POST: "A law unto their learned selves,"  by Andrew L. Durbin, posted on "Pursue Democracy" on February 15, 2015.
SUB-HEADING:  "Examples of senior legal practitioners disregarding the
 law and not being held accountable for it is evident in Australia’s 
criminal legal system." 
GIST: "The judges of the South Australian court  of criminal appeal have accepted that Henry Keogh had been 
wrongly convicted of murder some
 20 years ago, that new evidence shows it was an accident – yet they 
ordered a retrial. South Australian Director of Public Prosecutions, 
Adam Kimber, has asked the court for six weeks (‘longer than the 
ordinary four weeks your Honour’) in which the police can ‘assemble the 
brief of evidence and ascertain the availability of witnesses’ for a 
directions hearing on March 20, 2015. “The proper legal decision was to acquit Keogh,” comments noted legal
 academic Dr Bob Moles. The court ordered a retrial, “for which – in 
light of their own decisions – there is no legal or logical basis.” If 
Dr Moles is correct, the law is being disregarded. Judges (and lawyers in general) are frequently timid in criticising 
their professional colleagues. Is peer group protectionism among lawyers
 trumping miscarriages of justice? It’s a question Dr Moles and other 
concerned observers are asking." (Durban than applies his analysis to the  David Szach and  Sue Neill-Fraser cases.  HL); 
The entire post can be found at:
 
http://pursuedemocracy.com/2015/02/a-law-unto-their-learned-selves/
PUBLISHER'S NOTE: 
Dear Reader. Keep your eye on the Charles Smith Blog. We are following this case.
 
I
 have added a search box for content in this blog which now encompasses 
several thousand posts. The search box is located  near the bottom of 
the screen just above the list of links. I am confident that this 
powerful search tool provided by "Blogger" will help our readers and 
myself get more out of the site.
The
 Toronto Star, my previous employer for more than twenty incredible 
years, has put considerable effort into exposing the harm caused by Dr. 
Charles Smith and his protectors - and into pushing for reform of 
Ontario's forensic pediatric pathology system. The Star has a "topic" 
section which focuses on recent stories related to Dr. Charles Smith. It
 can be found at:
http://www.thestar.com/topic/charlessmith
Information on "The Charles Smith Blog Award"- and its nomination process - can be found at:
 
http://smithforensic.blogspot.ca/2013/12/the-charles-smith-award-presented-to_28.html
 
I look forward to hearing from readers at:
hlevy15@gmail.com.
 
Harold Levy; Publisher; The Charles Smith Blog;