Thursday, January 1, 2015

Back in action: (Catch-up 18); Aisling Brady McCarthy: Irish nanny case: Massachusetts; Her lawyers allege that a doctor rewrote and revised his report on the death of toddler Rehma Sabir after another medical expert said the infant did not die from a rare genetic disorder. Irish Times;


STORY: "Report in Aisling Brady McCarthy case was 'rewritten,"  by reporter Beverly Ford,  published by the Irish Times on November 26, 2014.

SUB-HEADING: "Irish nanny accused of killing toddler Rehma Sabir."

PHOTO CAPTION: "Attorneys for Aisling Brady McCarthy said a doctor rewrote and revised his report on the death of Rehma Sabir after another medical expert said the infant did not die from a rare genetic disorder."

GIST:  "Attorneys for Irish nanny Aisling Brady McCarthy have said a doctor rewrote and revised his report on the death of toddler Rehma Sabir after another medical expert said the infant did not die from a rare genetic disorder. Ms Brady McCarthy is accused of killing Rehma Sabir in her family’s apartment near Boston. The Co Cavan woman, who has been in jail since January 2013, has pleaded not guilty. The paediatric opthalmologist, who is also an expert on child abuse, apparently revised, rewrote and revamped his report on the child’s death after another expert said the infant did not die from Hyperimmunoglobulin E Syndrome, also known as Job’s Syndrome. “There’s a suggestion that this is not his original report. It apparently had been revised. Words are repeated, sentences are inserted. Sentences don’t make sense to the reader,” defence counsel David Meier said. He added that the paediatric opthalmologist concluded that the infant died of abusive head trauma despite a minimal amount of retinal haemorrhaging which is common in head trauma cases. Mr Meier’s co-counsel, Melinda Thompson, said it appeared the medical expert initially believed that the toddler’s injuries could have been caused by Job’s Syndrome, but changed that opinion after he read a report by a second medical expert. Ms McCarthy’s defence team have asked a judge in Massachusetts to allow them to question the medical experts without a jury being present in order to determine how they came to their conclusions."

The entire story can be found at:

http://ie.bukvar.mk/news/?newsid=MD

PUBLISHER'S NOTE: 

Dear Reader. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog. We are following this case.
 
I have added a search box for content in this blog which now encompasses several thousand posts. The search box is located  near the bottom of the screen just above the list of links. I am confident that this powerful search tool provided by "Blogger" will help our readers and myself get more out of the site.

The Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It can be found at:

http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith

Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:
 
http://smithforensic.blogspot.ca/2013/12/the-charles-smith-award-presented-to_28.html
 
I look forward to hearing from readers at:

hlevy15@gmail.com.

Harold Levy: Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog;