the inquiry is close to 200, although officials have refused to give a precise number.

East Kent maternity services have already come under fire this year, after admitting in April that they failed to provide safe care to baby Harry Richford and his mother Sarah in a landmark case brought by the Care Quality Commission. It is due to be sentenced in June and faces an unlimited fine.

Kent detectives have met on several occasions with the inquiry’s team – led by Dr Bill Kirkup – as it begins its work ahead of a final report due at the end of 2022.


Detective Chief Superintendent Paul Fotheringham, head of major crime at Kent Police, told The Independent: “We received information in August 2020 relating to baby deaths in East Kent hospitals. This information is being assessed and detectives from the Kent and Essex serious crime directorate are carrying out a scoping exercise, whilst making a number of enquiries.”


Harry Richford’s death at the Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother Hospital in Margate in 2017 could be central to any corporate manslaughter charge.


Concerns have been raised that the trust bosses did not learn from a damning review by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists in 2015, and that errors that were repeated in Harry’s death.


Last year a coroner ruled his death was “wholly avoidable” and contributed to by neglect.


Harry’s grandfather Derek Richford, told The Independent: “We would welcome a police inquiry into all the baby deaths at East Kent hospitals trust over the last 10 years.


“Specifically in Harry’s case we feel there needs to be more accountability and maybe a police inquiry will bring that level of accountability that we have been looking for for some time.”


He described the number of affected families now reaching almost 200 as “shocking” adding: “From everything I know and have been told this would make East Kent the second biggest maternity scandal in NHS history after Shrewsbury.


“I have known there were other cases, some going back quite a long time. There have been many families getting in touch and their overriding comment to me is to say ‘thank you for giving us a voice’ which really resonates with me because the hospital tried to shut us down, but they were unsuccessful.”


Helen Gittos, whose baby Harriet died in August 2014 when she was just eight days old, said she had feared for a long time that there were more families affected and that she felt regret for not doing more.


She said: “I feel very confident that the way the inquiry is proceeding will get to the heart of how and why things went so wrong. It’s horrifying that our private life-changing tragedy was something so almost routine.”


Under the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007, an NHS trust can be guilty of corporate manslaughter if the way its services are managed or organised causes a patient’s death and amounts to “a gross breach of a relevant duty of care owed by the organisation to the deceased”. A gross breach is defined as actions or inaction that “fall far below what can reasonably be expected”.


The only other NHS corporate manslaughter case to reach court was taken against Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust in 2016 over the death of mum-of-two Frances Cappuccini. The case later collapsed at trial.


Concerns over maternity safety nationally have prompted an inquiry by MPs on the Health Committee which is due to publish in the coming months.

Mr Hunt, chair of the committee, told The Independent: “Many of these serious incidents [at East Kent] were taking place at the very same time we were tackling the horrors of Morecambe Bay, where 11 babies died avoidably between 2004 and 2013. Coming on the back of the Shrewsbury and Telford scandal – which probably spanned 40 years and potentially thousands of incidents of poor maternity care – it is impossible to dismiss any of these as isolated events.”


He added: “I believe we must face up to the fact that there are deep-seated cultural and systemic issues in our maternity care. Huge progress has been made on stillbirth and neonatal death rates, and the NHS should be proud of its record of improvement here, but we have still not found a systemised way to learn from serious mistakes to prevent future families suffering harm.


“As we emerge from the pandemic and the true horrors of East Kent and Shrewsbury and Telford come to light through these inquiries, making maternity care safer must be one of the government’s top priorities, and the select committee will be holding them to account.”

NHS England has injected almost £100m into maternity safety following a campaign by The Independent. The money will include an increase in midwives and doctors as well as £26m for specific safety training.


The new chairman of East Kent Hospitals, Niall Dickson, a former head of the General Medical Council, told the trust board last month the inquiry by Bill Kirkup “will undoubtedly be hard to read because we know that there are families we have failed by not providing the right standard of care”.


He committed the trust to becoming a learning organisation and said it must respond “without defensiveness and use it to understand as fully as possible the experience of mothers, babies and their families.”



A spokesperson for East Kent Hospitals said it had not yet been contacted by Kent Police but if a criminal investigation was opened “we would of course cooperate fully”.


They added: “We thank the families who have come forward to share their experiences of using our maternity services with the independent investigation and remain committed to continuing to make improvements.”



PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

Wednesday, December 15, 2021

Baby Harry Richford: UK: Bulletin: Police have dropped their criminal investigation into the East Kent NHS (National Health Service) Trust launched after the baby's death, BBC News reports..."A criminal investigation into an NHS trust which was fined over the death of a baby boy following an emergency delivery has been dropped by police. East Kent Hospitals was fined £733,000 for failures in the case of Harry Richford after an inquest found his death in 2017 was "wholly avoidable". Kent Police has not said what offences or which individuals were being assessed for subsequent investigation. However, the force has said a further investigation is unlikely. Harry was born in a hospital in Margate in an emergency delivery. He was transferred to the intensive neonatal unit at William Harvey Hospital in Ashford, but later died. After an inquest heard Harry was born not crying, pale, and with no movement, in an operating room "full of panicking people", coroner Christopher Sutton-Mattocks found his death was contributed to by neglect."


BACKGROUND: (From an earlier post): 



PUBLISHER'S NOTE: An estimated 200 baby deaths in the East Kent hospital over a period of just four years. That is utterly numbing.  When four babies were reported to have died in the cardiac ward of the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto -  between July 1980 and March 1981 - the city went into a state of shock, which reverberated throughout the entire country. The thought of 4 dead babies - and the blow to their respective families - is devastating. 200 dead babies is unthinkable. I will be following developments closely. So much more to make one weep. I hope the story will be picked up by others far beyond Britain's borders. As the Independent reports, the UK has experienced a crisis in its maternity wards for years before East Kent - and not much has changed. Perhaps international attention will lead to lasting reform (this time)  and help save baby's lives.

Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

4752165461025146135


---------------------------------------------------------------------------


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "After it emerged the NHS trust may have had up to 15 preventable baby deaths, an independent review led by Dr Bill Kirkup was announced. The investigation is looking at nearly 200 births at the trust and is not due to report until late in 2022."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Harry Richford: Police drop probe into East Kent NHS Trust after baby death,  published by BBC  News (Unattributed)  BBC  on December 9, 2021.

GIST: "A criminal investigation into an NHS trust which was fined over the death of a baby boy following an emergency delivery has been dropped by police.


East Kent Hospitals was fined £733,000 for failures in the case of Harry Richford after an inquest found his death in 2017 was "wholly avoidable".


Kent Police has not said what offences or which individuals were being assessed for subsequent investigation.


However, the force has said a further investigation is unlikely.


Harry was born in a hospital in Margate in an emergency delivery. He was transferred to the intensive neonatal unit at William Harvey Hospital in Ashford, but later died.


After an inquest heard Harry was born not crying, pale, and with no movement, in an operating room "full of panicking people", coroner Christopher Sutton-Mattocks found his death was contributed to by neglect.


The Crown Prosecution Service went on to consider potential criminal charges after an initial prosecution by the Care Quality Commission in the summer.


An independent review was announced after a series of failings at the trust came to light

Det Ch Supt Paul Fotheringham, head of major crime at Kent Police, said: "Since August 2020, Kent Police has been carrying out an assessment of information received in relation to the standard of maternity care provided at a hospital in east Kent.


"After careful consideration and following consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service, we took the decision that a criminal investigation would not be undertaken at this time as there is no realistic prospect of conviction against any individual or organisation based on the evidence currently available.


"Any further information received at any time in the future will be assessed as appropriate."


After it emerged the NHS trust may have had up to 15 preventable baby deaths, an independent review led by Dr Bill Kirkup was announced.


The investigation is looking at nearly 200 births at the trust and is not due to report until late in 2022.


Harry's parents, Sarah and Tom Richford, have been approached for comment.

The NHS trust has declined to comment."


The entire story can be read at:


https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-kent-59596956

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;


FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: "It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.

Sunday, June 20, 2021

Beleaguered East Kent Hospital. UK: Major Development: The hospital has been fined a whopping 733,000 pounds sterling ($1, 021,654. U.S) over serious failures that led to the death of a one-week old baby, the Guardian (Health Policy Editor Denis Campbell) reports..."A hospital trust has been fined £733,000 over serious failures that led to the death of a week-old baby, in a groundbreaking prosecution brought by the NHS care regulator. East Kent hospitals university NHS (National Health Service) foundation trust was handed the fine at Folkestone magistrates court on Friday over lapses in how its maternity staff treated Harry Richford and his mother, Sarah. The trust pleaded guilty in April to a charge of failing to provide safe care to Harry and his mother after she went into labour and around the time of the birth in November 2017 at the Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother hospital in Margate, which resulted in them both suffering avoidable harm. “Due to the trust not managing this risk of avoidable harm, following his birth on 2 November 2017 Harry was found to be unwell and placed into incubated care on a ventilator. However, on 9 November, seven days after his birth, Harry died,” the Care Quality Commission (CQC) said.


BACKGROUND:  On May 21st, 2021, I ran my first post on the East Kent hospital system in the UK which had suffered an extraordinary number of baby deaths. The headnote to the post ran as follows: "East Kent Hospital: UK: An estimated 200 baby deaths in recent history in one British hospital - yet you hardly read a word about it outside the UK - even though it is under high level criminal investigation and reportedly considering manslaughter charges..."Detectives are examining a series of baby deaths at a troubled NHS (National Health Service) trust as the number of cases being investigated by an independent inquiry nears 200 – making it one of the worst maternity scandals in NHS history," The Independent (Health Correspondent Shaun Lintern) reports..."The original independent inquiry into East Kent was set up last year after The Independent revealed scores of babies had died at the trust between 2014 and 2018, while more than 100 others suffered brain damage during birth." I expressed my sadness and outrage in the following 'Publisher's Note,' as follows:  "An estimated 200 baby deaths in the East Kent hospital over a period of just four years. That is utterly numbing.  When four babies were reported to have died in the cardiac ward of the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto -  between July 1980 and March 1981 - the city went into a state of shock, which reverberated throughout the entire country. The thought of 4 dead babies - and the blow to their respective families - is devastating. 200 dead babies is unthinkable. I will be following developments closely. So much more to make one weep. I hope the story will be picked up by others far beyond Britain's borders. As the Independent reports, the UK has experienced a crisis in its maternity wards for years before East Kent - and not much has changed. Perhaps international attention will lead to lasting reform (this time)  and help save baby's lives.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.https; The entire post can be read at: 

https://smithforensic.blogspot.com/search?q=%22east+kent%22


---------------------------------------------------------------------


This new post (June 20, 2021) is devoted to the massive 733,000 pound fine (1,021,654 US)  levied against the hospital trust over the  serious failures that led to the death of  Harry Richford, a week-old baby - just one prong of the multiple investigations of the hospital that currently under way.


---------------------------------------------------------------------


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "At an inquest last year, the coroner Christopher Sutton-Maddocks found that Harry’s death was “contributed to by neglect”. He identified a series of blunders that led to the boy being born looking pale, not crying and in a poor state, and later dying. Staff failed to ensure that Harry was born within 30 minutes of a cardiotachography scan showing that his heart rate was worryingly high at 2am on 2 November 2017, he said. Instead it took 92 minutes to deliver him. At 2.05am an inexperienced locum registrar obstetrician, Dr Christos Spyroulis, tried to deliver Harry using forceps but failed. Harry was eventually born by emergency caesarean section at 3.32am but was “to all intents and purposes lifeless”.

 An obstetrics expert said that if Harry had been born at 2am he would have been in a good condition and lived. The coroner said the delivery was complicated and should have been done by a consultant, whom he criticised for arriving late.

The trust is the subject of a government-ordered review of its maternity care led by Dr Bill Kirkup after it emerged that other babies died after receiving what their families said was poor care."


-------------------------------------------------------------

STORY: "Kent Hospital Trust find 733,000 pounds over failure that lead to babies death," by Health Policy Editor Denis Campbell. published by The Guardian on June 18, 2021.

SUB-HEADING: "Case of baby Harry Richford was first prosecution of its kind brought by NHS (National Health Service) regulator."

PHOTO CAPTION: "The East Kent trust is the subject of a review of its maternity care after it emerged that other babies died after receiving what their families said was poor care.


GIST: "A hospital trust has been fined £733,000 over serious failures that led to the death of a week-old baby, in a groundbreaking prosecution brought by the NHS care regulator.

East Kent hospitals university NHS foundation trust was handed the fine at Folkestone magistrates court on Friday over lapses in how its maternity staff treated Harry Richford and his mother, Sarah.


The trust pleaded guilty in April to a charge of failing to provide safe care to Harry and his mother after she went into labour and around the time of the birth in November 2017 at the Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother hospital in Margate, which resulted in them both suffering avoidable harm.


“Due to the trust not managing this risk of avoidable harm, following his birth on 2 November 2017 Harry was found to be unwell and placed into incubated care on a ventilator. However, on 9 November, seven days after his birth, Harry died,” the Care Quality Commission (CQC) said.


The trust was fined £733,000 for breaching regulation 12 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 and ordered to pay a £170 victim surcharge and £28,000 of the CQC’s costs in bringing the case, meaning it has to pay a total of £761,170.


The sentencing brings to an end the first prosecution of a trust by the CQC for providing criminally inadequate standards of clinical care.


Nigel Acheson, the CQC’s deputy chief inspector of hospitals, said after the hearing: “No family should ever have to endure the pain and suffering that the Richford family have experienced. The trust’s acceptance of responsibility for the errors in Harry and Sarah’s care is welcome, but the fact remains that the series of events which led up to Harry’s death could and should have been avoided.”


While most births occurred safely, he said, “the death or injury of even one new baby or mother is one too many and something that everyone working in the health and care system must do all they can to prevent”.


At an inquest last year, the coroner Christopher Sutton-Maddocks found that Harry’s death was “contributed to by neglect”. He identified a series of blunders that led to the boy being born looking pale, not crying and in a poor state, and later dying.


Staff failed to ensure that Harry was born within 30 minutes of a cardiotachography scan showing that his heart rate was worryingly high at 2am on 2 November 2017, he said. Instead it took 92 minutes to deliver him.


At 2.05am an inexperienced locum registrar obstetrician, Dr Christos Spyroulis, tried to deliver Harry using forceps but failed. Harry was eventually born by emergency caesarean section at 3.32am but was “to all intents and purposes lifeless”.


An obstetrics expert said that if Harry had been born at 2am he would have been in a good condition and lived. The coroner said the delivery was complicated and should have been done by a consultant, whom he criticised for arriving late.


The trust is the subject of a government-ordered review of its maternity care led by Dr Bill Kirkup after it emerged that other babies died after receiving what their families said was poor care.


The trust’s boss apologised to the family. “Harry’s parents expected that they would return home with a healthy baby and we failed them. We fully acknowledge the mistakes that we made,” said Niall Dickson, the chair of the trust’s board.


He outlined improvements made to its maternity services since Harry’s death, including hiring more consultants and extending the hours a consultant is on duty at the hospital in Margate and at the trust’s William Harvey hospital in Ashford."


The entire story can be read at:

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;
-----------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they’ve exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

Friday, January 7, 2022

East Kent Hospitals Trust: Back in the news again: Inquest opens into the deaths of two mothers who tragically died of herpes shortly after giving birth. Question of the day: Why did it take a BBC investigation to figure out that both C-sections were performed by the same locum doctor, who could have infected the women with herpes?..."Kim Sampson, 29, from Whitstable, and Samantha Mulcahy, 32, from Hawkinge, died in 2018 after undergoing Caesarean sections at hospitals in east Kent. The coroner had originally decided not to hold inquests into their deaths - but an investigation later found both C-sections were performed by the same locum doctor, who could have infected the women with herpes. Neither woman had a history of the virus. Following the revelations, last week it was confirmed the coroner had performed a U-turn and an inquest was opened today at Archbishop’s Palace, Maidstone."


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "More than a year after the women died, their families each received a letter from the coroner, Katrina Hepburn, saying there would be no inquests into their deaths. The letters acknowledged there had been a similar case but said there was "no connection" between the two deaths. They also set out the investigating pathologist's belief that the women had been infected with herpes "prior to hospital admission" But BBC journalists who have been investigating the East Kent Hospitals Trust's maternity services since 2019 turned their attention to the deaths of Kimberly and Samantha in the spring of this year. While reviewing documents sent to the families, they found Public Health England (PHE) had looked into how the women could have come into contact with the herpes viruses. Kimberly's family requested PHE gave them access to that investigation, and were sent redacted emails sent between staff at PHE, East Kent Hospitals Trust, other NHS bodies and a private laboratory called Micropathology. The emails showed PHE's investigation continued even after the coroner told the families no inquests would be taking place. The emails also revealed a significant link between the two deaths: that the same surgeon and midwife had taken part in both Kimberly's and Samantha's C-sections. Micropathology was asked to examine the two viruses the women had been infected with, to see if they were genetically identical and could have come from the same place. The emails show the parts of the virus that were tested were identical. In one email, someone working for Micropathology said both cases "look like surgical contamination". 

STORY: "Inquest opens into deaths of new mums Kim Sampson and Samantha Mulcahy who died after being infected with herpes,"  by Reporter Brad Harper, published by KentOnline on January 4, 2021.

GIST: "An inquest has been opened this morning into the deaths of two Kent mums who tragically died of herpes shortly after giving birth.


Kim Sampson, 29, from Whitstable, and Samantha Mulcahy, 32, from Hawkinge, died in 2018 after undergoing Caesarean sections at hospitals in east Kent.


The coroner had originally decided not to hold inquests into their deaths - but an investigation later found both C-sections were performed by the same locum doctor, who could have infected the women with herpes.


Neither woman had a history of the virus.


Following the revelations, last week it was confirmed the coroner had performed a U-turn and an inquest was opened today at Archbishop’s Palace, Maidstone.


The cause of death of both women was confirmed as multi-organ failure after contracting herpes.


Area coroner for central and south east Kent, Katrina Hepburn, told the inquest both families “had no objection the cases are linked”.


Speaking of Mrs Mulcahy, she said: “This case is similar in nature and was discontinued following an investigation in 2019.


“It has since came to light that the herpes infection was related to the Caesarean section.”

Both cases were adjourned to February 21 where a pre-inquest review will take place.


Neither family were in attendance this morning - but they have welcomed the news a full inquest will be held.


Last week Kim's mother Yvette Sampson told KentOnline: "We're very pleased that it's finally going to be happening.


"We've waited since 2018, so it's been a long while.


"We're just hopeful we will get from the inquest the answers that we need, for ourselves and obviously our grandchildren.”


Meanwhile, Ryan Mulcahy, Samantha's husband told the BBC that "not knowing what happened has worsened the pain and the suffering from losing Sam".


Samantha's mother Nicky said: "How did Sam and Kim get the virus, and from where? You feel like you are stuck and you can't move forward because you haven't got the answers you should have had."


The decision to open inquests more than three years after the women's deaths comes after a BBC investigation uncovered details of efforts made behind closed doors to establish any links between the two tragedies.


Tragic deaths after C-sections

Kim Sampson, a "bright and bubbly" barber and mum to a three-year-old daughter, lived at her mother's home in Newton Road, Whitstable.


After a smooth pregnancy, she went into labour at Margate's QEQM Hospital on May 3, 2018. 


She experienced complications, and it was eventually decided to perform a C-section.

Baby Albie was delivered healthy, but Kimberly required a blood transfusion following the operation.


She was discharged with Albie two days later, at her request, but was in a lot of pain and barely able to walk.


Her condition deteriorated over the following days and she was eventually taken back to hospital by ambulance, where she was treated on the maternity ward for bacterial sepsis - a potentially fatal condition - with antibiotics.


But her condition continued to worsen, so she underwent a series of operations to identify and treat the infection.'


Eight days after she was readmitted, a consultant microbiologist suggested trying the antiviral drug Aciclovir, which is used to treat herpes infections.


It was only after Kimberly was transferred to King's College Hospital in London that she was diagnosed with a catastrophic herpes infection.


She was given just "hours or days" to live and died on May 22.


Six weeks later, nursery nurse Samantha would die of the same virus at the William Harvey in Ashford, which is also run by East Kent Hospitals.


She had gone into labour four days before her due date, and after 17 hours of contractions and some concerning blood test results was taken for a C-section.


The operation was performed by the same doctor who had delivered Kimberly's baby.


Samantha's daughter was born healthy, but the new mum was kept in for observation because doctors were concerned about signs of the blood pressure condition pre-eclampsia.


These were no longer visible three days later, but Samantha continued to deteriorate, with her stomach swelling and her temperature and blood pressure rising.


Like Kimberly, doctors thought Samantha was suffering from bacterial sepsis so she too was given antibiotics, which did not work.


As her organs began to shut down, she was taken to intensive care, where she stayed for four days.


A doctor suggested she be treated with antiviral medication, but they were advised by the microbiology department to continue with antibiotics instead.


Doctors called for support from a hospital in London, and surgeons took her into the operating theatre to try to stabilise her, but she died on July 4.


"They told us that unfortunately they couldn't save her - that she'd gone, passed away," her mum, Nicola Foster, told the BBC.


The post-mortem investigation found Samantha had died from multiple-organ failure following a "disseminated herpes simplex type 1 infection".


Herpes is generally passed on by skin-to-skin contact, and almost 70% of adults have one of its two strains by the time they are 25.


Some people will develop cold sores or genital herpes, but about two-thirds will have no, or mild, symptoms.


Analysis of medical records revealed neither Kimberly or Samantha had previously had herpes, so would not have built up any natural protection against the virus.


Women in the late stages of pregnancy also have less protection from their immune system.


Investigation carried out behind closed doors

More than a year after the women died, their families each received a letter from the coroner, Katrina Hepburn, saying there would be no inquests into their deaths.


The letters acknowledged there had been a similar case but said there was "no connection" between the two deaths.


They also set out the investigating pathologist's belief that the women had been infected with herpes "prior to hospital admission".


But BBC journalists who have been investigating the East Kent Hospitals Trust's maternity services since 2019 turned their attention to the deaths of Kimberly and Samantha in the spring of this year.


While reviewing documents sent to the families, they found Public Health England (PHE) had looked into how the women could have come into contact with the herpes viruses.


Kimberly's family requested PHE gave them access to that investigation, and were sent redacted emails sent between staff at PHE, East Kent Hospitals Trust, other NHS bodies and a private laboratory called Micropathology.


The emails showed PHE's investigation continued even after the coroner told the families no inquests would be taking place.


The emails also revealed a significant link between the two deaths: that the same surgeon and midwife had taken part in both Kimberly's and Samantha's C-sections.


Micropathology was asked to examine the two viruses the women had been infected with, to see if they were genetically identical and could have come from the same place.


The emails show the parts of the virus that were tested were identical.


In one email, someone working for Micropathology said both cases "look like surgical contamination".


In another email, a Micropathology worker says "it seems the most likely explanation [is] that these strains are probably the same… which also adds weight to the idea that these two women were infected with the same virus."


The laboratory asked East Kent Hospitals Trust to provide a mouth or lesion swab from "the suspect surgeon in O&G (obstetrics and gynaecology)", but this was not provided.


In a statement, the Trust said the surgeon underwent a verbal occupational health check, where he said he had no history of herpes infection and had no hand lesions, although he was not tested for the virus at the time of the operations.


KentOnline understands the surgeon no longer works for the Trust.


Sexual health consultant Peter Greenhouse - who has 30 years experience in the field, and a particular interest in the herpes viruses - reviewed the cases and uncovered documents for the BBC.


Contrary to the pathologist's opinion, Mr Greenhouse believes the most likely scenario is that the infection was passed on accidentally by the surgeon carrying out the C-sections, through the women's abdomens."


The entire story can be read at:

https://www.kentonline.co.uk/whitstable/news/inquest-opens-into-deaths-of-mums-after-c-sections-260100/

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SEE BREAKDOWN OF  SOME OF THE ON-GOING INTERNATIONAL CASES (OUTSIDE OF THE CONTINENTAL USA) THAT I AM FOLLOWING ON THIS BLOG,  AT THE LINK BELOW:  HL:



FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————

FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

Thursday, December 9, 2021

Baby Archie Powell: UK: Bulletin: Beleaguered East Kent Hospitals NHS (National Health System) Foundation Trust..."Speaking after the conclusion of the inquest, Archie's parents said they "couldn't forgive" the errors made by the management and doctors at the QEQM, which is run by the East Kent Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. "Everything's been taken away from our entire family", said his mother, Dawn Powell. "The only chance we have, not to see him exactly, is to visit his grave every week and to look at photos. That's all we've got left. It's indescribable."..."The trust, which is at the centre of an independent investigation into maternity care and had failed to inform the coroner of Archie's death at the time, has issued an apology to his parents. Speaking outside the court, Sarah Shingler, the hospital's chief nursing officer, said: "We recognise that we could and should have done things differently for Archie and we apologise unreservedly for failing him and his family."

BACKGROUND: (From an earlier post): 



PUBLISHER'S NOTE: An estimated 200 baby deaths in the East Kent hospital over a period of just four years. That is utterly numbing.  When four babies were reported to have died in the cardiac ward of the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto -  between July 1980 and March 1981 - the city went into a state of shock, which reverberated throughout the entire country. The thought of 4 dead babies - and the blow to their respective families - is devastating. 200 dead babies is unthinkable. I will be following developments closely. So much more to make one weep. I hope the story will be picked up by others far beyond Britain's borders. As the Independent reports, the UK has experienced a crisis in its maternity wards for years before East Kent - and not much has changed. Perhaps international attention will lead to lasting reform (this time)  and help save baby's lives.

Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog.

4752165461025146135



------------------------------------------------------------------


PASSAGE OF THE DAY: "Archie Powell was born at the Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother Hospital in Margate, Kent, on 10 February 2019. He was treated for a bowel condition but was actually suffering from a group B streptococcus infection. At the end of an inquest into Archie's death, the coroner concluded that had antibiotics been given earlier, he would have survived."


----------------------------------------------------------------


STORY: "Archie Powell inquest: Hospital failures led to baby's death," by Reporter MichaelBuchanan, published by BBC News on December 3, 2021.


PHOTO CAPTION: "Archie Powell died from a group B streptococcus infection four days after he was born."


GIST: "A series of hospital failures led to the death of a four-day-old baby, an inquest has found.


Archie Powell was born at the Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother Hospital in Margate, Kent, on 10 February 2019.


He was treated for a bowel condition but was actually suffering from a group B streptococcus infection.


At the end of an inquest into Archie's death, the coroner concluded that had antibiotics been given earlier, he would have survived.


Archie was born healthy, but at 07:00, when he was six hours old, he started intermittently grunting - a sign of possible respiratory problems, the inquest heard.


The midwife caring for him alerted the on-call doctors but they didn't respond. Two further alerts were also ignored and Archie was not examined until 09:25, the inquest was told.


The doctor who did examine him failed to act on the reports of grunting, and further delays in transferring him to the hospital's special care baby unit meant Archie was not given life-saving antibiotics until 16:00.


By that time "the die had been cast, it was too late to make a difference to Archie", concluded the Kent assistant corner, Catherine Wood.

Despite being transferred to a hospital in London, Archie died aged four days.


'Everything's been taken away'

Ms Wood said: "If he [Archie] had been given antibiotics before noon, on the balance of probabilities, Archie would have survived".


She described a number of poor decisions and delays as "missed opportunities".


She said there had been a failure to escalate concerns, a failure to communicate those concerns clearly and a failure to provide the care that Archie needed.


Speaking after the conclusion of the inquest, Archie's parents said they "couldn't forgive" the errors made by the management and doctors at the QEQM, which is run by the East Kent Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.


"Everything's been taken away from our entire family", said his mother, Dawn Powell.

"The only chance we have, not to see him exactly, is to visit his grave every week and to look at photos. That's all we've got left. It's indescribable."


The trust, which is at the centre of an independent investigation into maternity care and had failed to inform the coroner of Archie's death at the time, has issued an apology to his parents.

Speaking outside the court, Sarah Shingler, the hospital's chief nursing officer, said: "We recognise that we could and should have done things differently for Archie and we apologise unreservedly for failing him and his family.


"Since his death, we have made a number of changes in the service - to clinical practice and to staff training""


The entire story can be read at: 


uk-england-kent-59524832

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: I am monitoring this case/issue. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog for reports on developments. The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic"  section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at: http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith. Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at: http://smithforensic.blogspot.com/2011/05/charles-smith-blog-award-nominations.html Please send any comments or information on other cases and issues of interest to the readers of this blog to: hlevy15@gmail.com.  Harold Levy: Publisher: The Charles Smith Blog;


FINAL WORD:  (Applicable to all of our wrongful conviction cases):  "Whenever there is a wrongful conviction, it exposes errors in our criminal legal system, and we hope that this case — and lessons from it — can prevent future injustices."
Lawyer Radha Natarajan:
Executive Director: New England Innocence Project;
—————————————————————————————————
FINAL, FINAL WORD: "Since its inception, the Innocence Project has pushed the criminal legal system to confront and correct the laws and policies that cause and contribute to wrongful convictions.   They never shied away from the hard cases — the ones involving eyewitness identifications, confessions, and bite marks. Instead, in the course of presenting scientific evidence of innocence, they've exposed the unreliability of evidence that was, for centuries, deemed untouchable." So true!
Christina Swarns: Executive Director: The Innocence Project;

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL, FINAL, FINAL WORD: "It is incredibly easy to convict an innocent person, but it's exceedingly difficult to undo such a devastating injustice. 
Jennifer Givens: DirectorL UVA Innocence Project.